Sean P. Collins

Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy in low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma: preliminary results of a multi-institutional phase 1 feasibility trial.

Recent reports using extreme hypofractionated regimens in the treatment of low‐risk prostate adenocarcinoma have been encouraging. Here, the authors report on their own multi‐institutional experience with extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage disease.

Proctitis following stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

BackgroundProctitis after radiation therapy for prostate cancer remains an ongoing clinical challenge and critical quality of life issue. SBRT could minimize rectal toxicity by reducing the volume of rectum receiving high radiation doses and offers the potential radiobiologic benefits of hypofractionation. This study sought to evaluate the incidence and severity of proctitis following SBRT for prostate cancer.MethodsBetween February 2008 and July 2011, 269 men with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated definitively with SBRT monotherapy at Georgetown University Hospital. All patients were treated to 35-36.25Gy in 5 fractions delivered with the CyberKnife Radiosurgical System (Accuray). Rectal bleeding was recorded and scored using the CTCAE v.4. Telangiectasias were graded using the Vienna Rectoscopy Score (VRS). Proctitis was assessed via the Bowel domain of the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC)-26 at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24xa0months post-SBRT.ResultsThe median age was 69 years with a median prostate volume of 39 cc. The median follow-up was 3.9 years with a minimum follow-up of two years. The 2-year actuarial incidence of late rectal bleeding ≥ grade 2 was 1.5%. Endoscopy revealed VRS Grade 2 rectal telangiectasias in 11% of patients. All proctitis symptoms increased at one month post-SBRT but returned to near-baseline with longer follow-up. The most bothersome symptoms were bowel urgency and frequency. At one month post-SBRT, 11.2% and 8.5% of patients reported a moderate to big problem with bowel urgency and frequency, respectively. The EPIC bowel summary scores declined transiently at 1 month and experienced a second, more protracted decline between 6 months and 18 months before returning to near-baseline at two years post-SBRT. Prior to treatment, 4.1% of men felt their bowel function was a moderate to big problem which increased to 11.5% one month post-SBRT but returned to near-baseline at two years post-SBRT.ConclusionsIn this single institution cohort, the rate and severity of proctitis observed following SBRT is low. QOL decreased on follow-up; however, our results compare favorably to those reported for patients treated with alternative radiation modalities. Future prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Overview of Toxicity Outcomes with Prostate SBRT and Comparison to Other Treatment Interventions (Urinary, Rectal and Sexual Outcomes)

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis amongst adult males in the United States, with approximately 160,000 new diagnoses per year in the United States. Treatment of this disease may be associated with genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual adverse effects. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has recently gained acceptance as an effective treatment modality, although concerns have been voiced over a potentially increased risk of toxicity given the high dose-per-fraction regimens employed. Fortunately, a wealth patient-reported outcome (PRO) data, in addition to standard physician-scored toxicity, is available from single and multi-institutional reports. This chapter will review the adverse effects that have been reported following SBRT, provide guidelines for prevention and management of symptoms, and compare these outcomes with those achieved by other treatment methods.

The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery.

Background For patients with brain metastases, systemic disease burden has historically been accepted as a major determinant of overall survival (OS). However, less research has focused on specific history and physical findings made by clinicians and how such findings pertain to patient outcomes at a given time point. The aim of this study is to determine how the initial clinical assessment of patients with brain metastases, as part of the history and physical at the time of consultation, correlates to patient prognosis. Methods We evaluated a prospective, multi-institutional database of 1523 brain metastases in 507 patients who were treated with radiosurgery (Gamma Knife or CyberKnife) from 2001 to 2014. Relevant history of present illness (HPI) and past medical history (PMH) variables included comorbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and seizure history. Physical exam findings included a sensory exam, motor exam, and cognitive function. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of OS. Results Two hundred ninety-four patients were included in the final analysis with a median OS of 10.8u2009months (95% CI, 7.8–13.7u2009months). On univariate analysis, significant HPI predictors of OS included age, primary diagnosis, performance status, extracranial metastases, systemic disease status, and history of surgery. Significant predictors of OS from the PMH included cardiac, vascular, and infectious comorbidities. On a physical exam, findings consistent with cognitive deficits were predictive of worse OS. However, motor deficits or changes in vision were not predictive of worse OS. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, predictors of worse OS were primary diagnosis (pu2009=u20090.002), ECOG performance status (OR 1.73, pu2009<u20090.001), and presence of extracranial metastases (OR 1.22, pu2009=u20090.009). Conclusion Neurological deficits and systemic comorbidities noted at presentation are not associated with worse overall prognosis for patients with brain metastases undergoing radiosurgery. When encountering new patients with brain metastases, the most informative patient-related characteristics that determine prognosis remain performance status, primary diagnosis, and extent of extracranial disease.