Sebastian G.B. Furness

Beyond mere markers: functions for CD34 family of sialomucins in hematopoiesis.

CD34, podocalyxin, and endoglycan are members of a family of single-pass transmembrane proteins that show distinct expression on early hematopoietic precursors and vascular-associated tissue. In spite of the fact that the expression of CD34 on these early progenitors has been known for over 20 yr and used clinically in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for more than 15 yr, little is known about its exact role or function. More recently, CD34 expression has been shown to distinguish activated early progenitors from quiescent cells. With the subsequent identification of podocalyxin and endoglycan as related family members also expressed on early progenitor cells, attention is slowly shifting toward understanding how these molecules might contribute to progenitor function and behavior. In this review we examine the existing evidence and propose testable models to reveal the importance of these molecules for stem and progenitor cell function.

Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a class B GPCR–G-protein complex

Class B G-protein-coupled receptors are major targets for the treatment of chronic diseases, such as osteoporosis, diabetes and obesity. Here we report the structure of a full-length class B receptor, the calcitonin receptor, in complex with peptide ligand and heterotrimeric Gαsβγ protein determined by Volta phase-plate single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. The peptide agonist engages the receptor by binding to an extended hydrophobic pocket facilitated by the large outward movement of the extracellular ends of transmembrane helices 6 and 7. This conformation is accompanied by a 60° kink in helix 6 and a large outward movement of the intracellular end of this helix, opening the bundle to accommodate interactions with the α5-helix of Gαs. Also observed is an extended intracellular helix 8 that contributes to both receptor stability and functional G-protein coupling via an interaction with the Gβ subunit. This structure provides a new framework for understanding G-protein-coupled receptor function.

Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins Differentially Modulate the G Protein-Coupling Efficiency of Amylin Receptors

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) 1, 2, and 3 are prototypic G protein-coupled receptor accessory proteins that can alter not only receptor trafficking but also receptor phenotype. Specific RAMP interaction with the calcitonin receptor (CTR) generates novel and distinct receptors for the peptide amylin; however, the role of RAMPs in receptor signaling is not understood. The current study demonstrates that RAMP interaction with the CTRa in COS-7 or HEK-293 cells leads to selective modulation of signaling pathways activated by the receptor complex. There was a 20- to 30-fold induction in amylin potency at CTR/RAMP1 (AMY1) and CTR/RAMP3 (AMY3) receptors, compared with CTR alone, for formation of the second-messenger cAMP that parallels an increase in amylin binding affinity. In contrast, only 2- to 5-fold induction of amylin potency was seen for mobilization of intracellular Ca++ or activation of ERK1/2. In addition, in COS-7 cells, the increase in amylin potency for Ca++ mobilization was 2-fold greater for AMY3 receptors, compared with AMY1 receptors and this paralleled the relative capacity of overexpression of Galphaq proteins to augment induction of high affinity 125I-amylin binding. These data demonstrate that RAMP-complexed receptors have a different signaling profile to CTRs expressed in the absence of RAMPs, and this is likely due to direct effects of the RAMP on G protein-coupling efficiency.

The dioxin (aryl hydrocarbon) receptor as a model for adaptive responses of bHLH/PAS transcription factors

This review examines the common theme of adaptive responses of bHLH/PAS proteins, using the dioxin receptor as a prototype. The bHLH/PAS family of transcriptional regulators are a group of key developmental and environmental stress sensing proteins. They employ a variety of post‐translational control mechanisms to regulate their transcriptional output. Amongst this family, the dioxin receptor is best known for its ability to elicit toxic responses to dioxin and dioxin like chemicals even though it mediates more benign adaptive responses to non‐toxic xenobiotics. We discuss what is known about dioxin receptor physiology, both adaptive and inherent, along with its molecular regulation and put this into the context of the wider bHLH/PAS family. We also raise the issue of its toxic responses, in particular the idea that it is the dysregulation of its poorly characterised housekeeping functions that leads to these outcomes.

The pleiotropy of dioxin toxicity — Xenobiotic misappropriation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor's alternative physiological roles

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is a signal regulated transcription factor that has best been characterised as regulating the xenobiotic response to a variety of planar aromatic hydrocarbons. There is compelling evidence that it mediates most, if not all, of the toxic effects of dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin). Dioxin exposure results in a wide variety of toxic outcomes including severe wasting syndrome, chloracne, thymic involution, severe immune suppression, reduced fertility, hepatotoxicity, teratogenicity, tumour promotion and death. The pleiotropy of toxic outcomes implies the disruption of a wide range of normal physiological functions. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor has developmentally restricted expression as well as developmental defects in gene-targeted mice. It has a wide range of target genes that do not fit into the classical xenobiotic metabolising gene battery and has recently been shown to interact with NF-kappa B and the estrogen receptor. There is also evidence for its activation in the absence of exogenous ligand, all of which point to various roles outside xenobiotic metabolism. Ligands so far identified display differential activation potential with respect to receptor activity. This article addresses activities of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor that are outside the xenobiotic response. Known physiological roles are discussed as well as how their disruption contributes to the pleiotropic toxicity of TCDD.

The Extracellular Surface of the GLP-1 Receptor Is a Molecular Trigger for Biased Agonism

Summary Ligand-directed signal bias offers opportunities for sculpting molecular events, with the promise of better, safer therapeutics. Critical to the exploitation of signal bias is an understanding of the molecular events coupling ligand binding to intracellular signaling. Activation of class B G protein-coupled receptors is driven by interaction of the peptide N terminus with the receptor core. To understand how this drives signaling, we have used advanced analytical methods that enable separation of effects on pathway-specific signaling from those that modify agonist affinity and mapped the functional consequence of receptor modification onto three-dimensional models of a receptor-ligand complex. This yields molecular insights into the initiation of receptor activation and the mechanistic basis for biased agonism. Our data reveal that peptide agonists can engage different elements of the receptor extracellular face to achieve effector coupling and biased signaling providing a foundation for rational design of biased agonists.

Recent advances in understanding GLP-1R (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor) function.

Type 2 diabetes is a major global health problem and there is ongoing research for new treatments to manage the disease. The GLP-1R (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor) controls the physiological response to the incretin peptide, GLP-1, and is currently a major target for the development of therapeutics owing to the broad range of potential beneficial effects in Type 2 diabetes. These include promotion of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, increased insulin biosynthesis, preservation of β-cell mass, improved peripheral insulin sensitivity and promotion of weight loss. Despite this, our understanding of GLP-1R function is still limited, with the desired spectrum of GLP-1R-mediated signalling yet to be determined. We review the current understanding of GLP-1R function, in particular, highlighting recent contributions in the field on allosteric modulation, probe-dependence and ligand-directed signal bias and how these behaviours may influence future drug development.

Ligand-Dependent Modulation of G Protein Conformation Alters Drug Efficacy

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, mediated by hetero-trimeric G proteins, can be differentially controlled by agonists. At a molecular level, this is thought to occur principally via stabilization of distinct receptor conformations by individual ligands. These distinct conformations control subsequent recruitment of transducer and effector proteins. Here, we report that ligand efficacy at the calcitonin GPCR (CTR) is also correlated with ligand-dependent alterations to G protein conformation. We observe ligand-dependent differences in the sensitivity of the G protein ternary complex to disruption by GTP, due to conformational differences in the receptor-bound G protein hetero-trimer. This results in divergent agonist-dependent receptor-residency times for the hetero-trimeric G protein and different accumulation rates for downstream second messengers. This study demonstrates that factors influencing efficacy extend beyond receptor conformation(s) and expands understanding of the molecular basis for how G proteins control/influence efficacy. This has important implications for the mechanisms that underlie ligand-mediated biased agonism. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor dimerization differentially regulates agonist signaling but does not affect small molecule allostery

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a family B G protein-coupled receptor and an important drug target for the treatment of type II diabetes, with activation of pancreatic GLP-1Rs eliciting glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Currently, approved therapeutics acting at this receptor are peptide based, and there is substantial interest in small molecule modulators for the GLP-1R. Using a variety of resonance energy transfer techniques, we demonstrate that the GLP-1R forms homodimers and that transmembrane helix 4 (TM4) provides the primary dimerization interface. We show that disruption of dimerization using a TM4 peptide, a minigene construct encoding TM4, or by mutation of TM4, eliminates G protein-dependent high-affinity binding to GLP-1(7-36)NH2 but has selective effects on receptor signaling. There was <10-fold decrease in potency in cAMP accumulation or ERK1/2 phosphorylation assays but marked loss of intracellular calcium mobilization by peptide agonists. In contrast, there was near-complete abrogation of the cAMP response to an allosteric agonist, compound 2, but preservation of ERK phosphorylation. Collectively, this indicates that GLP-1R dimerization is important for control of signal bias. Furthermore, we reveal that two small molecule ligands are unaltered in their ability to allosterically modulate signaling from peptide ligands, demonstrating that these modulators act in cis within a single receptor protomer, and this has important implications for small molecule drug design.

Molecular mechanisms underlying physiological and receptor pleiotropic effects mediated by GLP‐1R activation

The incidence of type 2 diabetes in developed countries is increasing yearly with a significant negative impact on patient quality of life and an enormous burden on the healthcare system. Current biguanide and thiazolidinedione treatments for type 2 diabetes have a number of clinical limitations, the most serious long‐term limitation being the eventual need for insulin replacement therapy (Table 1). Since 2007, drugs targeting the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor have been marketed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. These drugs have enjoyed a great deal of success even though our underlying understanding of the mechanisms for their pleiotropic effects remain poorly characterized even while major pharmaceutical companies actively pursue small molecule alternatives. Coupling of the GLP‐1 receptor to more than one signalling pathway (pleiotropic signalling) can result in ligand‐dependent signalling bias and for a peptide receptor such as the GLP‐1 receptor this can be exaggerated with the use of small molecule agonists. Better consideration of receptor signalling pleiotropy will be necessary for future drug development. This is particularly important given the recent failure of taspoglutide, the report of increased risk of pancreatitis associated with GLP‐1 mimetics and the observed clinical differences between liraglutide, exenatide and the newly developed long‐acting exenatide long acting release, albiglutide and dulaglutide.