Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sara Bangen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sara Bangen.


Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 2018

Upscaling site-scale ecohydraulic models to inform salmonid population-level life cycle modeling and restoration actions – Lessons from the Columbia River Basin

Joseph M. Wheaton; Nicolaas Bouwes; Peter A. McHugh; Carla Saunders; Sara Bangen; Phillip Bailey; Matt Nahorniak; Eric Wall; Chris E. Jordan

With high-resolution topography and imagery in fluvial environments, the potential to quantify physical fish habitat at the reach scale has never been better. Increased availability of hydraulic, temperature and food availability data and models have given rise to a host of species and life stage specific ecohydraulic fish habitat models ranging from simple, empirical habitat suitability curve driven models, to fuzzy inference systems to fully mechanistic bioenergetic models. However, few examples exist where such information has been upscaled appropriately to evaluate entire fish populations. We present a framework for applying such ecohydraulic models from over 905 sites in 12 sub-watersheds of the Columbia River Basin (USA), to assess status and trends in anadromous salmon populations. We automated the simulation of computational engines to drive the hydraulics, and subsequent ecohydraulic models using cloud computing for over 2075 visits from 2011 to 2015 at 905 sites. We also characterize each sites geomorphic reach type, habitat condition, geomorphic unit assemblage, primary production potential and thermal regime. We then independently produce drainage network-scale models to estimate these same parameters from coarser, remotely sensed data available across entire populations within the Columbia River Basin. These variables give us a basis for imputation of reach-scale capacity estimates across drainage networks. Combining capacity estimates with survival estimates from mark–recapture monitoring allows a more robust quantification of capacity for freshwater life stages (i.e. adult spawning, juvenile rearing) of the anadromous life cycle. We use these data to drive life cycle models of populations, which not only include the freshwater life stages but also the marine and migration life stages through the hydropower system. More fundamentally, we can begin to look at more realistic, spatially explicit, tributary habitat restoration scenarios to examine whether the enormous financial investment on such restoration actions can help recover these populations or prevent their extinction. Copyright


Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 2017

Geomorphic process from topographic form: automating the interpretation of repeat survey data in river valleys

Alan Kasprak; Joshua Caster; Sara Bangen; Joel B. Sankey

The ability to quantify the processes driving geomorphic change in river valley margins is vital to geomorphologists seeking to understand the relative role of transport mechanisms (e.g. fluvial, aeolian, and hillslope processes) in landscape dynamics. High-resolution, repeat topographic data are becoming readily available to geomorphologists. By contrasting digital elevation models derived from repeat surveys, the transport processes driving topographic changes can be inferred, a method termed ‘mechanistic segregation.’ Unfortunately, mechanistic segregation largely relies on subjective and time consuming manual classification, which has implications both for its reproducibility and the practical scale of its application. Here we present a novel computational workflow for the mechanistic segregation of geomorphic transport processes in geospatial datasets. We apply the workflow to seven sites along the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, where geomorphic transport is driven by a diverse suite of mechanisms. The workflow performs well when compared to field observations, with an overall predictive accuracy of 84% across 113 validation points. The approach most accurately predicts changes due to fluvial processes (100% accuracy) and aeolian processes (96%), with reduced accuracy in predictions of alluvial and colluvial processes (64% and 73%, respectively). Our workflow is designed to be applicable to a diversity of river systems and will likely provide a rapid and objective understanding of the processes driving geomorphic change at the reach and network scales. We anticipate that such an understanding will allow insight into the response of geomorphic transport processes to external forcings, such as shifts in climate, land use, or river regulation, with implications for process-based river management and restoration. Copyright


Geomorphology | 2014

A methodological intercomparison of topographic survey techniques for characterizing wadeable streams and rivers

Sara Bangen; Joseph M. Wheaton; Nicolaas Bouwes; Boyd Bouwes; Chris E. Jordan


Geomorphology | 2015

Geomorphic mapping and taxonomy of fluvial landforms

Joseph M. Wheaton; Kirstie Fryirs; Gary Brierley; Sara Bangen; Nicolaas Bouwes; G. R. O'Brien


Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 2014

Crew variability in topographic surveys for monitoring wadeable streams: a case study from the Columbia River Basin

Sara Bangen; Joseph M. Wheaton; Nicolaas Bouwes; Chris E. Jordan; Carol Volk; Michael B. Ward


Water Resources Research | 2016

Error modeling of DEMs from topographic surveys of rivers using fuzzy inference systems

Sara Bangen; James Hensleigh; Peter A. McHugh; Joseph M. Wheaton


Ecological Modelling | 2017

Linking models across scales to assess the viability and restoration potential of a threatened population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Middle Fork John Day River, Oregon, USA

Peter A. McHugh; W. Carl Saunders; Nicolaas Bouwes; C. Eric Wall; Sara Bangen; Joseph M. Wheaton; Matthew Nahorniak; James R. Ruzycki; Ian A. Tattam; Chris E. Jordan


Water Resources Research | 2016

Error modeling of DEMs from topographic surveys of rivers using fuzzy inference systems: ERROR MODELING OF DEMS FROM TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS OF RIVERS

Sara Bangen; James Hensleigh; Peter A. McHugh; Joseph M. Wheaton


Archive | 2017

Linking fluvial and aeolian morphodynamics in the Grand Canyon, USA

Alan Kasprak; Sara Bangen; Daniel D. Buscombe; Joshua Caster; Amy E. East; Paul E. Grams; Joel B. Sankey


Archive | 2012

CHaMPCrewVariability:InfluenceonTopographicSurfaces&DerivedMetrics

Sara Bangen; Joseph M. Wheaton

Collaboration


Dive into the Sara Bangen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris E. Jordan

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan Kasprak

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joshua Caster

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy E. East

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge