S. Roy Himes

The mononuclear phagocyte system revisited

The mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) was defined as a family of cells comprising bone marrow progenitors, blood monocytes, and tissue macrophages. In this review, we briefly consider markers for cells of this lineage in the mouse, especially the F4/80 surface antigen and the receptor for macrophage colony‐stimulating factor. The concept of the MPS is challenged by evidence that there is a separate embryonic phagocyte lineage, the blurring of the boundaries between macrophages and other cells types arising from phenotypic plasticity and transdifferentiation, and evidence of local renewal of tissue macrophage populations as opposed to monocyte recruitment. Nevertheless, there is a unity to cells of the MPS suggested by their location, morphology, and shared markers. We discuss the origins of macrophage heterogeneity and argue that macrophages and antigen‐representing dendritic cells are closely related and part of the MPS.

Mouse neutrophilic granulocytes express mRNA encoding the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF-1R) as well as many other macrophage-specific transcripts and can transdifferentiate into macrophages in vitro in response to CSF-1

The differentiation of macrophages from their progenitors is controlled by macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (CSF‐1), which binds to a receptor (CSF‐1R) encoded by the c‐fms proto‐oncogene. We have previously used the promoter region of the CSF‐1R gene to direct expression of an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene to resident macrophage populations in transgenic mice. In this paper, we show that the EGFP reporter is also expressed in all granulocytes detected with the Gr‐1 antibody, which binds to Ly‐6C and Ly‐6G or with a Ly‐6G‐specific antibody. Transgene expression reflects the presence of CSF‐1R mRNA but not CSF‐1R protein. The same pattern is observed with the macrophage‐specific F4/80 marker. Based on these findings, we performed a comparative array profiling of highly purified granulocytes and macrophages. The patterns of mRNA expression differed predominantly through granulocyte‐specific expression of a small subset of transcription factors (Egr1, HoxB7, STAT3), known abundant granulocyte proteins (e.g., S100A8, S100A9, neutrophil elastase), and specific receptors (fMLP, G‐CSF). These findings suggested that appropriate stimuli might mediate rapid interconversion of the major myeloid cell types, for example, in inflammation. In keeping with this hypothesis, we showed that purified Ly‐6G‐positive granulocytes express CSF‐1R after overnight culture and can subsequently differentiate to form F4/80‐positive macrophages in response to CSF‐1.

High Mobility Group Protein I(Y) Is Required for Function and for c-Rel Binding to CD28 Response Elements within the GM-CSF and IL-2 Promoters

CD28 response elements (CD28REs) within cytokine promoters are variant NF-kappaB-binding sites and are essential for transcription in response to CD28 receptor activation in T cells. We show that the CK-1 element (CD28RE) within the GM-CSF promoter binds the RelA and c-Rel transcription factors in response to CD28 activation. We further show that the high mobility group protein HMG I(Y) can bind to the CD28REs of both GM-CSF and IL-2 and that this binding is critical for c-Rel, but not RelA, binding. A second NF-kappaB site in the GM-CSF promoter that binds p50 and RelA, but neither c-Rel nor HMG I(Y), failed to respond to CD28 activation. Expression of HMG I or c-Rel antisense RNA inhibited CD28 activation of the IL-2 and GM-CSF promoters, implying that HMG I(Y) enhancement of c-Rel binding plays an important role in the activity of the CD28REs.

The JNK Are Important for Development and Survival of Macrophages

We report in this study that activation of the JNK by the growth factor, CSF-1 is critical for macrophage development, proliferation, and survival. Inhibition of JNK with two distinct classes of inhibitors, the pharmacological agent SP600125, or the peptide D-JNKI1 resulted in cell cycle inhibition with an arrest at the G2/M transition and subsequent apoptosis. JNK inhibition resulted in decreased expression of CSF-1R (c-fms) and Bcl-xL mRNA in mature macrophages and repressed CSF-1-dependent differentiation of bone marrow cells to macrophages. Macrophage sensitivity to JNK inhibitors may be linked to phosphorylation of the PU.1 transcription factor. Inhibition of JNK disrupted PU.1 binding to an element in the c-fms gene promoter and decreased promoter activity. Promoter activity could be restored by overexpression of PU.1. A comparison of expression profiles of macrophages with 22 other tissue types showed that genes that signal JNK activation downstream of tyrosine kinase receptors, such as focal adhesion kinase, Nck-interacting kinase, and Rac1 and scaffold proteins are highly expressed in macrophages relative to other tissues. This pattern of expression may underlie the novel role of JNK in macrophages.

A highly conserved c-fms gene intronic element controls macrophage-specific and regulated expression

The c‐fms gene encodes the receptor for macrophage colony‐stimulating factor‐1. This gene is expressed selectively in the macrophage cell lineage. Previous studies have implicated sequences in intron 2 that control transcript elongation in tissue‐specific and regulated expression of c‐fms. Four macrophage‐specific deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I)‐hypersensitive sites (DHSs) were identified within mouse intron 2. Sequences of these DHSs were found to be highly conserved compared with those in the human gene. A 250‐bp region we refer to as the fms intronic regulatory element (FIRE), which is even more highly conserved than the c‐fms proximal promoter, contains many consensus binding sites for macrophage‐expressed transcription factors including Sp1, PU.1, and C/EBP. FIRE was found to act as a macrophage‐specific enhancer and as a promoter with an antisense orientation preference in transient transfections. In stable transfections of the macrophage line RAW264, as well as in clones selected for high‐ and low‐level c‐fms mRNA expression, the presence of intron 2 increased the frequency and level of expression of reporter genes compared with those attained using the promoter alone. Removal of FIRE abolished reporter gene expression, revealing a suppressive activity in the remaining intronic sequences. Hence, FIRE is shown to be a key regulatory element in thefms gene.

The Role of High-Mobility Group I(Y) Proteins in Expression of IL-2 and T Cell Proliferation

The high-mobility group I(Y) (HMGI(Y)) family of proteins plays an important architectural role in chromatin and have been implicated in the control of inducible gene expression. We have previously shown that expression of HMGI antisense RNA in Jurkat T cells inhibits the activity of the IL-2 promoter. Here we have investigated the role of HMGI(Y) in controlling IL-2 promoter-reporter constructs as well as the endogenous IL-2 gene in both Jurkat T cells and human PBL. We found that the IL-2 promoter has numerous binding sites for HMGI(Y), which overlap or are adjacent to the known transcription factor binding sites. HMGI(Y) modulates binding to the IL-2 promoter of at least three transcription factor families, AP-1, NF-AT and NF-κB. By using a mutant HMGI that cannot bind to DNA but can still interact with the transcription factors, we found that DNA binding by HMGI was not essential for the promotion of transcription factor binding. However, the non-DNA binding mutant acts as a dominant negative protein in transfection assays, suggesting that the formation of functional HMGI(Y)-containing complexes requires DNA binding as well as protein:protein interactions. The alteration of HMGI(Y) levels affects IL-2 promoter activity not only in Jurkat T cells but also in PBL. Importantly, we also show here that expression of the endogenous IL-2 gene as well as proliferation of PBL are affected by changes in HMGI(Y) levels. These results demonstrate a major role for HMGI(Y) in IL-2 expression and hence T cell proliferation.

Alternate transcription of the Toll-like receptor signaling cascade.

BackgroundAlternate splicing of key signaling molecules in the Toll-like receptor (Tlr) cascade has been shown to dramatically alter the signaling capacity of inflammatory cells, but it is not known how common this mechanism is. We provide transcriptional evidence of widespread alternate splicing in the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, derived from a systematic analysis of the FANTOM3 mouse data set. Functional annotation of variant proteins was assessed in light of inflammatory signaling in mouse primary macrophages, and the expression of each variant transcript was assessed by splicing arrays.ResultsA total of 256 variant transcripts were identified, including novel variants of Tlr4, Ticam1, Tollip, Rac1, Irak1, 2 and 4, Mapk14/p38, Atf2 and Stat1. The expression of variant transcripts was assessed using custom-designed splicing arrays. We functionally tested the expression of Tlr4 transcripts under a range of cytokine conditions via northern and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The effects of variant Mapk14/p38 protein expression on macrophage survival were demonstrated.ConclusionMembers of the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway are highly alternatively spliced, producing a large number of novel proteins with the potential to functionally alter inflammatory outcomes. These variants are expressed in primary mouse macrophages in response to inflammatory mediators such as interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide. Our data suggest a surprisingly common role for variant proteins in diversification/repression of inflammatory signaling.

The Ewing Sarcoma Protein (EWS) Binds Directly to the Proximal Elements of the Macrophage-Specific Promoter of the CSF-1 Receptor (csf1r) Gene

Many macrophage-specific promoters lack classical transcriptional start site elements such as TATA boxes and Sp1 sites. One example is the CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R, CD115, c-fms), which is used as a model of the transcriptional regulation of macrophage genes. To understand the molecular basis of start site recognition in this gene, we identified cellular proteins binding specifically to the transcriptional start site (TSS) region. The mouse and human csf1r TSS were identified using cap analysis gene expression (CAGE) data. Conserved elements flanking the TSS cluster were analyzed using EMSAs to identify discrete DNA-binding factors in primary bone marrow macrophages as candidate transcriptional regulators. Two complexes were identified that bind in a highly sequence-specific manner to the mouse and human TSS proximal region and also to high-affinity sites recognized by myeloid zinc finger protein 1 (Mzf1). The murine proteins were purified by DNA affinity isolation from the RAW264.7 macrophage cell line and identified by mass spectrometry as EWS and FUS/TLS, closely related DNA and RNA-binding proteins. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments in bone marrow macrophages confirmed that EWS, but not FUS/TLS, was present in vivo on the CSF-1R proximal promoter in unstimulated primary macrophages. Transfection assays suggest that EWS does not act as a conventional transcriptional activator or repressor. We hypothesize that EWS contributes to start site recognition in TATA-less mammalian promoters.