S. Stefoni

The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of marginal donors allocated by standardized pretransplant donor biopsy assessment: distribution and association with graft outcomes.

Pretransplant donor biopsy (PTDB)‐based marginal donor allocation systems to single or dual renal transplantation could increase the use of organs with Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) in the highest range (e.g. >80 or >90), whose discard rate approximates 50% in the United States. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively calculated the KDPI and analyzed the outcomes of 442 marginal kidney transplants (340 single transplants: 278 with a PTDB Remuzzi score <4 [median KDPI: 87; interquartile range (IQR): 78–94] and 62 with a scoreu2009=u20094 [median KDPI: 87; IQR: 76–93]; 102 dual transplants [median KDPI: 93; IQR: 86–96]) and 248 single standard transplant controls (median KDPI: 36; IQR: 18–51). PTDB‐based allocation of marginal grafts led to a limited discard rate of 15% for kidneys with KDPI of 80–90 and of 37% for kidneys with a KDPI of 91–100. Although 1‐year estimated GFRs were significantly lower in recipients of marginal kidneys (−9.3, −17.9 and −18.8u2009mL/min, for dual transplants, single kidneys with PTDB score <4 and =4, respectively; pu2009<u20090.001), graft survival (median follow‐up 3.3 years) was similar between marginal and standard kidney transplants (hazard ratio: 1.20 [95% confidence interval: 0.80–1.79; pu2009=u20090.38]). In conclusion, PTDB‐based allocation allows the safe transplantation of kidneys with KDPI in the highest range that may otherwise be discarded.

The influence of intraoperative central venous pressure on delayed graft function in renal transplantation: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTIONnDelayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication in kidney transplantation. We sought to evaluate possible correlates for DGF including intraoperative parameters, focusing on fluid replacement and central venous pressure (CVP) values among patients undergoing kidney transplantation at our center.nnnMETHODSnOne hundred fifty-five cadaveric donor transplantations performed at our center between 2001 and 2005 were selected for the study. We compared intraoperative parameters together with 15 other clinical and socio-demographic recipient and donor variables among patients experiencing DGF (n = 58) versus those with immediate graft function (IGF; n = 97). All significant variables at P < .05 upon univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model to identify risk factors for DGF.nnnRESULTSnCVP at awakening of ≤8 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] = 3.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-7.63), fluid input during surgery ≤2.250 mL (OR = 2.12; 95% CI, 1.00-4.51), and recipient age ≥50 years (OR = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.11-6.68) were the strongest correlates of DGF.nnnCONCLUSIONSnOur data suggested that reduced intraoperative perfusion as measured using CVP monitoring might increase DGF risk. This study provides the rationale to further investigate the optimal CVP target during this surgery.

Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies After Bone-Graft Transplantation. Impact on a Subsequent Renal Transplantation: A Case Report

Immunological evaluation by panel-reactive antibody (PRA) and determination of anti-HLA specificity are important phases in the evaluation of patients awaiting kidney transplantation. The main causes of immunization are previous solid organ transplantation, hemotransfusion, and pregnancy. It is also possible that immunogenicity can be triggered by vascularized tissue grafts. Immune induction by cryopreserved bone prostheses is not yet understood. A 19-year-old patient with osteosarcoma had undergone resection of the left proximal tibia with reconstruction using human bone in 1997. The donor HLA typing was as follows: A3, A29 (19); B44 (12), Bw4; DR13 (6), DR7, DR52, DR53. The patient was subsequently enrolled onto the waiting list for cadaveric donor kidney transplantation due to chronic kidney failure caused by cisplatin toxicity. Pretransplantation immunological screening using the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique revealed a PRA of 63%. IgG antibody specificities were detected against class I and class II donor antigens, specifically anti-A3, B44, DR7 antibodies, using flow cytometry (Tepnel Luminex). Further immunological studies using single HLA specificity analysis (LSA Class I degrees -II degrees , Tepnel-Luminex) showed direct antibodies against all donor antigen specificities. This case showed immune induction after the implantation of bone prosthesis in a kidney transplant candidate, underlining the importance of the availability of HLA typing data of donors of a human prosthesis.

Hyperimmunized Patients Awaiting Cadaveric Kidney Graft : Is There a Quick Desensitization Possible?

On all kidney waiting lists the 10% to 20% of patients who have antibodies against more than 80% of a panel of HLA antigens (panel reactive antibody [PRA] >80%) are difficult to transplant. The best solution for these patients is to find a compatible donor, ideally a full match, who yields a negative crossmatch test (CMX). If this is not possible, desensitization treatment (high-dose) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis (PP) + low-dose IVIG is possible with good results in living donor kidney transplantation mainly if the antibody titer is low. It may also be offered to patients awaiting cadaveric donors too after a long waiting time; however, when applied for several months, it has the obvious disadvantage of giving the patient the risk for long-lasting immunologic weakness without the certitude of finding a kidney. In one of our recent cases of combined liver plus kidney transplantation, a positive CMX became negative 8 hours after the liver operation; the kidney was transplanted with a good result which lasted over 3 years. This observation suggested the possibility of a quick desensitization protocol in selected patients with a large (but not strong) immunization who probably are the majority. Patients sensitized to IVIG and with low titer PRA could be given a single PP + low-dose IVIG (what can be done within the time limit of cadaveric donor kidney transplantation) with good probability of turning an initial positive CMX to negative with the possibility of performing the operation and the advantage of giving the immunosuppression only when the kidney is present.