Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sebastian O'Shea is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sebastian O'Shea.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2016

Extensive release of methane from Arctic seabed west of Svalbard during summer 2014 does not influence the atmosphere

C. Lund Myhre; Benedicte Ferre; S. M. Platt; Anna Silyakova; Ove Hermansen; G. Allen; I. Pisso; Norbert Schmidbauer; Andreas Stohl; Joseph Pitt; Pär Jansson; J. Greinert; Carl J. Percival; A. M. Fjaeraa; Sebastian O'Shea; Martin Gallagher; M. Le Breton; Keith N. Bower; S. J.-B. Bauguitte; Stig B. Dalsøren; Sunil Vadakkepuliyambatta; R. E. Fisher; Euan G. Nisbet; D. Lowry; Gunnar Myhre; J. A. Pyle; M. Cain; Jürgen Mienert

We find that summer methane (CH4) release from seabed sediments west of Svalbard substantially increases CH4 concentrations in the ocean but has limited influence on the atmospheric CH4 levels. Our conclusion stems from complementary measurements at the seafloor, in the ocean, and in the atmosphere from land-based, ship and aircraft platforms during a summer campaign in 2014. We detected high concentrations of dissolved CH4 in the ocean above the seafloor with a sharp decrease above the pycnocline. Model approaches taking potential CH4 emissions from both dissolved and bubble-released CH4 from a larger region into account reveal a maximum flux compatible with the observed atmospheric CH4 mixing ratios of 2.4–3.8 nmol m−2 s−1. This is too low to have an impact on the atmospheric summer CH4 budget in the year 2014. Long-term ocean observatories may shed light on the complex variations of Arctic CH4 cycles throughout the year.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Area fluxes of carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide derived from airborne measurements around Greater London: A case study during summer 2012

Sebastian O'Shea; G. Allen; Zoe L. Fleming; S. J.-B. Bauguitte; Carl J. Percival; Martin Gallagher; James Lee; Carole Helfter; E. Nemitz

Airborne measurements of thermodynamic properties and carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and carbon monoxide (CO) mole fractions were recorded on board the FAAM BAe-146 UK research aircraft and used to characterize the inflow and outflow from Greater London on 30 July 2012. All three trace gases were observed to be significantly enhanced downwind of Greater London with spatially resolved plumes of comparable extent and position. A mass budget calculation using a box model approach (and uncertainty propagation) was used to determine net regional fluxes of 21 ± 3 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1, 0.13 ± 0.02 µmol CH4 m−2 s−1, and 0.12 ± 0.02 µmol CO m−2 s−1 for Greater London. These fluxes are comparable with simultaneous surface observations and previous studies in urban environments. A comparison was made with the 2010 UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (NAEI), and fluxes from this study are found to be factors 2.3 for CO2 and 2.2 for CO larger than those estimated by the spatially disaggregated NAEI (2011) for Greater London. Fluxes of CH4 were found to be a factor 3.4 larger than the UK NAEI (2009). The efficacy of this mass balance approach, in general, is also discussed in terms of key assumptions and uncertainties, and we offer advice for future studies on how uncertainties could be reduced.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2017

Measurement of the 13C isotopic signature of methane emissions from northern European wetlands

R. E. Fisher; D. Lowry; M. Lanoisellé; Rebecca Brownlow; J. A. Pyle; M. Cain; N. J. Warwick; U. Skiba; Julia Drewer; Kerry J. Dinsmore; Sarah R. Leeson; S. J.-B. Bauguitte; Axel Wellpott; Sebastian O'Shea; G. Allen; Martin Gallagher; Joseph Pitt; Carl J. Percival; Keith N. Bower; Charles George; Garry D. Hayman; Tuula Aalto; Annalea Lohila; Mika Aurela; Tuomas Laurila; Patrick M. Crill; Carmody K. McCalley; Euan G. Nisbet

Isotopic data provide powerful constraints on regional and global methane emissions and their source profiles. However, inverse modeling of spatially resolved methane flux is currently constrained by a lack of information on the variability of source isotopic signatures. In this study, isotopic signatures of emissions in the Fennoscandian Arctic have been determined in chambers over wetland, in the air 0.3 to 3 m above the wetland surface and by aircraft sampling from 100 m above wetlands up to the stratosphere. Overall, the methane flux to atmosphere has a coherent δ13C isotopic signature of −71 ± 1‰, measured in situ on the ground in wetlands. This is in close agreement with δ13C isotopic signatures of local and regional methane increments measured by aircraft campaigns flying through air masses containing elevated methane mole fractions. In contrast, results from wetlands in Canadian boreal forest farther south gave isotopic signatures of −67 ± 1‰. Wetland emissions dominate the local methane source measured over the European Arctic in summer. Chamber measurements demonstrate a highly variable methane flux and isotopic signature, but the results from air sampling within wetland areas show that emissions mix rapidly immediately above the wetland surface and methane emissions reaching the wider atmosphere do indeed have strongly coherent C isotope signatures. The study suggests that for boreal wetlands (>60°N) global and regional modeling can use an isotopic signature of −71‰ to apportion sources more accurately, but there is much need for further measurements over other wetlands regions to verify this.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Measurements of δ13C in CH4 and using particle dispersion modeling to characterize sources of arctic methane within an air mass

M. Cain; R. E. Fisher; D. Lowry; G. Allen; Sebastian O'Shea; Sam Illingworth; J. A. Pyle; N. J. Warwick; Benjamin T. Jones; Martin Gallagher; Keith N. Bower; M. Le Breton; Carl J. Percival; Jennifer Muller; A. Welpott; S. J.-B. Bauguitte; Charles George; Garry D. Hayman; Alistair J. Manning; C. Lund Myhre; M. Lanoisellé; Euan G. Nisbet

Abstract A stratified air mass enriched in methane (CH4) was sampled at ~600 m to ~2000 m altitude, between the north coast of Norway and Svalbard as part of the Methane in the Arctic: Measurements and Modelling campaign on board the UKs BAe‐146‐301 Atmospheric Research Aircraft. The approach used here, which combines interpretation of multiple tracers with transport modeling, enables better understanding of the emission sources that contribute to the background mixing ratios of CH4 in the Arctic. Importantly, it allows constraints to be placed on the location and isotopic bulk signature of the emission source(s). Measurements of δ13C in CH4 in whole air samples taken while traversing the air mass identified that the source(s) had a strongly depleted bulk δ13C CH4 isotopic signature of −70 (±2.1)‰. Combined Numerical Atmospheric‐dispersion Modeling Environment and inventory analysis indicates that the air mass was recently in the planetary boundary layer over northwest Russia and the Barents Sea, with the likely dominant source of methane being from wetlands in that region.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Airborne observations of the microphysical structure of two contrasting cirrus clouds

Sebastian O'Shea; T. W. Choularton; Gary Lloyd; Jonathan Crosier; Keith Bower; Martin Gallagher; Steven J. Abel; Richard Cotton; P. R. A. Brown; Jacob P. Fugal; O Schlenczek; Stephan Borrmann; Juliet C. Pickering

We present detailed airborne in situ measurements of cloud microphysics in two midlatitude cirrus clouds, collected as part of the Cirrus Coupled Cloud-Radiation Experiment (CIRCCREX). A new habit recognition algorithm for sorting cloud particle images using a neural network is introduced. Both flights observed clouds that were related to frontal systems, but one was actively developing whilst the other dissipated as it was sampled. The two clouds showed distinct differences in particle number, habit and size. However a number of common features were observed in the 2DS dataset, including a distinct bimodal size distribution within the higher temperature regions of the clouds. This may result from a combination of local heterogeneous nucleation and large particles sedimenting from aloft. Both clouds had small ice crystals (<100 µm) present at all levels However, this small ice mode is not present in observations from a holographic probe. This raises the possibility that the small ice observed by optical array probes may at least be in part an instrument artefact due to the counting of out-of-focus large particles as small ice. The concentrations of ice crystals were a factor ~10 higher in the actively growing cloud with the stronger updrafts, with a mean concentration of 261 L-1 compared to 29 L-1 in the decaying case. Particles larger than 700 µm were largely absent from the decaying cirrus case. A comparison with ice nucleating particle parameterisations suggests that for the developing case the ice concentrations at the lowest temperatures are best explained by homogenous nucleation.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

A cautionary tale: A study of a methane enhancement over the North Sea

M. Cain; N. J. Warwick; R. E. Fisher; D. Lowry; M. Lanoisellé; Euan G. Nisbet; Joseph Pitt; Sebastian O'Shea; Keith N. Bower; G. Allen; Sam Illingworth; Alastair Manning; S. J.-B. Bauguitte; I. Pisso; J. A. Pyle

Airborne measurements of a methane (CH4) plume over the North Sea from August 2013 are analyzed. The plume was only observed downwind of circumnavigated gas fields, and three methods are used to determine its source. First, a mass balance calculation assuming a gas field source gives a CH4 emission rate between 2.5±0.8x104 and 4.6±1.5x104 kg h−1. This would be greater than the industry target of a 0.5% leak rate if it were emitting for more than half the time. Second, annual average UK CH4 emissions are combined with an atmospheric dispersion model to create pseudo-observations. Clean air from the North Atlantic passed over mainland UK, picking up anthropogenic emissions. To best explain the observed plume using pseudo-observations, an additional North Sea source from the gas rigs area is added. Third, the δ13C-CH4 from the plume is shown to be -53%0, which is lighter than fossil gas but heavier than the UK average emission. We conclude that either an additional small-area mainland source is needed, combined with temporal variability in emission or transport in small-scale meteorological features. Alternatively, a combination of additional sources that are at least 75% from the mainland (-58%0) and up to 25% from the North Sea gas rigs area (-32%0) would explain the measurements. Had the isotopic analysis not been performed, the likely conclusion would have been of a gas field source of CH4. This demonstrates the limitation of analysing mole fractions alone, as the simplest explanation is rejected based on analysis of isotopic data.


Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions | 2018

Airborne validation of radiative transfer modelling of ice clouds atmillimetre and sub-millimetre wavelengths

Stuart Fox; Jana Mendrok; Patrick Eriksson; Robin Ekelund; Sebastian O'Shea; Keith N. Bower; R. Chawn Harlow; Juliet C. Pickering

The next generation of European polar orbiting weather satellites will carry a novel instrument, the Ice Cloud Imager (ICI), which uses passive observations between 183 and 664 GHz to make daily global observations of cloud ice. Successful use of these observations requires accurate modelling of cloud ice scattering, and this study uses airborne observations from two flights of the Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) BAe 146 research aircraft to validate radiative transfer simulations of cirrus clouds at frequencies between 325 and 664 GHz using the Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Simulator (ARTS) and a stateof-the-art database of cloud ice optical properties. Particular care is taken to ensure that the inputs to the radiative transfer model are representative of the true atmospheric state by combining both remote-sensing and in situ observations of the same clouds to create realistic vertical profiles of cloud properties that are consistent with both observed particle size distributions and bulk ice mass. The simulations are compared to measurements from the International Submillimetre Airborne Radiometer (ISMAR), which is an airborne demonstrator for ICI. It is shown that whilst they are generally able to reproduce the observed cloud signals, for a given ice water path (IWP) there is considerable sensitivity to the cloud microphysics, including the distribution of ice mass within the cloud and the ice particle habit. Accurate retrievals from ICI will therefore require realistic representations of cloud microphysical properties. Copyright statement. The works published in this journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This license does not affect the Crown copyright work, which is re-usable under the Open Government Licence (OGL). The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License and the OGL are interoperable and do not conflict with, reduce or limit each other.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Constraints on oceanic methane emissions west of Svalbard from atmospheric in situ measurements and Lagrangian transport modeling

I. Pisso; C. Lund Myhre; S. M. Platt; Sabine Eckhardt; Ove Hermansen; Norbert Schmidbauer; Jürgen Mienert; Sunil Vadakkepuliyambatta; S. J.-B. Bauguitte; Joseph Pitt; G. Allen; Keith N. Bower; Sebastian O'Shea; Martin Gallagher; Carl J. Percival; J. A. Pyle; M. Cain; Andreas Stohl

Abstract Methane stored in seabed reservoirs such as methane hydrates can reach the atmosphere in the form of bubbles or dissolved in water. Hydrates could destabilize with rising temperature further increasing greenhouse gas emissions in a warming climate. To assess the impact of oceanic emissions from the area west of Svalbard, where methane hydrates are abundant, we used measurements collected with a research aircraft (Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements) and a ship (Helmer Hansen) during the Summer 2014 and for Zeppelin Observatory for the full year. We present a model‐supported analysis of the atmospheric CH4 mixing ratios measured by the different platforms. To address uncertainty about where CH4 emissions actually occur, we explored three scenarios: areas with known seeps, a hydrate stability model, and an ocean depth criterion. We then used a budget analysis and a Lagrangian particle dispersion model to compare measurements taken upwind and downwind of the potential CH4 emission areas. We found small differences between the CH4 mixing ratios measured upwind and downwind of the potential emission areas during the campaign. By taking into account measurement and sampling uncertainties and by determining the sensitivity of the measured mixing ratios to potential oceanic emissions, we provide upper limits for the CH4 fluxes. The CH4 flux during the campaign was small, with an upper limit of 2.5 nmol m−2 s−1 in the stability model scenario. The Zeppelin Observatory data for 2014 suggest CH4 fluxes from the Svalbard continental platform below 0.2 Tg yr−1. All estimates are in the lower range of values previously reported.


Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2013

Development of a cavity-enhanced absorption spectrometer for airborne measurements of CH 4 and CO 2

Sebastian O'Shea; S. J.-B. Bauguitte; Martin Gallagher; D. Lowry; Carl J. Percival


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2013

Quantifying the impact of BOReal forest fires on Tropospheric oxidants over the Atlantic using Aircraft and Satellites (BORTAS) experiment: design, execution and science overview

Paul I. Palmer; Mark Parrington; James Lee; Alastair C. Lewis; Andrew R. Rickard; Peter F. Bernath; Thomas J. Duck; D. L. Waugh; David W. Tarasick; Stephen J. Andrews; Eleonora Aruffo; L. J. Bailey; E. Barrett; S. J.-B. Bauguitte; K. R. Curry; P. Di Carlo; L. Chisholm; L. Dan; G. Forster; J. E. Franklin; Mark Gibson; Debora Griffin; Detlev Helmig; J. R. Hopkins; J. T. Hopper; Michael E. Jenkin; D. Kindred; J. Kliever; M. Le Breton; Stephan Matthiesen

Collaboration


Dive into the Sebastian O'Shea's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. Allen

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Keith N. Bower

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. A. Pyle

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sam Illingworth

Manchester Metropolitan University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge