Scott Alan Wuthrich

Triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation: experimental studies.

OBJECTIVES Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a swine model. BACKGROUND Triphasic shocks have been found to cause less post-shock dysfunction than biphasic shocks in chick embryo studies. METHODS After 30 s of electrically induced ventricular fibrillation (VF), each pig in part I (n = 32) received truncated exponential biphasic (7.2/7.2 ms) and triphasic (4.8/4.8/4.8 ms) transthoracic shocks. Each pig in part II (n = 14) received biphasic (5/5 ms) and triphasic shocks (5/5/5 ms). Three selected energy levels (50, 100, and 150 J) were tested for parts I and II. Pigs in part III (n = 13) received biphasic (5/5 ms) and triphasic (5/5/5 ms) shocks at a higher energy (200 and 300 J). Although the individual pulse durations of these shocks were equal, the energy of each pulse varied. Nine pigs in part I also received shocks where each individual pulse contained equal energy but was of a different duration (biphasic 3.3/11.1 ms; triphasic 2.0/3.2/9.2 ms). RESULTS Triphasic shocks of equal duration pulses achieved higher success than biphasic shocks at delivered low energies: <40 J: 38 +/- 5% triphasic vs. 19 +/- 4% biphasic (p < 0.01); 40 to <50 J: 66 +/- 7% vs. 42 +/- 7% (p < 0.01); and 50 to <65 J: 78 +/- 4% vs. 54 +/- 5% (p < 0.05). Shocks of equal energy but different duration pulses achieved relatively poor success for both triphasic and biphasic waveforms. Shock-induced ventricular tachycardia (VT) and asystole occurred less often after triphasic shocks. CONCLUSIONS Triphasic transthoracic shocks composed of equal duration pulses were superior to biphasic shocks for VF termination at low energies and caused less VT and asystole.

A novel hands-free carotid ultrasound detects low-flow cardiac output in a swine model of pulseless electrical activity arrest

OBJECTIVE To determine if a hands-free, noninvasive Doppler ultrasound device can reliably detect low-flow cardiac output by measuring carotid artery blood flow velocities. We compared the ability of observers to detect carotid artery flow velocity differences between pseudo-pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and true-PEA cardiac arrest. METHODS Five swine were instrumented with aortic (Ao) and right atrial pressure-transducing catheters. The Doppler ultrasound device was adhered to the neck over the carotid artery. Continuous electrocardiogram, pressure readings, and Doppler signal were recorded. Each swine underwent multiple episodes of fibrillation and resuscitation. Episodes of true-PEA and pseudo-PEA were retrospectively identified from all resuscitation attempts by examination of electrocardiogram and Ao waveforms. The sensitivity and specificity of the device to detect pseudo-PEA was obtained using observers blinded to Ao waveform recordings. RESULTS There was good interobserver reliability related to identification of pseudo- and true-PEA (κ = 0.873). The observers blinded to Ao waveform recordings agreed on 8 of the 9 episodes of pseudo-PEA, whereas 4 false positives of 26 true-PEA events were reported (sensitivity, 0.89; specificity, 0.85). The Doppler device was able to detect carotid flow velocity over a wide range of Ao blood pressures. CONCLUSIONS This hands-free, noninvasive Doppler ultrasound device can reliably differentiate pseudo-PEA from true-PEA during resuscitation from cardiac arrest, detecting pressure gradient changes of less than 5 mm Hg through to normotension. This device distinguishes conditions of no cardiac output from low cardiac output and may have applications for use during resuscitation from various etiologies of arrest and shock.