Sabine Ohlendorf

Three-dimensional MR-encephalography: Fast volumetric brain imaging using rosette trajectories

MR‐Encephalography (MREG) is a technique that allows real time observation of functional changes in the brain that appears within 100 msec. The high sampling rate is achieved at the cost of some spatial resolution. The article describes a novel imaging method for fast three‐dimensional‐MR‐encephalography whole brain coverage based on rosette trajectories and the use of multiple small receiver coils. The technique allows the observation of changes in brain physiology at very high temporal resolution. A highly undersampled three‐dimensional rosette trajectory is chosen, to perform single shot acquisition of k‐space data within 23 msec. By using a 32‐channel head coil array and regularized nonuniform Fourier transformation reconstruction, the spatial resolution is sufficient to detect even subtle centers of activation (e.g. human MT+). The method was applied to visual block design paradigms and compared with echo planar imaging‐based functional MRI. As a proof‐of‐principle of the methods ability to detect local differences in the hemodynamic response functions, the analyzed MR‐encephalography data revealed a spatially dependent delay of the arrival of the blood oxygenation level dependent response within the visual cortex. Magn Reson Med, 2011.

Neural activation associated with corrective saccades during tasks with fixation, pursuit and saccades

Corrective saccades are small eye movements that redirect gaze whenever the actual eye position differs from the desired eye position. In contrast to various forms of saccades including pro-saccades, recentering-saccades or memory guided saccades, corrective saccades have been widely neglected so far. The fMRI correlates of corrective saccades were studied that spontaneously occurred during fixation, pursuit or saccadic tasks. Eyetracking was performed during the fMRI data acquisition with a fiber-optic device. Using a combined block and event-related design, we isolated the cortical activations associated with visually guided fixation, pursuit or saccadic tasks and compared these to the activation associated with the occurrence of corrective saccades. Neuronal activations in anterior inferior cingulate, bilateral middle and inferior frontal gyri, bilateral insula and cerebellum are most likely specifically associated with corrective saccades. Additionally, overlapping activations with the established pro-saccade and, to a lesser extent, pursuit network were present. The presented results imply that corrective saccades represent a potential systematic confound in eye-movement studies, in particular because the frequency of spontaneously occurring corrective saccades significantly differed between fixation, pursuit and pro-saccades.

Gaze pursuit, ‘attention pursuit’ and their effects on cortical activations

A moving object draws our attention to it and we can track the object with smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM). Gaze and attention are usually directed to the same object during SPEM. In this study we investigated whether gaze and attention can be divided during pursuit. We explored the cortical control of ocular tracking and attentive tracking and the role of focused and divided attention. We presented a sinusoidally moving target for pursuit and simultaneously a stationary target for fixation. Gaze could be directed to the pursuit target and attention to the fixation target or vice versa, or gaze and attention were directed to the same (moving or stationary) target. We found that gaze (overt) and attentive (covert) pursuit similarly activated the cortical oculomotor network. Gaze pursuit showed higher activations than attentive pursuit. Activations, specific to the dissociation of attention from gaze and independent of eye movements, were found solely in the posterior parietal cortex. A cue indicating a forthcoming attention task activated large parts of the cortical SPEM network, as a kind of preparatory mechanism. We did not find any attention‐related regions outside the well‐known visuo‐oculomotor network. We conclude that attention control during gaze pursuit and gaze fixation occur within the cortical SPEM network, supporting the premotor theory of attention [Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I. & Umilta, C. (1987) Neuropsychologia, 25, 31–40].

Interindividual synchronization of brain activity during live verbal communication

Verbal social interaction plays an important role both in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. However, the neural basis of social interaction has primarily been studied in the individual brain, neglecting the inter-individual perspective. Here, we show inter-individual neuronal coupling of brain activity during live verbal interaction, by investigating 11 pairs of good female friends who were instructed to speak about autobiographical life events during simultaneous fMRI acquisition. The analysis revealed that the time course of neural activity in areas associated with speech production was coupled with the time course of neural activity in the interlocutors auditory cortex. This shows the feasibility of the new methodology, which may help elucidate basic reciprocal mechanisms of social interaction and the underpinnings of disordered communication. In particular, it may serve to study the process of psychotherapy on a neuronal level.

Optic Flow Stimuli in and Near the Visual Field Centre: A Group fMRI Study of Motion Sensitive Regions

Motion stimuli in one visual hemifield activate human primary visual areas of the contralateral side, but suppress activity of the corresponding ipsilateral regions. While hemifield motion is rare in everyday life, motion in both hemifields occurs regularly whenever we move. Consequently, during motion primary visual regions should simultaneously receive excitatory and inhibitory inputs. A comparison of primary and higher visual cortex activations induced by bilateral and unilateral motion stimuli is missing up to now. Many motion studies focused on the MT+ complex in the parieto-occipito-temporal cortex. In single human subjects MT+ has been subdivided in area MT, which was activated by motion stimuli in the contralateral visual field, and area MST, which responded to motion in both the contra- and ipsilateral field. In this study we investigated the cortical activation when excitatory and inhibitory inputs interfere with each other in primary visual regions and we present for the first time group results of the MT+ subregions, allowing for comparisons with the group results of other motion processing studies. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigated whole brain activations in a large group of healthy humans by applying optic flow stimuli in and near the visual field centre and performed a second level analysis. Primary visual areas were activated exclusively by motion in the contralateral field but to our surprise not by central flow fields. Inhibitory inputs to primary visual regions appear to cancel simultaneously occurring excitatory inputs during central flow field stimulation. Within MT+ we identified two subregions. Putative area MST (pMST) was activated by ipsi- and contralateral stimulation and located in the anterior part of MT+. The second subregion was located in the more posterior part of MT+ (putative area MT, pMT).

Visual motion, eye motion, and relative motion: A parametric fMRI study of functional specializations of smooth pursuit eye movement network areas.

The ability to pursue moving objects with the eyes is vital to humans. However, it remains unclear how the brain differentiates visual object motion, smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM), and eye movement-induced relative motion on the retina and where visual-to-oculomotor transformation takes place. To characterize functional differences of SPEM-processing cortical areas, we simultaneously measured functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and smooth pursuit to visual, oculomotor, and visuo-oculomotor stimuli varying the quantity of background dots of the stimuli. Resulting activations involved the whole visuo-oculomotor network. They varied among regions depending on the functional tasks and parametric changes of the background. Activation in many SPEM regions increased from 1 to 16 background dots but decreased at 36 dots. This could be an effect of coherent-texture perception. Putative MST area was not influenced by the amount of moving or stationary background dots. It probably participates in visuo-oculomotor transformation. Parts of the posterior parietal cortex seem specifically activated with relative motion between eye and background, but not with motion per se. This could be important for the perception of spatial references.

Self-perspective leads to increased activation of pain processing brain regions in fibromyalgia.

BACKGROUND Dysfunction of central nervous pain processing is assumed to play a key role in primary fibromyalgia (FM) syndrome. This pilot study examined differences of pain processing associated with adopting different interpersonal perspectives. METHODS Eleven FM patients and 11 healthy controls (HC) were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were trained to take either a self-perspective or another persons perspective when viewing the visual stimuli. Stimuli showed body parts in painful situations of varying intensity (low, medium, and high) and visually similar but neutral situations. RESULTS Patients with FM showed a higher increase in blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response, particularly in the supplementary motor area (SMA). All pain-related regions of interest (anterior insula, somatosensory cortices, anterior cingulate cortex, and SMA) showed stronger modulation of BOLD responses in FM patients in the self-perspective. In contrast to pain processing regions, perspective-related regions (e.g. temporoparietal junction) did not differ between FM and HC. CONCLUSIONS The stronger response of all four pain processing cerebral regions during self-perspective is discussed in the light of disturbed bottom-up processing. Furthermore, the results confirm earlier reports of augmented pain processing in FM, and provide evidence for sensitization of central nervous pain processing.

Gaze pursuit, ‘Attention pursuit’ and their Effects on Cortical Activations

A moving object draws our attention to it and we can track the object with smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM). Gaze and attention are usually directed to the same object during SPEM. In this study we investigated whether gaze and attention can be divided during pursuit. We explored the cortical control of ocular tracking and attentive tracking and the role of focused and divided attention. We presented a sinusoidally moving target for pursuit and simultaneously a stationary target for fixation. Gaze could be directed to the pursuit target and attention to the fixation target or vice versa, or gaze and attention were directed to the same (moving or stationary) target. We found that gaze (overt) and attentive (covert) pursuit similarly activated the cortical oculomotor network. Gaze pursuit showed higher activations than attentive pursuit. Activations, specific to the dissociation of attention from gaze and independent of eye movements, were found solely in the posterior parietal cortex. A cue indicating a forthcoming attention task activated large parts of the cortical SPEM network, as a kind of preparatory mechanism. We did not find any attention-related regions outside the well-known visuo-oculomotor network. We conclude that attention control during gaze pursuit and gaze fixation occur within the cortical SPEM network, supporting the premotor theory of attention [Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I. & Umilta, C. (1987) Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40].