Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sarah Jane Noblin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sarah Jane Noblin.


Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2013

NSGC practice guideline: Prenatal screening and diagnostic testing options for chromosome aneuploidy

K. L. Wilson; Jennifer Czerwinski; Jennifer M. Hoskovec; Sarah Jane Noblin; Cathy Sullivan; A. Harbison; MaryAnn Campion; K. Devary; Patricia Devers; Claire N. Singletary

The BUN and FASTER studies, two prospective multicenter trials in the United States, validated the accuracy and detection rates of first and second trimester screening previously reported abroad. These studies, coupled with the 2007 release of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin that endorsed first trimester screening as an alternative to traditional second trimester multiple marker screening, led to an explosion of screening options available to pregnant women. ACOG also recommended that invasive diagnostic testing for chromosome aneuploidy be made available to all women regardless of maternal age. More recently, another option known as Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) became available to screen for chromosome aneuploidy. While screening and testing options may be limited due to a variety of factors, healthcare providers need to be aware of the options in their area in order to provide their patients with accurate and reliable information. If not presented clearly, patients may feel overwhelmed at the number of choices available. The following guideline includes recommendations for healthcare providers regarding which screening or diagnostic test should be offered based on availability, insurance coverage, and timing of a patient’s entry into prenatal care, as well as a triage assessment so that a general process can be adapted to unique situations.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2010

Survival of Texas infants born with trisomies 21, 18, and 13†

Catherine Vendola; Mark A. Canfield; Stephen P. Daiger; Michael J. Gambello; S. Shahrukh Hashmi; Terri King; Sarah Jane Noblin; D. Kim Waller; Jacqueline T. Hecht

Trisomies 21, 18, and 13 are the three most common trisomies among infants who survive to 20 weeks gestation or more. Overall information about birth prevalence, natural history, and mortality for all three trisomies is well defined, but information about ethnic‐specific rates is limited. Only a few studies have examined mortality rates of trisomies 18 and 13 because so few cases are liveborn and most have very short life spans. This study assessed ethnic‐specific population‐based survival probabilities among infants for each trisomy. All cases of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 born in Texas between 1999 and 2003 were obtained from the Texas Birth Defects Registry and included 2,260 cases of trisomy 21, 398 cases of trisomy 18, and 213 cases of trisomy 13. Date and cause of death were obtained from the Texas vital statistics records and the National Death Index. Overall, birth prevalence rates (per 10,000 adjusted live births) for the three trisomies were 11.74 (95% CI: 11.25–12.25), 1.34 (95% CI: 1.18–1.52), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.79–1.07), respectively, and are consistent with previously reported rates. There were no differences in survival rates by ethnicity and the median survival for each trisomy was consistent with previous reports. The results of this study provide comprehensive population‐based information for survival of infants with trisomies 21, 18, and 13.


Genetics in Medicine | 2007

Indications for genetic referral: a guide for healthcare providers

Beth A. Pletcher; Helga V. Toriello; Sarah Jane Noblin; Laurie H. Seaver; Deborah A. Driscoll; Robin L. Bennett; Susan J. Gross

Disclaimer: This guideline is designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical genetic services. Adherence to this guideline does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. This guideline should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the geneticist should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. It may be prudent, however, to document in the patients record the rationale for any significant deviation from this guideline.


Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2011

Exploring the Role of Religiosity and Spirituality in Amniocentesis Decision-Making Among Latinas

Sarah Guerra Seth; Goka Tj; Andrea Harbison; Lisa M. Hollier; Susan K. Peterson; Lois M. Ramondetta; Sarah Jane Noblin

Given the complex array of emotional and medical issues that may arise when making a decision about amniocentesis, women may find that their spiritual and/or religious beliefs can comfort and assist their decision-making process. Prior research has suggested that Latinas’ spiritual and/or religious beliefs directly influence their amniocentesis decision. A more intimate look into whether Latinas utilize their beliefs during amniocentesis decision-making may provide an opportunity to better understand their experience. The overall goal of this study was to describe the role structured religion and spirituality plays in Latinas’ daily lives and to evaluate how religiosity and spirituality influences health care decisions, specifically in prenatal diagnosis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eleven women who were invited to describe their religious beliefs and thoughts while considering the option of amniocentesis. All participants acknowledged the influence of religious and/or spiritual beliefs in their everyday lives. Although the women sought comfort and found validation in their beliefs and in their faith in God’s will during their amniocentesis decision-making process, results suggest the risk of procedure-related complications played more of a concrete role than their beliefs.


Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2016

2013 Review and Update of the Genetic Counseling Practice Based Competencies by a Task Force of the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling.

Debra Lochner Doyle; Rawan Awwad; Jehannine Austin; Bonnie J. Baty; Amanda L. Bergner; Stephanie J. Brewster; Lori H. Erby; Cathi Rubin Franklin; Anne Greb; Robin E. Grubs; Gillian W. Hooker; Sarah Jane Noblin; Kelly E. Ormond; Christina G.S. Palmer; Elizabeth M. Petty; Claire N. Singletary; Matthew J Thomas; Helga V. Toriello; Carol S. Walton; Wendy R. Uhlmann

The first practice based competencies (PBCs) for the field of genetic counseling were adopted by the American Board of Genetic Counseling (ABGC), 1996. Since that time, there has been significant growth in established and new work settings (clinical and non-clinical) and changes in service delivery models and the roles of genetic counselors. These changes prompted the ABGC to appoint a PBC Task Force in 2011 to review the PBCs with respect to their current relevance and to revise and update them as necessary. There are four domains in the revised PBCs: (I) Genetics Expertise and Analysis (II) Interpersonal, Psychosocial and Counseling Skills (III) Education and (IV) Professional Development and Practice. There are 22 competencies, each clarified with learning objectives or samples of activities and skills; a glossary is included. New competencies were added that address genomics, genetic testing and genetic counselors’ roles in risk assessment, education, supervision, conducting research and presenting research options to patients. With PBCs serving as the pre-defined abilities or outcomes of training, graduating genetic counselors will be well prepared to enter the field with a minimum level of skills and abilities. A description of the Task Force’s work, key changes and the 2013 PBCs are presented herein.


Genetics in Medicine | 2015

Is it all Lynch syndrome?: An assessment of family history in individuals with mismatch repair-deficient tumors

Katherine M. Dempsey; Russell Broaddus; Y. Nancy You; Sarah Jane Noblin; Maureen E. Mork; Bryan Fellman; Diana L. Urbauer; Molly S. Daniels; Karen H. Lu

Purpose:Mismatch repair-deficient (MMRD) colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) may be suggestive of Lynch syndrome (LS). LS can be confirmed only by positive germ-line testing. It is unclear if individuals with MMRD tumors but no identifiable cause (MMRD+/germ-line−) have LS. Because LS is hereditary, individuals with LS are expected to have family histories of LS-related tumors. Our study compared the family histories of MMRD+/germ-line− CRC and/or EC patients with LS CRC and/or EC patients.Methods:A total of 253 individuals with an MMRD CRC or EC from one institution were included for analysis in one of four groups: LS; MMRD+/germ-line−; MMRD tumor with variant of uncertain significance (MMRD+/VUS); and sporadic MSI-H (MMRD tumor with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation or BRAF mutation). Family histories were analyzed utilizing MMRpro and PREMM1,2,6. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare family history scores.Results:MMRD+/germ-line− individuals had significantly lower median family history scores (MMRpro = 8.1, PREMM1,2,6 = 7.3) than did LS individuals (MMRpro = 89.8, PREMM1,2,6 = 26.1, P < 0.0001).Conclusion:MMRD+/germ-line− individuals have less suggestive family histories of LS than individuals with LS. These results imply that MMRD+/germ-line− individuals may not all have LS. This finding highlights the need to determine other causes of MMRD tumors so that these patients and their families can be accurately counseled regarding screening and management.Genet Med 17 6, 476–484.


Genetics in Medicine | 2009

Expanded newborn screening in Texas: A survey and educational module addressing the knowledge of pediatric residents

Amy Stanford Wells; Hope Northrup; Sharon S. Crandell; Terri M. King; Neena L. Champaigne; Michael Yafi; Bradford L. Therrell; Sarah Jane Noblin

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of an educational module as a tool for improving the knowledge of pediatric residents about newborn screening and its expansion in Texas.Methods: The study population consisted of 63 pediatric residents from the University of Texas at Houston, Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, and the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. Residents were invited to participate in the study during daily scheduled didactic lectures in their respective residency programs. Questionnaires were distributed to the residents both before and after the presentation of an educational module about newborn screening in Texas to assess whether knowledge was gained from the presentation.Results: Analysis of questionnaires from the full group of participants showed a substantial increase in knowledge about newborn screening in Texas after the presentation of the educational module. This included a 45.4% increase in knowledge about pre-expansion newborn screening conditions and a 308.4% increase in knowledge about expanded newborn screening conditions (P ≤ 0.001).Conclusions: Our results suggest that an educational module about newborn screening like the one we created for this study would be an effective tool for improving the knowledge of pediatric residents on a larger scale.


American Journal of Perinatology Reports | 2017

First Neonatal Demise with Travel-Associated Zika Virus Infection in the United States of America

Nikolaos Zacharias; Janice Whitty; Sarah Jane Noblin; Sophia Tsakiri; Jose Garcia; Michael Covinsky; Meenakshi B. Bhattacharjee; David M. Saulino; Nina Tatevian; Sean C. Blackwell

Zika virus is increasingly recognized as a fetal pathogen worldwide. We describe the first case of neonatal demise with travel-associated Zika virus infection in the United States of America, including a novel prenatal ultrasound finding. A young Latina presented to our health care system in Southeast Texas for prenatal care at 23 weeks of gestation. Fetal Dandy–Walker malformation, asymmetric cerebral ventriculomegaly, single umbilical artery, hypoechoic fetal knee, dorsal foot edema, and mild polyhydramnios were noted upon initial screening prenatal sonography at 26 weeks. A growth-restricted, microcephalic, and arthrogrypotic infant was delivered alive at 36 weeks but died within an hour despite resuscitation. The neonatal karyotype was normal. Flavivirus IgM antibodies were identified in the serum of the puerpera, once she disclosed that she had traveled from El Salvador to Texas in the early second trimester. Zika virus was identified in the umbilical cord and neonatal brain. Fetal arthritis may precede congenital arthrogryposis in cases of Zika virus infection and may be detectable by prenatal sonography. Physician and health care system vigilance is required to optimally address the significant and enduring Zika virus global health threat.


Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2015

Perceptions of Latinas on the Traditional Prenatal Genetic Counseling Model

Stephanie Thompson; Sarah Jane Noblin; Jennifer Lemons; Susan K. Peterson; Carlos Carreno; Andrea Harbison

The traditional genetic counseling model encompasses an individualized counseling session that includes the presentation of information about genes, chromosomes, personalized risk assessment, and genetic testing and screening options. Counselors are challenged to balance the provision of enough basic genetic information to ensure clients’ understanding of the genetic condition in question with a personalized discussion of what this information means to them. This study explored the perceptions Latinas have about prenatal genetic counseling sessions and aimed to determine if they had preferences about the delivery of care. Data were collected through focus groups and one-on-one, semi-structured interviews of 25 Spanish speaking Latinas who received genetic counseling during their current pregnancy. We implemented grounded theory to evaluate participant responses, and were able to identify common emergent themes. Several themes were identified including an overall satisfaction with their prenatal genetic counseling appointment, desire for a healthy baby, peace of mind following their appointment, lack of desire for invasive testing, and faith in God. Several participants stated a preference for group genetic counseling over the traditional individual genetic counseling model. Our data indicate that Latinas value the information presented at prenatal genetic counseling appointments despite disinterest in pursuing genetic testing or screening and suggest that group prenatal genetic counseling may be an effective alternative to the traditional genetic counseling model in the Latina population.


Journal of Maternal-fetal & Neonatal Medicine | 2009

Fetal trisomy 21 and the risk of preeclampsia.

Jennifer Defant; Michael J. Gambello; Manju Monga; Peter H. Langlois; Sarah Jane Noblin; Alex C. Vidaeff

Objective. Microchimerism has been investigated as a possible contributor to the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Although trisomy 21 is associated with pronounced microchimerism, it has not been connected with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Our objective was to readdress the relationship between preeclampsia and trisomy 21 in a large population. Methods. Using the Texas Birth Defects Registry for 1999–2003, a cohort of 2995 pregnancies with a trisomy 21 fetus was identified and compared with a control cohort of 1959 pregnancies with fetal isolated oral clefts. Chi-square test was used to estimate the significance of observed difference in the proportion of preeclampsia between groups. The interactive and confounding effects of covariates were examined by stratified analysis and the Mantel–Haenszel method. Results. We observed 84 cases of preeclampsia in the trisomy 21 cohort (3.7%) and 111 cases in the oral cleft cohort (5.7%). The crude OR for having preeclampsia in relation to trisomy 21 was 0.63 (95% CI 0.47–0.85). The OR estimates remained the same after adjustment for confounders. Conclusion. Pregnancies carrying a trisomy 21 fetus do not have an increased risk of preeclampsia. Besides epidemiologic significance, our data also have relevance for genetic counseling.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sarah Jane Noblin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Shahrukh Hashmi

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan K. Peterson

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claire N. Singletary

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea Harbison

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hope Northrup

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer Czerwinski

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Molly S. Daniels

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge