Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where S V Rajkumar is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by S V Rajkumar.


Leukemia | 2006

International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma

Brian G. M. Durie; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Jesús F. San Miguel; Joan Bladé; Bart Barlogie; Kenneth C. Anderson; Morie A. Gertz; M. Dimopoulos; Jan Westin; Pieter Sonneveld; H. Ludwig; Gösta Gahrton; Meral Beksac; John Crowley; Andrew R. Belch; M. Boccadaro; Ingemar Turesson; Douglas E. Joshua; David H. Vesole; Robert A. Kyle; Raymond Alexanian; Guido Tricot; Michel Attal; Giampaolo Merlini; R. Powles; Paul G. Richardson; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Patrizia Tosi; Gareth J. Morgan; S V Rajkumar

New uniform response criteria are required to adequately assess clinical outcomes in myeloma. The European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry criteria have been expanded, clarified and updated to provide a new comprehensive evaluation system. Categories for stringent complete response and very good partial response are added. The serum free light-chain assay is included to allow evaluation of patients with oligo-secretory disease. Inconsistencies in prior criteria are clarified making confirmation of response and disease progression easier to perform. Emphasis is placed upon time to event and duration of response as critical end points. The requirements necessary to use overall survival duration as the ultimate end point are discussed. It is anticipated that the International Response Criteria for multiple myeloma will be widely used in future clinical trials of myeloma.


Leukemia | 2008

Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma

A. Palumbo; S V Rajkumar; M. A. Dimopoulos; Paul G. Richardson; J. F. San Miguel; Bart Barlogie; Jean Luc Harousseau; Jeffrey A. Zonder; Michele Cavo; Maurizio Zangari; Michel Attal; Andrew R. Belch; S. Knop; Douglas E. Joshua; Orhan Sezer; H. Ludwig; David H. Vesole; J. Bladé; Robert A. Kyle; Jan Westin; Donna M. Weber; Sara Bringhen; Ruben Niesvizky; Anders Waage; M. von Lilienfeld-Toal; Sagar Lonial; Gareth J. Morgan; Robert Z. Orlowski; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Kenneth C. Anderson

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is more than 1‰ annually in the general population and increases further in cancer patients. The risk of VTE is higher in multiple myeloma (MM) patients who receive thalidomide or lenalidomide, especially in combination with dexamethasone or chemotherapy. Various VTE prophylaxis strategies, such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin or aspirin, have been investigated in small, uncontrolled clinical studies. This manuscript summarizes the available evidence and recommends a prophylaxis strategy according to a risk-assessment model. Individual risk factors for thrombosis associated with thalidomide/lenalidomide-based therapy include age, history of VTE, central venous catheter, comorbidities (infections, diabetes, cardiac disease), immobilization, surgery and inherited thrombophilia. Myeloma-related risk factors include diagnosis and hyperviscosity. VTE is very high in patients who receive high-dose dexamethasone, doxorubicin or multiagent chemotherapy in combination with thalidomide or lenalidomide, but not with bortezomib. The panel recommends aspirin for patients with ⩽1 risk factor for VTE. LMWH (equivalent to enoxaparin 40 mg per day) is recommended for those with two or more individual/myeloma-related risk factors. LMWH is also recommended for all patients receiving concurrent high-dose dexamethasone or doxorubicin. Full-dose warfarin targeting a therapeutic INR of 2–3 is an alternative to LMWH, although there are limited data in the literature with this strategy. In the absence of clear data from randomized studies as a foundation for recommendations, many of the following proposed strategies are the results of common sense or derive from the extrapolation of data from many studies not specifically designed to answer these questions. Further investigation is needed to define the best VTE prophylaxis.


Leukemia | 2009

International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders

Angela Dispenzieri; Robert A. Kyle; Giampaolo Merlini; Jesús F. San Miguel; H. Ludwig; Roman Hájek; A. Palumbo; Sundar Jagannath; J. Bladé; Sagar Lonial; M. Dimopoulos; Raymond L. Comenzo; Hermann Einsele; Bart Barlogie; Kenneth C. Anderson; Morie A. Gertz; Jean Luc Harousseau; Michel Attal; Patrizia Tosi; Pieter Sonneveld; Mario Boccadoro; Gareth J. Morgan; Paul G. Richardson; Orhan Sezer; M.V. Mateos; Michele Cavo; Doug Joshua; Ingemar Turesson; Wenming Chen; Kazuyuki Shimizu

The serum immunoglobulin-free light chain (FLC) assay measures levels of free κ and λ immunoglobulin light chains. There are three major indications for the FLC assay in the evaluation and management of multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders (PCD). In the context of screening, the serum FLC assay in combination with serum protein electrophoresis (PEL) and immunofixation yields high sensitivity, and negates the need for 24-h urine studies for diagnoses other than light chain amyloidosis (AL). Second, the baseline FLC measurement is of major prognostic value in virtually every PCD. Third, the FLC assay allows for quantitative monitoring of patients with oligosecretory PCD, including AL, oligosecretory myeloma and nearly two-thirds of patients who had previously been deemed to have non-secretory myeloma. In AL patients, serial FLC measurements outperform PEL and immunofixation. In oligosecretory myeloma patients, although not formally validated, serial FLC measurements reduce the need for frequent bone marrow biopsies. In contrast, there are no data to support using FLC assay in place of 24-h urine PEL for monitoring or for serial measurements in PCD with measurable disease by serum or urine PEL. This paper provides consensus guidelines for the use of this important assay, in the diagnosis and management of clonal PCD.


Leukemia | 2014

Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients

Shaji Kumar; A Dispenzieri; Martha Q. Lacy; Morie A. Gertz; Francis Buadi; S Pandey; Prashant Kapoor; David Dingli; S R Hayman; Nelson Leung; John A. Lust; Arleigh McCurdy; Stephen J. Russell; Steven R. Zeldenrust; Robert A. Kyle; S V Rajkumar

Therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has markedly changed in the past decade with the introduction of new drugs, but it is not clear whether the improvements have been sustained. We studied 1038 patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2010, grouping patients into two 5-year periods by diagnosis, 2001–2005 and 2006–2010. The median estimated follow-up for the cohort was 5.9 years with 47% alive at the last follow-up. The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 5.2 years: 4.6 years for patients in the 2001–2005 group compared with 6.1 years for the 2006–2010 cohort (P=0.002). The improvement was primarily seen among patients over 65 years, the 6-year OS improving from 31 to 56%, P<0.001. Only 10% of patients died during the first year in the latter group, compared with 16% in the earlier cohort (P<0.01), suggesting improvement in early mortality. The improved outcomes were linked closely to the use of one or more new agents in initial therapy. The current results confirm continued survival improvement in MM and highlight the impact of initial therapy with novel agents. Most importantly, we demonstrate that the improved survival is benefitting older patients and that early mortality in this disease has reduced considerably.


Leukemia | 2012

Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: A multicenter international myeloma working group study

Shaji Kumar; Jae Hoon Lee; Juan José Lahuerta; Gareth J. Morgan; Paul G. Richardson; John Crowley; Jeff Haessler; John Feather; Antje Hoering; P. Moreau; Xavier Leleu; Cyrille Hulin; S. K. Klein; Pieter Sonneveld; David Siegel; J. Bladé; H. Goldschmidt; Sundar Jagannath; Jesús F. San Miguel; Robert Z. Orlowski; A. Palumbo; Orhan Sezer; S V Rajkumar; Brian G. M. Durie

Promising new drugs are being evaluated for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), but their impact should be measured against the expected outcome in patients failing current therapies. However, the natural history of relapsed disease in the current era remains unclear. We studied 286 patients with relapsed MM, who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive, an IMiD (immunomodulatory drug), had measurable disease, and ECOG PS of 0, 1 or 2. The date patients satisfied the entry criteria was defined as time zero (T0). The median age at diagnosis was 58 years, and time from diagnosis to T0 was 3.3 years. Following T0, 213 (74%) patients had a treatment recorded with one or more regimens (median=1; range 0–8). The first regimen contained bortezomib in 55 (26%) patients and an IMiD in 70 (33%). A minor response or better was seen to at least one therapy after T0 in 94 patients (44%) including ⩾partial response in 69 (32%). The median overall survival and event-free survival from T0 were 9 and 5 months, respectively. This study confirms the poor outcome, once patients become refractory to current treatments. The results provide context for interpreting ongoing trials of new drugs.


Leukemia | 2010

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management

Robert A. Kyle; Brian G. M. Durie; S V Rajkumar; Ola Landgren; J. Bladé; Giampaolo Merlini; N Kröger; Hermann Einsele; David H. Vesole; M. A. Dimopoulos; J. F. San Miguel; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Roman Hájek; Wenming Chen; Kenneth C. Anderson; H. Ludwig; Pieter Sonneveld; Santiago Pavlovsky; A. Palumbo; Paul G. Richardson; Bart Barlogie; P. R. Greipp; Robert Vescio; Ingemar Turesson; Jan Westin; Mario Boccadoro

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) was identified in 3.2% of 21 463 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, 50 years of age or older. The risk of progression to multiple myeloma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis or a lymphoproliferative disorder is approximately 1% per year. Low-risk MGUS is characterized by having an M protein <15 g/l, IgG type and a normal free light chain (FLC) ratio. Patients should be followed with serum protein electrophoresis at six months and, if stable, can be followed every 2–3 years or when symptoms suggestive of a plasma cell malignancy arise. Patients with intermediate and high-risk MGUS should be followed in 6 months and then annually for life. The risk of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma (SMM) progressing to multiple myeloma or a related disorder is 10% per year for the first 5 years, 3% per year for the next 5 years and 1–2% per year for the next 10 years. Testing should be done 2–3 months after the initial recognition of SMM. If the results are stable, the patient should be followed every 4–6 months for 1 year and, if stable, every 6–12 months.


Leukemia | 2009

International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma

Meletios A. Dimopoulos; E Terpos; Raymond L. Comenzo; Patrizia Tosi; Meral Beksac; Orhan Sezer; David Siegel; Henk M. Lokhorst; Shaji Kumar; S V Rajkumar; Ruben Niesvizky; L A Moulopoulos; Brian G. M. Durie

Several imaging technologies are used for the diagnosis and management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Conventional radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine imaging are all used in an attempt to better clarify the extent of bone disease and soft tissue disease in MM. This review summarizes all available data in the literature and provides recommendations for the use of each of the technologies. Conventional radiography still remains the ‘gold standard’ of the staging procedure of newly diagnosed and relapsed myeloma patients. MRI gives information complementary to skeletal survey and is recommended in MM patients with normal conventional radiography and in all patients with an apparently solitary plasmacytoma of bone. Urgent MRI or CT (if MRI is not available) is the diagnostic procedure of choice to assess suspected cord compression. Bone scintigraphy has no place in the routine staging of myeloma, whereas sequential dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans are not recommended. Positron emission tomography/CT or MIBI imaging are also not recommended for routine use in the management of myeloma patients, although both techniques may be useful in selected cases that warrant clarification of previous imaging findings, but such an approach should ideally be made within the context of a clinical trial.


Leukemia | 2007

Impact of lenalidomide therapy on stem cell mobilization and engraftment post-peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma

Shaji Kumar; A Dispenzieri; Martha Q. Lacy; S R Hayman; Francis Buadi; Dennis A. Gastineau; Litzow Mr; Rafael Fonseca; Vivek Roy; S V Rajkumar; Morie A. Gertz

While initial therapies have become highly effective with introduction of lenalidomide and bortezomib and patients may opt for delayed stem cell transplantation, it is important to collect stem cells for future transplant. Given its increasing use as initial therapy, we examined if lenalidomide had any impact on the ability to collect peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). We studied the entire cohort of patients with myeloma undergoing PBSC mobilization at our institution during a 5-year period, comparing the results between patients receiving different initial therapies. Among those mobilized with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone, there was a significant decrease in total CD34+ cells collected (P<0.001), average daily collection (P<0.001), day 1 collection (P<0.001) and increased number of aphereses (P=0.004) in patients treated with lenalidomide compared to those receiving dexamethasone, thalidomide-dexamethasone or VAD. A similar trend was seen in those mobilized with chemotherapy and G-CSF. A trend was seen towards decreased PBSC yield with increasing duration of lenalidomide therapy as well as increasing age (P=0.002). There was no effect on quality of PBSC collected based on similar engraftment across all groups. We recommend collection of PBSC within 6 months of initiation of therapy with lenalidomide containing regimens to minimize the risk of mobilization failures.


Leukemia | 2003

Chromosome abnormalities clustering and its implications for pathogenesis and prognosis in myeloma

C. S. Debes-Marun; Gordon W. Dewald; Sandra C. Bryant; E. Picken; Rafael Santana-Davila; Natalia Gonzalez-Paz; Jerry M. Winkler; Robert A. Kyle; Morie A. Gertz; Thomas E. Witzig; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q. Lacy; S V Rajkumar; John A. Lust; P. R. Greipp; Rafael Fonseca

The nonrandom recurrent nature of chromosome abnormalities in myeloma suggests a role for them in disease pathogenesis. We performed a careful cytogenetic analysis of patients with abnormal karyotypes (n = 254), to discern patterns of association, search for novel abnormalities and elucidate clinical implications. Patients with karyotypic abnormalities suggestive of myelodysplasia/acute leukemia were excluded. In this study we compared survival by abnormality only between patients with abnormal karyotypes. Patients with abnormalities were more likely to have features of aggressive disease as compared to all other patients without abnormalities entered into the myeloma database (lower hemoglobin, higher β2-microglobulin, labeling-index and plasmocytosis; all P < 0.0001). Several groups of patients could be readily identified; hypodiploid (22%), pseudodiploid (36%), hyperdiploid (31%) and near-tetraploid (11%). Clustering associations were seen among several trisomies and monosomy of chromosome 13 and 14. Several monosomies (−2, −3, −13, −14 and −19), 1p translocations/ deletions, and hypodiploidy were associated with a significantly shorter survival. Trisomy of chromosome 13 was rare (<2%). Even among patients with abnormal karyotypes, specific chromosome abnormalities can impart biologic variability in myeloma, including several monosomies, hypodiploidy and abnormalities of 1p.


Leukemia | 2003

Thalidomide as initial therapy for early-stage myeloma

S V Rajkumar; Morie A. Gertz; Martha Q. Lacy; A Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Susan Geyer; Nancy Iturria; Shaji Kumar; John A. Lust; Robert A. Kyle; P. R. Greipp; Thomas E. Witzig

Patients with early-stage myeloma are typically observed without therapy until symptomatic disease occurs. However, they are at high risk of progression to symptomatic myeloma, with a median time to progression of approximately 1–2 years. We report the final results of a phase II trial of thalidomide as initial therapy for early-stage multiple myeloma in an attempt to delay progression to symptomatic disease. In total, 31 patients with smoldering or indolent multiple myeloma were studied at the Mayo Clinic. Two patients were deemed ineligible because they were found to have received prior therapy for myeloma, and were excluded from analyses except for toxicity. Thalidomide was initiated at a starting dose of 200 mg/day. Patients were followed-up monthly for the first 6 months and every 3 months thereafter. Of the 29 eligible patients, 10 (34%) had a partial response to therapy with at least 50% or greater reduction in serum and urine monoclonal (M) protein. When minor responses (25–49% decrease in M protein) were included, the response rate was 66%. Three patients had progressive disease while on therapy. Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival are 80% at 1 year and 63% at 2 years. Major grade 3–4 toxicities included two patients with somnolence and one patient each with neuropathy, deep-vein thrombosis, hearing loss, weakness, sinus bradycardia, and edema. Thalidomide has significant activity in early-stage myeloma and has the potential to delay progression to symptomatic disease. This approach must be further tested in randomized trials.

Collaboration


Dive into the S V Rajkumar's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge