Sarah J. Finlayson

A brief mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral intervention improves sexual functioning versus wait-list control in women treated for gynecologic cancer

GOAL The goal of this study was to evaluate a mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral intervention for sexual dysfunction in gynecologic cancer survivors compared to a wait-list control group. METHODS Thirty-one survivors of endometrial or cervical cancer (mean age 54.0, range 31-64) who self-reported significant and distressing sexual desire and/or sexual arousal concerns were assigned either to three, 90-minute mindfulness-based cognitive behavior therapy sessions or two months of wait-list control prior to entering the treatment arm. Validated measures of sexual response, sexual distress, and mood, as well as laboratory-evoked physiological and subjective sexual arousal were assessed at pre-, one month post-, and 6-months following treatment. RESULTS There were no significant effects of the wait-list condition on any measure. Treatment led to significant improvements in all domains of sexual response, and a trend towards significance for reducing sexual distress. Perception of genital arousal during an erotic film was also significantly increased following the intervention despite no change in physiologically-measured sexual arousal. CONCLUSIONS A brief mindfulness-based intervention was effective for improving sexual functioning. Geographic restrictions permitted only a select sample of survivors to participate, thus, the generalizability of the findings is limited. Future studies should aim to develop online modalities for treatment administration to overcome this limitation.

Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the uptake and perioperative safety of bilateral salpingectomy (BS) as an ovarian cancer risk-reduction strategy in low-risk women after a regional initiative that was aimed at general gynecologists in the province of British Columbia, Canada. STUDY DESIGN This population-based retrospective cohort study evaluated 43,931 women in British Columbia from 2008-2011 who underwent hysterectomy that was performed with and without BS or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or who underwent surgical sterilization by means of BS or tubal ligation. Parameters that were examined include patient age, operating time, surgical approach, indication, length of hospital stay, and perioperative complications. RESULTS There was an increase in the uptake of hysterectomy with BS (5-35%; P < .001) and BS for sterilization (0.5-33%; P < .001) over the study period, particularly in women <50 years old. Minimal additional surgical time is required for hysterectomy with BS (16 minutes; P < .001) and BS for sterilization (10 minutes; P < .001) compared with hysterectomy alone or tubal ligation, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the risks of hospital readmission or blood transfusions in women who underwent hysterectomy with BS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.10; and aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.10, respectively) or BS for sterilization (aOR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.56-1.21; and aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.32-1.73, respectively). From 2008-2011 the proportion of hysterectomies with BS performed by open laparotomy decreased from 77-44% with uptake in laparoscopic, vaginal, and combined procedures (P < .001). CONCLUSION After our 2010 educational initiative, there has been a shift in surgical paradigm in our province. This cancer prevention approach does not increase the risk of operative/perioperative complications and appears both feasible and safe.

Costs and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of opportunistic salpingectomy (elective salpingectomy at hysterectomy or instead of tubal ligation). METHODS: A Markov Monte Carlo simulation model estimated the costs and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy in a hypothetical cohort of women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions or surgical sterilization. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Effectiveness was measured in terms of life expectancy gain. Sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty around various parameters. Monte Carlo simulation estimated the number of ovarian cancer cases associated with each strategy in the Canadian population. RESULTS: Salpingectomy with hysterectomy was less costly (

A functional proteogenomic analysis of endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas using reverse phase protein array and mutation analysis: protein expression is histotype-specific and loss of ARID1A /BAF250a is associated with AKT phosphorylation

11,044.32±

Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants

1.56) than hysterectomy alone (

Risk-reducing salpingectomy in Canada: a survey of obstetrician-gynaecologists.

11,206.52±

The significance of surgical staging in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer

29.81) or with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (

Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada

12,626.84±

Experiencing Health Advocacy During Cervical Cancer Awareness Week: A National Initiative for Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residents

13.11) but more effective at 21.12±0.02 years compared with 21.10±0.03 and 20.94±0.03 years, representing average gains of 1 week and 2 months, respectively. For surgical sterilization, salpingectomy was more costly (

The Role of the Fallopian Tube in Ovarian Cancer

9,719.52±