Sachiko T. St. Jeor

Overweight in Children and Adolescents Pathophysiology, Consequences, Prevention, and Treatment

The prevalence of overweight among children and adolescents has dramatically increased. There may be vulnerable periods for weight gain during childhood and adolescence that also offer opportunities for prevention of overweight. Overweight in children and adolescents can result in a variety of adverse health outcomes, including type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and the metabolic syndrome. The best approach to this problem is prevention of abnormal weight gain. Several strategies for prevention are presented. In addition, treatment approaches are presented, including behavioral, pharmacological, and surgical treatment. Childhood and adolescent overweight is one of the most important current public health concerns.

Lyon Diet Heart Study Benefits of a Mediterranean-Style, National Cholesterol Education Program/American Heart Association Step I Dietary Pattern on Cardiovascular Disease

Diet is a cornerstone of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and treatment efforts. Step I and Step II diets are widely recommended as the first line of CVD intervention.1 At the core of this dietary guidance are the recommendations to decrease saturated fat and cholesterol and to consume more fruits, vegetables, and whole grain products. Information from an extensive database, especially regarding saturated fat, indicates that these diets significantly lower blood cholesterol levels, a major risk factor for CVD. Consequently, it is beyond debate that these diets reduce CVD risk. Since the advent of Step I and Step II diets, nutritionists have sought to develop effective implementation strategies, including identifying dietary patterns that augment the beneficial effects of these diets. Recent findings indicate that we are making impressive progress in attaining these goals. There is provocative evidence from the Lyon Diet Heart Study2 suggesting that a Mediterranean-style, Step I diet (emphasizing more bread, more root vegetables and green vegetables, more fish, less beef, lamb and pork replaced with poultry, no day without fruit, and butter and cream replaced with margarine high in α-linolenic acid) has effects that may be superior to those observed for the usual Step I diet. These findings raise the interesting, but not yet corroborated, question of whether a modified Step I diet (ie, a Mediterranean-style Step I diet) that features a dietary pattern consistent with the new American Heart Association (AHA) Dietary Guidelines may augment the Step I or Step II diets that are presently implemented in clinical practice. Defining a Mediterranean-style diet is challenging given the broad geographical region, including at least 16 countries, that borders the Mediterranean Sea. As would be expected, there are cultural, ethnic, religious, economic, and agricultural production differences that result in different dietary practices in these areas and that …Diet is a cornerstone of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and treatment efforts. Step I and Step II diets are widely recommended as the first line of CVD intervention.1 At the core of this dietary guidance are the recommendations to decrease saturated fat and cholesterol and to consume more fruits, vegetables, and whole grain products. Information from an extensive database, especially regarding saturated fat, indicates that these diets significantly lower blood cholesterol levels, a major risk factor for CVD. Consequently, it is beyond debate that these diets reduce CVD risk. Since the advent of Step I and Step II diets, nutritionists have sought to develop effective implementation strategies, including identifying dietary patterns that augment the beneficial effects of these diets. Recent findings indicate that we are making impressive progress in attaining these goals. There is provocative evidence from the Lyon Diet Heart Study2 suggesting that a Mediterranean-style, Step I diet (emphasizing more bread, more root vegetables and green vegetables, more fish, less beef, lamb and pork replaced with poultry, no day without fruit, and butter and cream replaced with margarine high in α-linolenic acid) has effects that may be superior to those observed for the usual Step I diet. These findings raise the interesting, but not yet corroborated, question of whether a modified Step I diet (ie, a Mediterranean-style Step I diet) that features a dietary pattern consistent with the new American Heart Association (AHA) Dietary Guidelines may augment the Step I or Step II diets that are presently implemented in clinical practice. Defining a Mediterranean-style diet is challenging given the broad geographical region, including at least 16 countries, that borders the Mediterranean Sea. As would be expected, there are cultural, ethnic, religious, economic, and agricultural production differences that result in different dietary practices in these areas and that …

AHA Dietary Guidelines Revision 2000: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association

This document presents guidelines for reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease by dietary and other lifestyle practices. Since the previous publication of these guidelines by the American Heart Association,1 the overall approach has been modified to emphasize their relation to specific goals that the AHA considers of greatest importance for lowering the risk of heart disease and stroke. The revised guidelines place increased emphasis on foods and an overall eating pattern and the need for all Americans to achieve and maintain a healthy body weight (Table⇓). View this table: Table 1. Summary of Dietary Guidelines The major guidelines are designed for the general population and collectively replace the “Step 1” designation used for earlier AHA population-wide dietary recommendations. More individualized approaches involving medical nutrition therapy for specific subgroups (for example, those with lipid disorders, diabetes, and preexisting cardiovascular disease) replace the previous “Step 2” diet for higher-risk individuals. The major emphasis for weight management should be on avoidance of excess total energy intake and a regular pattern of physical activity. Fat intake of ≤30% of total energy is recommended to assist in limiting consumption of total energy as well as saturated fat. The guidelines continue to advocate a population-wide limitation of dietary saturated fat to <10% of energy and cholesterol to <300 mg/d. Specific intakes for individuals should be based on cholesterol and lipoprotein levels and the presence of existing heart disease, diabetes, and other risk factors. Because of increased evidence for the cardiovascular benefits of fish (particularly fatty fish), consumption of at least 2 fish servings per week is now recommended. Finally, recent studies support a major benefit on blood pressure of consuming vegetables, fruits, and low-fat dairy products, as well as limiting salt intake (<6 grams per day) and alcohol (no more than 2 drinks per day for men and …

Prevention Conference VII Obesity, a Worldwide Epidemic Related to Heart Disease and Stroke: Executive Summary

On April 27 and 28, 2002, the American Heart Association (AHA) sponsored a scientific conference, “Obesity, a Worldwide Epidemic Related to Heart Disease and Stroke,” in Honolulu, Hawaii. The purpose of the conference was to develop a plan to reduce cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) associated with overweight and obesity. This report discusses the activities of the 4 working groups held before the conference, presentations at the conference, and extensive discussions among working group members after the conference. The primary objectives of this meeting were to The major findings of each working group are presented in this Executive Summary of the conference proceedings. The complete conference report with references is available online at http://www.circulationaha.org in the November 2, 2004, issue of Circulation . The prevalence of obesity is increasing in virtually all populations and age groups worldwide. Although this increase is most evident in the United States, it is not limited to the more developed, affluent nations of the world. The escalation in obesity rates reflects the upward shift in body weights of individual populations in response to environmental changes. BMI, or weight in kilograms per square meter of height (kg/m2), generally is accepted as a convenient measurement that provides a crude indication of body fat. The classifications of normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0 to 29.9), and obesity (BMI >30.0) are somewhat arbitrary but are based on international analyses of the health impact of different BMIs. By using approaches similar to those used for birth cohort trends in cholesterol …

Summary of the Scientific Conference on Dietary Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Health Conference Summary From the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association

The objective of this Executive Summary is to provide a synopsis of the research findings presented at the American Heart Association conference “Dietary Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Health—Dietary Recommendations for Fatty Acids: Is There Ample Evidence?” held on June 5–6, 2000, in Reston, Va. The conference was held to summarize the current understanding of the effects of fatty acids on risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer, as well as to identify gaps in our knowledge base that need to be addressed. There is great interest in learning more about the biological effects of the individual fatty acids, their role in chronic disease risk, and their underlying mechanisms of action. As research advances are made, there is always the need to question how new findings may be translated into practice. There is a long history of research providing the basis for the modification of existing dietary guidelines. Research findings have been used to verify intake criteria and are considered along with practical issues of implementation to establish new guidelines. A substantive body of consistent evidence sufficient to defend a dietary recommendation or a change in existing dietary guidance is essential. The conference highlighted the progress that has been made in understanding the biological effects of fatty acids and also addressed the need to learn more about how different fatty acids affect the risk of chronic disease, within the context of refining dietary guidance to further enhance health. As study designs have become increasingly rigorous, a number of megatrends have emerged from the data.1 2 There is increased emphasis on identifying the type of fat that best correlates with disease end points. The classic studies of Keys et al3 and Hegsted et al4 have shown that saturated fatty acids (ie, those with a carbon chain length of C12:0 …

Psychological correlates of weight fluctuation

This investigation attempted to determine psychological correlates of weight fluctuation in a sample of 497 normal weight and obese adults who were enrolled in a prospective, natural history study. Subjects were stratified by gender, obesity, and age and classified as weight maintainers, gainers, or losers based on their changes in weight over a 1-year period. Subjects were further classified as either weight fluctuators or nonfluctuators based on historical self-report. Nonfluctuators reported significantly higher general well-being, greater eating self-efficacy, and lower stress than weight fluctuators, regardless of body weight. Weight maintainers had more favorable eating self-efficacy related to negative affect than weight gainers. Results suggest that weight fluctuation is strongly associated with negative psychological attributes in both normal weight and obese individuals. Future research should focus on the assessment and treatment of weight fluctuation and on weight maintenance, irrespective of weight status.

Blood pressure and symptoms of depression and anxiety: a prospective study

This study investigated whether symptoms of depression and anxiety were related to the development of elevated blood pressure in initially normotensive adults. The studys hypothesis was addressed with an existing set of prospective data gathered from an age-, sex-, and weight-stratified sample of 508 adults. Four years of follow-up data were analyzed both with logistic analysis, which used hypertension (blood pressure > or =140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic) as the dependent variable, and with multiple regression analysis, which used change in blood pressure as the dependent variable. Five physical risk factors for hypertension (age, sex, baseline body mass index, family history of hypertension, and baseline blood pressure levels) were controlled for in the regression analyses. Use of antidepressant/antianxiety and antihypertensive medications were controlled for in the study. Of the 433 normotensive participants who were eligible for our study, 15% had missing data in the logistic regression analysis focusing on depression (n = 371); similarly, 15% of the eligible sample had missing data in the logistic regression using anxiety as the psychological variable of interest (n = 370). Both logistic regression analyses showed no significant relationship for either depression or anxiety in the development of hypertension. The multiple regression analyses (n = 369 for the depression analysis; n = 361 for the anxiety analysis) similarly showed no relationship between either depression or anxiety in changes in blood pressure during the 4-year follow-up. Thus, our results do not support the role of depressive or anxiety symptoms in the development of hypertension in our sample of initially normotensive adults.

A Classification System to Evaluate Weight Maintainers, Gainers, and Losers

OBJECTIVES To study natural weight changes and to develop a weight classification system that can identify weight maintainers, gainers, and losers. DESIGN/OUTCOME: A prospective, observational study in which weight changes over five annual measurements were evaluated. In the weight classification system used, changes greater than 5 lb defined weight maintenance, gain, or loss. SUBJECTS/SETTINGS Subjects were healthy, normal-weight and over weight, men and women (mean age = 44.1 +/- 14.1 years) in the Relationships of Energy, Nutrition, and Obesity to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Study. Prospective data for 385 of the original 508 subjects for whom actual weights were available for each of the 5 years (1985 to 1990) were used to classify and characterize subjects by weight-change categories. STATISTICAL ANALYSES Cross-tabulations (with chi 2 tests) and hterarchical log-linear analyses (with partial chi 2 tests) to examine the relationships of categorical variables; analyses of variance (with F tests) for continuous measures. RESULTS Over the 4-year interval, 46% of subjects were classified as maintainers, 34% as gainers, and 20% as losers. Over shorter 1-year epochs, more subjects were maintainers (62%) and fewer subjects were gainers (22%) or losers (16%). Maintainers had fewer and smaller magnitudes of weight fluctuations and showed fewer deleterious changes in health risk factors than gainers. APPLICATIONS Weight changes of greater than +/-5 lb can classify a person as a weight maintainer, or loser. Although annual weight changes were used in this study, a weight change of more than 5 lb between any two points in time may suggest nonmaintenance of weight or weight instability that needs further evaluation.

Summary and recommendations from the American Health Foundation’s Expert Panel on Healthy Weight

OVERVIEW The Expert Panel on Healthy Weight was faced with an extraordinary challenge: to arrive at a consensus on what is a healthy weight, which in and of itself is an elusive term. However, the opportunity to tackle a health problem that confronts the medical community every day helped motivate the panel to arrive at reasonable and responsible recommendations. To initiate discussion, two key questions were posed from which a public health recommendation for healthy weight could be derived: 1) What should the target be for healthy weight? and 2) How much weight loss is enough to reduce disease risk? Concern regarding the definition of a healthy weight and its application was widely expressed. Additionally, the concept of guidelines and the broad applications to individuals and population groups raised further debate. Ranges are often cxpressed to reflect a statistically derived best weight associated with the least mortality, morbidity, and disease onset. How these guidelines are interpreted in the health care setting, particularly for those individuals falling outside the range, were

Clinical practice guidelines for healthy eating for the prevention and treatment of metabolic and endocrine diseases in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/the American College of Endocrinology and the Obesity Society: executive summary.

J. Michael Gonzalez-Campoy, MD, PhD, FACE1; Sachiko T. St. Jeor, PhD, RD2; Kristin Castorino, DO3; Ayesha Ebrahim, MD, FACE4; Dan Hurley, MD, FACE5; Lois Jovanovic, MD, MACE6; Jeffrey I. Mechanick, MD, FACP, FACN, FACE, ECNU7; Steven M. Petak, MD, JD, MACE, FCLM8; Yi-Hao Yu, MD, PhD, FACE9; Kristina A. Harris10; Penny Kris-Etherton, PhD, RD11; Robert Kushner, MD12; Maureen Molini-Blandford, MPH, RD13; Quang T. Nguyen, DO14; Raymond Plodkowski, MD15; David B. Sarwer, PhD16; Karmella T. Thomas, RD17