Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sarah M. Greene is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sarah M. Greene.


Medical Care | 2005

Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC)

Russell E. Glasgow; Edward H. Wagner; Judith Schaefer; Lisa D. Mahoney; Robert J. Reid; Sarah M. Greene

Rationale:There is a need for a brief, validated patient self-report instrument to assess the extent to which patients with chronic illness receive care that aligns with the Chronic Care Model—measuring care that is patient-centered, proactive, planned and includes collaborative goal setting; problem-solving and follow-up support. Sample:A total of 283 adults reporting one or more chronic illness from a large integrated health care delivery system were studied. Methods:Participants completed the 20-item Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) as well as measures of demographic factors, a patient activation scale, and subscales from a primary care assessment instrument so that we could evaluate measurement performance, construct, and concurrent validity of the PACIC. Results:The PACIC consists of 5 scales and an overall summary score, each having good internal consistency for brief scales. As predicted, the PACIC was only slightly correlated with age and gender, and unrelated to education. Contrary to prediction, it was only slightly correlated (r = 0.13) with number of chronic conditions. The PACIC demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability (r = 0.58 during the course of 3 months) and was correlated moderately, as predicted (r = 0.32–0.60, median = 0.50, P < 0.001) to measures of primary care and patient activation. Discussion:The PACIC appears to be a practical instrument that is reliable and has face, construct, and concurrent validity. The resulting questionnaire is in the public domain, and recommendations for its use in research and quality improvement are outlined.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2008

Web-Based Smoking-Cessation Programs : Results of a Randomized Trial

Victor J. Strecher; Jennifer B. McClure; Gwen Alexander; Bibhas Chakraborty; Vijay Nair; Janine M. Konkel; Sarah M. Greene; Linda M. Collins; Carola Carlier; Cheryl Wiese; Roderick J. A. Little; Cynthia S. Pomerleau; Ovide F. Pomerleau

BACKGROUND Initial trials of web-based smoking-cessation programs have generally been promising. The active components of these programs, however, are not well understood. This study aimed to (1) identify active psychosocial and communication components of a web-based smoking-cessation intervention and (2) examine the impact of increasing the tailoring depth on smoking cessation. DESIGN Randomized fractional factorial design. SETTING Two HMOs: Group Health in Washington State and Henry Ford Health System in Michigan. PARTICIPANTS 1866 smokers. INTERVENTION A web-based smoking-cessation program plus nicotine patch. Five components of the intervention were randomized using a fractional factorial design: high- versus low-depth tailored success story, outcome expectation, and efficacy expectation messages; high- versus low-personalized source; and multiple versus single exposure to the intervention components. MEASUREMENTS Primary outcome was 7 day point-prevalence abstinence at the 6-month follow-up. FINDINGS Abstinence was most influenced by high-depth tailored success stories and a high-personalized message source. The cumulative assignment of the three tailoring depth factors also resulted in increasing the rates of 6-month cessation, demonstrating an effect of tailoring depth. CONCLUSIONS The study identified relevant components of smoking-cessation interventions that should be generalizable to other cessation interventions. The study also demonstrated the importance of higher-depth tailoring in smoking-cessation programs. Finally, the use of a novel fractional factorial design allowed efficient examination of the study aims. The rapidly changing interfaces, software, and capabilities of eHealth are likely to require such dynamic experimental approaches to intervention discovery.


Journal of Medical Internet Research | 2008

The role of engagement in a tailored web-based smoking cessation program: randomized controlled trial.

Victor J. Strecher; Jennifer A McClure; Gwen Alexander; Bibhas Chakraborty; Vijay Nair; Janine M. Konkel; Sarah M. Greene; Mick P. Couper; Carola Carlier; Cheryl Wiese; Roderick J. A. Little; Cynthia S. Pomerleau; Ovide F. Pomerleau

Background Web-based programs for health promotion, disease prevention, and disease management often experience high rates of attrition. There are 3 questions which are particularly relevant to this issue. First, does engagement with program content predict long-term outcomes? Second, which users are most likely to drop out or disengage from the program? Third, do particular intervention strategies enhance engagement? Objective To determine: (1) whether engagement (defined by the number of Web sections opened) in a Web-based smoking cessation intervention predicts 6-month abstinence, (2) whether particular sociodemographic and psychographic groups are more likely to have lower engagement, and (3) whether particular components of a Web-based smoking cessation program influence engagement. Methods A randomized trial of 1866 smokers was used to examine the efficacy of 5 different treatment components of a Web-based smoking cessation intervention. The components were: high- versus low-personalized message source, high- versus low-tailored outcome expectation, efficacy expectation, and success story messages. Moreover, the timing of exposure to these sections was manipulated, with participants randomized to either a single unified Web program with all sections available at once, or sequential exposure to each section over a 5-week period of time. Participants from 2 large health plans enrolled to receive the online behavioral smoking cessation program and a free course of nicotine replacement therapy (patch). The program included: an introduction section, a section focusing on outcome expectations, 2 sections focusing on efficacy expectations, and a section with a narrative success story (5 sections altogether, each with multiple screens). Most of the analyses were conducted with a stratification of the 2 exposure types. Measures included: sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics, Web sections opened, perceived message relevance, and smoking cessation 6-months following quit date. Results The total number of Web sections opened was related to subsequent smoking cessation. Participants who were younger, were male, or had less formal education were more likely to disengage from the Web-based cessation program, particularly when the program sections were delivered sequentially over time. More personalized source and high-depth tailored self-efficacy components were related to a greater number of Web sections opened. A path analysis model suggested that the impact of high-depth message tailoring on engagement in the sequentially delivered Web program was mediated by perceived message relevance. Conclusions Results of this study suggest that one of the mechanisms underlying the impact of Web-based smoking cessation interventions is engagement with the program. The source of the message, the degree of message tailoring, and the timing of exposure appear to influence Web-based program engagement.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2006

How health care systems can begin to address the challenge of limited literacy.

Michael K. Paasche-Orlow; Dean Schillinger; Sarah M. Greene; Edward H. Wagner

ConclusionThe growing literacy and health literature calls attention to the ways in which the U.S. health care system is inadequate and even unjust, not only for the estimated 90 million U.S. adults with limited literacy, but for many other users to the system. We have presented 3 overarching principles for health system transformation that focus on promoting productive interactions between patients and providers, reorganizing health care delivery, and embracing a community level and ecological perspective. We believe that instituting such changes could improve the quality of care not only for patients with limited literacy, but for all health care consumers, and could contribute to the development of a more “health literate” society.


Medical Care | 2002

Surveying physicians: do components of the "Total Design Approach" to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians?

Terry S. Field; Cynthia A. Cadoret; Martin L. Brown; Marvella E. Ford; Sarah M. Greene; Deanna D. Hill; Mark C. Hornbrook; Richard T. Meenan; Mary Jo White; Jane Zapka

Background. Surveys serve essential roles in clinical epidemiology and health services research. However, physician surveys frequently encounter problems achieving adequate response rates. Research on enhancing response rates to surveys of the general public has led to the development of Dillman’s “Total Design Approach“ to the design and conduct of surveys. The impact of this approach on response rates among physicians is uncertain. Objective. To determine the extent to which the components of the total design approach have been found to be effective in physician surveys. Design. A systematic review. Results. The effectiveness of prepaid financial incentives, special contacts, and personalization to enhance response rates in surveys of physicians have been confirmed by the existing research. There is suggestive evidence supporting the use of first class stamps on return envelopes and multiple contacts. The optimum amount for incentives and the number of contacts necessary have not been established. Details of questionnaire design and their impact on response rates have received almost no attention from researchers. Few studies have assessed the usefulness of combinations of components of the total design approach. Conclusions. Despite the number of surveys conducted among physicians, their cost, the level of interest in their findings, and in spite of inadequate response rates, there have been few randomized trials conducted on important aspects of enhancing response in this population. Until this gap has been filled, researchers conducting surveys of physicians should consider including all components of the total design approach whenever feasible.


The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety | 2010

Twelve evidence-based principles for implementing self-management support in primary care.

Malcolm Battersby; Michael Von Korff; Judith Schaefer; Connie Davis; Evette Ludman; Sarah M. Greene; Melissa Parkerton; Edward H. Wagner

BACKGROUND Recommendations to improve self-management support and health outcomes for people with chronic conditions in primary care settings are provided on the basis of expert opinion supported by evidence for practices and processes. Practices and processes that could improve self-management support in primary care were identified through a nominal group process. In a targeted search strategy, reviews and meta-analyses were then identifed using terms from a wide range of chronic conditions and behavioral risk factors in combination with Self-Care, Self-Management, and Primary Care. On the basis of these reviews, evidence-based principles for self-management support were developed. FINDINGS The evidence is organized within the framework of the Chronic Care Model. Evidence-based principles in 12 areas were associated with improved patient self-management and/or health outcomes: (1) brief targeted assessment, (2) evidence-based information to guide shared decision-making, (3) use of a nonjudgmental approach, (4) collaborative priority and goal setting, (5) collaborative problem solving, (6) self-management support by diverse providers, (7) self-management interventions delivered by diverse formats, (8) patient self-efficacy, (9) active followup, (10) guideline-based case management for selected patients, (11) linkages to evidence-based community programs, and (12) multifaceted interventions. A framework is provided for implementing these principles in three phases of the primary care visit: enhanced previsit assessment, a focused clinical encounter, and expanded postvisit options. CONCLUSIONS There is a growing evidence base for how self-management support for chronic conditions can be integrated into routine health care.


Cancer | 2008

Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives.

Erin J. Aiello Bowles; Leah Tuzzio; Cheryl Wiese; Beth Kirlin; Sarah M. Greene; Steven B. Clauser; Edward H. Wagner

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) report Crossing the Quality Chasm proposed 6 aims for high‐quality healthcare: effective, safe, timely, efficient, equitable, and patient‐centered, and emphasized care coordination. Through interviews with nationally recognized experts in healthcare quality, perspectives on barriers and facilitators to achieving these aims for cancer patients were elicited.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006

Contentment With Quality of Life Among Breast Cancer Survivors With and Without Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

Ann M. Geiger; Carmen N. West; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Lisa J. Herrinton; In Liu A Liu; Andrea Altschuler; Sharon J. Rolnick; Emily L. Harris; Sarah M. Greene; Joann G. Elmore; Karen M. Emmons; Suzanne W. Fletcher

PURPOSE To understand psychosocial outcomes after prophylactic removal of the contralateral breast in women with unilateral breast cancer. METHODS We mailed surveys to women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy after breast cancer diagnosis between 1979 and 1999 at six health care delivery systems, and to a smaller random sample of women with breast cancer without the procedure. Measures were modeled on instruments developed to assess contentment with quality of life, body image, sexual satisfaction, breast cancer concern, depression, and health perception. We examined associations between quality of life and the other domains using logistic regression. RESULTS The response rate was 72.6%. Among 519 women who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, 86.5% were satisfied with their decision; 76.3% reported high contentment with quality of life compared with 75.4% of 61 women who did not undergo the procedure (P = .88). Among all case subjects, less contentment with quality of life was not associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy or demographic characteristics, but was associated with poor or fair general health perception (odds ratio [OR], 7.0; 95% CI, 3.4 to 14.1); possible depression (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 3.1 to 9.2); dissatisfaction with appearance when dressed (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.0 to 6.0); self-consciousness about appearance (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.7); and avoiding thoughts about breast cancer (modest: OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.5; highest: OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.2). CONCLUSION Most women undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy report satisfaction with their decision and experience psychosocial outcomes similar to breast cancer survivors without the procedure.


Breast Journal | 2008

Positive, Negative, and Disparate—Women’s Differing Long‐Term Psychosocial Experiences of Bilateral or Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

Andrea Altschuler; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Sharon J. Rolnick; Sarah M. Greene; Joann G. Elmore; Carmen N. West; Lisa J. Herrinton; Emily L. Harris; Suzanne W. Fletcher; Karen M. Emmons; Ann M. Geiger

Abstract:  Because of recent studies showing strong prevention benefit and acceptable psychosocial outcomes, more women may be considering prophylactic mastectomy. A growing literature shows some positive psychosocial outcomes for women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, but less is known about women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Several surveys have shown that a large majority of women with prophylactic mastectomy report satisfaction with their decisions to have the procedure when asked in a quantitative, closed‐ended format. We sought to explore the nuances of women’s satisfaction with the procedure using a qualitative, open‐ended format. We included open‐ended questions as part of a mailed survey on psychosocial outcomes of prophylactic mastectomy. The research team coded and analyzed these responses using qualitative methods. We used simple descriptive statistics to compare the demographics of the entire survey sample to those women who answered the open‐ended questions; the responses to the open‐ and closed‐ended satisfaction questions, and the responses of women with bilateral and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Seventy‐one percent of women with prophylactic mastectomy responded to the survey and 48% provided open‐ended responses about psychosocial outcomes. Women’s open‐ended responses regarding psychosocial outcomes could be coded into one of three general categories—positive, negative, and disparate. In the subgroup of women with both open‐and closed‐ended responses, over 70% of women providing negative and disparate comments to the open‐ended question simultaneously indicated satisfaction on a closed‐ended question. Negative and disparate open‐ended responses were twice as common among women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (52%) than women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (26%). These findings suggest that even among women who report general satisfaction with their decision to have prophylactic mastectomy via closed‐ended survey questions, lingering negative psychosocial outcomes can remain, particularly among women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. This dichotomy could be an important factor to discuss in counseling women considering the procedure.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2007

Quality of Life After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

Ann M. Geiger; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Lisa J. Herrinton; Sharon J. Rolnick; Sarah M. Greene; Carmen N. West; Emily L. Harris; Joann G. Elmore; Andrea Altschuler; In Liu A Liu; Suzanne W. Fletcher; Karen M. Emmons

BackgroundBilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with increased breast cancer risk dramatically reduces breast cancer occurrence but little is known about psychosocial outcomes.MethodsTo examine long-term quality of life after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, we mailed surveys to 195 women who had the procedure from 1979 to 1999 and to a random sample of 117 women at increased breast cancer risk who did not have the procedure. Measures were modeled on or drawn directly from validated instruments designed to assess quality of life, body image, sexuality, breast cancer concerns, depression, health perception, and demographic characteristics. We used logistic regression to examine associations between quality of life and other domains.ResultsThe response rate was 58%, with 106 women with and 62 women without prophylactic mastectomy returning complete surveys. Among women who underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, 84% were satisfied with their decision to have the procedure; 61% reported high contentment with quality of life compared with an identical 61% of women who did not have the procedure (P = 1.0). Among all subjects, diminished contentment with quality of life was not associated with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy but with dissatisfaction with sex life (adjusted ratio [OR] = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0–6.2), possible depression (CES-D > 16, OR = 4.9, CI = 2.0–11.8), and poor or fair general health perception (OR = 8.3, 95% CI = 2.4–29.0).ConclusionsThe majority of women reported satisfaction with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and experienced psychosocial outcomes similar to women with similarly elevated breast cancer risk who did not undergo prophylactic mastectomy. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy appears to neither positively nor negatively impact long-term psychosocial outcomes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sarah M. Greene's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathleen M. Mazor

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cheryl Wiese

Group Health Cooperative

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer B. McClure

Group Health Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Terry S. Field

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge