Saina Attaran

Do all patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis need surgery

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was do all patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis need surgery? Seventeen papers were found using the reported search that represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. These studies compared the outcome and survival between surgically and non-surgically treated patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis. Of these studies, two were prospective observational studies and the rest were retrospective studies. The results of most of these papers were in accordance with the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart association. These studies showed that unless a patient is not a surgical candidate, an operation is the treatment of choice in prosthetic valve endocarditis. Surgery should be performed as soon as possible, particularly in haemodynamically unstable patients and those who develop complications such as heart failure, valvular dysfunction, regurgitation/obstruction, dehiscence and annular abscess. In addition to the above indications and cardiac/valvularrelated complications of prosthetic valve endocarditis, infection with Staphylococcus aureus plays an important role in the outcome, and the presence of this micro-organism should be considered an urgent surgical indication in the treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Surgery should be performed before the development of any cerebral or other complications. In contrast, in stable patients with other micro-organisms, particularly those with organisms sensitive to antibiotic treatment who have no structural valvular damage or cardiac complications, surgery can be postponed. The option of surgical intervention can also be revisited if there is a change in response to the treatment. This option is reserved for selected patients only and we conclude that as soon as the diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis is made, cardiac surgeons should be involved.

Does coronary artery bypass grafting improve quality of life in elderly patients

Traditional outcome measures such as long-term mortality may be of less value than symptomatic improvement in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In this systematic review, we analyse health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as a marker of outcome after CABG. We aimed to assess the role of HRQOL tools in making recommendations for elderly patients undergoing surgery, where symptomatic and quality-of-life improvement may often be the key indications for intervention. Twenty-three studies, encompassing 4793 patients were included. Overall, elderly patients underwent CABG at reasonably low risk. Our findings, therefore, support the conclusion that performing CABG in the elderly may be associated with significant improvements in HRQOL. In order to overcome previous methodological limitations, future work must clearly define and stringently follow-up this elderly population, to develop a more robust, sensitive and specialty-specific HRQOL tool.

Does surgical debulking for advanced stages of thymoma improve survival

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was Does surgical debulking for advanced stages of thymoma improve survival? Altogether, only 17 papers were found using the reported search, of which only 10 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated; these studies have mainly reported the survival and recurrence rates after total vs subtotal resection of thymic tumours in patients receiving or not receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. These studies confirmed that complete resection is the best prognostic factor in thymomas. With regard to subtotal tumour resection/debulking, we did not find any randomized controlled trials. The evidence on this topic is scarce and these 10 reported were retrospective reviews of the operative, histology and survival data of patients with thymoma who had subtotal vs partial resection for advanced stages of thymoma. Although debulking surgery for thymoma had positively affected survival, in six studies, the difference failed to reach statistical significance. Three of the studies, on the other hand, showed a higher survival rate in thymomas in which maximum debulking was performed and the treatment was followed by high-dose irradiation. None of these studies showed any benefit in debulking surgery for thymic carcinoma. Besides histology and tumour cell-type, other factors influencing survival included the tumour stage and the presence of symptoms such as myasthenia gravis as a warning sign at an early stage. Current evidence in the literature on the survival after debulking surgery for thymoma is contradictory, and most of the studies do not show any survival benefit after debulking for thymoma. However, debulking surgery minimizes the tumour size and area for irradiation postoperatively, hence it can result in less damage to the adjacent tissue during radiotherapy and may be considered for patients in advanced stages of thymoma in whom extensive radiotherapy will be required. In these cases, however, the risks of surgery followed by radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone should carefully be assessed prior to the initiation of treatment.

Is coronary artery bypass grafting an acceptable alternative to myotomy for the treatment of myocardial bridging

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was Is CABG an effective alternative for the treatment of myocardial bridging? Altogether, only six papers were identified using the reported search that represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, and results of these papers are tabulated; these studies reported the outcome of myotomy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for myocardial bridging. All of these studies were retrospective reports of the results of surgical intervention in patients with myocardial bridging. They showed that the incidence of myocardial bridging was less than 1-1.5% in patients with angina requiring angiography, and 7-9% of these patients had refractory angina despite medical treatment and required surgery. The evidence on the treatment of this congenital condition that mainly affects the middle segment of left anterior descending artery is limited, and there are no treatment guidelines currently available. Stenting of the tunnelled segment has shown high failure rates in approximately half of the cases. Current evidence in the literature suggests that surgery is the mainstay treatment for myocardial bridging. Surgery is performed either as supra-arterial myotomy and de-roofing of the muscle bands on- or off-pump, or as coronary artery bypass grafting of the affected coronary artery beyond the tunnelled segment. Although no mortality was reported with either of these operations, surgical myotomy on deep and extensive myocardial bridges carries the risk of entering the right ventricle, bleeding and aneurysm formation. In addition, in a small percentage of the patients undergoing myotomy, angina recurred. Despite the possibility of competitive flow in the native coronary artery after CABG for myocardial bridging, we did not identify any evidence demonstrating graft occlusion after CABG for myocardial bridging. In conclusion, in extensive and deep myocardial bridgings, CABG may be the treatment of choice that carries low risk, limited complications and excellent symptomatic relief.

Management of a Left Atrial Intramural Hematoma After Percutaneous Intervention

Left atrial intramural hematoma is a rare complication of percutaneous intervention. We report the case of a 69-year-old man with recurrent angina after CABG 19 years ago who was admitted for percutaneous intervention. After an attempt to recanalize the native circumflex artery and the vein graft, he had a cardiac arrest and was resuscitated successfully. Transesophageal echocardiography showed a large expanding hematoma within the left atrial wall causing obstruction of the mitral valve and compressing the right atrium from across the septum. An emergency thoracotomy was performed and with transesophageal echocardiography guidance and left atrial intramural hematoma was drained successfully.

Surgical revascularisation of the acute coronary artery syndrome.

Although the European Society of Cardiology and American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines provide some suggestions regarding coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the exact indications for surgery in this diverse spectrum of disease requires further clarification. ACS may present with different scenarios, from NSTEMI to cardiogenic shock. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the first-line treatment in most cases; however, there may be a subgroup of ACS patients in whom CABG may be preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention, particularly in the setting of triple vessel disease. CABG can be performed with reasonably low mortality and excellent outcome, particularly in the case of NSTEMI. Furthermore, off-pump or on-pump beating heart techniques may further improve the feasibility and outcomes of CABG. Where possible every patient should be immediately referred to a tertiary centre and evaluated by the ‘heart team’. Here risk stratification and intervention according to the expert consensus may be rapidly implemented in order to improve both morbidity and mortality.

Are frozen sections of mediastinoscopy samples as effective as formal paraffin assessment of mediastinoscopy samples for a decision on a combined mediastinoscopy plus lobectomy

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was Are frozen sections of mediastinoscopy samples as effective as formal paraffin assessment of mediastinoscopy samples for a decision on a same-day lobectomy?. Five papers were found using the reported search that represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. These studies compared the efficacy and accuracy of frozen sections (FSs) from mediastinal lymph nodes for staging of patients with lung cancer to determine whether a combined procedure can be planned based on these results and to proceed to thoracotomy and lung resection in cases of negative mediastinal nodes diagnosed by FS. These studies unanimously showed that FS of mediastinal nodes are as accurate as permanent section results and definite histology diagnosis with a sensitivity of >94% and specificity of 100% with no false-positive results. They also confirmed that even in benign lung conditions and other malignancies of the mediastinum, the results of FS are compared with the histology of the node. Based on the current reports, a combined procedure (staging mediastinal nodes by FS and planning for thoracotomy or abandoning thoracotomy) is a safe approach to treat non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From the patients point of view, this approach is superior to the staged procedure (mediastinoscopy followed by lung resection at a later date based on the histology of mediastinal nodes) due to single hospitalization and anaesthesia, however whether it is cost effective or not is debatable. It is also labour-intensive and operator-dependent. In conclusion, the current evidence in the literature suggests that a combined procedure of mediastinal node FS followed by lung resection can be a safe alternative to a staged approach to this disease.

A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of distal coronary artery anastomotic devices in MIDCAB and TECAB surgery.

Background: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) techniques may improve recovery and reduce hospital stay following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). However, working in a limited space with indirect visualisation would greatly benefit from a simple, high-quality and reproducible automated distal anastomotic method. Several devices have been developed; however, their uptake has been limited due to uncertainty around their impact on patient outcomes. Methods: A systematic review of the literature identified six studies, incorporating 139 subjects undergoing MIDCAB or TECAB surgery using a distal anastomotic device. Results: The overall 30-day mortality was 0.7% (1/137). No cardiac specific mortality was observed. For each outcome of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), postoperative stroke and haemorrhage, only a single event was observed for each (n=1/136, 1/138 and 1/136, respectively). The overall device failure rates were low, with the use of additional sutures only reported in a single case with the Magnetic Vascular Port (MVP) device. Anastomotic time ranged from a mean of 3.32 minutes with the MVP device to 20 minutes with the C-Port device. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the overall acceptable early outcomes of distal anastomotic devices for use in minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery. Future research should focus on designing adequately powered, comparative, randomised trials, focusing on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) outcomes in both the short and long-term, with clear case-by-case reasons for device failure and a comparison of anastomotic times. In this way, we may determine whether such devices will facilitate the minimal access and robotic coronary procedures of the future.