Sergei V. Isakov
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sergei V. Isakov.
Nature Physics | 2014
Sergio Boixo; Troels F. Rønnow; Sergei V. Isakov; Zhi-Hui Wang; David B. Wecker; Daniel A. Lidar; John M. Martinis; Matthias Troyer
Quantum annealing is expected to solve certain optimization problems more efficiently, but there are still open questions regarding the functioning of devices such as D-Wave One. A numerical and experimental investigation of its performance shows evidence for quantum annealing with 108 qubits.
Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment | 2007
Bela Bauer; Lincoln D. Carr; Hans Gerd Evertz; Adrian E. Feiguin; Juliana Freire; Sebastian Fuchs; Lukas Gamper; Jan Gukelberger; Emanuel Gull; S Guertler; A Hehn; R Igarashi; Sergei V. Isakov; David Koop; Pn Ma; P Mates; Haruhiko Matsuo; Olivier Parcollet; G Pawłowski; Jd Picon; Lode Pollet; Emanuele Santos; V. W. Scarola; Ulrich Schollwöck; Cláudio T. Silva; Brigitte Surer; Synge Todo; Simon Trebst; Matthias Troyer; Michael L. Wall
We present release 2.0 of the ALPS (Algorithms and Libraries for Physics Simulations) project, an open source software project to develop libraries and application programs for the simulation of strongly correlated quantum lattice models such as quantum magnets, lattice bosons, and strongly correlated fermion systems. The code development is centered on common XML and HDF5 data formats, libraries to simplify and speed up code development, common evaluation and plotting tools, and simulation programs. The programs enable non-experts to start carrying out serial or parallel numerical simulations by providing basic implementations of the important algorithms for quantum lattice models: classical and quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) using non-local updates, extended ensemble simulations, exact and full diagonalization (ED), the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) both in a static version and a dynamic time-evolving block decimation (TEBD) code, and quantum Monte Carlo solvers for dynamical mean field theory (DMFT). The ALPS libraries provide a powerful framework for programmers to develop their own applications, which, for instance, greatly simplify the steps of porting a serial code onto a parallel, distributed memory machine. Major changes in release 2.0 include the use of HDF5 for binary data, evaluation tools in Python, support for the Windows operating system, the use of CMake as build system and binary installation packages for Mac OS X and Windows, and integration with the VisTrails workflow provenance tool. The software is available from our web server at http://alps.comp-phys.org/.
Science | 2014
Troels F. Rønnow; Zhi-Hui Wang; Joshua Job; Sergio Boixo; Sergei V. Isakov; David B. Wecker; John M. Martinis; Daniel A. Lidar; Matthias Troyer
How to benchmark a quantum computer Quantum machines offer the possibility of performing certain computations much faster than their classical counterparts. However, how to define and measure quantum speedup is a topic of debate. Rønnow et al. describe methods for fairly evaluating the difference in computational power between classical and quantum processors. They define various types of quantum speedup and consider quantum processors that are designed to solve a specific class of problems. Science, this issue p. 420 What makes a quantum machine quantum? The development of small-scale quantum devices raises the question of how to fairly assess and detect quantum speedup. Here, we show how to define and measure quantum speedup and how to avoid pitfalls that might mask or fake such a speedup. We illustrate our discussion with data from tests run on a D-Wave Two device with up to 503 qubits. By using random spin glass instances as a benchmark, we found no evidence of quantum speedup when the entire data set is considered and obtained inconclusive results when comparing subsets of instances on an instance-by-instance basis. Our results do not rule out the possibility of speedup for other classes of problems and illustrate the subtle nature of the quantum speedup question.
Nature Physics | 2018
Sergio Boixo; Sergei V. Isakov; Vadim N. Smelyanskiy; Ryan Babbush; Nan Ding; Zhang Jiang; Michael J. Bremner; John M. Martinis; Hartmut Neven
A critical question for quantum computing in the near future is whether quantum devices without error correction can perform a well-defined computational task beyond the capabilities of supercomputers. Such a demonstration of what is referred to as quantum supremacy requires a reliable evaluation of the resources required to solve tasks with classical approaches. Here, we propose the task of sampling from the output distribution of random quantum circuits as a demonstration of quantum supremacy. We extend previous results in computational complexity to argue that this sampling task must take exponential time in a classical computer. We introduce cross-entropy benchmarking to obtain the experimental fidelity of complex multiqubit dynamics. This can be estimated and extrapolated to give a success metric for a quantum supremacy demonstration. We study the computational cost of relevant classical algorithms and conclude that quantum supremacy can be achieved with circuits in a two-dimensional lattice of 7 × 7 qubits and around 40 clock cycles. This requires an error rate of around 0.5% for two-qubit gates (0.05% for one-qubit gates), and it would demonstrate the basic building blocks for a fault-tolerant quantum computer.As a benchmark for the development of a future quantum computer, sampling from random quantum circuits is suggested as a task that will lead to quantum supremacy—a calculation that cannot be carried out classically.
Physical Review X | 2016
Vasil S. Denchev; Sergio Boixo; Sergei V. Isakov; Nan Ding; Ryan Babbush; Vadim N. Smelyanskiy; John M. Martinis; Hartmut Neven
Quantum annealing (QA) has been proposed as a quantum enhanced optimization heuristic exploiting tunneling. Here, we demonstrate how finite range tunneling can provide considerable computational advantage. For a crafted problem designed to have tall and narrow energy barriers separating local minima, the D-Wave 2X quantum annealer achieves significant runtime advantages relative to Simulated Annealing (SA). For instances with 945 variables, this results in a time-to-99%-success-probability that is
Nature Physics | 2011
Sergei V. Isakov; Matthew B. Hastings; Roger G. Melko
\sim 10^8
Physical Review Letters | 2004
Sergei V. Isakov; K. Gregor; Roderich Moessner; S. L. Sondhi
times faster than SA running on a single processor core. We also compared physical QA with Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC), an algorithm that emulates quantum tunneling on classical processors. We observe a substantial constant overhead against physical QA: D-Wave 2X again runs up to
Nature Communications | 2016
Sergio Boixo; Vadim N. Smelyanskiy; Alireza Shabani; Sergei V. Isakov; Mark Dykman; Vasil S. Denchev; Mohammad H. Amin; Anatoly Yu. Smirnov; Masoud Mohseni; Hartmut Neven
\sim 10^8
Science | 2015
Bettina Heim; Troels F. Rønnow; Sergei V. Isakov; Matthias Troyer
times faster than an optimized implementation of QMC on a single core. We note that there exist heuristic classical algorithms that can solve most instances of Chimera structured problems in a timescale comparable to the D-Wave 2X. However, we believe that such solvers will become ineffective for the next generation of annealers currently being designed. To investigate whether finite range tunneling will also confer an advantage for problems of practical interest, we conduct numerical studies on binary optimization problems that cannot yet be represented on quantum hardware. For random instances of the number partitioning problem, we find numerically that QMC, as well as other algorithms designed to simulate QA, scale better than SA. We discuss the implications of these findings for the design of next generation quantum annealers.
Computer Physics Communications | 2015
Sergei V. Isakov; Ilia Zintchenko; Troels F. Rønnow; Matthias Troyer
Spin liquids are states of matter that reside outside the regime where the Landau paradigm for classifying phases can be applied. This makes them interesting, but also hard to find, as no conventional order parameters exist. The authors demonstrate that topologically ordered spin-liquid phases can be identified by numerically evaluating a measure known as topological entanglement entropy.