Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sarah R. Supp is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sarah R. Supp.


Ecology | 2014

Species‐level and community‐level responses to disturbance: a cross‐community analysis

Sarah R. Supp; S. K. Morgan Ernest

Communities are comprised of individual species that respond to changes in their environment depending in part on their niche requirements. These species comprise the biodiversity of any given community. Common biodiversity metrics such as richness, evenness, and the species abundance distribution are frequently used to describe biodiversity across ecosystems and taxonomic groups. While it is increasingly clear that researchers will need to forecast changes in biodiversity, ecology currently lacks a framework for understanding the natural background variability in biodiversity or how biodiversity patterns will respond to environmental change. We predict that while species populations depend on local ecological mechanisms (e.g., niche processes) and should respond strongly to disturbance, community-level properties that emerge from these species should generally be less sensitive to disturbance because they depend on regional mechanisms (e.g., compensatory dynamics). Using published data from terrestrial animal communities, we show that community-level properties were generally resilient under a suite of artificial and natural manipulations. In contrast, species responded readily to manipulation. Our results suggest that community-level measures are poor indicators of change, perhaps because many systems display strong compensatory dynamics maintaining community-level properties. We suggest that ecologists consider using multiple metrics that measure composition and structure in biodiversity response studies.


Ecology | 2011

Species composition and abundance of mammalian communities

Katherine M. Thibault; Sarah R. Supp; Mikaelle Giffin; Ethan P. White; S. K. Morgan Ernest

Ecologists have long sought to understand the mechanisms underlying the assembly and structure of communities. Such understanding is relevant to both basic science and conservation-related issues. The macroecological approach to this problem involves asking scientific questions using a large number of communities in order to elucidate generalities in pattern and process. Such analyses are typically conducted using a substantial amount of data from a particular taxonomic group across a diversity of systems. Large community databases are available for a number of taxa, but no publicly available database exists for mammals. Given the logistical challenges of collecting such data de novo, compiling existing information from the literature provides the best avenue for acquiring the necessary data. Here, we provide a data set that includes species lists for 1000 mammal communities, excluding bats, with species-level abundances available for 940 of these communities. All communities found in the literature that included complete, site-specific sampling data, composed of species lists with or without associated abundances, were included in the data set. Most, but not all, sites are limited to species groups that are sampled using a single technique (e.g., small mammals sampled with Sherman traps). The data set consists of 7977 records from 1000 georeferenced sites encompassing a variety of habitats throughout the world, and it includes data on 660 mammal species with sizes ranging from 2 g to >500 kg. The complete data sets corresponding to abstracts published in the Data Papers section of the journal are published electronically in Ecological Archives at 〈http://esapubs.org/archive〉. (The accession number for each Data Paper is given directly beneath the title.)


Ecosphere | 2015

Citizen‐science data provides new insight into annual and seasonal variation in migration patterns

Sarah R. Supp; Frank A. La Sorte; Tina Cormier; Marisa C.W. Lim; Donald R. Powers; Susan M. Wethington; Scott J. Goetz; Catherine H. Graham

Current rates of global environmental and climate change pose potential challenges for migratory species that must cope with or adapt to new conditions and different rates of change across broad spatial scales throughout their annual life cycle. North American migratory hummingbirds may be especially sensitive to changes in environment and climate due to their extremely small body size, high metabolic rates, and dependence on nectar as a main resource. We used occurrence information from the eBird citizen-science database to track migratory movements of five North American hummingbird species (Archilochus alexandri, A. colubris, Selasphorus calliope, S. platycercus, and S. rufus) across 6 years (2008–2013) at a daily temporal resolution to describe annual and seasonal variation in migration patterns. Our findings suggest that the timing of the onset of spring migration generally varies less than the arrival on the wintering grounds. Species follow similar routes across years, but exhibit more variation in...


Ecosphere | 2015

Using life history trade‐offs to understand core‐transient structuring of a small mammal community

Sarah R. Supp; David N. Koons; S. K. Morgan Ernest

An emerging conceptual framework suggests that communities are composed of two main groups of species through time: core species that are temporally persistent, and transient species that are temporally intermittent. Core and transient species have been shown to differ in spatiotemporal turnover, diversity patterns, and importantly, survival strategies targeted at local versus regional habitat use. While the core-transient framework has typically been a site-specific designation for species, we suggest that if core and transient species have local versus regional survival strategies across sites, and consistently differ in population-level spatial structure and gene flow, they may also typically exhibit different life-history strategies. Specifically, core species should display relatively low movement rates, low reproductive effort, high ecological specialization and high survival rates compared to transient species, which may display a wider range of traits given that transience may result from source-s...


Journal of Insect Conservation | 2012

Patch shape alters spider community structure: links between microhabitat choice and sensitivity to increased edge habitat

Stephanie M. Cobbold; Sarah R. Supp

Increased edge effects in fragmented habitats can affect the abundance of edge-dwelling organisms, but these impacts may depend on the biological attributes of species. Microhabitat choice, a species characteristic that reflects combinations of biological traits, may affect the ability of peripheral species to take advantage of increased edge habitat in the presence of edge effects. In this field study, we built artificial shrub modules designed to encourage web spiders to build webs on the periphery. While modules were identical in volume, they differed in shape (cubic and elongated), so that elongated modules had more edge habitat and were subject to enhanced edge effects. Given that the tangle-web spiders Theridion and Dictyna built webs on module edges and strongly differed in terms of concealment and substrate generalization, two habitat characteristics associated with lower vulnerability to habitat modification, we tested the hypothesis that Theridion, which built webs in more concealed locations and on a greater diversity of substrate configurations in the modules compared to Dictyna, would take better advantage of increased edge habitat. As predicted, Theridion was significantly more abundant on elongated modules whereas the abundance of Dictyna did not respond to shape, even though the change in module shape entailed a similar increase in favored substrate for both spider groups. Our results suggest that the microhabitat associations of organisms may be linked to their propensity to be sensitive to edges, and that a better understanding of these links can improve our ability to predict the effects of habitat modification on biodiversity.


Conservation Biology | 2010

Hindrance of Conservation Biology by Delays in the Submission of Manuscripts

Ryan P. O’Donnell; Sarah R. Supp; Stephanie M. Cobbold

Timely dissemination of scientific findings depends not only on rapid publication of submitted manuscripts, a topic which has received much discussion, but also on rapid submission of research after the research is completed. We measured submission delay (time from the last date of data collection to the submission of a manuscript) for every paper from 14 journals in 2007 and compared these submission delays among four fields of biology (conservation, taxonomy, behavior, and evolution). Manuscripts published in leading journals in the field of conservation biology have the longest delays in publication of accepted manuscripts and the longest intervals between completion of research and submission of the manuscript. Delay in manuscript submission accounts for more than half of the total time from last date of data collection to publication. Across fields, the number of authors was significantly negatively correlated with submission delay, but conservation journals had the second highest number of authors and the greatest submission delay, so submission of conservation manuscripts was not hindered by a shortage of collaboration relative to other fields. Rejection rates were greater in conservation journals than in behavior and evolution, but rejection times were faster; thus, there were no obvious net differences among fields in the time papers spent waiting to be rejected. Publication delay has been reduced significantly in the last 7 years, but was still greater in conservation journals than in any of the other three fields we studied. Thus, the urgent field of conservation biology is hindered in both preparation and publication of manuscripts.


BioScience | 2017

Skills and Knowledge for Data-Intensive Environmental Research

Stephanie E. Hampton; Matthew Jones; Leah Wasser; Mark Schildhauer; Sarah R. Supp; Julien Brun; Rebecca R. Hernandez; Carl Boettiger; Scott L. Collins; Louis J. Gross; Denny S. Fernández; Amber E. Budden; Ethan P. White; Tracy K. Teal; Stephanie G. Labou; Juliann E. Aukema

&NA; The scale and magnitude of complex and pressing environmental issues lend urgency to the need for integrative and reproducible analysis and synthesis, facilitated by data‐intensive research approaches. However, the recent pace of technological change has been such that appropriate skills to accomplish data‐intensive research are lacking among environmental scientists, who more than ever need greater access to training and mentorship in computational skills. Here, we provide a roadmap for raising data competencies of current and next‐generation environmental researchers by describing the concepts and skills needed for effectively engaging with the heterogeneous, distributed, and rapidly growing volumes of available data. We articulate five key skills: (1) data management and processing, (2) analysis, (3) software skills for science, (4) visualization, and (5) communication methods for collaboration and dissemination. We provide an overview of the current suite of training initiatives available to environmental scientists and models for closing the skill‐transfer gap.


Ecology Letters | 2018

Integrating community assembly and biodiversity to better understand ecosystem function: the Community Assembly and the Functioning of Ecosystems (CAFE) approach

Katherine H. Bannar-Martin; Colin T. Kremer; S. K. Morgan Ernest; Mathew A. Leibold; Harald Auge; Jonathan M. Chase; Steven Declerck; Nico Eisenhauer; Stanley Harpole; Helmut Hillebrand; Forest Isbell; Thomas Koffel; Stefano Larsen; Anita Narwani; Jana S. Petermann; Christiane Roscher; Juliano Sarmento Cabral; Sarah R. Supp

The research of a generation of ecologists was catalysed by the recognition that the number and identity of species in communities influences the functioning of ecosystems. The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) is most often examined by controlling species richness and randomising community composition. In natural systems, biodiversity changes are often part of a bigger community assembly dynamic. Therefore, focusing on community assembly and the functioning of ecosystems (CAFE), by integrating both species richness and composition through species gains, losses and changes in abundance, will better reveal how community changes affect ecosystem function. We synthesise the BEF and CAFE perspectives using an ecological application of the Price equation, which partitions the contributions of richness and composition to function. Using empirical examples, we show how the CAFE approach reveals important contributions of composition to function. These examples show how changes in species richness and composition driven by environmental perturbations can work in concert or antagonistically to influence ecosystem function. Considering how communities change in an integrative fashion, rather than focusing on one axis of community structure at a time, will improve our ability to anticipate and predict changes in ecosystem function.


Bulletin of The Ecological Society of America | 2014

ESA's Early Career Ecologist Section: Supporting the Professional Development of Early Career Ecologists in All Career Trajectories

Daniel R. Scholes; Daniel E. Stanton; Sarah R. Supp

Recent graduates often experience several years of transitional career development before obtaining permanent employment. Short-term positions may be held during this period in an effort to enhance research and/or teaching skills to improve candidacy for an academic position, for example, or a scientist may explore various skill sets and career trajectories involving policy, government, non-profit, or industrial jobs. Once permanent employment has been obtained, a secondary transitional period begins as the new hire becomes familiar with the myriad job responsibilities, policies, and organizational structure until a sense of stability is attained (e.g. tenure is earned or seniority is developed). During this time, new hires may be faced with their first true sense of independence, and may thus lack previous experience in administration, project management, course development, grant writing, research publishing, and other potential duties. In addition, this period of time often also coincides with substantial personal development (e.g. moving to a new location or starting a family).


Bulletin of The Ecological Society of America | 2015

Ecology Postdocs in Academia: Primary Concerns and Possible Solutions

Allison K. Shaw; Daniel E. Stanton; Sarah R. Supp; Amber Budden; Stephanie Eby; Pamela L. Reynolds; Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Daniel R. Scholes; Naupaka Zimmerman

The postdoctoral research phase is intended to allow researchers to further develop and strengthen skills needed to succeed in an academic career (NAS et al. 2000). For example, doctoral programs train students to conduct research and publish papers, but often do not include opportunities to develop professional skills, such as project management, balancing multiple research projects, applying for large grants, managing research teams, teaching, and developing the mentorship skills necessary for future careers both within and outside of academia. Many postdoctoral positions, however, do allow early-career researchers to practice these skills sets while deepening their research skills and expanding their collaboration network. Thus, job candidates that have postdoctoral experience are often viewed as more competitive in the academic market (Nerad 1999). For these reasons, and because the ratio of Ph.D.s to available academic positions is increasing (Schillebeeckx et al. 2013), postdoctoral positions have nearly become a prerequisite for modern careers in ecology. The postdoctoral phase is clearly an important, and potentially exciting, time to develop the skills needed to succeed in an academic career. Yet the uncertainty of advancing successfully to the next career stage Ecology Postdocs in Academia: Primary Concerns and Possible Solutions

Collaboration


Dive into the Sarah R. Supp's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tina Cormier

Woods Hole Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott J. Goetz

Northern Arizona University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge