Sarah A. Bannon
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sarah A. Bannon.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Maureen E. Mork; Y. Nancy You; Jun Ying; Sarah A. Bannon; Patrick M. Lynch; Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas; Eduardo Vilar
PURPOSE Established guidelines recommend evaluation for hereditary cancer syndromes in patients younger than 50 years diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). This group has been well described in the literature; however, patients diagnosed as adolescents and young adults are not well represented in CRC studies. Here, we define the clinical profile, including the extent of hereditary cancer syndromes and family history of cancer, in patients diagnosed with CRC at age 35 or younger. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed patients who underwent genetic counseling at our institution during 5 years (2009 to 2013). Data were collected regarding demographics, clinicopathologic information, tumor and genetic testing, and family history. Patients with an identified hereditary cancer syndrome were compared with those without a syndrome. RESULTS Of the 193 patients with evaluable data, 35% had an identifiable hereditary cancer syndrome, including 23 with Lynch syndrome, 22 with mutation-negative Lynch syndrome, 16 with familial adenomatous polyposis, two with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency, two with biallelic MUTYH mutations, and one with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Patients without a hereditary syndrome more frequently presented with metastatic disease, whereas patients with a syndrome were more likely to present at earlier stages and to have a family history of cancer. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of the hereditary syndromes (19%) were diagnosed in individuals with no family history of the disease. CONCLUSION We conclude that patients diagnosed with CRC at age 35 years or younger should receive genetic counseling regardless of their family history and phenotype.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences | 2016
Sarah A. Bannon; Courtney D. DiNardo
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, bone marrow dysplasia, and peripheral cytopenias. Familial forms of MDS have traditionally been considered rare, especially in adults; however, the increasing availability of somatic and germline genetic analyses has identified multiple susceptibility loci. Bone marrow failure syndromes have been well-described in the pediatric setting, e.g., Fanconi anemia (FA), dyskeratosis congenita (DC), Diamond–Blackfan anemia (DBA), and Shwachman–Diamond syndrome (SBS), hallmarked by clinically-recognizable phenotypes (e.g., radial ray anomalies in FA) and significantly increased risks for MDS and/or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the setting of bone marrow failure. However, additional families with multiple cases of MDS or AML have long been reported in the medical literature with little known regarding potential hereditary etiologies. Over the last decade, genomic investigation of such families has revealed multiple genes conferring inherited risks for MDS and/or AML as the primary malignancy, including RUNX1, ANKRD26, DDX41, ETV6, GATA2, and SRP72. As these syndromes are increasingly appreciated in even apparently de novo presentations of MDS, it is important for hematologists/oncologists to become familiar with these newly-described syndromes. Herein, we provide a review of familial MDS syndromes and practical aspects of management in patients with predisposition syndromes.
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice | 2014
Sarah A. Bannon; Maureen E. Mork; Eduardo Vilar; Susan K. Peterson; Karen H. Lu; Patrick M. Lynch; Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas; YiQian Nancy You
BackgroundPatients with Lynch Syndrome, the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, benefit from genetic education and family counseling regarding diagnostic testing and cancer surveillance/prevention recommendations. Although genetic counseling is currently the most common venue where such education and counseling takes place, little is known about the level of disease knowledge and education needs as directly reported by patients and families with Lynch Syndrome. Furthermore, experiences with forums for larger-scale knowledge transfer have been limited in the current literature.MethodsWe conducted a one-day interactive multidisciplinary patient conference, designed to complement individual genetic counseling for updating disease knowledge, supportive networking and needs assessment among Lynch Syndrome patients and their family members. The patient conference was designed utilizing the conceptual framework of action research. Paired pre- and post-conference surveys were administered to 44 conference participants anonymously to assess patient-reported disease knowledge and education needs.ResultsA multidisciplinary team of expert providers utilized a variety of educational formats during the one-day conference. Four main focus areas were: genetic testing, surveillance/prevention, living with Lynch Syndrome, and update on research. Thirty-two participants (73%) completed the pre-conference, and 28 (64%) participants completed the post-conference surveys. Nineteen respondents were affected and the remaining were unaffected. The scores of the disease-knowledge items significantly increased from 84% pre- to 92% post-conference (p = 0.012). Patients reported a high level of satisfaction and identified further knowledge needs in nutrition (71%), surveillance/prevention options (71%), support groups (36%), cancer risk assessment (32%), active role in medical care (32%), and research opportunities (5%).ConclusionOur experience with a dedicated patient education conference focused on Lynch Syndrome demonstrated that such an educational format is effective for updating or reinforcing disease knowledge, for identifying patient-reported unmet educational needs, as well as for peer-support.
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics | 2014
Eduardo Vilar; Maureen E. Mork; Amanda Cuddy; Ester Borras; Sarah A. Bannon; Melissa W. Taggart; Jun Ying; Russell Broaddus; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas; Patrick M. Lynch; Yi Qian Nancy You
Lynch syndrome is the most common Mendelian disorder predisposing persons to hereditary colorectal cancer. Carriers of MSH6 mutations constitute less than 10% of the total of cases with Lynch syndrome and present with a weaker clinical phenotype, including low levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-L) in colorectal tumors. The frequency of MSH6 mutation carriers among patients presenting with MSI-L colorectal cancer has yet to be determined, as has the appropriate genetic workup in this context. We have reviewed here the clinicopathologic characteristics, immunohistochemistry, and genetic testing results for 71 patients at a single institution diagnosed with MSI-L colorectal cancers. Of 71 patients with MSI-L tumors, 21 underwent genetic testing for MSH6 mutations, three of whom presented with loss of staining of MSH6 and only one of whom carried a pathogenic germline MSH6 mutation in exon 4 (c.2677_2678delCT; p.Leu893Alafs*6). This latter patient had a significant family history of cancer and had a rectal primary tumor that showed instability only in mononucleotide markers. In this cohort of MSI-L patients, we detected no notable clinicopathologic or molecular characteristic that would help to distinguish a group most likely to harbor germline MSH6 mutations. Therefore, we conclude that the prevalence of MSH6 mutations among patients with MSI-L tumors is very low. Microsatellite instability analysis combined with immunohistochemistry of mismatch repair proteins adequately detects potential MSH6 mutation carriers among MSI-L colorectal cancers.
Familial Cancer | 2016
Maureen E. Mork; Ester Borras; Melissa W. Taggart; Amanda Cuddy; Sarah A. Bannon; Y. Nancy You; Patrick M. Lynch; Pedro T. Ramirez; Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas; Eduardo Vilar
Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) is a rare autosomal recessive predisposition to colorectal polyposis and other malignancies, often childhood-onset, that is caused by biallelic inheritance of mutations in the same mismatch repair gene. Here, we describe a patient with a clinical diagnosis of CMMRD based on colorectal polyposis and young-onset endometrial cancer who was identified to have two alterations in trans in PMS2: one known pathogenic mutation (c.1831insA; p.Ile611Asnfs*2) and one novel variant of uncertain significance (c.505C>G; p.Arg169Glu), a missense alteration. We describe the clinical and molecular features in the patient harboring this novel alteration c.505C>G, who meets clinical criteria for CMMRD and exhibits molecular evidence supporting a diagnosis of CMMRD. Although experimental validation is needed to confirm its pathogenicity, PMS2 c.505C>G likely has functional consequences that contributes to our patient’s phenotype based on the patient’s clinical presentation, tumor studies, and bioinformatics analysis.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2017
Jennifer Brooke Goldstein; William Wu; Ester Borras; Gita Masand; Amanda Cuddy; Maureen E. Mork; Sarah A. Bannon; Patrick M. Lynch; Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas; Melissa W. Taggart; Ji Wu; Paul Scheet; Scott Kopetz; Y. Nancy You; Eduardo Vilar
Purpose: Determination of microsatellite instability (MSI) by PCR is the gold standard; however, IHC of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins is frequently performed instead. The reliability of these methods on postneoadjuvant therapy specimens is unknown. We examined the effect of neoadjuvant therapy on MSI results by PCR and IHC. Experimental design: A total of 239 colorectal cancers resected after neoadjuvant therapy were assessed for MSI with PCR and IHC. PCR and IHC results for matched paired pre- and posttreatment specimens were compared. In parallel, 2 isogenic cell lines conditioned for MMR functioning and 2 different patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) were exposed to chemotherapy, radiation, or both. We also examined whether establishment of PDXs induced MSI changes in 5 tumors. IHC and MSI were tested after treatment to assess for changes. Results: We identified paired pre- and posttreatment specimens for 37 patients: 2 with PCR only, 34 with IHC only, and 1 with both. All 3 patients with PCR had microsatellite stable pre- and posttreatment specimens. Of the 35 patients with IHC, 30 had intact MMR proteins in pre- and posttreatment specimens, 1 had equivocal MLH1 staining in the pretreatment and loss in the posttreatment specimen, and 4 had intact pretreatment MSH6 but variable posttreatment staining. In the experimental setting, no changes in MSI status were detected after treatment or tumor implantation in animals. Conclusions: Our findings show that the expression of MMR proteins, commonly MSH6, can change after neoadjuvant therapy and confirm PCR as the gold-standard test for MSI after neoadjuvant therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(17); 5246–54. ©2017 AACR.
Cancer Prevention Research | 2017
Ester Borras; Kyle Chang; Mala Pande; Amanda Cuddy; Jennifer L. Bosch; Sarah A. Bannon; Maureen E. Mork; Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas; Melissa W. Taggart; Patrick M. Lynch; Y. Nancy You; Eduardo Vilar
Lynch syndrome (LS) is a genetic condition secondary to germline alterations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes with 30% of changes being variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Our aim was to perform an in silico reclassification of VUS from a large single institutional cohort that will help prioritizing functional validation. A total of 54 VUS were detected with 33 (61%) novel variants. We integrated family history, pathology, and genetic information along with supporting evidence from eight different in silico tools at the RNA and protein level. Our assessment allowed us to reclassify 54% (29/54) of the VUS as probably damaging, 13% (7/54) as possibly damaging, and 28% (15/54) as probably neutral. There are more than 1,000 VUS reported in MMR genes and our approach facilitates the prioritization of further functional efforts to assess the pathogenicity to those classified as probably damaging. Cancer Prev Res; 10(10); 580–7. ©2017 AACR.
Familial Cancer | 2017
Maureen E. Mork; Andrea Rodriguez; Melissa W. Taggart; Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas; Patrick M. Lynch; Sarah A. Bannon; Y. Nancy You; Eduardo Vilar
Traditional germline sequencing and deletion/duplication analysis does not detect Lynch syndrome-causing mutations in all individuals whose colorectal or endometrial tumors demonstrate mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. Unique inversions and other rearrangements of the MMR genes have been reported in families with Lynch syndrome. In 2014, a recurrent inversion of MSH2 exons 1–7 was identified in five families suspected to have Lynch syndrome. We aimed to describe our clinical experience in identifying families with this specific inversion. Four probands whose Lynch syndrome-associated tumors demonstrated absence of MSH2/MSH6 staining and who had negative MMR germline testing were evaluated for the MSH2 inversion of exons 1–7, offered during initial genetic workup or upon routine clinical follow-up. All four probands tested positive for the MSH2 inversion. Proband cancer diagnoses included colon and endometrial adenocarcinoma and sebaceous adenoma. A variety of Lynch syndrome-associated cancers were reported in the family histories, although only one family met Amsterdam II criteria. Thirteen at-risk relatives underwent predictive testing. MSH2 inversion of exons 1–7 was found in four probands previously suspected to have Lynch syndrome based on family history and tumor testing. This testing should be offered routinely to patients with tumors demonstrating loss of MSH2/MSH6 staining.
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics | 2017
Annette Y. Sunga; Charite Ricker; Carin R. Espenschied; Danielle Castillo; Marilena Melas; Josef Herzog; Sarah A. Bannon; Marcia Cruz-Correa; Patrick M. Lynch; Ilana Solomon; Stephen B. Gruber; Jeffrey N. Weitzel
Lynch syndrome (LS), the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, is caused by mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations. However, data about MMR mutations in Hispanics are limited. This study aims to describe the spectrum of MMR mutations in Hispanics with LS and explore ancestral origins. This case series involved an IRB-approved retrospective chart review of self-identified Hispanic patients (n = 397) seen for genetic cancer risk assessment at four collaborating academic institutions in California, Texas, and Puerto Rico who were evaluated by MMR genotyping and/or tumor analysis. A literature review was conducted for all mutations identified. Of those who underwent clinical genetic testing (n = 176), 71 had MMR gene mutations. Nine mutations were observed more than once. One third (3/9) of recurrent mutations and two additional mutations (seen only once) were previously reported in Spain, confirming the influence of Spanish ancestry on MMR mutations in Hispanic populations. The recurrent mutations identified (n = 9) included both previously reported mutations as well as unique mutations not in the literature. This is the largest report of Hispanic MMR mutations in North America; however, a larger sample and haplotype analyses are needed to better understand recurrent MMR mutations in Hispanic populations.
Cancer | 2018
Courtney D. DiNardo; Mark Routbort; Sarah A. Bannon; Christopher B. Benton; Koichi Takahashi; Steve Kornblau; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; L. Jeffrey Medeiros; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop M. Kantarjian; P. Andrew Futreal; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Keyur P. Patel
Recognizing and referring patients with possible inherited cancer predisposition syndromes for appropriate genetic evaluation and testing provides insights into optimal patient treatment approaches and also can provide education and testing opportunities for family members. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based, targeted genotyping for somatic mutations is increasingly used in the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment selection for patients with hematologic malignancies. However, certain mutations that may be somatically acquired can also be present as germline mutations in some individuals and families. Whether the results of NGS‐based leukemia panels can be used to inform decisions and subsequent evaluation of patients with possible inherited cancer predispositions has not been described previously. Because a normal control often is not available when using NGS panels in patients with hematologic malignancies, NGS panel results offer both an opportunity and a challenge to determine the origin and pathogenicity of identified mutations. In the absence of a matched germline control, variant allele frequency (VAF) estimation and data from publically available data sets provide important clues to the possible germline origin of a variant. Careful annotation and review of NGS panels in patients with hematologic malignancies can provide a useful screening tool to systematically improve upon the detection of potentially pathogenic germline variants. Cancer 2018;124:2704‐2713.