Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where V. V. Kalegaev is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by V. V. Kalegaev.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1996

Magnetic storms and magnetotail currents

I. I. Alexeev; E. S. Belenkaya; V. V. Kalegaev; Y. I. Feldstein; A. Grafe

The magnetospheric magnetic field is highly time-dependent and may have explosive changes (magnetospheric substorms and geomagnetic storms) accompanied by significant energy input into the magnetosphere. However, the existing stationary magnetospheric models can not simulate the magnetosphere for disturbed conditions associated with the most interesting magnetospheric physics events (intensive auroras, particle injection in the inner magnetosphere, and precipitations at the high latitudes, etc.). We propose a method for constructing a nonstationary model of the magnetospheric magnetic field, which enables us to describe the magnetosphere during the disturbances. The dynamic changes of the magnetosphere will be represented as a sequence of quasistationary states. The relative contributions to the Dst index by various sources of magnetospheric magnetic field are considered using a dynamic model of the Earths magnetosphere. The calculated magnetic field is obtained by using the solar wind and geomagnetic activity empirical data of the magnetic storm of March 23–24, 1969 and the magnetic disturbance of July 24–26, 1986. The main emphasis is on the current system of the magnetospheric tail, the variations of which enable a description of the fast changes of Dst.


Cosmic Research (English translation of Kosimicheskie Issledovaniya) | 2004

Magnetic storms in October 2003

M. I. Panasyuk; S. N. Kuznetsov; L. L. Lazutin; S.I. Avdyushin; I. I. Alexeev; P.P. Ammosov; A.E. Antonova; D.G. Baishev; E. S. Belenkaya; A.B. Beletsky; A. V. Belov; V.V. Benghin; Sergey Bobrovnikov; V.A. Bondarenko; K.A. Boyarchuk; I. S. Veselovsky; T.Y. Vyushkova; G.A. Gavrilieva; S. P. Gaidash; E. A. Ginzburg; Yu. I. Denisov; A.V. Dmitriev; G.A. Zherebtsov; L. M. Zelenyi; G.S. Ivanov-Kholodny; V. V. Kalegaev; Kh. D. Kanonidi; N. G. Kleimenova; O. V. Kozyreva; O.P. Kolomiitsev

Preliminary results of an analysis of satellite and ground-based measurements during extremely strong magnetic storms at the end of October 2003 are presented, including some numerical modeling. The geosynchronous satellites Ekspress-A2and Ekspress-A3, and the low-altitude polar satellites Coronas-F and Meteor-3M carried out measurements of charged particles (electrons, protons, and ions) of solar and magnetospheric origin in a wide energy range. Disturbances of the geomagnetic field caused by extremely high activity on the Sun were studied at more than twenty magnetic stations from Lovozero (Murmansk region) to Tixie (Sakha-Yakutia). Unique data on the dynamics of the ionosphere, riometric absorption, geomagnetic pulsations, and aurora observations at mid-latitudes are obtained.


Advances in Space Research | 2015

Understanding space weather to shield society : A global road map for 2015-2025 commissioned by COSPAR and ILWS

Carolus J. Schrijver; K. Kauristie; A. D. Aylward; Clezio Marcos Denardini; Sarah E. Gibson; Alexi Glover; Nat Gopalswamy; M. Grande; Mike Hapgood; Daniel Heynderickx; Norbert Jakowski; V. V. Kalegaev; Giovanni Lapenta; Jon A. Linker; Siqing Liu; Cristina Hemilse Mandrini; Ian R. Mann; Tsutomu Nagatsuma; Dibyendu Nandy; Takahiro Obara; T. Paul O'Brien; T. G. Onsager; H. J. Opgenoorth; Michael Terkildsen; C. E. Valladares; N. Vilmer

There is a growing appreciation that the environmental conditions that we call space weather impact the technological infrastructure that powers the coupled economies around the world. With that co ...


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

Field‐aligned currents in Saturn's northern nightside magnetosphere: Evidence for interhemispheric current flow associated with planetary period oscillations

G. J. Hunt; S. W. H. Cowley; G. Provan; E. J. Bunce; I. I. Alexeev; E. S. Belenkaya; V. V. Kalegaev; M. K. Dougherty; A. J. Coates

We investigate the magnetic perturbations associated with field-aligned currents observed on 34 Cassini passes over the premidnight northern auroral region during 2008. These are found to be significantly modulated not only by the northern planetary-period oscillation (PPO) system, similar to the southern currents by the southern PPO system found previously, but also by the southern PPO system as well, thus providing the first clear evidence of PPO-related interhemispheric current flow. The principal field-aligned currents of the two PPO systems are found to be co-located in northern ionospheric colatitude, together with the currents of the PPO-independent (subcorotation) system, located between the vicinity of the open-closed field boundary and field lines mapping to ~9 Saturn radius (Rs) in the equatorial plane. All three systems are of comparable magnitude, ~3 MA in each PPO half-cycle. Smaller PPO-related field-aligned currents of opposite polarity also flow in the interior region, mapping between ~6 and ~9 Rs in the equatorial plane, carrying a current of ~ ±2 MA per half-cycle, which significantly reduce the oscillation amplitudes in the interior region. Within this interior region the amplitudes of the northern and southern oscillations are found to fall continuously with distance along the field lines from the corresponding hemisphere, thus showing the presence of cross-field currents, with the southern oscillations being dominant in the south, and modestly lower in amplitude than the northern oscillations in the north. As in previous studies, no oscillations related to the opposite hemisphere are found on open field lines in either hemisphere.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2001

Dynamic model of the magnetosphere: Case study for January 9–12, 1997

I. I. Alexeev; V. V. Kalegaev; E. S. Belenkaya; Sergey Bobrovnikov; Y. I. Feldstein; L. I. Gromova

The dynamics of the magnetospheric current systems are studied in the course of the specific magnetospheric disturbance on January 9–12, 1997, caused by the interaction of the Earths magnetosphere with a dense solar wind plasma cloud. To estimate the contribution of the different sources of the magnetospheric magnetic field to the disturbance ground measured, a dynamic paraboloid model of the magnetosphere is used. The model input parameters are defined by the solar wind density and velocity, by the strength and direction of the interplanetary magnetic field, and by the auroral AL index. The total energy of the ring current particles is calculated from the energy balance equation, where the injection function is determined by the value of the solar wind electric field. New analytical relations describing the dynamics of the different magnetospheric magnetic field sources dependent on the model input parameters are obtained. The analysis of the magnetic disturbances during the January 9–12, 1997, event shows that in the course of the main phase of the magnetic storm the contribution of the ring current, the currents on the magnetopause, and the currents in the magnetotail are approximately equal to each other by an order of magnitude. Nevertheless, in some periods one of the current systems becomes dominant. For example, an intense Dst positive enhancement (up to +50 nT) in the course of the magnetic storm recovery phase in the first hours on January 11, 1997, is associated with a significant increase of the currents on the magnetopause, while the ring current and the magnetotail current remain at a quiet level. A comparison of the calculated Dst variation with measurements indicates good agreement. The root mean square deviation is ∼ 8.7 nT in the course of the storm.


Cosmic Research | 2007

First results of investigating the space environment onboard the Universitetskii-Tatyana satellite

V. A. Sadovnichy; M. I. Panasyuk; S. Yu. Bobrovnikov; N. Vedenkin; N. A. Vlasova; G. K. Garipov; O. R. Grigorian; T. A. Ivanova; V. V. Kalegaev; P. A. Klimov; A. S. Kovtyukh; S. A. Krasotkin; N. V. Kuznetsov; S. N. Kuznetsov; E. A. Muravyeva; Irina N. Myagkova; N. N. Pavlov; R.A. Nymmik; V. L. Petrov; M. V. Podzolko; V. V. Radchenko; S.Ya. Reisman; I. A. Rubinshtein; M.O. Riazantseva; E. A. Sigaeva; E. N. Sosnovets; L.I. Starostin; A. V. Sukhanov; V. I. Tulupov; B. A. Khrenov

The complex of scientific pay load installed onboard the research and educational Universitetskii-Tatyana microsatellite of Moscow State University is described. The complex is designed to study charged particles in the near-earth space and ultraviolet emissions of the atmosphere. Data of the measurements of charged particle fluxes in the microsatellite orbit are presented, spectra are calculated, and the dynamics of penetration boundaries for protons of solar cosmic rays (SCR) during geomagnetic disturbances in 2005 is investigated. Intensities of the ultraviolet emission are measured in the entire range of variation of the atmospheric irradiation, as well as intensities of auroras in the polar regions of the Northern and Southern hemispheres. The experimental data on flashes of ultraviolet radiation (transient light phenomena in the upper atmosphere) are considered, and some examples of oscillograms of their temporal development and their distribution over geographical coordinates are presented.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Saturn's dayside ultraviolet auroras: Evidence for morphological dependence on the direction of the upstream interplanetary magnetic field.

C. J. Meredith; I. I. Alexeev; S. V. Badman; E. S. Belenkaya; S. W. H. Cowley; M. K. Dougherty; V. V. Kalegaev; G. R. Lewis; J. D. Nichols

We examine a unique data set from seven Hubble Space Telescope (HST) “visits” that imaged Saturns northern dayside ultraviolet emissions exhibiting usual circumpolar “auroral oval” morphologies, during which Cassini measured the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) upstream of Saturns bow shock over intervals of several hours. The auroras generally consist of a dawn arc extending toward noon centered near ∼15° colatitude, together with intermittent patchy forms at ∼10° colatitude and poleward thereof, located between noon and dusk. The dawn arc is a persistent feature, but exhibits variations in position, width, and intensity, which have no clear relationship with the concurrent IMF. However, the patchy postnoon auroras are found to relate to the (suitably lagged and averaged) IMF Bz, being present during all four visits with positive Bz and absent during all three visits with negative Bz. The most continuous such forms occur in the case of strongest positive Bz. These results suggest that the postnoon forms are associated with reconnection and open flux production at Saturns magnetopause, related to the similarly interpreted bifurcated auroral arc structures previously observed in this local time sector in Cassini Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph data, whose details remain unresolved in these HST images. One of the intervals with negative IMF Bz however exhibits a prenoon patch of very high latitude emission extending poleward of the dawn arc to the magnetic/spin pole, suggestive of the occurrence of lobe reconnection. Overall, these data provide evidence of significant IMF dependence in the morphology of Saturns dayside auroras. Key Points We examine seven cases of joint HST Saturn auroral images and Cassini IMF data The persistent but variable dawn arc shows no obvious IMF dependence Patchy postnoon auroras are present for northward IMF but not for southward IMF


Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics | 2003

Energetics of the magnetosphere during the magnetic storm

Y. I. Feldstein; L. A. Dremukhina; A.E. Levitin; U. Mall; I. I. Alexeev; V. V. Kalegaev

Abstract The most detailed studies of the energetic budget of the magnetosphere during the magnetic storms were done on the basis of the paraboloid model using the November 23–27, 1986 and May 6–8, 1988 magnetic storms. Calculations have shown that the energy injected in the course of the magnetic storms into the inner magnetosphere and ionosphere of both hemispheres amounts to ∼ 0.9 –2.2% of the solar wind kinetic energy on the magnetospheric cross section. The total energy injected into the magnetosphere from a distance of 60RE in the tail down to the ionosphere is ∼4.0–7.5% of the solar wind kinetic energy during the main phase of the two magnetic storms. The injected energy into the tail ETL is 1.03–1.18 of the total energy input into the inner magnetosphere and ionosphere of both hemispheres at the main phase of the two storms. The decay parameter for the energy stored in the magnetospheric tail is ∼5 h . The total energy dissipated in the ionosphere of both hemispheres, in the inner magnetosphere and in the tail during the two storms, is 1.85×1017 and 3.24×10 17 J , respectively. The total energy input into the magnetosphere is calculated to be 1.77×1017 and 3.16×10 17 J . The discrepancies of 0.08×1017 and 0.10×10 17 J amount to 4.3% and 3.1% of the total energy input and characterize the accuracy of the magnetospheric energy budget calculation. In the magnetotail the balance between the injected and dissipated energy of ∼1.09×10 17 J for one storm and ∼1.7×10 17 J for the other is preserved as well. We conclude that one-half of the energy which is injected into the magnetosphere from the solar wind during the storms enters the magnetotail and dissipates there. The coupling parameter ePA is widely considered to be a measure of the energy dissipation in the inner magnetosphere. The dissipation energy in the inner magnetosphere UT=UJ+UA+UDR is defined as the sum of the contributions of the Joule dissipation UJ, the energy of auroral particle precipitation UA, and the energy injection into the ring current UDR. In this paper, we find that ePA in the two storms investigated is substantially different from UT. The energy injected into the ring current region at the main phase of the storm amounts to ∼10 16 J . It is nearly 3 or 4 times smaller than the energy input into the magnetosphere via the field-aligned currents or the energy dissipated in the ionosphere by Joule dissipation. The energy injected into the magnetosphere is transferred mainly into processes different from the ring current generation. During the development of intensive auroral electrojets, the energy dissipation in the magnetotail and the increase in the energy of the tail current system occur simultaneously. The energy dissipation in the inner magnetosphere and ionosphere US occurs not only at the expense of energy previously stored in the magnetotail, but rather at the expense of energy that is injected into the near-Earth tail. This energy transfer from the solar wind into the magnetotail and the energy dissipation in the ionosphere increased simultaneously. Thus, during disturbances in the magnetosphere, simultaneously loading–unloading and directly driven processes occur. Loading- and unloading processes manifest themselves both in the storage of the solar wind energy in the magnetotail and the ring current, and subsequent dissipation. The directly driven processes become manifest in the direct dissipation of the energy which enters into the ionosphere through large-scale field-aligned current systems.


Solar System Research | 2011

Investigations of the space environment aboard the Universitetsky-Tat’yana and Universitetsky-Tat’yana-2 microsatellites

V. A. Sadovnichy; M. I. Panasyuk; I. V. Yashin; V. O. Barinova; N. N. Veden’kin; N. A. Vlasova; G. K. Garipov; O. R. Grigoryan; T. A. Ivanova; V. V. Kalegaev; P. A. Klimov; A. S. Kovtyukh; S. A. Krasotkin; N. V. Kuznetsov; S. N. Kuznetsov; E. A. Murav’eva; Irina N. Myagkova; R.A. Nymmik; N. N. Pavlov; D. A. Parunakyan; A.N. Petrov; V. L. Petrov; M. V. Podzolko; V. V. Radchenko; S.Ya. Reizman; I. A. Rubinshtein; M. O. Ryazantseva; E. A. Sigaeva; E. N. Sosnovets; L.I. Starostin

The first results obtained through the university small satellites program developed at Moscow State University (MSU) are presented. The space environment was investigated aboard two MSU microsatellites designed for scientific and educational purposes, Universitetsky-Tat’yana and Universitetsky-Tat’yana-2. The scientific equipment is described to study charged particles in near Earth space and atmospheric radiations in ultraviolet, red, and infrared optical wavelength ranges. The dynamic properties of fluxes of charged particles in microsatellite orbits are studied and findings are presented regarding specific parameters of solar proton penetration during the geomagnetic disturbances. Experimental results are considered concerning flashes of ultraviolet (UV), red (R), and infrared (IR) radiation that are transient light phenomena in the upper atmosphere. The space educational MSU program developed on the basis of the Universitetsky-Tat’yana projects is reviewed.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1993

Electric fields and field-aligned current generation in the magnetosphere

I. I. Alexeev; E. S. Belenkaya; V. V. Kalegaev; Yu. G. Lyutov

The authors present a calculation of the electric potential, field-aligned currents, and plasma convection caused by the penetration of the solar wind electric field into the magnetosphere. Ohms law and the continuity equation of ionospheric currents are used. It is shown that the large-scale convection system is reversed in the plasma sheet flanks. In this region the plasma flow is antisunward earthward of the neutral line and sunward tailward of it. The interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) B[sub z] dependences on the dimension of the magnetopause [open quotes]windows[close quotes] which are intersected by open field lines, on the potential drop across the polar cap, and on the distance to the neutral line are determined. Because of the IMF effect and the effect of seasonal or daily variations of the geomagnetic field which violate its symmetry relative to the equatorial plane, there may arise a potential drop along field lines which causes field-aligned currents. The values and directions of these currents, the field-aligned potential drop, and a self-consistent solution for the potential at the ionosphere level for high field-aligned conductivity have been determined. 41 refs., 7 figs.

Collaboration


Dive into the V. V. Kalegaev's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

I. V. Yashin

Moscow State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge