Shailja Pathania

BRCA1 Recruitment to Transcriptional Pause Sites Is Required for R-Loop-Driven DNA Damage Repair

Summary The mechanisms contributing to transcription-associated genomic instability are both complex and incompletely understood. Although R-loops are normal transcriptional intermediates, they are also associated with genomic instability. Here, we show that BRCA1 is recruited to R-loops that form normally over a subset of transcription termination regions. There it mediates the recruitment of a specific, physiological binding partner, senataxin (SETX). Disruption of this complex led to R-loop-driven DNA damage at those loci as reflected by adjacent γ-H2AX accumulation and ssDNA breaks within the untranscribed strand of relevant R-loop structures. Genome-wide analysis revealed widespread BRCA1 binding enrichment at R-loop-rich termination regions (TRs) of actively transcribed genes. Strikingly, within some of these genes in BRCA1 null breast tumors, there are specific insertion/deletion mutations located close to R-loop-mediated BRCA1 binding sites within TRs. Thus, BRCA1/SETX complexes support a DNA repair mechanism that addresses R-loop-based DNA damage at transcriptional pause sites.

BRCA1 is required for postreplication repair after UV-induced DNA damage.

BRCA1 contributes to the response to UV irradiation. Utilizing its BRCT motifs, it is recruited during S/G2 to UV-damaged sites in a DNA replication-dependent but nucleotide excision repair (NER)-independent manner. More specifically, at UV-stalled replication forks, it promotes photoproduct excision, suppression of translesion synthesis, and the localization and activation of replication factor C complex (RFC) subunits. The last function, in turn, triggers post-UV checkpoint activation and postreplicative repair. These BRCA1 functions differ from those required for DSBR.

Cdk1 Participates in BRCA1-Dependent S Phase Checkpoint Control in Response to DNA Damage

Cdk2 and cdk1 are individually dispensable for cell-cycle progression in cancer cell lines because they are able to compensate for one another. However, shRNA-mediated depletion of cdk1 alone or small molecule cdk1 inhibition abrogated S phase cell-cycle arrest and the phosphorylation of a subset of ATR/ATM targets after DNA damage. Loss of DNA damage-induced checkpoint control was caused by a reduction in formation of BRCA1-containing foci. Mutation of BRCA1 at S1497 and S1189/S1191 resulted in loss of cdk1-mediated phosphorylation and also compromised formation of BRCA1-containing foci. Abrogation of checkpoint control after cdk1 depletion or inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer cells sensitized them to DNA-damaging agents. Conversely, reduced cdk1 activity caused more potent G2/M arrest in nontransformed cells and antagonized the response to subsequent DNA damage. Cdk1 inhibition may therefore selectively sensitize BRCA1-proficient cancer cells to DNA-damaging treatments by disrupting BRCA1 function.

BRCA1 haploinsufficiency for replication stress suppression in primary cells

BRCA1—a breast and ovarian cancer suppressor gene—promotes genome integrity. To study the functionality of BRCA1 in the heterozygous state, we established a collection of primary human BRCA1+/+ and BRCA1mut/+ mammary epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Here we report that all BRCA1mut/+ cells exhibited multiple normal BRCA1 functions, including the support of homologous recombination- type double-strand break repair (HR-DSBR), checkpoint functions, centrosome number control, spindle pole formation, Slug expression and satellite RNA suppression. In contrast, the same cells were defective in stalled replication fork repair and/or suppression of fork collapse, that is, replication stress. These defects were rescued by reconstituting BRCA1mut/+ cells with wt BRCA1. In addition, we observed ‘conditional’ haploinsufficiency for HR-DSBR in BRCA1mut/+ cells in the face of replication stress. Given the importance of replication stress in epithelial cancer development and of an HR defect in breast cancer pathogenesis, both defects are candidate contributors to tumorigenesis in BRCA1-deficient mammary tissue.

A unique right end–enhancer complex precedes synapsis of Mu ends: the enhancer is sequestered within the transpososome throughout transposition

Assembly of the Mu transpososome is dependent on interactions of transposase subunits with the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu and an enhancer (E). We have followed the order and dynamics of association of these sites within a series of transpososomes prior to and during formation of a three‐site complex (LER), engagement of Mu ends by the transposase active site (type 0 complex), cleavage of the ends (type I complex) and their transfer to target DNA (type II complex). LER appears to be preceded by a two‐site complex (ER) where E and R are interwrapped twice, as in the mature transpososome. At each stage thereafter, the overall topology of five DNA supercoils is retained: two between E and R, one between E and L and two between L and R. However, L–R interactions within LER appear to be flexible. Unexpectedly, the enhancer was seen to persist within the transpososome through cleavage and strand transfer of Mu ends to target DNA.

Symmetric DNA sites are functionally asymmetric within FLP and Cre site-specific DNA recombination synapses

Flp and Cre-mediated recombination on symmetrized FRT and loxP sites, respectively, in circular plasmid substrates yield both DNA inversion and deletion. However, upon sequestering three negative supercoils outside the recombination complex using the resII-resIII synapse formed by Tn3 resolvase and the LER synapse formed by phage Mu transposase in the case of Flp and Cre, respectively, the reactions are channeled towards inversion at the expense of deletion. The inversion product is a trefoil, its unique topology being conferred by the external resolvase or LER synapse. Thus, Flp and Cre assign their symmetrized substrates a strictly antiparallel orientation with respect to strand cleavage and exchange. These conclusions are supported by the product profiles from tethered parallel and antiparallel native FRT sites in dilution and competition assays. Furthermore, the observed recombination bias favoring deletion over inversion in a nicked circular substrate containing two symmetrized FRT sites is consistent with the predictions from Monte Carlo simulations based on antiparallel synapsis of the DNA partners.

Structural Alterations and Conformational Dynamics in Holliday Junctions Induced by Binding of a Site-Specific Recombinase

Binding of a cleavage-incompetent mutant of the Flp recombinase induces a roughly square-planar geometry in synthetic immobile Holliday junctions. The branch points, which are rigidly fixed in these junctions in their free forms, tend to be more flexible in their protein-bound forms. Our results (1) suggest a plausible mechanism for the switching of the recombination complex from the Holliday-forming mode to the Holliday-resolving mode, (2) provide a rationale for previous observations that Flp resolves preformed immobile Holliday structures in the parental or in the recombinant mode in a relatively unbiased manner, and (3) accommodate two modes of DNA cleavage by Flp (transhorizontal or transdiagonal) in Holliday substrates.

True reversal of Mu integration

We describe a high‐temperature (75°C) transition in the Mu integration complex that causes efficient and true reversal of the integration reaction. A second reversal pathway, first described as ‘foldback’ reversal for the HIV integrase, was also observed upon disassembly/reassembly of the Mu complex at normal temperatures. Both true and foldback reversal severed only one or the other of the two integrated Mu ends, and each exhibited distinct metal ion specificities. Our results directly implicate an altered transposase configuration in the Mu strand transfer complex that inhibits reversal, thereby regulating the directionality of transposition.

Physiological modulation of endogenous BRCA1 p220 abundance suppresses DNA damage during the cell cycle

Endogenous BRCA1 p220 expression peaks in S and G2 when it is activated, and the protein participates in certain key DNA damage responses. In contrast, its expression is markedly reduced in G0/G1. While variations in transcription represent a significant part of p220 expression control, there is at least one other relevant process. We found that a microRNA, miR-545, that is expressed throughout the cell cycle down-modulates endogenous p220 mRNA and protein abundance directly in both G0/G1 and S/G2. When miR-545 function was inhibited by a specific antagomir, endogenous p220 expression increased in G0/G1, and aberrant p220-associated DNA damage responses and de novo DNA strand breaks accumulated. Analogous results were observed upon inhibition of miR-545 function in S/G2. Both sets of antagomir effects were mimicked by infecting cells with a p220 cDNA-encoding adenoviral vector. Thus, strand breaks were a product of p220 overexpression, and their prevention by miR-545 depends on its modulation of p220 expression. Breaks were also dependent on aberrant, overexpressed p220-driven recruitment of RAD51 to either spontaneously arising or mutagen-based DNA damage sites. Hence, when its level is not physiologically maintained, endogenous p220 aberrantly directs at least one DNA repair protein, RAD51, to damage sites, where their action contributes to the development of de novo DNA damage. Thus, like its loss, a surfeit of endogenous p220 function represents a threat to genome integrity.

Flp Ribonuclease Activities MECHANISTIC SIMILARITIES AND CONTRASTS TO SITE-SPECIFIC DNA RECOMBINATION

The ribonuclease active site harbored by the Flp site-specific recombinase can act on two neighboring phosphodiester bonds to yield mechanistically distinct chain breakage reactions. One of the RNase reactions apparently proceeds via a covalent enzyme intermediate and targets the phosphodiester position involved in DNA recombination (Flp RNase I activity). The second activity (Flp RNase II) targets the phosphodiester immediately to the 3′ side but appears not to involve an enzyme-linked intermediate. Flp RNase I is absolutely dependent upon Tyr-343 of Flp and is competitive with respect to the normal strand joining reaction. It can utilize the 2′-hydroxyl group from any one of the four ribonucleotides with comparable efficiencies in the cleavage reaction. On the other hand, the RNase II reaction mediated by Flp(Y343F) is specific for U and cannot utilize the 2′-hydroxyl group from ribo-A, -G, or -C under standard reaction conditions. The RNase II activity is also sensitive to the 3′-neighboring base. Although dT is functional, the activity is stimulated by U or U-2′-OMe. The Flp RNase II reaction effectively competes with the normal strand cleavage reaction mediated by Tyr-343, even though their phosphodiester targets are not the same.