Sergey Bobrovnikov
Moscow State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sergey Bobrovnikov.
Cosmic Research (English translation of Kosimicheskie Issledovaniya) | 2004
M. I. Panasyuk; S. N. Kuznetsov; L. L. Lazutin; S.I. Avdyushin; I. I. Alexeev; P.P. Ammosov; A.E. Antonova; D.G. Baishev; E. S. Belenkaya; A.B. Beletsky; A. V. Belov; V.V. Benghin; Sergey Bobrovnikov; V.A. Bondarenko; K.A. Boyarchuk; I. S. Veselovsky; T.Y. Vyushkova; G.A. Gavrilieva; S. P. Gaidash; E. A. Ginzburg; Yu. I. Denisov; A.V. Dmitriev; G.A. Zherebtsov; L. M. Zelenyi; G.S. Ivanov-Kholodny; V. V. Kalegaev; Kh. D. Kanonidi; N. G. Kleimenova; O. V. Kozyreva; O.P. Kolomiitsev
Preliminary results of an analysis of satellite and ground-based measurements during extremely strong magnetic storms at the end of October 2003 are presented, including some numerical modeling. The geosynchronous satellites Ekspress-A2and Ekspress-A3, and the low-altitude polar satellites Coronas-F and Meteor-3M carried out measurements of charged particles (electrons, protons, and ions) of solar and magnetospheric origin in a wide energy range. Disturbances of the geomagnetic field caused by extremely high activity on the Sun were studied at more than twenty magnetic stations from Lovozero (Murmansk region) to Tixie (Sakha-Yakutia). Unique data on the dynamics of the ionosphere, riometric absorption, geomagnetic pulsations, and aurora observations at mid-latitudes are obtained.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2001
I. I. Alexeev; V. V. Kalegaev; E. S. Belenkaya; Sergey Bobrovnikov; Y. I. Feldstein; L. I. Gromova
The dynamics of the magnetospheric current systems are studied in the course of the specific magnetospheric disturbance on January 9–12, 1997, caused by the interaction of the Earths magnetosphere with a dense solar wind plasma cloud. To estimate the contribution of the different sources of the magnetospheric magnetic field to the disturbance ground measured, a dynamic paraboloid model of the magnetosphere is used. The model input parameters are defined by the solar wind density and velocity, by the strength and direction of the interplanetary magnetic field, and by the auroral AL index. The total energy of the ring current particles is calculated from the energy balance equation, where the injection function is determined by the value of the solar wind electric field. New analytical relations describing the dynamics of the different magnetospheric magnetic field sources dependent on the model input parameters are obtained. The analysis of the magnetic disturbances during the January 9–12, 1997, event shows that in the course of the main phase of the magnetic storm the contribution of the ring current, the currents on the magnetopause, and the currents in the magnetotail are approximately equal to each other by an order of magnitude. Nevertheless, in some periods one of the current systems becomes dominant. For example, an intense Dst positive enhancement (up to +50 nT) in the course of the magnetic storm recovery phase in the first hours on January 11, 1997, is associated with a significant increase of the currents on the magnetopause, while the ring current and the magnetotail current remain at a quiet level. A comparison of the calculated Dst variation with measurements indicates good agreement. The root mean square deviation is ∼ 8.7 nT in the course of the storm.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1998
I. I. Alexeev; D. G. Sibeck; Sergey Bobrovnikov
We start from an assumption that merging occurs in regions of the magnetopause where current strengths are greater than some threshold value which corresponds to the total jump in the field across the magnetopause greater than 50 nT. Because time and cost constraints preclude running numerical simulations for a wide variety of interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) orientations to determine these locations, we adopt an analytical model based on previously derived formulations for magnetospheric and magnetosheath magnetic fields. The magnetospheric magnetic field is confined within a paraboloid. The magnetosheath magnetic field is derived from that in the solar wind and lies between the magnetopause and a paraboloid bow shock. We allow a slight diffusion of the magnetosheath magnetic field into the magnetosphere. The results of the model show that during periods of due southward IMF orientation, merging occurs (as expected) in a wide region centered on the subsolar magnetopause. During periods of northward IMF, connection continues near the subsolar point but also poleward of the cusps. Magnetic energy is only released to the plasma in the latter regions. During periods of strongly northward IMF (By = 0), reconnection ceases on the subsolar magnetopause but continues poleward of the cusp. If the IMF points northward but By is nonzero, reconnection continues near the subsolar point and poleward of the cusps. During periods of sunward IMF orientation, merging nearly ceases on the northern hemisphere (except in the vicinity of the subsolar point) but continues outside the southern lobes. Dawnward and duskward IMF orientations produce tilted patches of enhanced current densities in the subsolar region. We compare the results of our model with previous predictions of the “component” and “antiparallel” merging models.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2006
I. I. Alexeev; V. V. Kalegaev; E. S. Belenkaya; Sergey Bobrovnikov; E. J. Bunce; S. W. H. Cowley; J. D. Nichols
Space Science Reviews | 2003
I. I. Alexeev; E. S. Belenkaya; Sergey Bobrovnikov; V. V. Kalegaev
Planetary and Space Science | 2005
E. S. Belenkaya; Sergey Bobrovnikov; I. I. Alexeev; V. V. Kalegaev; S. W. H. Cowley
Archive | 1996
I. I. Alexeev; Sergey Bobrovnikov
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union | 2017
I. N. Myagkova; V. V. Kalegaev; M. I. Panasyuk; Yuliya S. Shugai; Sergey Dolenko; Sergey Bobrovnikov; V. O. Barinova; Minh Duc Nguyen; Vladimir Shiroky; Valery E. Eremeev; A. V. Bogomolov; O. G. Barinov; Natalia Vlasova; Nikolay V. Kusnetsov
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union | 2017
Irina N. Myagkova; A. V. Bogomolov; Vitaly V. Bogomolov; S. I. Svertilov; Sergey Bobrovnikov; I. V. Yashin; M. I. Panasyuk; V. V. Kalegaev; V. L. Petrov; Svetlana S. Shishkova
European geosciences union general assembly | 2016
I. N. Myagkova; V. V. Kalegaev; M. I. Panasyuk; S. I. Svertilov; V. V. Bogomolov; A. V. Bogomolov; V. O. Barinova; O. G. Barinov; Sergey Bobrovnikov; Sergey Dolenko; L.R. Mukhametdinova; Vladimir Shiroky; J. Shugay