Sara Giordano

Differential cognitive performances between schizophrenic responders and non-responders to antipsychotics: Correlation with course of the illness, psychopathology, attitude to the treatment and antipsychotics doses

Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that schizophrenia patients may perform worse than normal controls in several cognitive tasks. However, little is known on putative differences in cognitive functioning between schizophrenia patients responding to antipsychotics and those resistant to the treatment. In this cross-sectional study, 63 subjects (41 schizophrenia and schizoaffective patients and 22 age and sex-matched controls) were enrolled. Patients were divided in resistant (TRS, n=19) and non-resistant to pharmacological treatment (non-TRS, n=22) according to the American Psychiatric Association (APA) criteria for treatment resistance. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) was administered to patients and controls. The following rating scales were administered to schizophrenia patients: the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI) and the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics (SWN). Statistically significant differences among non-TRS patients, TRS ones, and controls were detected at the BACS. TRS patients performed significantly worse than non-TRS ones on Verbal Memory task, exhibited higher PANSS total and subscales scores and were prescribed higher antipsychotic doses. Poorer performances at the BACS significantly correlated with more severe negative symptoms in TRS but not in non-TRS patients. These results may suggest that TRS patients suffer from a form of the disease with prominent cognitive impairment possibly related to negative symptoms.

Treatment resistant schizophrenia is associated with the worst community functioning among severely-ill highly-disabling psychiatric conditions and is the most relevant predictor of poorer achievements in functional milestones

The aim of this work was to compare achievements in milestones of community functioning in highly disabling psychiatric conditions, including treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), schizophrenia (responsive to antipsychotics), bipolar disorder, and anxiety/depressive diseases. Also, we investigated the predictors of community functioning outcomes across several domains. Among consecutive patients screened, 188 met inclusion criteria and 118 ultimately entered the study. Diagnosis of TRS was made by stringent criteria, including historic and perspective evaluations and excluding potential confounding factors. Achievements in functional milestones of everyday living were recorded. Performances in discrete cognitive tasks were assessed. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Personal and Social Performance Scale, the Drug Attitude Inventory-10, and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire were administered. TRS patients showed the highest impairment in community functioning among diagnostic groups. TRS was found to have more severe psychopathology, more impaired cognitive functioning, and poorer psychosocial adjustment compared to all the other groups. In the whole sample, the main predictors of community functioning were the diagnostic group (with TRS diagnosis associated with worst functioning) and achievements in the other functional milestones. In psychotic patients, however, the main predictors of community functioning were clinical and psychopathological variables. These results may support the hypothesis that TRS represents a separate schizophrenia subtype, with its own neurobiology, psychopathology and clinical course. Our results identify a group of modifiable predictors to be addressed to prevent community disability.

Clinical evaluation of functional capacity in treatment resistant schizophrenia patients: Comparison and differences with non-resistant schizophrenia patients

Treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is defined by poor or non-response to conventional antipsychotic agents. Functional capacity is defined as the baseline potential of a patient to function in the community, irrespective of actual achievements gained, and has never been studied in TRS. Here, we screened 182 patients with psychotic symptoms and separated them in TRS (n = 28) and non-TRS (n = 32) ones, to evaluate whether they exhibited differential extents and predictive clinical variables of functional capacity. Functional capacity was measured by the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA). Psychotic symptoms by PANSS, social functioning by PSP and SLOF, clinical severity of the illness, cognitive functioning, and neurological soft signs (NSS) were assessed. TRS patients had non-significant lower UPSA scores compared to non-TRS (t-test: p > 0.05). In TRS, UPSA score correlated with multiple clinical variables. The highest effect sizes were observed for PANSS negative score (r = -0.67, p < 0.005); SLOF Area1 score (r = 0.66, p < 0.005); NSS severity (r = -0.61, p < 0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that main predictors of UPSA score in TRS patients were PANSS negative score, education years, NSS, Problem Solving performances, and PSP score (F = 11.12, R2 = 0.75, p < 0.0005). These variables were not predictive of UPSA score in non-TRS patients. Hierarchical analysis found that variance in UPSA score mainly depended on negative symptoms, NSS, and problem solving (F = 15.21, R2 = 0.65, p < 0.0005). Path analysis individuated two separate paths to UPSA score. These results delineate a limited and independent group of candidate predictors to be putatively accounted for therapeutic interventions to improve functional capacity, and possibly social functioning, in TRS patients.

EPA-1118 - Knowledge of the illness and its relations with quality of life, social functioning, cognitive performances, and adherence in psychotic patients: Toward effectiveness-focused interventions

Introduction Psychosocial factors are often underestimated in psychotic patients, although they may profoundly influence (and be influenced by) clinical presentation and effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in these people. Objectives To investigate relevance, relationship with clinical presentation and overall quality of life of multiple psychosocial factors in psychotic patients. Aims To evaluate whether knowledge about the illness and utilization of health services are defective in psychotic vs. non-psychotic patients and whether these correlates with the type of psychotic symptoms, cognitive performances, global social functioning, quality of life, and acceptance of pharmacotherapy. Methods Approximately 110 patients were enrolled after written informed consent. Patients were administered the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP), the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI), the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q). All patients were also screened for cognitive performances. Patients and relatives completed a questionnaire on knowledge about the illness and on the level of utilization of mental health services. Patients were subdivided in psychotic (cases) and non-psychotic (controls) based on their score on the PANSS. Results Psychotic patients and their relatives showed lower levels of knowledge about the illness. These features were associated with the other variables assessed in a very complex and multidimensional model of reciprocal influences. Conclusions Lack of response to pharmacological treatments and to overall therapeutic interventions in psychotic patients may also depend on multiple psychosocial factors, which may be carefully investigated and become the target of adjunctive, effectiveness-focused interventions.