Sarah Bowdin
University of Toronto
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sarah Bowdin.
Genetics in Medicine | 2014
Gretchen MacCarrick; James H. Black; Sarah Bowdin; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Pamela A. Frischmeyer-Guerrerio; Anthony L. Guerrerio; Paul D. Sponseller; Bart Loeys; Harry C. Dietz
Loeys–Dietz syndrome is a connective tissue disorder predisposing individuals to aortic and arterial aneurysms. Presenting with a wide spectrum of multisystem involvement, medical management for some individuals is complex. This review of literature and expert opinion aims to provide medical guidelines for care of individuals with Loeys–Dietz syndrome.Genet Med 16 8, 576–587.Genetics in Medicine (2014); 16 8, 576–587. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.11
Human Mutation | 2013
Marta Girdea; Sergiu Dumitriu; Marc Fiume; Sarah Bowdin; Kym M. Boycott; Sébastien Chénier; David Chitayat; Hanna Faghfoury; M. Stephen Meyn; Peter N. Ray; Joyce So; Dimitri J. Stavropoulos; Michael Brudno
We have developed PhenoTips: open source software for collecting and analyzing phenotypic information for patients with genetic disorders. Our software combines an easy‐to‐use interface, compatible with any device that runs a Web browser, with a standardized database back end. The PhenoTips’ user interface closely mirrors clinician workflows so as to facilitate the recording of observations made during the patient encounter. Collected data include demographics, medical history, family history, physical and laboratory measurements, physical findings, and additional notes. Phenotypic information is represented using the Human Phenotype Ontology; however, the complexity of the ontology is hidden behind a user interface, which combines simple selection of common phenotypes with error‐tolerant, predictive search of the entire ontology. PhenoTips supports accurate diagnosis by analyzing the entered data, then suggesting additional clinical investigations and providing Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) links to likely disorders. By collecting, classifying, and analyzing phenotypic information during the patient encounter, PhenoTips allows for streamlining of clinic workflow, efficient data entry, improved diagnosis, standardization of collected patient phenotypes, and sharing of anonymized patient phenotype data for the study of rare disorders. Our source code and a demo version of PhenoTips are available at http://phenotips.org.
npj Genomic Medicine | 2016
Dimitri J. Stavropoulos; Daniele Merico; Rebekah Jobling; Sarah Bowdin; Nasim Monfared; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Thomas Nalpathamkalam; Giovanna Pellecchia; Ryan Kc C. Yuen; Michael J. Szego; Robin Z. Hayeems; Randi Zlotnik Shaul; Michael Brudno; Marta Girdea; Brendan J. Frey; Babak Alipanahi; Sohnee Ahmed; Riyana Babul-Hirji; Ramses Badilla Porras; Melissa T. Carter; Lauren Chad; Ayeshah Chaudhry; David Chitayat; Soghra Jougheh Doust; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; Lucie Dupuis; Resham Ejaz; Leona Fishman; Andrea Guerin; Bita Hashemi
The standard of care for first-tier clinical investigation of the aetiology of congenital malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders is chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) for copy-number variations (CNVs), often followed by gene(s)-specific sequencing searching for smaller insertion–deletions (indels) and single-nucleotide variant (SNV) mutations. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has the potential to capture all classes of genetic variation in one experiment; however, the diagnostic yield for mutation detection of WGS compared to CMA, and other tests, needs to be established. In a prospective study we utilised WGS and comprehensive medical annotation to assess 100 patients referred to a paediatric genetics service and compared the diagnostic yield versus standard genetic testing. WGS identified genetic variants meeting clinical diagnostic criteria in 34% of cases, representing a fourfold increase in diagnostic rate over CMA (8%; P value=1.42E−05) alone and more than twofold increase in CMA plus targeted gene sequencing (13%; P value=0.0009). WGS identified all rare clinically significant CNVs that were detected by CMA. In 26 patients, WGS revealed indel and missense mutations presenting in a dominant (63%) or a recessive (37%) manner. We found four subjects with mutations in at least two genes associated with distinct genetic disorders, including two cases harbouring a pathogenic CNV and SNV. When considering medically actionable secondary findings in addition to primary WGS findings, 38% of patients would benefit from genetic counselling. Clinical implementation of WGS as a primary test will provide a higher diagnostic yield than conventional genetic testing and potentially reduce the time required to reach a genetic diagnosis.
Genetics in Medicine | 2016
Sarah Bowdin; Adel Gilbert; Emma C. Bedoukian; Christopher Carew; Adam Mp; John W. Belmont; Barbara A. Bernhardt; Leslie G. Biesecker; Hans T. Bjornsson; Miriam G. Blitzer; Lisa D'Alessandro; Matthew A. Deardorff; Laurie A. Demmer; Alison M. Elliott; Gerald L. Feldman; Ian A. Glass; Gail E. Herman; Lucia A. Hindorff; Fuki M. Hisama; Louanne Hudgins; A. Micheil Innes; Laird G. Jackson; Gail Jarvik; Raymond Kim; Bruce R. Korf; David H. Ledbetter; Mindy Li; Eriskay Liston; Christian R. Marshall; Livija Medne
The introduction of diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) is changing the scope of practice for clinical geneticists. Many large institutions are making a significant investment in infrastructure and technology, allowing clinicians to access CGES, especially as health-care coverage begins to extend to clinically indicated genomic sequencing-based tests. Translating and realizing the comprehensive clinical benefits of genomic medicine remain a key challenge for the current and future care of patients. With the increasing application of CGES, it is necessary for geneticists and other health-care providers to understand its benefits and limitations in order to interpret the clinical relevance of genomic variants identified in the context of health and disease. New, collaborative working relationships with specialists across diverse disciplines (e.g., clinicians, laboratorians, bioinformaticians) will undoubtedly be key attributes of the future practice of clinical genetics and may serve as an example for other specialties in medicine. These new skills and relationships will also inform the development of the future model of clinical genetics training curricula. To address the evolving role of the clinical geneticist in the rapidly changing climate of genomic medicine, two Clinical Genetics Think Tank meetings were held that brought together physicians, laboratorians, scientists, genetic counselors, trainees, and patients with experience in clinical genetics, genetic diagnostics, and genetics education. This article provides recommendations that will guide the integration of genomics into clinical practice.Genet Med 18 11, 1075–1084.
Genetics in Medicine | 2017
Anath C. Lionel; Gregory Costain; Nasim Monfared; Susan Walker; Miriam S. Reuter; S. Mohsen Hosseini; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Daniele Merico; Rebekah Jobling; Thomas Nalpathamkalam; Giovanna Pellecchia; Wilson W L Sung; Z. B. Wang; Peter Bikangaga; Cyrus Boelman; Melissa T. Carter; Dawn Cordeiro; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; Sharon D. Dell; Priya Dhir; James J. Dowling; Elise Héon; Stacy Hewson; Linda Hiraki; Michal Inbar-Feigenberg; Regan Klatt; Jonathan Kronick; Ronald M Laxer; Christoph Licht; Heather MacDonald
PurposeGenetic testing is an integral diagnostic component of pediatric medicine. Standard of care is often a time-consuming stepwise approach involving chromosomal microarray analysis and targeted gene sequencing panels, which can be costly and inconclusive. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides a comprehensive testing platform that has the potential to streamline genetic assessments, but there are limited comparative data to guide its clinical use.MethodsWe prospectively recruited 103 patients from pediatric non-genetic subspecialty clinics, each with a clinical phenotype suggestive of an underlying genetic disorder, and compared the diagnostic yield and coverage of WGS with those of conventional genetic testing.ResultsWGS identified diagnostic variants in 41% of individuals, representing a significant increase over conventional testing results (24%; P = 0.01). Genes clinically sequenced in the cohort (n = 1,226) were well covered by WGS, with a median exonic coverage of 40 × ±8 × (mean ±SD). All the molecular diagnoses made by conventional methods were captured by WGS. The 18 new diagnoses made with WGS included structural and non-exonic sequence variants not detectable with whole-exome sequencing, and confirmed recent disease associations with the genes PIGG, RNU4ATAC, TRIO, and UNC13A.ConclusionWGS as a primary clinical test provided a higher diagnostic yield than conventional genetic testing in a clinically heterogeneous cohort.
Human Mutation | 2014
Sarah Bowdin; Peter N. Ray; Ronald D. Cohn; M. Stephen Meyn
Our increasing knowledge of how genomic variants affect human health and the falling costs of whole‐genome sequencing are driving the development of individualized genetic medicine. This new clinical paradigm uses knowledge of an individuals genomic variants to guide health care decisions throughout life, to anticipate, diagnose, and manage disease. While individualized genetic medicine offers the promise of transformative change in health care, it forces us to reconsider existing ethical, scientific, and clinical paradigms. The potential benefits of presymptomatic identification of at risk individuals, improved diagnostics, individualized therapy, accurate prognosis, and avoidance of adverse drug reactions coexist with the potential risks of uninterpretable results, psychological harm, outmoded counseling models, and increased health care costs. Here, we review the challenges of integrating genomic analysis into clinical practice and describe a prototype for implementing genetic medicine. Our multidisciplinary team of bioinformaticians, health economists, ethicists, geneticists, genetic counselors, and clinicians has designed a “Genome Clinic” research project that addresses multiple challenges in genomic medicine—ranging from the development of bioinformatics tools for the clinical assessment of genomic variants and the discovery of disease genes to health policy inquiries, assessment of clinical care models, patient preference, and the ethics of consent.
Clinical Genetics | 2015
J.A. Anderson; Robin Z. Hayeems; Cheryl Shuman; Michael J. Szego; Nasim Monfared; Sarah Bowdin; R. Zlotnik Shaul; MStephen Meyn
The publication of the ACMG recommendations has reignited the debate over predictive testing for adult‐onset disorders in minors. Response has been polarized. With this in mind, we review and critically analyze this debate. First, we identify long‐standing inconsistencies between consensus guidelines and clinical practice regarding risk assessment for adult‐onset genetic disorders in children using family history and molecular analysis. Second, we discuss the disparate assumptions regarding the nature of whole genome and exome sequencing underlying arguments of both supporters and critics, and the role these assumptions play in the arguments for and against reporting. Third, we suggest that implicit differences regarding the definition of best interests of the child underlie disparate conclusions as to the best interests of children in this context. We conclude by calling for clarity and consensus concerning the central foci of this debate.
Genetics in Medicine | 2016
Lisa Ca D’Alessandro; Saeed Al Turki; Ashok Kumar Manickaraj; Dorin Manase; Barbara J.M. Mulder; Lynn Bergin; Herschel C. Rosenberg; Tapas Mondal; Elaine Gordon; Jane Lougheed; John Smythe; Koen Devriendt; Shoumo Bhattacharya; Hugh Watkins; Jamie Bentham; Sarah Bowdin; Seema Mital
Purpose:The genetic etiology of atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) is unknown in 40% cases. Conventional sequencing and arrays have identified the etiology in only a minority of nonsyndromic individuals with AVSD.Methods:Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 81 unrelated probands with AVSD to identify potentially causal variants in a comprehensive set of 112 genes with strong biological relevance to AVSD.Results:A significant enrichment of rare and rare damaging variants was identified in the gene set, compared with controls (odds ratio (OR): 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35–1.71; P = 4.8 × 10−11). The enrichment was specific to AVSD probands, compared with a cohort without AVSD with tetralogy of Fallot (OR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.84–2.76; P = 2.2 × 10−16). Six genes (NIPBL, CHD7, CEP152, BMPR1a, ZFPM2, and MDM4) were enriched for rare variants in AVSD compared with controls, including three syndrome-associated genes (NIPBL, CHD7, and CEP152). The findings were confirmed in a replication cohort of 81 AVSD probands.Conclusion:Mutations in genes with strong biological relevance to AVSD, including syndrome-associated genes, can contribute to AVSD, even in those with isolated heart disease. The identification of a gene set associated with AVSD will facilitate targeted genetic screening in this cohort.Genet Med 18 2, 189–198.
Clinical Genetics | 2016
Sarah Bowdin; Robin Z. Hayeems; Nasim Monfared; Ronald D. Cohn; MStephen Meyn
Our increasing knowledge of how genomic variants affect human health and the falling costs of whole‐genome sequencing are driving the development of individualized genomic medicine. This new clinical paradigm uses knowledge of an individuals genomic variants to anticipate, diagnose and manage disease. While individualized genetic medicine offers the promise of transformative change in health care, it forces us to reconsider existing ethical, scientific and clinical paradigms. The potential benefits of pre‐symptomatic identification of at‐risk individuals, improved diagnostics, individualized therapy, accurate prognosis and avoidance of adverse drug reactions coexist with the potential risks of uninterpretable results, psychological harm, outmoded counseling models and increased health care costs. Here we review the challenges, opportunities and limits of integrating genomic analysis into pediatric clinical practice and describe a model for implementing individualized genomic medicine. Our multidisciplinary team of bioinformaticians, health economists, health services and policy researchers, ethicists, geneticists, genetic counselors and clinicians has designed a ‘Genome Clinic’ research project that addresses multiple challenges in pediatric genomic medicine – ranging from development of bioinformatics tools for the clinical assessment of genomic variants and the discovery of disease genes to health policy inquiries, assessment of clinical care models, patient preference and the ethics of consent.
Annals of Neurology | 2014
Andrea K. Vaags; Sarah Bowdin; Mary Lou Smith; Brigitte Gilbert-Dussardier; Katja S. Brocke-Holmefjord; Katia Sinopoli; Cindy Gilles; Tove B. Haaland; Catherine Vincent-Delorme; Emmanuelle Lagrue; Radu Harbuz; Susan Walker; Christian R. Marshall; Gunnar Houge; Vera M. Kalscheuer; Stephen W. Scherer; Berge A. Minassian
Synaptic function is central to brain function. Understanding the synapse is aided by studies of patients lacking individual synaptic proteins. Common neurological diseases are genetically complex. Their understanding is likewise simplified by studies of less common monogenic forms. We detail the disease caused by absence of the synaptic protein CNKSR2 in 8 patients ranging from 6 to 62 years old. The disease is characterized by intellectual disability, attention problems, and abrupt lifelong language loss following a brief early childhood epilepsy with continuous spike‐waves in sleep. This study describes the phenotype of CNKSR2 deficiency and its involvement in systems underlying common neurological disorders. Ann Neurol 2014;76:758–764