Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sari C. Saunders is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sari C. Saunders.


BioScience | 1999

Microclimate in Forest Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology

Jiquan Chen; Sari C. Saunders; Thomas R. Crow; Robert J. Naiman; Kimberley D. Brosofske; Glenn D. Mroz; Brian L. Brookshire; Jerry F. Franklin

Microclimate is the suite of climatic conditions measured in localized areas near the earths surface (Geiger 1965). These environmental variables, which include temperature, light, windspeed, and moisture, have been critical throughout human history, providing meaningful indicators for habitat selection and other activities. For example, for 2600 years the Chinese have used localized seasonal changes in temperature and precipitation to schedule their agricultural activities. In seminal studies, Shirley (1929, 1945) emphasized microclimate as a determinant of ecological patterns in both plant and animal communities and a driver of such processes as the growth and mortality of organisms. The importance of microclimate in influencing ecological processes such as plant regeneration and growth, soil resperation and growth, soil repiration, nutrient cycling, and wildlife habitat selection has became an essential component of current ecological research (Perry 1994). plant regeneration and growth, soil respiration, nutrient cycling, and


Biological Conservation | 2002

Effects of roads on landscape structure within nested ecological units of the Northern Great Lakes Region, USA

Sari C. Saunders; Mo R. Mislivets; Jiquan Chen; David T. Cleland

Road development is a primary mechanism of fragmentation in the northern Great Lakes Region, removing original land cover, creating edge habitat, altering landscape structure and function, and increasing access for humans. We examined road density, landscape structure, and edge habitat created by roads for eight land cover types at two ecological extents within a 78,752 km 2 landscape. Road density ranged from 0.16 to 2.07 km/km 2 within land type associations. Between 5 and 60% of a land cover type was affected by roads, depending on the assumed depth-of-edge influence (DEI). Roads increased number of patches and patch density, and decreased mean patch size and largest patch index. Changes in patch size coefficient of variation and measures of patch shape complexity depended on ecological level (i.e. scale) and land cover class. Limited additional change in landscape metrics occurred as road DEI was increased from 20 to 300 m. Land cover type occurred in buffers at the same percentages as in the landscape as a whole. At finer extents, areas with greatest road densities did not always parallel those with greatest changes in landscape structure. Interactions of scale and variation in the distribution of roads across the region emphasize the importance of examining landscape metrics and road impacts within specific cover types and at appropriate, or multiple, scales. Although this region is densely forested, the fragmentation effects of roads are pervasive, significantly altering landscape structure within multiple forest cover classes and at differing ecological extents. # 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.


Landscape Ecology | 2004

Characterizing historical and modern fire regimes in Michigan (USA): A landscape ecosystem approach

David T. Cleland; Thomas R. Crow; Sari C. Saunders; Donald I. Dickmann; Ann L. Maclean; James K. Jordan; Richard L. Watson; Alyssa M. Sloan; Kimberley D. Brosofske

We studied the relationships of landscape ecosystems to historical and contemporary fire regimes across 4.3 million hectares in northern lower Michigan (USA). Changes in fire regimes were documented by comparing historical fire rotations in different landscape ecosystems to those occurring between 1985 and 2000. Previously published data and a synthesis of the literature were used to identify six forest-replacement fire regime categories with fire rotations ranging from very short (<100 years) to very long (>1,000 years). We derived spatially-explicit estimates of the susceptibility of landscape ecosystems to fire disturbance using Landtype Association maps as initial units of investigation. Each Landtype Association polygon was assigned to a fire regime category based on associations of ecological factors known to influence fire regimes. Spatial statistics were used to interpolate fire points recorded by the General Land Office. Historical fire rotations were determined by calculating the area burned for each category of fire regime and dividing this area by fifteen (years) to estimate area burned per annum. Modern fire rotations were estimated using data on fire location and size obtained from federal and state agencies. Landtype Associations networked into fire regime categories exhibited differences in both historical and modern fire rotations. Historical rotations varied by 23-fold across all fire rotation categories, and modern forest fire rotations by 13-fold. Modern fire rotations were an order of magnitude longer than historical rotations. The magnitude of these changes has important implications for forest health and understanding of ecological processes in most of the fire rotation categories that we identified.


Landscape Ecology | 1998

Hierarchical relationships between landscape structure and temperature in a managed forest landscape

Sari C. Saunders; Jiquan Chen; Thomas R. Crow; Kimberley D. Brosofske

Management may influence abiotic environments differently across time and spatial scale, greatly influencing perceptions of fragmentation of the landscape. It is vital to consider a priori the spatial scales that are most relevant to an investigation, and to reflect on the influence that scale may have on conclusions. While the importance of scale in understanding ecological patterns and processes has been widely recognized, few researchers have investigated how the relationships between pattern and process change across spatial and temporal scales. We used wavelet analysis to examine the multiscale structure of surface and soil temperature, measured every 5 m across a 3820 m transect within a national forest in northern Wisconsin. Temperature functioned as an indicator – or end product – of processes associated with energy budget dynamics, such as radiative inputs, evapotranspiration and convective losses across the landscape. We hoped to determine whether functional relationships between landscape structure and temperature could be generalized, by examining patterns and relationships at multiple spatial scales and time periods during the day. The pattern of temperature varied between surface and soil temperature and among daily time periods. Wavelet variances indicated that no single scale dominated the pattern in temperature at any time, though values were highest at finest scales and at midday. Using general linear models, we explained 38% to 60% of the variation in temperature along the transect. Broad categorical variables describing the vegetation patch in which a point was located and the closest vegetation patch of a different type (landscape context) were important in models of both surface and soil temperature across time periods. Variables associated with slope and microtopography were more commonly incorporated into models explaining variation in soil temperature, whereas variables associated with vegetation or ground cover explained more variation in surface temperature. We examined correlations between wavelet transforms of temperature and vegetation (i.e., structural) pattern to determine whether these associations occurred at predictable scales or were consistent across time. Correlations between transforms characteristically had two peaks; one at finer scales of 100 to 150 m and one at broader scales of >300 m. These scales differed among times of day and between surface and soil temperatures. Our results indicate that temperature structure is distinct from vegetation structure and is spatially and temporally dynamic. There did not appear to be any single scale at which it was more relevant to study temperature or this pattern-process relationship, although the strongest relationships between vegetation structure and temperature occurred within a predictable range of scales. Forest managers and conservation biologists must recognize the dynamic relationship between temperature and structure across landscapes and incorporate the landscape elements created by temperature-structure interactions into management decisions.


Forest Ecology and Management | 1999

Modeling temperature gradients across edges over time in a managed landscape

Sari C. Saunders; Jiquan Chen; Thomas D. Drummer; Thomas R. Crow

Landscape management requires an understanding of the distribution of habitat patches in space and time. Regions of edge influence can form dominant components of both managed and naturally patchy ecosystems. However, the boundaries of these regions are spatially and temporally dynamic. Further, areas of edge influence can be defined by either biotic (e.g. overstory cover) vs. abiotic (e.g. microclimate) characteristics, or structural (e.g. vegetation height) vs. functional (e.g. decomposition rates) features. Edges defined by different characteristics are not always concordant; the degree of spatial concurrence varies with time. Thus, edge effects are difficult to generalize or quantify across a landscape. We examined temperature at eight times of the day across the edge between a clearing and a 50-year-old pine stand. We used simple, nonlinear equations to model and predict temperature gradients across this edge over time. The depth of edge influence (DEI) on temperature varied from 0 to 40 m, depending on the patch type and time of day. Two equations were required to model adequately (r 2 >0.50) patterns of temperature at all eight times of the day. Model fit was best at night (r 2 a0.97) and lowest in the afternoon (r 2 a0.50). Parameters for the models could be predicted from local, reference weather conditions. However, these linear relationships varied among parameters and with time of day (0.29r 2 0.99). Model validation was weak, with mean absolute percent error >10% for all day-time combinations. The models tended to underestimate DEI for both patch types, though edge depth was more accurately predicted in the closed-canopy stand than in the clearing. The difference between observed and predicted edge effects was highest at midday in the clearing and during the morning under closed canopy. The models predicted the location of peak temperature and the slope of temperature change (i.e. pattern of temperature variation) across the edge and the range of temperature better than actual values. We suggest that this approach may, therefore, be useful for characterizing edge dynamics if a wider range of local weather conditions could be monitored during initial data collection. The empirical evidence for temporal changes in position and intensity of abiotic edge effects emphasized the need to quantify these dynamics across time and space for sound planning at the landscape scale. # 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.


Basic and Applied Ecology | 2002

The patch mosaic and ecological decomposition across spatial scales in a managed landscape of northern Wisconsin, USA

Sari C. Saunders; Jiquan Chen; Thomas D. Drummer; Thomas R. Crow; Kimberley D. Brosofske; Eric J. Gustafson

Summary Understanding landscape organization across scales is vital for determining the impacts of management and retaining structurally and functionally diverse ecosystems. We studied the relationships of a functional variable, decomposition, to microclimatic, vegetative and structural features at multiple scales in two distinct landscapes of northern Wisconsin, USA. We hoped to elucidate any characteristic resolutions of structure-process relationships on these landscapes, and to determine the validity of extrapolation of structure-process associations across scales and management regimes. We used a combination of ANOVA, wavelet, canonical discriminant, and correlation analyses and asked specifically whether: 1) specific combinations of microclimatic, structural, and vegetative features were consistently associated with differences in decomposition among management zones along transects (i.e., within landscapes); and 2) factors influencing decomposition were consistent among resolutions of analysis and depths within and between landscapes. Decomposition was greater on the pine barrens than the small block transect and greater at 4 cm depth than at the surface for both landscapes. Significant differences in decomposition occurred among management patches for both transects and depths, except 4 cm along the pine barrens. In general decomposition was faster for patch types with greater overstory cover at 1 cm (both transects) and lower at 4 cm (small block). Canonical discriminant analysis also separated management patches by overstory cover for both transects. Secondary vectors also separated patches along both transects by microclimate, independent from overstory effects on those variables. Dominant resolutions in the patterns of decomposition differed between transects and depths: 80 m (pine barrens, 1 cm); 500 m (pine barrens 4 cm); 160 m (small block, 1 cm); and 750 m (small block, 4 cm). At the 1 cm depth, the strongest correlations of wavelet transforms of decomposition with structural, microclimatic, and vegetation variables often differed in resolution from those dominant in the decomposition patterns. At the 4 cm depths, many of the strongest correlations occurred at the maximum resolutions examined. Although many important correlates differed between transects and depths within a transect, there were some consistencies. On both transects, surface and soil temperatures were strongly correlated (|r| > 0.40) with decomposition; soil temperatures were stronger correlates along the small block. The direction of association between decomposition and temperatures changed with depth, being negative at 1 cm and positive at 4 cm for both transects. Overstory was an important correlate (|r| > 0.50) for 3 of 4 transect-depth combinations. On both transects, correlations between decomposition and overstory peaked at different resolutions and were different signs (positive at 1 cm and negative at 4 cm) for the two decomposition depths. Along the pine barrens but not the small block, there were two peaks of resolutions of correlation that appeared consistently across variables. Thus, correlates of decomposition changed with scale as well as depth and management regime. This suggests that factors other than management may still be maintaining decomposition patterns on the landscapes. Further, patterns in and relationships to process variables should be examined at multiple scales to develop a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms driving functional heterogeneity. Das Verstandnis der Landschaftsorganisation ist entscheidend fur die Bestimmung der Auswirkungen von Management und fur den Erhalt von strukturell und funktionell diversen Okosystemen. Wir untersuchten die Beziehungen zwischen einer funktionellen Variablen, der Zersetzung, und mikroklimatischen, Vegetations- und Struktureigenschaften auf multiplen Skalen in zwei unterschiedlichen Landschaften im nordlichen Wisconsin, USA. Wir hofften, charakteristische Losungen fur Struktur-Prozes-Beziehungen in den Landschaften aufzuklaren, sowie die Gultigkeit von Extrapolationen von Struktur-Prozess-Beziehungen uber Skalen und Management-Regimes zu bestimmen. Wir nutzten eine Kombination von ANOVA, “wavelet”-, kanonischer Diskriminanz- und Korrelationsanalysen und fragten uns insbesondere: (1) ob spezielle Kombinationen von mikroklimatischen, strukturellen und Vegetationseigenschaften durchweg mit Unterschieden in der Zersetzung zwischen den Managementzonen entlang der Transekte (d.h. innerhalb der Landschaften) verbunden waren; und (2) ob es bei verschiedenen Auflosungen der Analysen und Tiefen innerhalb und zwischen den Landschaften durchgangige Faktoren waren, die die Zersetzung beeinflusten. Die Zersetzung war in den beiden Landschaften in den Kieferodlandern groser als in den “small block”-Transekten; und in 4 cm Tiefe groser als an der Oberflache. Signifikante Unterschiede in der Zersetzung traten zwischen “Management-patches” sowohl fur die Transekte als auch die Tiefen auf; mit Ausnahme der 4 cm Tiefe in den Kieferodlandern. Im Allgemeinen war die Zersetzung in den “patch”-Typen mit groserer Oberholz-Deckung (overstorey) bei 1 cm schneller (beide Transekte), und bei 4 cm geringer (“small block”-Transekt). Die Kanonische Diskriminanzanalyse trennte ebenfalls gemanagte “patches” nach der Oberholz-Deckung bei beiden Transekten. Sekundare Vektoren) trennten ebenfalls “patches” nach dem Mikroklima, unabhangig vom Oberholz-Einfluss auf diese Variablen. Die dominanten Auflosungen in den Mustern der Zersetzung unterschieden sich zwischen den Transekten und Tiefen: 80 m (Kieferodlander, 1cm), 500 m (Kieferodlander, 4 cm), 160 m (“small block”-Transekt, 1 cm) und 750 m (“small block”-Transekt, 4 cm). Bei 1 cm Tiefe unterschieden sich die starksten Korrelationen der “wavelet”-Transformation der Zersetzung mit strukturellen, mikroklimatischen und Vegetationsvariablen haufig in der Auflosung von denen, die dominant in den Zersetzungsmustern waren. Bei 4 cm Tiefe fanden sich viele der starksten Korrelationen bei der maximalen betrachteten Auflosung. Obwohl sich viele, wichtige korrelierende Variablen (correlates) zwischen den Transekten und den Tiefen innerhalb eines Transektes unterschieden, gab es einige Gemeinsamkeiten. Auf beiden Transekten waren Oberflachen- und Bodentemperatur stark mit der Zersetzung korreliert (|r| > 0.40); die Bodentemperaturen waren die starker korrelierenden Variablen entlang des “small block”-Transekts. Die Richtung der Beziehung zwischen der Zersetzung und der Temperatur anderte sich mit der Tiefe und war negativ in 1 cm und positiv in 4 cm Tiefe bei beiden Transekten. Oberholz war eine wichtige korrelierende Variable (|r| > 0.50) bei 3 von 4 Transekt-Tiefen-Kombinationen. Bei beiden Transekten erreichten die Korrelationen zwischen Zersetzung und Oberholz ihren Hohepunkt bei verschiedenen Auflosungen und zeigten unterschiedliche Vorzeichen fur die beiden Zersetzungstiefen (positiv bei 1 cm, negativ bei 4 cm Tiefe). Entlang der Kieferodlander, jedoch nicht entlang des “small block”-Transekts, gab es zwei Hohepunkte der Auflosung der Korrelation, die bei den Variablen durchweg auftraten. Somit anderten sich die korrelierenden Variablen sowohl mit der Skala als auch mit der Tiefe und dem Management-Regime. Das legt nahe, dass andere Faktoren als das Management die Zersetzungs-Muster in den Landschaften aufrechterhalten. Weiterhin sollten Muster in und Beziehungen zwischen den Prozes-Variablen auf multiplen Skalen untersucht werden, um ein umfassendes Verstandnis der Mechanismen zu entwickeln, die die funktionelle Heterogenitat vorantreiben.


Conservation Biology | 2005

Edge Influence on Forest Structure and Composition in Fragmented Landscapes

Karen A. Harper; S. Ellen Macdonald; Philip J. Burton; Jiquan Chen; Kimberley D. Brosofske; Sari C. Saunders; Eugénie S. Euskirchen; Malanding S. Jaiteh; Per-Anders Esseen


Plant Ecology | 1999

Vegetation responses to landscape structure at multiple scales across a Northern Wisconsin, USA, pine barrens landscape

Kimberley D. Brosofske; Jiquan Chen; Thomas R. Crow; Sari C. Saunders


Ecological Complexity | 2005

Identifying scales of pattern in ecological data: a comparison of lacunarity, spectral and wavelet analyses

Sari C. Saunders; Jiquan Chen; Thomas D. Drummer; Eric J. Gustafson; Kimberley D. Brosofske


Environmental Management | 2004

Available Fuel Dynamics in Nine Contrasting Forest Ecosystems in North America

Soung-Ryoul Ryu; Jiquan Chen; Thomas R. Crow; Sari C. Saunders

Collaboration


Dive into the Sari C. Saunders's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jiquan Chen

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kimberley D. Brosofske

Michigan Technological University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas R. Crow

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas D. Drummer

Michigan Technological University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David T. Cleland

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric J. Gustafson

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alyssa M. Sloan

Michigan Technological University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann L. Maclean

Michigan Technological University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian L. Brookshire

Missouri Department of Conservation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge