Sandrine M. Caputo
Curie Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sandrine M. Caputo.
Human Mutation | 2012
Gaël Armel Millot; Marcelo A. Carvalho; Sandrine M. Caputo; Maaike P.G. Vreeswijk; Melissa A. Brown; Michelle Webb; Etienne Rouleau; Susan L. Neuhausen; Thomas V O Hansen; Alvaro Galli; Rita D. Brandão; Marinus J. Blok; Aneliya Velkova; Fergus J. Couch; Alvaro N.A. Monteiro
Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 confer an estimated lifetime risk of 56–80% for breast cancer and 15–60% for ovarian cancer. Since the mid 1990s when BRCA1 was identified, genetic testing has revealed over 1,500 unique germline variants. However, for a significant number of these variants, the effect on protein function is unknown making it difficult to infer the consequences on risks of breast and ovarian cancers. Thus, many individuals undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1 mutations receive test results reporting a variant of uncertain clinical significance (VUS), leading to issues in risk assessment, counseling, and preventive care. Here, we describe functional assays for BRCA1 to directly or indirectly assess the impact of a variant on protein conformation or function and how these results can be used to complement genetic data to classify a VUS as to its clinical significance. Importantly, these methods may provide a framework for genome‐wide pathogenicity assignment. Hum Mutat 33:1526–1537, 2012.
Journal of Medical Genetics | 2012
Amanda B. Spurdle; Phillip Whiley; Bryony A. Thompson; Bingjian Feng; Sue Healey; Melissa A. Brown; Christopher Pettigrew; Christi J. van Asperen; Margreet G. E. M. Ausems; Anna Kattentidt-Mouravieva; Ans van den Ouweland; Annika Lindblom; Maritta Hellström Pigg; Rita K. Schmutzler; Christoph Engel; Alfons Meindl; Sandrine M. Caputo; Olga M. Sinilnikova; Rosette Lidereau; Fergus J. Couch; Lucia Guidugli; Thomas V O Hansen; Mads Thomassen; Diana Eccles; Katherine L. Tucker; Javier Benitez; Susan M. Domchek; Amanda Ewart Toland; Elizabeth J. van Rensburg; Barbara Wappenschmidt
Background Clinical classification of rare sequence changes identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is essential for appropriate genetic counselling of individuals carrying these variants. We previously showed that variant BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln in the BRCA1 transcriptional transactivation domain demonstrated equivocal results from a series of functional assays, and proposed that this variant may confer low to moderate risk of cancer. Methods Measures of genetic risk (report of family history, segregation) were assessed for 68 BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) families recruited through family cancer clinics, comparing results with 34 families carrying the previously classified pathogenic BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp (R1699W) mutation at the same residue, and to 243 breast cancer families with no BRCA1 pathogenic mutation (BRCA-X). Results Comparison of BRCA1 carrier prediction scores of probands using the BOADICEA risk prediction tool revealed that BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln variant carriers had family histories that were less ‘BRCA1-like’ than BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp mutation carriers (p<0.00001), but more ‘BRCA1-like’ than BRCA-X families (p=0.0004). Further, modified segregation analysis of the subset of 30 families with additional genotyping showed that BRCA1 c.5096G >A p.Arg1699Gln had reduced penetrance compared with the average truncating BRCA1 mutation penetrance (p=0.0002), with estimated cumulative risks to age 70 of breast or ovarian cancer of 24%. Conclusions Our results provide substantial evidence that the BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) variant, demonstrating ambiguous functional deficiency across multiple assays, is associated with intermediate risk of breast and ovarian cancer, highlighting challenges for risk modelling and clinical management of patients of this and other potential moderate-risk variants.
Human Mutation | 2014
Lucia Guidugli; Aura Carreira; Sandrine M. Caputo; Åsa Ehlén; Alvaro Galli; Alvaro N.A. Monteiro; Susan L. Neuhausen; Thomas V O Hansen; Fergus J. Couch; Maaike P.G. Vreeswijk
Missense variants in the BRCA2 gene are routinely detected during clinical screening for pathogenic mutations in patients with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer. These subtle changes frequently remain of unknown clinical significance because of the lack of genetic information that may help establish a direct correlation with cancer predisposition. Therefore, alternative ways of predicting the pathogenicity of these variants are urgently needed. Since BRCA2 is a protein involved in important cellular mechanisms such as DNA repair, replication, and cell cycle control, functional assays have been developed that exploit these cellular activities to explore the impact of the variants on protein function. In this review, we summarize assays developed and currently utilized for studying missense variants in BRCA2. We specifically depict details of each assay, including variants of uncertain significance analyzed, and describe a validation set of (genetically) proven pathogenic and neutral missense variants to serve as a golden standard for the validation of each assay. Guidelines are proposed to enable implementation of laboratory‐based methods to assess the impact of the variant on cancer risk.
Journal of Medical Genetics | 2012
Pascaline Gaildrat; Sophie Krieger; Daniela Di Giacomo; Julie Abdat; Françoise Révillion; Sandrine M. Caputo; Dominique Vaur; Estelle Jamard; Elodie Bohers; Danielle Ledemeney; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Claude Houdayer; Etienne Rouleau; Rosette Lidereau; Thierry Frebourg; Agnès Hardouin; Mario Tosi; Alexandra Martins
Background Exonic variants of unknown biological significance (VUS) identified in patients can affect mRNA splicing, either by changing 5′ or 3′ splice sites or by modifying splicing regulatory elements. Bioinformatic predictions of these elements are still inaccurate and only few such elements have been functionally mapped in BRCA2. We studied the effect on splicing of eight exon 7 VUS, selected from the French UMD-BRCA2 mutation database. Methods We performed splicing minigene assays and analyses of patient RNA. We also developed a pyrosequencing-based quantitative assay, to measure, in patient RNA, the relative contribution of each allele to the production of exon 7-containing transcripts. Moreover, an exonic splicing enhancer (ESE)-dependent minigene assay was used to evaluate the splicing regulatory properties of wild-type and mutant segments. Results Six out of the eight variants induced splicing defects. In the minigene assay, c.517G>T and c.631G>A altered the natural splice sites, c.572A>G created a new 5′ splice site, and c.520C>T, c.587G>A and c.617C>G induced exon 7 skipping (66%, 25% and 46%, respectively). Pyrosequencing of patient RNA confirmed these levels of exon skipping for c.520C>T and c.617C>G. Results from the ESE-dependent minigene assay indicated that c.520C>T and c.587G>A disturb splicing regulatory elements. Conclusions BRCA2 exon 7 splicing is regulated by multiple exonic elements and is sensitive to disease-associated sequence variations. Measurements of allelic imbalance in patient-derived RNA and/or quantitative analyses using minigene assays provide valuable estimates of the extent of partial splicing defects. Assessment of pathogenicity of variants with partial splicing effect awaits additional evidence and especially the completion of segregation analyses.
Journal of Medical Genetics | 2015
Ankita Jhuraney; Aneliya Velkova; Randall C. Johnson; Bailey Kessing; Renato S. Carvalho; Phillip Whiley; Amanda B. Spurdle; Maaike P.G. Vreeswijk; Sandrine M. Caputo; Gaël Armel Millot; Ana Vega; Nicolas Coquelle; Alvaro Galli; Diana Eccles; Marinus J. Blok; Tuya Pal; Rob B. van der Luijt; Marta Santamariña Pena; Susan L. Neuhausen; Talia Donenberg; Eva Machackova; Simon Thomas; Maxime P. Vallée; Fergus J. Couch; Sean V. Tavtigian; J. N. Mark Glover; Marcelo A. Carvalho; Lawrence C. Brody; Shyam K. Sharan; Alvaro N.A. Monteiro
Background Inactivating germline mutations in the tumour suppressor gene BRCA1 are associated with a significantly increased risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. A large number (>1500) of unique BRCA1 variants have been identified in the population and can be classified as pathogenic, non-pathogenic or as variants of unknown significance (VUS). Many VUS are rare missense variants leading to single amino acid changes. Their impact on protein function cannot be directly inferred from sequence information, precluding assessment of their pathogenicity. Thus, functional assays are critical to assess the impact of these VUS on protein activity. BRCA1 is a multifunctional protein and different assays have been used to assess the impact of variants on different biochemical activities and biological processes. Methods and results To facilitate VUS analysis, we have developed a visualisation resource that compiles and displays functional data on all documented BRCA1 missense variants. BRCA1 Circos is a web-based visualisation tool based on the freely available Circos software package. The BRCA1 Circos web tool (http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic/circos/) aggregates data from all published BRCA1 missense variants for functional studies, harmonises their results and presents various functionalities to search and interpret individual-level functional information for each BRCA1 missense variant. Conclusions This research visualisation tool will serve as a quick one-stop publically available reference for all the BRCA1 missense variants that have been functionally assessed. It will facilitate meta-analysis of functional data and improve assessment of pathogenicity of VUS.
Human Mutation | 2016
Christophe Béroud; Stanley Letovsky; Corey Braastad; Sandrine M. Caputo; Olivia Beaudoux; Yves Jean Bignon; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; Myriam Bronner; Crystal M Buell; Gwenaëlle Collod-Béroud; Florence Coulet; Nicolas Derive; Christina DiVincenzo; Christopher Elzinga; Céline Garrec; Claude Houdayer; Izabela Karbassi; Sarab Lizard; Angela Love; Danièle Muller; Narasimhan Nagan; Camille R Nery; Ghadi Rai; Françoise Révillion; David Salgado; Nicolas Sevenet; Olga M. Sinilnikova; Hagay Sobol; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Christine Toulas
As next‐generation sequencing increases access to human genetic variation, the challenge of determining clinical significance of variants becomes ever more acute. Germline variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes can confer substantial lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Assessment of variant pathogenicity is a vital part of clinical genetic testing for these genes. A database of clinical observations of BRCA variants is a critical resource in that process. This article describes BRCA Share™, a database created by a unique international alliance of academic centers and commercial testing laboratories. By integrating the content of the Universal Mutation Database generated by the French Unicancer Genetic Group with the testing results of two large commercial laboratories, Quest Diagnostics and Laboratory Corporation of America (LabCorp), BRCA Share™ has assembled one of the largest publicly accessible collections of BRCA variants currently available. Although access is available to academic researchers without charge, commercial participants in the project are required to pay a support fee and contribute their data. The fees fund the ongoing curation effort, as well as planned experiments to functionally characterize variants of uncertain significance. BRCA Share™ databases can therefore be considered as models of successful data sharing between private companies and the academic world.
Journal of Medical Genetics | 2018
Setareh Moghadasi; Huong Meeks; Maaike P.G. Vreeswijk; Linda A.M. Janssen; Åke Borg; Hans Ehrencrona; Ylva Paulsson-Karlsson; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Christoph Engel; Andrea Gehrig; Norbert Arnold; Thomas V O Hansen; Mads Thomassen; Uffe Birk Jensen; Torben A. Kruse; Bent Ejlertsen; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Inge Søkilde Pedersen; Sandrine M. Caputo; Fergus J. Couch; Emily Hallberg; Ans van den Ouweland; J. Margriet Collée; Erik Teugels; Muriel A. Adank; Rob B. van der Luijt; Arjen R. Mensenkamp; Jan C. Oosterwijk; Marinus J. Blok; Nicolas Janin
Background We previously showed that the BRCA1 variant c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) was associated with an intermediate risk of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). This study aimed to assess these cancer risks for R1699Q carriers in a larger cohort, including follow-up of previously studied families, to further define cancer risks and to propose adjusted clinical management of female BRCA1*R1699Q carriers. Methods Data were collected from 129 BRCA1*R1699Q families ascertained internationally by ENIGMA (Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium members. A modified segregation analysis was used to calculate BC and OC risks. Relative risks were calculated under both monogenic model and major gene plus polygenic model assumptions. Results In this cohort the cumulative risk of BC and OC by age 70 years was 20% and 6%, respectively. The relative risk for developing cancer was higher when using a model that included the effects of both the R1699Q variant and a residual polygenic component compared with monogenic model (for BC 3.67 vs 2.83, and for OC 6.41 vs 5.83). Conclusion Our results confirm that BRCA1*R1699Q confers an intermediate risk for BC and OC. Breast surveillance for female carriers based on mammogram annually from age 40 is advised. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be considered based on family history.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2018
Raphaël Leman; Pascaline Gaildrat; Gérald Le Gac; Chandran Ka; Yann Fichou; Marie-Pierre Audrézet; Virginie Caux-Moncoutier; Sandrine M. Caputo; Nadia Boutry-Kryza; Mélanie Léoné; Sylvie Mazoyer; Françoise Bonnet-Dorion; Nicolas Sévenet; Marine Guillaud-Bataille; Etienne Rouleau; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Maria Rossing; Danielle Muller; Violaine Bourdon; Françoise Revillon; Michael T. Parsons; Antoine Rousselin; Grégoire Davy; Gaïa Castelain; Laurent Castera; Joanna Sokolowska; Florence Coulet; Capucine Delnatte; Claude Férec
Abstract Variant interpretation is the key issue in molecular diagnosis. Spliceogenic variants exemplify this issue as each nucleotide variant can be deleterious via disruption or creation of splice site consensus sequences. Consequently, reliable in silico prediction of variant spliceogenicity would be a major improvement. Thanks to an international effort, a set of 395 variants studied at the mRNA level and occurring in 5′ and 3′ consensus regions (defined as the 11 and 14 bases surrounding the exon/intron junction, respectively) was collected for 11 different genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, CFTR and RHD, and used to train and validate a new prediction protocol named Splicing Prediction in Consensus Elements (SPiCE). SPiCE combines in silico predictions from SpliceSiteFinder-like and MaxEntScan and uses logistic regression to define optimal decision thresholds. It revealed an unprecedented sensitivity and specificity of 99.5 and 95.2%, respectively, and the impact on splicing was correctly predicted for 98.8% of variants. We therefore propose SPiCE as the new tool for predicting variant spliceogenicity. It could be easily implemented in any diagnostic laboratory as a routine decision making tool to help geneticists to face the deluge of variants in the next-generation sequencing era. SPiCE is accessible at (https://sourceforge.net/projects/spicev2-1/).
Oncotarget | 2017
François Lallemand; Ambre Petitalot; Sophie Vacher; Leanne De Koning; Karim Taouis; Bernard S. Lopez; Sophie Zinn-Justin; Nicole Dalla-Venezia; Walid Chemlali; Anne Schnitzler; Rosette Lidereau; Ivan Bièche; Sandrine M. Caputo
In mammals, FOXO transcriptional factors form a family of four members (FOXO1, 3, 4, and 6) involved in the modulation proliferation, apoptosis, and carcinogenesis. The role of the FOXO family in breast cancer remains poorly elucidated. According to the cellular context and the stage of the disease, FOXOs can have opposite effects on carcinogenesis. To study the role of FOXOs in breast carcinogenesis in more detail, we examined their expression in normal tissues, breast cell lines, and a large series of breast tumours of human origin. We found a very low physiological level of FOXO6 expression in normal adult tissues and high levels of expression in foetal brain. FOXO gene expressions fluctuate specifically in breast cancer cells compared to normal cells, suggesting that these genes may have different roles in breast carcinogenesis. For the first time, we have shown that, among the various FOXO genes, only FOXO6 was frequently highly overexpressed in breast cell lines and tumours. We also found that inhibition of the endogenous expression of FOXO6 by a specific siRNA inhibited the growth of the human breast cell lines MDA-MB-468 and HCC-38. FACS and Western blot analysis showed that inhibition of endogenous expression of FOXO6 induced accumulation of cells in G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle, but not apoptosis. These results tend to demonstrate that the overexpression of the human FOXO6 gene that we highlighted in the breast tumors stimulates breast carcinogenesis by activating breast cancer cell proliferation.
Oncotarget | 2018
Sandrine M. Caputo; Mélanie Léoné; Francesca Damiola; Åsa Ehlén; Aura Carreira; Pascaline Gaidrat; Alexandra Martins; Rita D. Brandão; Ana Peixoto; Ana Vega; Claude Houdayer; Capucine Delnatte; Myriam Bronner; Danièle Muller; Laurent Castera; Marine Guillaud-Bataille; Inge Søkilde; Nancy Uhrhammer; Sophie Demontety; Hélène Tubeuf; Gaïa Castelain; Uffe Birk Jensen; Ambre Petitalot; Sophie Krieger; Cédrick Lefol; Virginie Moncoutier; Nadia Boutry-Kryza; Henriette Roed Nielsen; Olga Silninilkova; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
Germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA2 gene are associated with a cumulative high risk of breast/ovarian cancer. Several BRCA2 variants result in complete loss of the exon-3 at the transcript level. The pathogenicity of these variants and the functional impact of loss of exon 3 have yet to be established. As a collaboration of the COVAR clinical trial group (France), and the ENIGMA consortium for investigating breast cancer gene variants, this study evaluated 8 BRCA2 variants resulting in complete deletion of exon 3. Clinical information for 39 families was gathered from Portugal, France, Denmark and Sweden. Multifactorial likelihood analyses were conducted using information from 293 patients, for 7 out of the 8 variants (including 6 intronic). For all variants combined the likelihood ratio in favor of causality was 4.39*1025. These results provide convincing evidence for the pathogenicity of all examined variants that lead to a total exon 3 skipping, and suggest that other variants that result in complete loss of exon 3 at the molecular level could be associated with a high risk of cancer comparable to that associated with classical pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. In addition, our functional study shows, for the first time, that deletion of exon 3 impairs the ability of cells to survive upon Mitomycin-C treatment, supporting lack of function for the altered BRCA2 protein in these cells. Finally, this study demonstrates that any variant leading to expression of only BRCA2 delta-exon 3 will be associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.