Sayda El Safi

A Global Comparative Evaluation of Commercial Immunochromatographic Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Visceral Leishmaniasis

Accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests was high in the Indian subcontinent; however, in Brazilian and East African samples, reduced sensitivity suggests that several cannot be used alone to exclude visceral leishmaniasis. Data on ease of use and performance using whole blood and in human immunodeficiency virus coinfections is needed.

Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests: visceral leishmaniasis

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a severe infectious disease caused by a protozoan parasite: Leishmania donovani in East Africa and the Indian subcontinent and Leishmania infantum in Latin America and the Mediterranean basin. Not all leishmanial infections lead to overt clinical disease, but in those infected persons who do develop the disease, multiplication of the parasite in the reticulo-endothelial system causes prolonged fever, anaemia, hepatosplenomegaly and weight loss. VL is fatal if it is not adequately treated. The drugs currently used to treat VL can have severe side effects and the clinical presentation of VL is not sufficiently specific to guide treatment. Highly accurate (both sensitive and specific), cheap and simple rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are therefore crucial for case-management of VL. Early case detection followed by adequate treatment is also central to control of VL because, as yet, no vaccine is available and the long-term impact of vector control is unclear. Although the need for accurate VL diagnostics is obvious, innovation in this field has been slow. Since the 1980s, the main objective of VL diagnostics development has been to replace the direct demonstration of parasites in tissue smears, a technique that is invasive and requires considerable expertise, by a ‘field test’ that is more appropriate for use in a VL-endemic context. Several serological tests have been developed, but none are specific for VL disease as such, although they have proved useful in combination with a clinical case definition. New diagnostic tools are needed for more than just the confirmation of VL disease. No alternatives to parasitological methods are yet available to establish test of cure in treated VL patients. Clinicians do not have the tools to distinguish re-infection from relapse in cases of recurrence, and control programmes do not have validated assays for the surveillance of drug resistance in parasites. Furthermore, in the context of the VL elimination initiative, it would be desirable to have better markers of leishmanial infection at the population level. Any evaluation of a new diagnostic device should carefully identify its intended purpose. Too often developers and researchers confuse a device for the detection of leishmanial infection with a device for the confirmation of VL disease, and this is particularly the case for nucleic-acidbased assays. PCR is usually highly sensitive for detection of leishmanial infection, but this does not mean PCR will be useful for the confirmation of acute VL disease in patients in endemic areas, as many carriers of the infection in these areas will be PCRpositive without developing VL disease. This article will focus specifically on the evaluation of RDTs for confirmation of VL disease.

Development of a Reverse Transcriptase Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for the Sensitive Detection of Leishmania Parasites in Clinical Samples

Here we describe a generic, reverse transcriptase-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay, for the identification of Leishmania species from clinical samples. LAMP is an isothermal reaction recently developed as a point-of-care diagnostic tool. Primers were designed in the conserved region of the 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene; amplification was visualized by the pre-amplification addition of fluorescent detection reagent (FDR) and a simple UV lamp. By using a reverse-transcriptase step, the system detected infections between 10 and 100 parasites per mL. The assay was tested on a range of nucleic acid extracts from Leishmania species, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) patients from Sudan, and cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) patients from Suriname. The sensitivity of RT-LAMP from the blood of VL patients was 83% (N = 30) compared with microscopy of bone-marrow and lymph-node aspirates; for CL patients the observed sensitivity was 98% (N = 43). The potential to use LAMP as a diagnostic tool for leishmaniasis is discussed.

Latent class analysis permits unbiased estimates of the validity of DAT for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis

Summary background Substantial uncertainty surrounds the specificity of the Direct Agglutination Test (DAT) for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in clinical suspects, since no good gold standard exists for unequivocally identifying diseased subjects. We explored the Latent Class Analysis (LCA) modelling technique to circumvent this problem.

Simplified molecular detection of Leishmania parasites in various clinical samples from patients with leishmaniasis

BackgroundMolecular methods to detect Leishmania parasites are considered specific and sensitive, but often not applied in endemic areas of developing countries due to technical complexity. In the present study isothermal, nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA) was coupled to oligochromatography (OC) to develop a simplified detection method for the diagnosis of leishmaniasis. NASBA-OC, detecting Leishmania RNA, was evaluated using clinical samples from visceral leishmaniasis patients from East Africa (n = 30) and cutaneous leishmaniasis from South America (n = 70) and appropriate control samples.ResultsAnalytical sensitivity was 10 parasites/ml of spiked blood, and 1 parasite/ml of culture. Diagnostic sensitivity of NASBA-OC was 93.3% (95% CI: 76.5%-98.8%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI: 91.1%-100%) on blood samples, while sensitivity and specificity on skin biopsy samples was 98.6% (95% CI: 91.2%-99.9%) and 100% (95% CI: 46.3%-100%), respectively.ConclusionThe NASBA-OC format brings implementation of molecular diagnosis of leishmaniasis in resource poor countries one step closer.

Accordance and concordance of PCR and NASBA followed by oligochromatography for the molecular diagnosis of Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania

Objective  To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of four simplified molecular assays for the diagnosis of Trypanosoma brucei spp. or Leishmania ssp. in a multicentre ring trial with seven participating laboratories.

Direct Leishmania species typing in Old World clinical samples: evaluation of 3 sensitive methods based on the heat-shock protein 70 gene

In the diagnosis of leishmaniasis, identification of the causative Leishmania species is relevant for treatment, prognosis, and epidemiology. Three new hsp70-based PCR variants were developed and recently validated on clinical samples from Peru, without the need for culturing. We evaluated their performance on 133 clinical samples (bone marrow, blood, buffy coat, lymph node aspirates, lesion biopsies) from 42 cutaneous and 56 visceral leishmaniasis patients and 35 negative cases, all from Old World countries (Italy, Sudan, Israel, and Tunisia). The 3 new PCRs were significantly more sensitive than those previously described for hsp70, and their respective restriction fragment analyses were more efficient for species identification. In 79% of the parasitologically confirmed positive samples, the species could be identified directly from sample DNA. This evaluation demonstrated that these new tools are globally applicable in different geographical, clinical, and sampling contexts, and they could become the reference method for identification of Leishmania species in clinical specimens.

Activity and turnover of eosinophil and neutrophil granulocytes are altered in visceral leishmaniasis

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a health issue in Sudan. Our aim was to investigate the involvement of eosinophils and neutrophils in VL by serum and plasma measurements of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) and some key cytokines and chemokines. Blood was collected from 125 VL patients and 181 healthy Sudanese controls from the same rural area. Results showed reduced eosinophil and neutrophil counts in the VL group (P=0.0001 and P=0.002, respectively). Serum-ECP levels were higher in the controls (P<0.0001), while plasma MPO levels were higher in the VL group (P<0.0001). Levels of IL-5, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-17 were increased among the VL group (P<0.0001, P=0.017 and P=0.03, respectively), whereas eotaxin and IL-8 levels were reduced (P<0.0001 and P=0.002, respectively). Positive correlations were found between IL-8 and ECP/MPO (P<0.0001). We conclude that eosinophil and neutrophil turnover and activity are increased in subjects in rural areas of Sudan. In VL the turnover was further increased, but the relatively low secretory activity of eosinophils and neutrophils in VL may relate to the reduced production and availability of the chemokines eotaxin and IL-8. The combined assay of ECP and MPO in serum and plasma provides further insight into the mechanisms of eosinophil and neutrophil involvement in disease and constitutes a novel approach to the study of disease processes.

Clinical bacteriology in low-resource settings: today's solutions

Low-resource settings are disproportionately burdened by infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance. Good quality clinical bacteriology through a well functioning reference laboratory network is necessary for effective resistance control, but low-resource settings face infrastructural, technical, and behavioural challenges in the implementation of clinical bacteriology. In this Personal View, we explore what constitutes successful implementation of clinical bacteriology in low-resource settings and describe a framework for implementation that is suitable for general referral hospitals in low-income and middle-income countries with a moderate infrastructure. Most microbiological techniques and equipment are not developed for the specific needs of such settings. Pending the arrival of a new generation diagnostics for these settings, we suggest focus on improving, adapting, and implementing conventional, culture-based techniques. Priorities in low-resource settings include harmonised, quality assured, and tropicalised equipment, consumables, and techniques, and rationalised bacterial identification and testing for antimicrobial resistance. Diagnostics should be integrated into clinical care and patient management; clinically relevant specimens must be appropriately selected and prioritised. Open-access training materials and information management tools should be developed. Also important is the need for onsite validation and field adoption of diagnostics in low-resource settings, with considerable shortening of the time between development and implementation of diagnostics. We argue that the implementation of clinical bacteriology in low-resource settings improves patient management, provides valuable surveillance for local antibiotic treatment guidelines and national policies, and supports containment of antimicrobial resistance and the prevention and control of hospital-acquired infections.

Diagnosis of Persistent Fever in the Tropics: Set of Standard Operating Procedures Used in the NIDIAG Febrile Syndrome Study.

In resource-limited settings, the scarcity of skilled personnel and adequate laboratory facilities makes the differential diagnosis of fevers complex [1–5]. Febrile illnesses are diagnosed clinically in most rural centers, and both Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) and clinical algorithms can be valuable aids to health workers and facilitate therapeutic decisions [6,7]. The persistent fever syndrome targeted by NIDIAG is defined as presence of fever for at least one week. The NIDIAG clinical research consortium focused on potentially severe and treatable infections and therefore targeted the following conditions as differential diagnosis of persistent fever: visceral leishmaniasis (VL), human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever, brucellosis, melioidosis, leptospirosis, malaria, tuberculosis, amoebic liver abscess, relapsing fever, HIV/AIDS, rickettsiosis, and other infectious diseases (e.g., pneumonia). From January 2013 to October 2014, a prospective clinical phase III diagnostic accuracy study was conducted in one site in Cambodia, two sites in Nepal, two sites in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and one site in Sudan (clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT01766830). The study objectives were to (1) determine the prevalence of the target diseases in patients presenting with persistent fever, (2) assess the predictive value of clinical and first-line laboratory features, and (3) assess the diagnostic accuracy of several RDTs for the diagnosis of the different target conditions.