Sara A. Hedderwick

Effect of Hand Cleansing with Antimicrobial Soap or Alcohol-Based Gel on Microbial Colonization of Artificial Fingernails Worn by Health Care Workers

This study was undertaken to determine differences in microflora on the nails of health care workers (HCWs) wearing artificial nails compared with control HCWs with native nails and to assess the effect on these microflora of hand cleansing with antimicrobial soap or alcohol-based gel. Cultures were obtained from 21 HCWs wearing artificial nails and 20 control HCWs before and after using antimicrobial soap or alcohol-based gel. Before cleansing with soap, 86% of HCWs with artificial nails had a pathogen (gram-negative bacilli, Staphylococcus aureus, or yeasts) isolated, compared with 35% of controls (P=.003); a similar difference was noted before hand cleansing with gel (68% vs. 28%; P=.03). Significantly more HCWs with artificial nails than controls had pathogens remaining after hand cleansing with soap or gel. Of HCWs with artificial nails, only 11% cleared pathogens with soap compared with 38% with gel. Of control HCWs, only 14% cleared with soap compared with 80% with gel. Artificial acrylic fingernails could contribute to the transmission of pathogens, and their use by HCWs should be discouraged.

Pathogenic organisms associated with artificial fingernails worn by healthcare workers

OBJECTIVE To determine differences in the identity and quantity of microbial flora from healthcare workers (HCWs) wearing artificial nails compared with control HCWs with native nails. DESIGN Two separate studies were undertaken. In study 1, 12 HCWs who did not normally wear artificial nails wore polished artificial nails on their nondominant hand for 15 days. Identity and quantity of microflora were compared between the artificial nails and the polished native nails of the other hand. In study 2, the microbial flora of the nails of 30 HCWs who wore permanent acrylic artificial nails were compared with that of control HCWs who had native nails. In both studies, nail surfaces were swabbed and subungual debris was collected to obtain material for culture. Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacilli, enterococci, and yeasts were considered to be potential pathogens. All organisms were identified and quantified. RESULTS In study 1, potential pathogens were isolated from more samples obtained from artificial nails than native nails (92% vs. 62%; P<.001). Colonization of artificial nails increased over time; by day 15, 71% of cultures yielded a pathogen compared with 21% on day 1 (P=.004). A significantly greater quantity of organisms (expressed as mean log10 colony-forming units +/- standard deviation) was isolated from the subungual area than the nail surface; this was noted for both artificial (5.0+/-1.4 vs. 4.1+/-1.0; P<.001) and native nails (4.9+/-1.3 vs. 3.7+/-0.8; P<.001). More organisms were found on the surface of artificial nails than native nails (P=.008), but there were no differences noted in the quantities of organisms isolated from the subungual areas. In study 2, HCWs wearing artificial nails were more likely to have a pathogen isolated than controls (87% vs. 43%; P=.001). More HCWs with artificial nails had gram-negative bacilli (47% vs. 17%; P=.03) and yeasts (50% vs. 13%; P=.006) than control HCWs. However, the quantities of organisms isolated from HCWs wearing artificial nails and controls did not differ. CONCLUSIONS Artificial fingernails were more likely to harbor pathogens, especially gram-negative bacilli and yeasts, than native nails. The longer artificial nails were worn, the more likely that a pathogen was isolated. Current recommendations restricting artificial fingernails in certain healthcare settings appear justified.

Epidemiology of yeast colonization in the intensive care unit.

Abstract In order to investigate the epidemiology of colonization and possible transmission of yeasts among patients and healthcare workers in adult intensive care units (ICUs), 194 patients were followed for a mean of 9±11 days and 63 healthcare workers were followed for a mean of 132±52 days. Among the patients, 142 (73%) were colonized by yeast, with Candida albicans being the species most commonly recovered. Most patients (65%) were already colonized with yeast upon admission to the intensive care unit; only 17% became colonized after admission. Persistent colonization occurred in 51 (55%) of 92 patients who had more than three cultures performed; in 75% of them, colonization persisted with the same strain of Candida albicans or Candida glabrata. Bacterial infection in the month preceding entry into the ICU was the only risk factor significantly associated with yeast colonization. Among the healthcare workers, yeasts were isolated from 42 (67%). Candida albicans was most frequently recovered from the oropharynx (19% of occasions), and Candida parapsilosis was most frequently found on hands (8% of occasions). Persistent colonization of the oropharynx occurred in only six healthcare workers, and none had persistence of yeasts on hands. In this non-outbreak setting, 5 (4%) of 123 patient/healthcare worker interactions that were linked epidemiologically yielded the same strain of Candida albicans, providing evidence for possible cross-transmission. No similar link was found between healthcare worker-patient interactions and colonization with Candida glabrata or Candida parapsilosis.

Risk factors for colonization with yeast species in a Veterans Affairs long-term care facility.

OBJECTIVES: To assess colonization and serious infection with yeasts and the risk factors that are associated with colonization by these organisms.

Treatment of systemic fungal infections in older patients: Achieving optimal outcomes

Systemic fungal infections are an increasing problem in older adults. For several of the endemic mycoses, this increase is the result of increased travel and leisure activities in areas endemic for these fungi. Immunosuppressive agents, care in an intensive care unit, and invasive devices all contribute to infection with opportunistic fungi. Treatment of systemic fungal infections is usually with an azole or amphotericin B. The preferred regimen depends on the specific fungal infection, the site and the severity of the infection, the state of immunosuppression of the patient and the possible toxicities of each drug for a specific patient. In older adults, drug-drug interactions between the azoles and drugs commonly prescribed for older persons may lead to serious toxicity, and absorption of itraconazole can be problematic. Amphotericin B is associated with significant nephrotoxicity, especially in older adults with pre-existing renal disease, and infusion-related adverse effects. Newer lipid formulations of amphotericin B can obviate some of these toxicities, but their role in the treatment of systemic fungal infections in older adults has not yet been clarified.

Mycobacterium avium complex endocarditis: Spurious diagnosis resulting from laboratory cross contamination

Contamination between specimens within clinical microbiology laboratories may be responsible for spurious outbreaks of mycobacterial infections. We report the case of a patient who had culture-negative endocarditis and whose cardiac tissue obtained at surgery yielded Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Epidemiologic investigation suggested cross contamination probably occurred during processing of the sputum specimens of a patient with pulmonary MAC disease and the cardiac samples from our patient; molecular strain typing showed the isolates from both patients to be identical. When mycobacterial infection rates increase or an unexpected case of mycobacterial infection occurs, the clinician should be alert to the possibility of cross contamination in the laboratory as a possible explanation.