Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sarah E. Johnstone is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sarah E. Johnstone.


Cell | 2005

Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells.

Laurie A. Boyer; Tong Ihn Lee; Megan F. Cole; Sarah E. Johnstone; Stuart S. Levine; Jacob P. Zucker; Matthew G. Guenther; Roshan M. Kumar; Heather L. Murray; Richard G. Jenner; David K. Gifford; Douglas A. Melton; Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard A. Young

The transcription factors OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG have essential roles in early development and are required for the propagation of undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells in culture. To gain insights into transcriptional regulation of human ES cells, we have identified OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG target genes using genome-scale location analysis. We found, surprisingly, that OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG co-occupy a substantial portion of their target genes. These target genes frequently encode transcription factors, many of which are developmentally important homeodomain proteins. Our data also indicate that OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG collaborate to form regulatory circuitry consisting of autoregulatory and feedforward loops. These results provide new insights into the transcriptional regulation of stem cells and reveal how OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG contribute to pluripotency and self-renewal.


Cell | 2006

Control of Developmental Regulators by Polycomb in Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Tong Ihn Lee; Richard G. Jenner; Laurie A. Boyer; Matthew G. Guenther; Stuart S. Levine; Roshan M. Kumar; Brett Chevalier; Sarah E. Johnstone; Megan F. Cole; Kyoichi Isono; Haruhiko Koseki; Takuya Fuchikami; Kuniya Abe; Heather L. Murray; Jacob P. Zucker; Bingbing Yuan; George W. Bell; Elizabeth Herbolsheimer; Nancy M. Hannett; Kaiming Sun; Duncan T. Odom; Arie P. Otte; Thomas L. Volkert; David P. Bartel; Douglas A. Melton; David K. Gifford; Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard A. Young

Polycomb group proteins are essential for early development in metazoans, but their contributions to human development are not well understood. We have mapped the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) subunit SUZ12 across the entire nonrepeat portion of the genome in human embryonic stem (ES) cells. We found that SUZ12 is distributed across large portions of over two hundred genes encoding key developmental regulators. These genes are occupied by nucleosomes trimethylated at histone H3K27, are transcriptionally repressed, and contain some of the most highly conserved noncoding elements in the genome. We found that PRC2 target genes are preferentially activated during ES cell differentiation and that the ES cell regulators OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG cooccupy a significant subset of these genes. These results indicate that PRC2 occupies a special set of developmental genes in ES cells that must be repressed to maintain pluripotency and that are poised for activation during ES cell differentiation.


Cell | 2008

Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells

Alexander Marson; Stuart S. Levine; Megan F. Cole; Garrett M. Frampton; Tobias Brambrink; Sarah E. Johnstone; Matthew G. Guenther; Wendy K. Johnston; Marius Wernig; Jamie J. Newman; J. Mauro Calabrese; Lucas M. Dennis; Thomas L. Volkert; Sumeet Gupta; Jennifer Love; Nancy M. Hannett; Phillip A. Sharp; David P. Bartel; Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard A. Young

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are crucial for normal embryonic stem (ES) cell self-renewal and cellular differentiation, but how miRNA gene expression is controlled by the key transcriptional regulators of ES cells has not been established. We describe here the transcriptional regulatory circuitry of ES cells that incorporates protein-coding and miRNA genes based on high-resolution ChIP-seq data, systematic identification of miRNA promoters, and quantitative sequencing of short transcripts in multiple cell types. We find that the key ES cell transcription factors are associated with promoters for miRNAs that are preferentially expressed in ES cells and with promoters for a set of silent miRNA genes. This silent set of miRNA genes is co-occupied by Polycomb group proteins in ES cells and shows tissue-specific expression in differentiated cells. These data reveal how key ES cell transcription factors promote the ES cell miRNA expression program and integrate miRNAs into the regulatory circuitry controlling ES cell identity.


Nature Protocols | 2006

Chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarray-based analysis of protein location

Tong Ihn Lee; Sarah E. Johnstone; Richard A. Young

Genome-wide location analysis, also known as ChIP-Chip, combines chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA microarray analysis to identify protein-DNA interactions that occur in living cells. Protein-DNA interactions are captured in vivo by chemical crosslinking. Cell lysis, DNA fragmentation and immunoaffinity purification of the desired protein will co-purify DNA fragments that are associated with that protein. The enriched DNA population is then labeled, combined with a differentially labeled reference sample and applied to DNA microarrays to detect enriched signals. Various computational and bioinformatic approaches are then applied to normalize the enriched and reference channels, to connect signals to the portions of the genome that are represented on the DNA microarrays, to provide confidence metrics and to generate maps of protein-genome occupancy. Here, we describe the experimental protocols that we use from crosslinking of cells to hybridization of labeled material, together with insights into the aspects of these protocols that influence the results. These protocols require approximately 1 week to complete once sufficient numbers of cells have been obtained, and have been used to produce robust, high-quality ChIP-chip results in many different cell and tissue types.


Genes & Development | 2008

Tcf3 is an integral component of the core regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells.

Megan F. Cole; Sarah E. Johnstone; Jamie J. Newman; Michael H. Kagey; Richard A. Young

Embryonic stem (ES) cells have a unique regulatory circuitry, largely controlled by the transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog, which generates a gene expression program necessary for pluripotency and self-renewal. How external signals connect to this regulatory circuitry to influence ES cell fate is not known. We report here that a terminal component of the canonical Wnt pathway in ES cells, the transcription factor T-cell factor-3 (Tcf3), co-occupies promoters throughout the genome in association with the pluripotency regulators Oct4 and Nanog. Thus, Tcf3 is an integral component of the core regulatory circuitry of ES cells, which includes an autoregulatory loop involving the pluripotency regulators. Both Tcf3 depletion and Wnt pathway activation cause increased expression of Oct4, Nanog, and other pluripotency factors and produce ES cells that are refractory to differentiation. Our results suggest that the Wnt pathway, through Tcf3, brings developmental signals directly to the core regulatory circuitry of ES cells to influence the balance between pluripotency and differentiation.


bioRxiv | 2017

Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains, Leading To Links Among Superenhancers And Downregulation Of Nearby Genes

Suhas S.P. Rao; Su-Chen Huang; Brian Glenn St Hilaire; Jesse M. Engreitz; Elizabeth M. Perez; Kyong-Rim Kieffer-Kwon; Adrian L. Sanborn; Sarah E. Johnstone; Ivan D. Bochkov; Xingfan Huang; Muhammad S. Shamim; Arina D. Omer; Bradley E. Bernstein; Rafael Casellas; Eric S. Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden

The human genome folds to create thousands of intervals, called “contact domains,” that exhibit enhanced contact frequency within themselves. “Loop domains” form because of tethering between two loci - almost always bound by CTCF and cohesin – lying on the same chromosome. “Compartment domains” form when genomic intervals with similar histone marks co-segregate. Here, we explore the effects of degrading cohesin. All loop domains are eliminated, but neither compartment domains nor histone marks are affected. Loci in different compartments that had been in the same loop domain become more segregated. Loss of loop domains does not lead to widespread ectopic gene activation, but does affect a significant minority of active genes. In particular, cohesin loss causes superenhancers to co-localize, forming hundreds of links within and across chromosomes, and affecting the regulation of nearby genes. Cohesin restoration quickly reverses these effects, consistent with a model where loop extrusion is rapid.


Cancer Research | 2018

Abstract 2996: Insulator dysfunction and epigenetic oncogene activation in SDH-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumor

William A. Flavahan; Yotam Drier; Sarah E. Johnstone; Daniel Tarjan; Esmat Hegazi; Ewa Sicinska; Matthew L. Hemming; Chandrajit P. Raut; Jason L. Hornick; George D. Demetri; Bradley E. Bernstein

Metabolic lesions with profound effects on epigenetic regulation are widely implicated in cancer, yet the mechanistic links between this epigenetic dysregulation and tumorigenesis remain unclear. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) deficiency, responsible for a subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), causes accumulation of the metabolite succinate and DNA hypermethylation. We identified convergent mechanisms involving altered chromosomal conformation and pseudo-hypoxia that mediate the tumorigenic effects of SDH deficiency in GIST. To investigate epigenetic alterations in this disease, we created epigenetic maps of 14 clinical GIST specimens; including KIT and PDGFRA mutant, and SDH-deficient tumors. We characterized the landscapes of enhancers, genetic regulatory elements which can drive gene expression, through histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq). We characterized both the DNA methylation and CTCF occupancy of insulators, elements which help control chromatin conformation and restrict enhancer-gene interactions, through hybrid selection bisulfite sequencing and CTCF ChIP-seq, respectively. Analyzing these data, we uncovered thousands of putative insulators where DNA methylation replaced CTCF binding in SDH-deficient GISTs. One of the strongest disrupted insulators protected the receptor tyrosine kinase and known driver of GIST, c-KIT, from a nearby superenhancer. Chromatin conformation studies confirmed an SDH-deficient-specific interaction of this superenhancer with the KIT gene. CRISPR-mediated excision of the insulator in an SDH-intact GIST model resulted in enhancer interaction and KIT upregulation. Immunohistochemical studies confirm strong expression of c-KIT in SDH-deficient GIST clinical samples. SDH deficiency has also been reported to cause pseudohypoxia in tumors. We confirmed that the enhancer landscape of SDH-deficient tumors had a signature of pseudohypoxia. Additionally, following pseudohypoxia induction in a SDH-intact GIST model, the c-KIT ligand Stem Cell Factor (SCF/KITLG) was upregulated 12-fold. While activating KIT mutations drive the majority (~75%) of GIST tumors and are mutually exclusive with SDH deficiency, we show that a primary consequence of SDH loss is in fact induction of KIT signaling. Our findings demonstrate how metabolic lesions can provide alternate epigenetic mechanisms to activate classic tumorigenic pathways in the absence of canonical genetic mutations. Citation Format: William A. Flavahan, Yotam Drier, Sarah E. Johnstone, Daniel R. Tarjan, Esmat Hegazi, Ewa T. Sicinska, Matthew L. Hemming, Chandrajit P. Raut, Jason L. Hornick, George D. Demetri, Bradley E. Bernstein. Insulator dysfunction and epigenetic oncogene activation in SDH-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2996.


Cancer Research | 2011

Abstract LB-174: A DNA hypermethylation module for the stem/progenitor cell signature of cancer

Hariharan Easwaran; Sarah E. Johnstone; Leander Van Neste; Joyce E. Ohm; Tim Mosbruger; Martin J. Aryee; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; William Matsui; Stephen B. Baylin

It has been firmly established that cancer gene expression partly mimics the gene expression signature in embryonic stem cells (ESC). Since most cancers arise in adult stem or progenitor cells, rather than ESC, we now compare cancer chromatin to both embryonic and adult cell renewal systems to understand the relationships between DNA hypermethylation, gene expression, and chromatin states. DNA hypermethylation at CpG island promoters of hundreds of genes, including classic tumor suppressors, is a major modulator of gene expression in human cancers. Past studies suggest ∼ 50% of these are frequently marked by polycomb complex (PcG) transcriptional repressors, but not DNA methylation, in embryonic stem cells (ESC). In ESC, PcG occupancy is predominantly in the context of “bivalent chromatin”, wherein the active transcription mark H3K4me3 and the repressive PcG mark H3K27me3 are simultaneously present. Genes so marked are in a low, but poised, transcription state important for stemness and self-renewal, characteristics shared with tumor cells. Using whole genome ChIP-seq and DNA methylation arrays, we find between 70 to 80% of genes with DNA hypermethylation in cancer have bivalent chromatin not only in ESC, but also in adult stem cells. For these genes, there appears to be an epigenetic switch in cancer wherein bivalent chromatin is replaced by DNA hypermethylation resulting in tighter repression of gene expression. Many of these DNA methylated cancer genes are constituents of the recently proposed “PRC module” of the “ESC cancer signature.” Our data suggest a “DNA methylation module” that recapitulates the “stem cell signature” and that DNA hypermethylation may be a key mechanism that confers cell-renewal and stemness to tumor cells. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-174. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-LB-174


Science | 2001

Gene Families from the Arabidopsis thaliana Pollen Coat Proteome

Jacob A. Mayfield; Aretha Fiebig; Sarah E. Johnstone; Daphne Preuss


Genome Research | 2012

A DNA hypermethylation module for the stem/progenitor cell signature of cancer

Hariharan Easwaran; Sarah E. Johnstone; Leander Van Neste; Joyce E. Ohm; Tim Mosbruger; Qiuju Wang; Martin J. Aryee; Patrick Joyce; Nita Ahuja; Daniel J. Weisenberger; Eric A. Collisson; Jingchun Zhu; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; William Matsui; Stephen B. Baylin

Collaboration


Dive into the Sarah E. Johnstone's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard A. Young

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Megan F. Cole

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew G. Guenther

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rudolf Jaenisch

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stuart S. Levine

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tong Ihn Lee

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arina D. Omer

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge