Satoshi Yamanokuchi

Oral and Parenteral Versus Parenteral Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (JMTO PREV 07-01): A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Trial.

Objective:To confirm the efficacy of oral and parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (ABX) in the elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Background:There is no evidence for the establishment of an optimal ABX regimen for laparoscopic colorectal surgery, which has become an important choice for the colorectal cancer patients. Methods:The colorectal cancer patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgery were eligible for this multicenter, open-label, randomized trial. They were randomized to receive either oral and parenteral prophylaxis (1 g cefmetazole before and every 3 h during the surgery plus 1 g oral kanamycin and 750 mg metronidazole twice on the day before the surgery; Oral-IV group) or parenteral prophylaxis alone (the same IV regimen; IV group). The primary endpoint was the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs). Secondary endpoints were the incidence rates of Clostridium difficile colitis, other infections, and postoperative noninfectious complications, as well as the frequency of isolating specific organisms. Results:Between November 2007 and December 2012, 579 patients (289 in the Oral-IV group and 290 in IV group) were evaluated for this study. The incidence of SSIs was 7.26% (21/289) in the Oral-IV group and 12.8% (37/290) in the IV group with an odds ratio of 0.536 (95% CI, 0.305–0.940; P = 0.028). The 2 groups had similar incidence rates of C difficile colitis (1/289 vs 3/290), other infections (6/289 vs 5/290), and postoperative noninfectious complications (11/289 vs 12/290). Conclusions:Our oral-parenteral ABX regimen significantly reduced the risk of SSIs following elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Suppressed complement activation in human decay accelerating factor transgenic porcine liver cross-circulated with nonhuman primates.

Background. We developed an extracorporeal liver perfusion (ECLP) system as a liver-assist device. In this study, we evaluated the safety of the ECLP using human decay accelerating factor (hDAF) transgenic porcine livers in healthy baboons. Methods. Livers were isolated from five hDAF transgenic pigs and five nontransgenic pigs for the ECLP. Ten cross-circulations between the ECLP and healthy baboons were performed without immunosuppressive agents. Cross-circulation was discontinued in any of the following circumstances: elevated hepatic arterial (>200 mm Hg) or portal (>60 mm Hg) perfusion pressure, massive exudate from the graft liver, mild macroscopic hemolysis, thrombocytopenia, or 24-hr well-conditioned cross-circulation. Results. The cross-circulations with nontransgenic porcine livers were discontinued at 4.4±1.2 hr (mean±standard deviation) because of high perfusion pressure (n=2) or hemolysis (n=3). Three cross-circulations with hDAF transgenic porcine livers were performed for 24 hr; the other two cross-circulations were discontinued at 13 and 17 hr because of massive exudate and thrombocytopenia, respectively. The duration was 20.4±5.1 hr. Deposition of membrane attack complex in the hDAF transgenic porcine liver was less than that in the nontransgenic liver, although immunoglobulin-M deposition was comparable. The porcine livers showed no apparent interlobular bleeding or lobular necrosis. All porcine livers maintained bile production during the cross-circulation. No baboons showed any serious complications after the cross-circulation. Conclusion. The hDAF transgenic porcine liver reduced complement activation in xenoperfusion with healthy nonhuman primate blood and led to extended duration of cross-circulation.