Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari
University Health Network
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari.
The Journal of Pathology | 2014
Jérôme Galon; Bernhard Mlecnik; Gabriela Bindea; Helen K. Angell; Anne Berger; Christine Lagorce; Alessandro Lugli; Inti Zlobec; Arndt Hartmann; Carlo Bifulco; Iris D. Nagtegaal; Richard Palmqvist; Giuseppe Masucci; Gerardo Botti; Fabiana Tatangelo; Paolo Delrio; Michele Maio; Luigi Laghi; Fabio Grizzi; Corrado D'Arrigo; Fernando Vidal-Vanaclocha; Eva Zavadova; Lotfi Chouchane; Pamela S. Ohashi; Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari; Bradly G. Wouters; Michael H. Roehrl; Linh T. Nguyen; Yutaka Kawakami; Shoichi Hazama
The American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) TNM staging system provides the most reliable guidelines for the routine prognostication and treatment of colorectal carcinoma. This traditional tumour staging summarizes data on tumour burden (T), the presence of cancer cells in draining and regional lymph nodes (N) and evidence for distant metastases (M). However, it is now recognized that the clinical outcome can vary significantly among patients within the same stage. The current classification provides limited prognostic information and does not predict response to therapy. Multiple ways to classify cancer and to distinguish different subtypes of colorectal cancer have been proposed, including morphology, cell origin, molecular pathways, mutation status and gene expression‐based stratification. These parameters rely on tumour‐cell characteristics. Extensive literature has investigated the host immune response against cancer and demonstrated the prognostic impact of the in situ immune cell infiltrate in tumours. A methodology named ‘Immunoscore’ has been defined to quantify the in situ immune infiltrate. In colorectal cancer, the Immunoscore may add to the significance of the current AJCC/UICC TNM classification, since it has been demonstrated to be a prognostic factor superior to the AJCC/UICC TNM classification. An international consortium has been initiated to validate and promote the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings. The results of this international consortium may result in the implementation of the Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM‐I (TNM‐Immune).
Nature | 2016
Faiyaz Notta; Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue; Mathieu Lemire; Yilong Li; Gavin Wilson; Ashton A. Connor; Robert E. Denroche; Sheng Ben Liang; Andrew M.K. Brown; Jaeseung C. Kim; Tao Wang; Jared T. Simpson; Timothy Beck; Ayelet Borgida; Nicholas Buchner; Dianne Chadwick; Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari; John E. Dick; Lawrence E. Heisler; Michael A. Hollingsworth; Emin Ibrahimov; Gun Ho Jang; Jeremy Johns; Lars G T Jorgensen; Calvin Law; Olga Ludkovski; Ilinca Lungu; Karen Ng; Danielle Pasternack; Gloria M. Petersen
Pancreatic cancer, a highly aggressive tumour type with uniformly poor prognosis, exemplifies the classically held view of stepwise cancer development. The current model of tumorigenesis, based on analyses of precursor lesions, termed pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasm (PanINs) lesions, makes two predictions: first, that pancreatic cancer develops through a particular sequence of genetic alterations (KRAS, followed by CDKN2A, then TP53 and SMAD4); and second, that the evolutionary trajectory of pancreatic cancer progression is gradual because each alteration is acquired independently. A shortcoming of this model is that clonally expanded precursor lesions do not always belong to the tumour lineage, indicating that the evolutionary trajectory of the tumour lineage and precursor lesions can be divergent. This prevailing model of tumorigenesis has contributed to the clinical notion that pancreatic cancer evolves slowly and presents at a late stage. However, the propensity for this disease to rapidly metastasize and the inability to improve patient outcomes, despite efforts aimed at early detection, suggest that pancreatic cancer progression is not gradual. Here, using newly developed informatics tools, we tracked changes in DNA copy number and their associated rearrangements in tumour-enriched genomes and found that pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis is neither gradual nor follows the accepted mutation order. Two-thirds of tumours harbour complex rearrangement patterns associated with mitotic errors, consistent with punctuated equilibrium as the principal evolutionary trajectory. In a subset of cases, the consequence of such errors is the simultaneous, rather than sequential, knockout of canonical preneoplastic genetic drivers that are likely to set-off invasive cancer growth. These findings challenge the current progression model of pancreatic cancer and provide insights into the mutational processes that give rise to these aggressive tumours.
American Journal of Transplantation | 2016
A. J. Demetris; Christopher Bellamy; Stefan G. Hubscher; Jacqueline G. O'Leary; Parmjeet Randhawa; Sandy Feng; D. Neil; Robert B. Colvin; Geoffrey W. McCaughan; John J. Fung; A. Del Bello; F. P. Reinholt; Hironori Haga; Oyedele Adeyi; A. J. Czaja; Tom Schiano; M. I. Fiel; Maxwell L. Smith; M. Sebagh; R. Y. Tanigawa; F. Yilmaz; Graeme J. M. Alexander; L. Baiocchi; M. Balasubramanian; Ibrahim Batal; Atul K. Bhan; C. T. S. Cerski; F. Charlotte; M. E. De Vera; M. Elmonayeri
The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology reviewed and discussed literature evidence regarding antibody‐mediated liver allograft rejection at the 11th (Paris, France, June 5–10, 2011), 12th (Comandatuba, Brazil, August 19–23, 2013), and 13th (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 5–10, 2015) meetings of the Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology. Discussion continued online. The primary goal was to introduce guidelines and consensus criteria for the diagnosis of liver allograft antibody‐mediated rejection and provide a comprehensive update of all Banff Schema recommendations. Included are new recommendations for complement component 4d tissue staining and interpretation, staging liver allograft fibrosis, and findings related to immunosuppression minimization. In an effort to create a single reference document, previous unchanged criteria are also included.
The Lancet | 2018
Franck Pagès; Bernhard Mlecnik; Florence Marliot; Gabriela Bindea; Fang Shu Ou; Carlo Bifulco; Alessandro Lugli; Inti Zlobec; Tilman T. Rau; Martin D. Berger; Iris D. Nagtegaal; Elisa Vink-Börger; Arndt Hartmann; Carol Geppert; Julie Kolwelter; Susanne Merkel; Robert Grützmann; Marc Van den Eynde; Anne Jouret-Mourin; Alex Kartheuser; Daniel Léonard; Christophe Remue; Julia Y. Wang; Prashant Bavi; Michael H. Roehrl; Pamela S. Ohashi; Linh T. Nguyen; Seong Jun Han; Heather L. MacGregor; Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari
BACKGROUND The estimation of risk of recurrence for patients with colon carcinoma must be improved. A robust immune score quantification is needed to introduce immune parameters into cancer classification. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of total tumour-infiltrating T-cell counts and cytotoxic tumour-infiltrating T-cells counts with the consensus Immunoscore assay in patients with stage I-III colon cancer. METHODS An international consortium of 14 centres in 13 countries, led by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, assessed the Immunoscore assay in patients with TNM stage I-III colon cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to a training set, an internal validation set, or an external validation set. Paraffin sections of the colon tumour and invasive margin from each patient were processed by immunohistochemistry, and the densities of CD3+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in the tumour and in the invasive margin were quantified by digital pathology. An Immunoscore for each patient was derived from the mean of four density percentiles. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the prognostic value of the Immunoscore for time to recurrence, defined as time from surgery to disease recurrence. Stratified multivariable Cox models were used to assess the associations between Immunoscore and outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders. Harrells C-statistics was used to assess model performance. FINDINGS Tissue samples from 3539 patients were processed, and samples from 2681 patients were included in the analyses after quality controls (700 patients in the training set, 636 patients in the internal validation set, and 1345 patients in the external validation set). The Immunoscore assay showed a high level of reproducibility between observers and centres (r=0·97 for colon tumour; r=0·97 for invasive margin; p<0·0001). In the training set, patients with a high Immunoscore had the lowest risk of recurrence at 5 years (14 [8%] patients with a high Immunoscore vs 65 (19%) patients with an intermediate Immunoscore vs 51 (32%) patients with a low Immunoscore; hazard ratio [HR] for high vs low Immunoscore 0·20, 95% CI 0·10-0·38; p<0·0001). The findings were confirmed in the two validation sets (n=1981). In the stratified Cox multivariable analysis, the Immunoscore association with time to recurrence was independent of patient age, sex, T stage, N stage, microsatellite instability, and existing prognostic factors (p<0·0001). Of 1434 patients with stage II cancer, the difference in risk of recurrence at 5 years was significant (HR for high vs low Immunoscore 0·33, 95% CI 0·21-0·52; p<0·0001), including in Cox multivariable analysis (p<0·0001). Immunoscore had the highest relative contribution to the risk of all clinical parameters, including the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification system. INTERPRETATION The Immunoscore provides a reliable estimate of the risk of recurrence in patients with colon cancer. These results support the implementation of the consensus Immunoscore as a new component of a TNM-Immune classification of cancer. FUNDING French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, the LabEx Immuno-oncology, the Transcan ERAnet Immunoscore European project, Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer, CARPEM, AP-HP, Institut National du Cancer, Italian Association for Cancer Research, national grants and the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.
Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2015
Runjan Chetty; Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari; Stefano Serra; Richard Colling; Lai Mun Wang
Background Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) is a very characteristic type of serrated polyp that has a predilection for the left colon. Recent molecular advances have shown two molecular phenotypes of TSA: one associated with BRAF mutations and the other with KRAS mutations. The former is associated with hyperplastic polyps (HPs) and sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs), while the latter is associated with more conventional adenomatous dysplasia. Aims The association of TSAs with so-called precursor lesions (HPs and SSAs) is not well recognised and the purpose of this study was to explore the coexistent presence of HPs, SSAs and adenomatous polyps within a large cohort of TSAs. Methods In total 149 TSAs were examined for the presence of HP, SSA and adenomatous polyps. Results Seen in 83 men and 65 women ranging in age from 32 to 89 years and 127 were left sided with 22 in the right colon. Seventy-eight of the 149 TSAs showed evidence of another polyp (52.34%): 32 were low-grade tubular/tubulovillous adenomas (TAs/TVAs; 41%), 28 were HPs (36%) and 18 were SSAs (23%). Eleven of the 22 right-sided TSAs were associated with a precursor lesion (1 HP and 7 SSA). In addition, five TSAs showed more than one polyp type: TSA with TA/TVA and HP (3); TSA with TA/TVA and SSA (2). The TAs/TVAs were adjacent to the TSA but occurred as a separate discrete polyp, while HPs and SSAs were intermingled with the TSA and present at the base and surface of the lesion. Conclusions More than 50% of TSAs are associated with a precursor lesion or adjacent TA/TVA. Their recognition is important as this may have surveillance and management ramifications.
Histopathology | 2015
Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari; Lai Mun Wang; Richard Colling; Stefano Serra; Runjan Chetty
To ascertain the degree of histological overlap between conventional villous/tubulovillous (VA/TVAs) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA).
Human Pathology | 2014
Kimberly C. Wiegand; Keiyan Sy; Steve E. Kalloger; Hector Li-Chang; Ryan Woods; Aalok Kumar; Catherine Streutker; Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari; Chen Zhou; Howard John Lim; David Huntsman; Blaise Clarke; David F. Schaeffer
ARID1A/BAF250a has been recently implicated as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer. We sought to clarify the clinical significance of BAF250a/ARID1A in relation to other clinical parameters and relevant biomarkers in gastric carcinoma. Cases from 2 separate cohorts of patients with gastric carcinoma from Vancouver (n = 173) and Toronto (n = 80) were selected for the construction of tissue microarrays, which were used to assess the immunohistochemical status of BAF250a (anti-ARID1A), mismatch repair proteins and p53, as well as in situ hybridization for HER2 amplification and Epstein-Barr virus infection. The Toronto cohort contained a higher proportion of early stage cases (P = .019) and a smaller proportion of cases from the proximal stomach (P < .001). Overall, immunohistochemical loss of BAF250a was observed in 22.5% of gastric adenocarcinomas from the Vancouver group and 20% from Toronto. In both cohorts, loss of BAF250a was positively associated with loss of mismatch repair protein expression (P < .0001 and P = .035, respectively). Loss of BAF250a expression was independently associated with poor overall survival in the Toronto cohort (P = .0015), whereas no significant association with survival was observed in the Vancouver cohort. BAF250a loss was not significantly associated with any additional clinical parameters in either cohort. HER2 amplification was confirmed as a negative prognostic factor in both cohorts. These findings suggest that ARID1A/BAF250a may be of prognostic significance in a subset of patients with early stage gastric cancer and that pathological assessment should increasingly use a multimarker approach.
Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2014
Runjan Chetty; Adrian C Bateman; Emina Torlakovic; Lai Mun Wang; Pelvender Gill; Adnan Al-Badri; Mark J. Arends; Leigh Biddlestone; Susan Burroughs; Frank A. Carey; David Cowlishaw; Stephen Crowther; Philip Da Costa; Mahomed A. Dada; Charles d'Adhemar; Kaushik Dasgupta; Chandima de Cates; Vikram Deshpande; Roger M Feakins; Bineeta Foria; Vipul Foria; Clare Fuller; Bryan Green; Joel K. Greenson; Paul Griffiths; Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari; James Henry; Eleanor Jaynes; Michael Jeffers; Philip Kaye
Aim The purpose of this survey was to ascertain reporting habits of pathologists towards sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/P). Methods A questionnaire designed to highlight diagnostic criteria, approach and clinical implications of SSA/P was circulated electronically to 45 pathologists in the UK and North America. Results Forty-three of 45 pathologists agreed to participate. The vast majority (88%) had a special interest in gastrointestinal (GI) pathology, had great exposure to GI polyps in general with 40% diagnosing SSA/P at least once a week if not more, abnormal architecture was thought by all participants to be histologically diagnostic, and 11% would make the diagnosis if a single diagnostic histological feature was present in one crypt only, while a further 19% would diagnose SSA/P in one crypt if more than one diagnostic feature was present. The vast majority agreed that deeper sections were useful and 88% did not feel proliferation markers were useful. More than one-third did not know whether, or did not feel that, their clinicians were aware of the implications of SSA/P. Conclusions 98% of pathologists surveyed are aware that SSA/P is a precursor lesion to colorectal cancer, the majority agree on diagnostic criteria, and a significant number feel that there needs to be greater communication and awareness among pathologists and gastroenterologists about SSA/P.
Modern Pathology | 2015
Iram Siddiqui; Nazia Selzner; Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari; Max Marquez; Oyedele Adeyi
Acute cellular rejection post liver transplant occurs most commonly but not exclusively in the first year. In this study, we report two patterns: sinusoidal infiltrative and hepatitic, which are not considered in the Banff system. We describe their presentation, response to Solu-Medrol, and compare these to the typical moderate-severe acute cellular rejection. Patients transplanted from 2007 to 2012 at University Health Network, who had biopsy-proven rejection in the first year, were studied. Baseline transaminases and bilirubin, time of acute cellular rejection, follow-up, and treatment responses were analyzed. A total of 407 biopsies were received, of which 77 had diagnosis of acute cellular rejection with rejection activity index 5 or above; 49 from viral hepatitis patients were excluded. Twenty-eight were included; 15/28 (54%) had typical acute cellular rejection (tACR) using Banff criteria. Six (21%) had hepatitic acute cellular rejection overlapping with typical features of acute cellular rejection; seven (25%) had infiltrative acute cellular rejection (iACR) overlapping with typical features. The iACR occurred later than the tACR (124 versus 50 days; P=0.032) and had a higher rise in baseline aspartate aminotransferase (ΔAST) compared with tACR (289 U/l versus 109 U/l; P=0.046). Only one out of seven patients with iACR (14 versus 40% in tACR) failed Solu-Medrol boluses and required thymoglobulin. Patients with hepatitic acute cellular rejection (hACR) had similar ΔAST (P=0.12) but higher bilirubinemia than typical acute cellular rejection (tACR) (160 μmol/l versus 35 mol/l; P=0.039) and required thymoglobulin in four out of six (67% versus 40%) instances. Patients with iACR had higher ΔAST than tACR but better Solu-Medrol response compared with both tACR and hACR. hACR is different from plasma cell-rich late-occurring cellular rejection in its pattern but similar in its poor Solu-Medrol response.
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology | 2010
Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari; Ayman Al-Habeeb; Danny Ghazarian
A 71‐year‐old man presented with a slowly growing 2.0×2.0×1.0 cm scalp lesion that was surgically removed. Microscopic examination showed a well‐circumscribed dermally located tumor composed of ductal elements lined by double to multiple cell layers of bland cuboidal inner cells and elongated spindled outer cells with areas showing cribriform and solid growth patterns. Some cells showed prominent cytoplasmic clearing. A few mitotic figures are noted ranging from 1‐2 mitotic figure/10 hpf. There are also foci of squamous differentiation as well as occasional mature adipocytes. The background stroma was predominantly sclerotic with only small area of myxoid background (confirmed by Hales colloidal iron).