Sadia N. Khan

Cardiac Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Coronary Stenting (CRISP Stent) Study: a prospective, randomized control trial.

Background— Myocyte necrosis as a result of elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) occurs in approximately one third of cases and is associated with subsequent cardiovascular events. This study assessed the ability of remote ischemic preconditioning (IPC) to attenuate cardiac troponin I (cTnI) release after elective PCI. Methods and Results— Two hundred forty-two consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI with undetectable preprocedural cTnI were recruited. Subjects were randomized to receive remote IPC (induced by three 5-minute inflations of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg around the upper arm, followed by 5-minute intervals of reperfusion) or control (an uninflated cuff around the arm) before arrival in the catheter laboratory. The primary outcome was cTnI at 24 hours after PCI. Secondary outcomes included renal dysfunction and major adverse cardiac and cerebral event rate at 6 months. The median cTnI at 24 hours after PCI was lower in the remote IPC compared with the control group (0.06 versus 0.16 ng/mL; P=0.040). After remote IPC, cTnI was <0.04 ng/mL in 44 patients (42%) compared with 24 in the control group (24%; P=0.01). Subjects who received remote IPC experienced less chest discomfort (P=0.0006) and ECG ST-segment deviation (P=0.005) than control subjects. At 6 months, the major adverse cardiac and cerebral event rate was lower in the remote IPC group (4 versus 13 events; P=0.018). Conclusion— Remote IPC reduces ischemic chest discomfort during PCI, attenuates procedure-related cTnI release, and appears to reduce subsequent cardiovascular events.

Remote ischaemic pre‐conditioning does not attenuate ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction in humans

Remote ischaemic pre‐conditioning (RIPC) reduces distant tissue ischaemia reperfusion injury. We tested the hypothesis that RIPC would protect the left ventricle (LV) from ischaemic dysfunction and stunning.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Stimulus Does Not Reduce Microvascular Resistance or Improve Myocardial Blood Flow in Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Introduction: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may limit myocardial infarction by improving microvascular function and maintaining myocardial blood flow. We hypothesized that a RIPC stimulus would reduce coronary microvascular resistance and improve coronary blood flow during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Method: We prospectively recruited 54 patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD = 32) or single vessel disease awaiting elective PCI. Patients with MVD had non-target vessel (NTV) index of micro-circulatory resistance (IMR) determined, before and after target vessel (TV) PCI (cardiac RIPC). The effect of arm RIPC on serial microvascular resistance (Rp) was assessed in patients with single vessel disease. Results: TV balloon occlusion did not alter the NTV IMR: 16.5 (12.4) baseline vs. 17.6 (11.6) post cardiac RIPC, P = 0.65 or hyperaemic transit time. Arm RIPC did not alter R p in patients with single vessel disease: Rp, mmHg.cm-1.s -1: 3.5 (1.9) baseline vs. 4.1 (3.0) post arm RIPC, P = 0.19 and coronary flow velocity remained constant. Conclusion: RIPC stimuli during elective PCI do not affect coronary microvascular resistance or coronary flow in humans.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial

BackgroundPatients with refractory angina have significant morbidity. This study aimed to compare two of the treatment options, Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and Percutaneous Myocardial Laser Revascularisation (PMR) in terms of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.MethodsEligible patients were randomised to PMR or SCS and followed up for exercise tolerance time (ETT), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification and the quality of life measures SF-36, Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the EuroQoL at 3, 12 and 24 months. Utilities were calculated using the EQ-5D and these and costs were compared between groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY for SCS compared to PMR was also calculated.ResultsAt 24 months post-randomisation, patients that had SCS and PMR had similar ETT (mean difference 0.05, 95% CI -2.08, 2.18, p = 0.96) and there was no difference in CCS classification or quality of life outcomes. The difference in overall mean costs when comparing SCS to PMR was GBP5,520 (95% CI GBP1,966 to GBP8,613; p < 0.01) and the ICER of using SCS was GBP46,000 per QALY.ConclusionOutcomes after SCS did not differ appreciably from those after PMR, with the former procedure being less cost-effective as currently applied. Larger studies could clarify which patients would most benefit from SCS, potentially increasing cost-effectiveness.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN09648950

Bacterial endocarditis complicating body art

Increasing numbers of patients are living with congenital heart disease at a time when body art is growing in popularity. We present a case of subacute bacterial endocarditis following repeated tattooing in a patient with known valvular heart disease. This case highlights the importance of education of patients with structural heart disease to the potential risks of such procedures, particularly at a time when endocarditis prophylaxis protocols are being revised.

Stunning and cumulative left ventricular dysfunction occurs late after coronary balloon occlusion in humans insights from simultaneous coronary and left ventricular hemodynamic assessment.

OBJECTIVES We aimed to investigate whether left ventricular (LV) stunning could be detected late after coronary occlusion when coronary flow has normalized. BACKGROUND Stunning and cumulative LV dysfunction after ischemia reperfusion has been clearly demonstrated in animal models but has been refuted in several angioplasty models in humans. However, these studies have assessed LV function early, during the reactive hyperemic phase, which might have augmented LV function. METHODS We recruited 20 male subjects with single-vessel, type A coronary disease, and normal ventricular function. We simultaneously measured LV function with a conductance catheter and coronary flow velocity with a Combowire (Volcano Therapeutics, Inc., Rancho Cordova, California) at baseline (BL), for 30 s after a low-pressure coronary balloon occlusion for 1 min and again after 30 min, before a second balloon occlusion. RESULTS Stunning was detected at 30 min after a 1-min balloon occlusion: stroke volume (ml) BL1: 88.4 (22.8) versus BL2: 79.4 (24.0), p = 0.04; tau (ms) BL1: 49.8 (9.0) versus BL2: 52.5 (8.9), p = 0.02, despite full recovery of coronary average peak velocity (p = 0.62). A second balloon occlusion caused cumulative LV dysfunction: stroke volume (ml) BO1: 77.3 (34.6) versus BO2 64.9 (22.9), p = 0.01. Reactive hyperemia significantly augmented early recovery systolic function: dP/dt max 30 s: +5.8% versus 30 min - 5.4%, p = 0.0009. CONCLUSIONS Coronary occlusion for 1-min results in late stunning and cumulative LV dysfunction after 30 min. Reactive hyperemia augments stunned LV systolic function in early recovery.

Assessment of Myocardial Scar; Comparison Between 18F-FDG PET, CMR and 99Tc-Sestamibi

Objective Patients with heart failure and ischaemic heart disease may obtain benefit from revascularisation if viable dysfunctional myocardium is present. Such patients have an increased operative risk, so it is important to ensure that viability is correctly identified. In this study, we have compared the utility of 3 imaging modalities to detect myocardial scar. Design Prospective, descriptive study. Setting Tertiary cardiac centre. Patients 35 patients (29 male, average age 70 years) with coronary artery disease and symptoms of heart failure (>NYHA class II). Intervention Assessment of myocardial scar by 99Tc-Sestamibi (MIBI), 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Outcome Measure The presence or absence of scar using a 20-segment model. Results More segments were identified as nonviable scar using MIBI than with FDG or CMR. FDG identified the least number of scar segments per patient (7.4 +/- 4.8 with MIBI vs. 4.9 +/- 4.2 with FDG vs. 5.8 +/- 5.0 with CMR, p = 0.0001 by ANOVA). The strongest agreement between modalities was in the anterior wall with the weakest agreement in the inferior wall. Overall, the agreement between modalities was moderate to good. Conclusion There is considerable variation amongst these 3 techniques in identifying scarred myocardium in patients with coronary disease and heart failure. MIBI and CMR identify more scar than FDG. We recommend that MIBI is not used as the sole imaging modality in patients undergoing assessment of myocardial viability.

Primary coronary microvascular dysfunction and poor coronary collaterals predict post-percutaneous coronary intervention cardiac necrosis

BackgroundAn elevation in cardiac troponin-I (cTnI) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is because of cardiac necrosis and has prognostic implications. Primary microvascular dysfunction, evident before PCI, and paucity of coronary collaterals at baseline may influence cTnI. MethodsWe selected 22 patients awaiting elective PCI for a single-vessel, type-A coronary stenosis, with normal left ventricular function and a normal preprocedure cTnI. Intracoronary pressure and Doppler flow were measured during coronary balloon occlusion to derive microvascular resistance: Rp=[Pd(occl)–Pv]/APVoccl and collateral resistance: Rcoll=[Pa–Pd(occl)]/APVoccl, at each stage of PCI, where Pa is mean aortic pressure, Pv is central venous pressure, Pd(occl) is mean distal pressure, Rp is coronary microvascular resistance, Rcoll is coronary collateral resistance, and APVoccl is average peak velocity during coronary balloon occlusion. The resistance indices were compared with postprocedural cTnI levels measured at 24 h. ResultsThere was a relationship between baseline Rp before PCI and elevated plasma cTnI levels at 24 h. Mean (SEM) Rp (mmHg/cm/s) increased for each cTnI tertile: T1 (mean cTnI 0.04 ng/ml): 1.3 (0.3), T2 (mean cTnI 0.13 ng/ml): 3.1 (0.4), and T3 (mean cTnI 2.5 ng/ml): 4.6 (0.7) (P=0.002). Baseline Rcoll (mmHg/cm/s) was similarly related to cTnI result and mean values showed an increasing trend: T1: 11.1 (1.9), T2: 14.5 (2.3), and T3: 19.5 (3.4) (P=0.12). Serial coronary balloon occlusions did not significantly alter Rp (P=0.82) or recruit coronary collaterals (P=0.69). ConclusionPrimary coronary microvascular dysfunction and poor collaterals at baseline are associated with post-PCI necrosis.

Hyperinsulinemia improves ischemic LV function in insulin resistant subjects

BackgroundGlucose is a more efficient substrate for ATP production than free fatty acid (FFA). Insulin resistance (IR) results in higher FFA concentrations and impaired myocardial glucose use, potentially worsening ischemia. We hypothesized that metabolic manipulation with a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) would affect a greater improvement in left ventricular (LV) performance during dobutamine stress echo (DSE) in subjects with IR.Methods24 subjects with normal LV function and coronary disease (CAD) awaiting revascularization underwent 2 DSEs. Prior to one DSEs they underwent an HEC, where a primed infusion of insulin (rate 43 mU/m 2/min) was co-administered with 20% dextrose at variable rates to maintain euglycemia. At steady-state the DSE was performed and images of the LV were acquired with tissue Doppler at each stage for offline analysis. Segmental peak systolic velocities (Vs) were recorded, as well as LV ejection fraction (EF). Subjects were then divided into two groups based on their insulin sensitivity during the HEC.ResultsHEC changed the metabolic environment, suppressing FFAs and thereby increasing glucose use. This resulted in improved LV performance at peak stress, measured by EF (IS group mean difference 5.3 (95% CI 2.5-8) %, p = 0.002; IR group mean difference 8.7 (95% CI 5.8-11.6) %, p < 0.0001) and peak V s in ischemic segments (IS group mean improvement 0.7(95% CI 0.07-1.58) cm/s, p = 0.07; IR group mean improvement 1.0 (95% CI 0.54-1.5) cm/s, p < 0.0001) , that was greater in the subjects with IR.ConclusionsIncreased myocardial glucose use induced by HEC improves LV function under stress in subjects with CAD and IR. Cardiac metabolic manipulation in subjects with IR is a promising target for future therapy.

Bacterial endocarditis and body art: active prevention or antibiotic prophylaxis.

Bacterial endocarditis complicating body piercing and tattooing is uncommon but increasing number of cases are being reported. Active prevention of this condition with significant morbidity and mortality requires cardiologists, patients and body art professionals to work together through education and guidance. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in this situation remains unclear in the light of recently revised guidelines from the American Heart Association.