Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sascha H.C. Duttke is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sascha H.C. Duttke.


Journal of Evolutionary Biology | 2012

Developmental plasticity, morphological variation and evolvability: a multilevel analysis of morphometric integration in the shape of compound leaves

Christian Peter Klingenberg; Sascha H.C. Duttke; S. Whelan; Minsung Kim

The structure of compound leaves provides flexibility for morphological change by variation in the shapes, sizes and arrangement of leaflets. Here, we conduct a multilevel analysis of shape variation in compound leaves to explore the developmental plasticity and evolutionary potential that are the basis of diversification in leaf shape. We use the methods of geometric morphometrics to study the shapes of individual leaflets and whole leaves in 20 taxa of Potentilla (sensu lato). A newly developed test based on the bootstrap approach suggests that uncertainty in the molecular phylogeny precludes firm conclusions whether there is a phylogenetic signal in the data on leaf shape. For variation among taxa, variation within taxa, as well as fluctuating asymmetry, there is evidence of strong morphological integration. The patterns of variation are similar across all three levels, suggesting that integration within taxa may act as a constraint on evolutionary change.


Molecular Cell | 2015

Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional

Sascha H.C. Duttke; Scott A. Lacadie; Mahmoud M. Ibrahim; Christopher K. Glass; David L. Corcoran; Christopher Benner; Sven Heinz; James T. Kadonaga; Uwe Ohler

Divergent transcription, in which reverse-oriented transcripts occur upstream of eukaryotic promoters in regions devoid of annotated genes, has been suggested to be a general property of active promoters. Here we show that the human basal RNA polymerase II transcriptional machinery and core promoter are inherently unidirectional and that reverse-oriented transcripts originate from their own cognate reverse-directed core promoters. In vitro transcription analysis and mapping of nascent transcripts in HeLa cells revealed that sequences at reverse start sites are similar to those of their forward counterparts. The use of DNase I accessibility to define proximal promoter borders revealed that about half of promoters are unidirectional and that unidirectional promoters are depleted at their upstream edges of reverse core promoter sequences and their associated chromatin features. Divergent transcription is thus not an inherent property of the transcription process but rather the consequence of the presence of both forward- and reverse-directed core promoters.


Genes & Development | 2014

TRF2, but not TBP, mediates the transcription of ribosomal protein genes

Yuan-Liang Wang; Sascha H.C. Duttke; Kai Chen; Jeff Johnston; George A. Kassavetis; Julia Zeitlinger; James T. Kadonaga

The TCT core promoter element is present in most ribosomal protein (RP) genes in Drosophila and humans. Here we show that TBP (TATA box-binding protein)-related factor TRF2, but not TBP, is required for transcription of the TCT-dependent RP genes. In cells, TCT-dependent transcription, but not TATA-dependent transcription, increases or decreases upon overexpression or depletion of TRF2. In vitro, purified TRF2 activates TCT but not TATA promoters. ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation [ChIP] combined with deep sequencing) experiments revealed the preferential localization of TRF2 at TCT versus TATA promoters. Hence, a specialized TRF2-based RNA polymerase II system functions in the synthesis of RPs and complements the RNA polymerase I and III systems.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2016

Nascent RNA sequencing reveals distinct features in plant transcription

Jonathan Hetzel; Sascha H.C. Duttke; Christopher Benner; Joanne Chory

Significance Transcription is a fundamental and dynamic step in the regulation of gene expression, but the characteristics of plant transcription are poorly understood. We adapted the global nuclear run-on sequencing (GRO-seq) and 5′GRO-seq methods for plants and provide a plant version of the next-generation sequencing software HOMER (homer.ucsd.edu/homer/plants) to facilitate data analysis. Mapping nascent transcripts in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings enabled identification of known and novel transcripts and precisely mapped their start sites, revealing distinct characteristics in plant transcription. Our modified method to map engaged RNA polymerases and nascent transcripts in primary tissues paves the way for comparative and response studies. Transcriptional regulation of gene expression is a major mechanism used by plants to confer phenotypic plasticity, and yet compared with other eukaryotes or bacteria, little is known about the design principles. We generated an extensive catalog of nascent and steady-state transcripts in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings using global nuclear run-on sequencing (GRO-seq), 5′GRO-seq, and RNA-seq and reanalyzed published maize data to capture characteristics of plant transcription. De novo annotation of nascent transcripts accurately mapped start sites and unstable transcripts. Examining the promoters of coding and noncoding transcripts identified comparable chromatin signatures, a conserved “TGT” core promoter motif and unreported transcription factor-binding sites. Mapping of engaged RNA polymerases showed a lack of enhancer RNAs, promoter-proximal pausing, and divergent transcription in Arabidopsis seedlings and maize, which are commonly present in yeast and humans. In contrast, Arabidopsis and maize genes accumulate RNA polymerases in proximity of the polyadenylation site, a trend that coincided with longer genes and CpG hypomethylation. Lack of promoter-proximal pausing and a higher correlation of nascent and steady-state transcripts indicate Arabidopsis may regulate transcription predominantly at the level of initiation. Our findings provide insight into plant transcription and eukaryotic gene expression as a whole.


Plant Physiology | 2012

Mutant Flower Morphologies in the Wind Orchid, a Novel Orchid Model Species

Sascha H.C. Duttke; Nicholas Zoulias; Minsung Kim

Orchids comprise one of the largest and most diverse angiosperm families. Currently, about 24,500 orchid species have been reported, and there are many more to be discovered ([Dressler, 2005][1]). Due to their biological complexity, orchids have been proposed as an attractive system with which to


Molecular Cell | 2015

Perspectives on Unidirectional versus Divergent Transcription

Sascha H.C. Duttke; Scott A. Lacadie; Mahmoud M. Ibrahim; Christopher K. Glass; David L. Corcoran; Christopher Benner; Sven Heinz; James T. Kadonaga; Uwe Ohler

In their Letter to the Editor, Andersson et al. (2015) examined divergent and unidirectional human promoter regions reported in our February 2015 Molecular Cell paper (Duttke et al., 2015) and compared our results with data from their concurrent studies (Andersson et al., 2014; Core et al., 2014). They concluded that the nature of our transcription start site (TSS) data generated by the 5′-GRO-seq method (Lam et al., 2013) led to an inflation of the percentage of unidirectional promoter regions, and further suggested that unidirectional promoter regions may not exist.


Trends in Biochemical Sciences | 2015

Evolution and diversification of the basal transcription machinery.

Sascha H.C. Duttke

Transcription initiation was once thought to be regulated primarily by sequence-specific transcription factors with the basal transcription machinery being largely invariant. Gradually it became apparent that the basal transcription machinery greatly diversified during evolution and new studies now demonstrate that diversification of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) family yielded specialized and largely independent transcription systems.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2014

RNA Polymerase III Accurately Initiates Transcription from RNA Polymerase II Promoters in Vitro

Sascha H.C. Duttke

Background: RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and III (Pol III) transcription systems are reported to regulate non-overlapping sets of genes. Results: Pol III can initiate transcription from Pol II promoters with AT-rich sequence. The DNA template to nuclear extract ratio determines the predominant polymerase. Conclusion: Pol II and Pol III transcription initiation can overlap. Significance: RNA polymerase specificity is variable and depends on the transcription conditions. In eukaryotes, there are three major RNA polymerases (Pol) in the nucleus, which are commonly described as transcribing non-overlapping subsets of genes. Structural studies have highlighted a conserved core shared among all three transcription systems. Initiation of human Pol III from TATA box-containing Pol II promoters under conditions with impaired Pol II transcription activity have been described previously. RNA polymerase III and Pol II were found to co-localize at the promoters of the c-myc gene and the RPPH1 sRNA in vivo. Here, I report that Pol III can, like Pol II, initiate transcription from most tested Pol II core promoters when assayed with crude human nuclear extracts (HSK, SNF, or Dignam). Both polymerases often initiate from the same transcription start site, and depend on a TATA box or AT-rich region but not the downstream promoter element (DPE) or the motif ten element (MTE). Moderate (∼2-fold) changes in the ratio of DNA template to nuclear extract were sufficient to change Pol II-mediated transcription to a mixture of Pol II- and Pol III-, or to a solely Pol III-dependent initiation of transcription from Pol II promoters. Polymerase specificity is thus not fixed but a variable that depends on the properties of the promoter and the transcription conditions. These findings provide functional evidence for a close similarity between the Pol II and Pol III transcription complexes, and additionally explain previous controversies in the literature.


Nature Communications | 2017

Mutant p53 shapes the enhancer landscape of cancer cells in response to chronic immune signaling

Homa Rahnamoun; Hanbin Lu; Sascha H.C. Duttke; Christopher Benner; Christopher K. Glass; Shannon M. Lauberth

Inflammation influences cancer development, progression, and the efficacy of cancer treatments, yet the mechanisms by which immune signaling drives alterations in the cancer cell transcriptome remain unclear. Using ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, and GRO-seq, here we demonstrate a global overlap in the binding of tumor-promoting p53 mutants and the master proinflammatory regulator NFκB that drives alterations in enhancer and gene activation in response to chronic TNF-α signaling. We show that p53 mutants interact directly with NFκB and that both factors impact the other’s binding at diverse sets of active enhancers. In turn, the simultaneous and cooperative binding of these factors is required to regulate RNAPII recruitment, the synthesis of enhancer RNAs, and the activation of tumor-promoting genes. Collectively, these findings establish a mechanism by which chronic TNF-α signaling orchestrates a functional interplay between mutant p53 and NFκB that underlies altered patterns of cancer-promoting gene expression.Inflammation is known to affect cancer development, yet the mechanisms by which immune signaling drives transformation remain unclear. Here, the authors provide evidence that chronic TNF-α signaling promotes the enhancer binding and transcriptional interplay between mutant p53 and NFκB.


Genes & Development | 2017

The human initiator is a distinct and abundant element that is precisely positioned in focused core promoters

Long Vo Ngoc; California Jack Cassidy; Cassidy Yunjing Huang; Sascha H.C. Duttke; James T. Kadonaga

DNA sequence signals in the core promoter, such as the initiator (Inr), direct transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II. Here we show that the human Inr has the consensus of BBCA+1BW at focused promoters in which transcription initiates at a single site or a narrow cluster of sites. The analysis of 7678 focused transcription start sites revealed 40% with a perfect match to the Inr and 16% with a single mismatch outside of the CA+1 core. TATA-like sequences are underrepresented in Inr promoters. This consensus is a key component of the DNA sequence rules that specify transcription initiation in humans.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sascha H.C. Duttke's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emma Westin

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jenhan Tao

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joanne Chory

Salk Institute for Biological Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan Hetzel

Salk Institute for Biological Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sven Heinz

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tobias Strid

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge