Sabah Sallah

Analysis of factors influencing aspiration risk following chemoradiation for oropharyngeal cancer

Our aim was to identify risk factors for aspiration following concurrent chemoradiation for oropharyngeal cancer. 46 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma underwent concurrent chemoradiation at our institution. All patients underwent modified barium swallow to assess dysphagia severity and to determine the need for continued tube feedings after treatment. Dysphagia severity was graded as 1-7. There were 5 Grade 2, 11 Grade 3, 5 Grade 4, 5 Grade 5, 10 Grade 6 and 10 Grade 7 scores. 25 patients (54%) developed aspiration (5 trace, 20 severe). The aspiration rate for T1-T2 and T3-T4 tumours was 31% and 67%, respectively (p = 0.03). There was no statistical difference in the aspiration rate between the base of the tongue and tonsillar carcinoma (p = 0.23). Despite anatomical organ preservation, most patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma had moderate to severe dysphagia after chemoradiation. Patients with large tumours had a significant risk of developing aspiration following treatment.

Aspiration Rate following Nonsurgical Therapy for Laryngeal Cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the aspiration rate following nonsurgical therapy, i.e. chemoradiation or radiation alone for laryngeal cancer. Modified barium swallow was performed in 43 patients who complained of dysphagia following chemoradiation (n = 22) or radiation alone (n = 21) for laryngeal cancer. Patients were selected if they were cancer free at the time of the swallowing study. Dysphagia severity was graded on a scale of 1–7. Patients were grouped according to the dysphagia severity: no aspiration (grade 1–4), and severe (grade 5–7). Mean and median dysphagia grades were 4.4/5 and 3.5/3 for chemoradiation and radiation, respectively. Aspiration occurred in 12 patients (54%) of the chemoradiation group and 7 (33%) of the radiation alone group (p = 0.13). There was a higher proportion of patients with large tumor (T3–T4) in the chemoradiation group (64%) compared to the radiation group (5%) (p = 0.0001). Aspiration is a significant source of morbidity in patients treated for laryngeal cancer with chemoradiation or radiation alone. Aspiration occurred in both groups. Although the observed difference in aspiration rates did not achieve statistical significance, the higher aspiration rate in the chemoradiation group may be due to a higher proportion of large tumors, to the additional toxic effect of chemotherapy, or to the small number of patients in both groups. Diagnostic studies such as modified barium swallow should be part of future laryngeal cancer prospective studies to assess the prevalence of aspiration as it may be silent.

Effectiveness of the Cough Reflex in Patients with Aspiration Following Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer

The effectiveness of the cough reflex in patients who aspirated following radiation for head and neck cancer was evaluated in 89 patients (49 chemoradiation, 33 postoperative radiation, and 7 radiation alone). All patients had modified barium swallow because of dysphagia. The cough reflex was graded as present and effective, ineffective, intermittently effective, or absent. All patients were cancer-free at the time of the swallowing study. The cough reflex was present and effective in 46 patients (52%), ineffective in 17 patients (19%), and absent in 26 patients (29%) on initial investigation. Among the 43 patients who had ineffective or absent cough reflex, their treatment was chemoradiation (26), postoperative radiation (13), and radiation alone (4). In 30 patients who had sequential modified barium swallow, the cough reflex was constantly effective, ineffective, or intermittently effective in 12 (40%), 13 (43%), and 5 (17%) patients, respectively. The cough reflex was frequently ineffective or absent in patients who aspirated following radiation for head and neck cancer. Cough may also be intermittently ineffective to protect the airways following radiation.

Quality of Life following Chemoradiation and Postoperative Radiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Background: To evaluate the impact of chemoradiation and postoperative radiation on patients’ quality of life (QOL) in a single institution. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 101 patients who had treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer in a single institution. Forty-seven patients had chemotherapy and radiation, 54 patients underwent postoperative radiation. QOL was assessed with the University of Washington (UW), and the Hospital Anxiety (HA) and Depression (HD) questionnaires. All patients were free of disease at the survey time. Results: Mean and median UW scores were not different between the 2 groups: chemoradiation (65/67), postoperative radiation (62/63). Mean and median HA scores were 7.6/7 (chemoradiation), and 8.3/8 (postoperative radiation). Mean and median HD scores were 6.7/7 (chemoradiation), and 7.1/7 (postoperative radiation). Forty-four patients developed complications, with mean/median UW, HA, and HD scores of 55/55, 9.9/8, and 8.9/9, respectively. These scores were significantly different compared to the 57 patients without complications: 70/70 (p = 0.0001), 6.5/6 (p = 0.001), and 8.9/9 (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in QOL between chemoradiation and postoperative radiation in this retrospective study with a relatively short follow-up in the chemoradiation group. In addition, there were more patients with resectable disease in the postoperative group which may explain the lack of difference in QOL between the two groups. Patients who developed complications following treatment experienced lower QOL, more anxiety and depression. Our study raised the need to conduct a prospective randomized study to assess the real impact of chemoradiation and postoperative radiation on patients’ QOL.

Analysis of the factors influencing dysphagia severity upon diagnosis of head and neck cancer

Our aim was to assess the influence of age, co-morbidity factors and tumour characteristics on dysphagia severity in the diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations were performed in patients at diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Dysphagia was graded on a scale of 1 to 7 of increasing severity. Between 2000 and 2006, 236 patients with dysphagia underwent MBS at diagnosis of their head and neck cancer. 82 patients were scored as Grade 1, 88 as Grade 2, 29 as Grade 3, 15 as Grade 4, 9 as Grade 5, 5 as Grade 6, and 8 as Grade 7. Grade 3-7 dysphagia occurred in 20% and 31% of patients with T1-T2 and T3-T4 tumours, respectively (p = 0.004). Corresponding values for N0-N1 and N2-N3 tumours were 20% and 39%, respectively (p = 0.002). The percentage of patients with Grade 3-7 dysphagia was 5%, 29%, 33% and 52% for oral cavity, laryngeal, oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal tumours, respectively, (p = 0.002). Age and co-morbidity factors (e.g. diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular diseases and arthritis) did not appear to have an impact on swallowing in this limited retrospective study. Patients with locally advanced stages (T3-T4, N2-N3) are at risk of severe dysphagia. Patients with oral cavity tumours appear to be less at risk of dysphagia than those with tumours in different anatomic locations. The role of age and co-morbidity factors should be investigated in future prospective studies.

Aspiration Risk and Postoperative Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer

The aim of the study was to assess the aspiration risk following postoperative radiation for head and neck cancer. Thirty-seven patients had Modified Barium Swallow before and following treatment. Dysphagia severity was graded from 1 to 7. Before treatment there were sixteen grade 1, seventeen grade 2, three grade 3 and one grade 5. Following postoperative radiation, two patients had grade 1, eleven patients had grade 2, thirteen patients had grade 3, four patients had grade 4, four patients had grade 5, one patients had grade 6, and two patients had grade 7. Nineteen percent (7/37) of the patients developed aspiration (grade 5–7). Aspiration is life-threatening and may develop for all tumor sites and stages.