Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where S. Schramm is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by S. Schramm.


Physics of the Dark Universe | 2015

Simplified models for dark matter searches at the LHC

J. Abdallah; H.M. Araújo; Alexandre Arbey; A. Ashkenazi; Alexander Belyaev; J. Berger; Celine Boehm; A. Boveia; A. J. Brennan; Jim J Brooke; O. L. Buchmueller; Matthew S. Buckley; Giorgio Busoni; Lorenzo Calibbi; S. Chauhan; Nadir Daci; Gavin Davies; Isabelle De Bruyn; Paul de Jong; Albert De Roeck; Kees de Vries; D. Del Re; Andrea De Simone; Andrea Di Simone; C. Doglioni; Matthew J. Dolan; Herbi K. Dreiner; John Ellis; Sarah Catherine Eno; E. Etzion

This document outlines a set of simplified models for dark matter and its interactions with Standard Model particles. It is intended to summarize the main characteristics that these simplified models have when applied to dark matter searches at the LHC, and to provide a number of useful expressions for reference. The list of models includes both s-channel and t-channel scenarios. For s-channel, spin-0 and spin-1 mediation is discussed, and also realizations where the Higgs particle provides a portal between the dark and visible sectors. The guiding principles underpinning the proposed simplified models are spelled out, and some suggestions for implementation are presented.


Archive | 2017

ATLAS Reconstruction and Performance

S. Schramm

When conducting an analysis, the first step is to define the topology that will be considered. This selection typically requires the presence or absence of certain objects, where an object is either a physical particle (electrons, muons, taus, photons), a representation of an underlying physical process (jets and b-jets), or the contribution of invisible processes creating an imbalance in the event (\(\mathrm {E}_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}\)). As such, detector quantities such as cells, tracks, and clusters must be translated into objects, which can then be properly calibrated and used in analyses.


Archive | 2017

Jet Reconstruction and Performance

S. Schramm

Unlike the other objects discussed in Chap. 3, jets are not a physical particle from the SM, rather they are a tool designed to represent an underlying physical process. While electrons exist as an independent entity, jets are defined only by the method which was used to build them. When a muon is observed, all of the different reconstruction algorithms aim to reproduce the single muon to the best precision with a single set of detector observations. On the other hand, the same set of detector observations can be used to build radically different types of jets, many of which are independently useful. Examples of the independent uses for different types of jet algorithms will be provided.


Archive | 2017

Mono-jet Dark Matter Interpretation

S. Schramm

This chapter is based on Ref. [1]. All ATLAS material, unless otherwise mentioned, is from this document.


Archive | 2017

The Mono-Jet Analysis

S. Schramm

This chapter is based entirely on Ref. [1]. All ATLAS material, unless otherwise mentioned, is from this document.


Archive | 2017

Introduction and Motivation for Dark Matter

S. Schramm

One of the largest remaining open questions in physics is the nature of DM. First postulated in the 1930s [1, 2], many independent astrophysical experiments have observed the effects of DM. Cosmology has even measured its abundance to be approximately five times that of the visible matter which makes up the universe [3], including all of the stars, planets, black holes, and other known sources of matter. However, there remains no experimentally verified theory that explains the origin of DM. While numerous experiments have been designed to search for DM, and some have claimed observations consistent with the signal expected from such a phenomenon [4], the nature of DM remains unknown.


Archive | 2017

The ATLAS Experiment

S. Schramm

A substantial part of this chapter is based off of [1] for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and [2] for the A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS (ATLAS) detector.


International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series | 2016

The ATLAS detector: status and performance in Run-II

S. Schramm

During the first extended shutdown of the LHC, in 2013 and 2014, the ATLAS detector has undergone several improvements. A new silicon pixel detector layer has been added inside of the existing layers, enhancing vertex identification, while the coverage of the muon detector has been significantly expanded. Many other detector systems have been upgraded to handle the higher expected pileup conditions in the coming years and to generally improve their performance. This document describes these upgrades and the resulting impact on the reconstruction and performance of standard physics objects. Preliminary results using the first ∼ 80pb−1 of 2015 data at s = 13 Tev are presented, demonstrating the capability of ATLAS to perform both searches and measurements.


Archive | 2017

Mono-jet Prospects at an Upgraded LHC

S. Schramm


Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings | 2016

ATLAS Sensitivity to WIMP√Dark Matter in the Monojet Topology at s = 14 TeV

S. Schramm

Collaboration


Dive into the S. Schramm's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Janis McKenna

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Boveia

Ohio State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea Di Simone

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Abdallah

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Berger

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gavin Davies

Imperial College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H.M. Araújo

Imperial College London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge