Shang-Gin Wu

Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Mutations Is Associated with Poor Gefitinib Treatment Response

Purpose: Clinical reports about responsiveness to gefitinib treatment in patients of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations in exon 20 of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are limited. To increase understanding of the influence of exon 20 mutations on NSCLC treatment with gefitinib, we investigated the clinical features of lung cancer in patients with exon 20 mutations and analyzed the gefitinib treatment response. Experimental Design: We surveyed the clinical data and mutational studies of NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 20 mutations in the National Taiwan University Hospital and reviewed the literature reports about EGFR exon 20 mutations and the gefitinib treatment response. Results: Twenty-three patients with mutations in exon 20 were identified. Nine (39%) had coexisting mutations in EGFR exons other than exon 20. Sixteen patients received gefitinib treatment, and a response was noted in 4 patients. The gefitinib response rate of NSCLC with exon 20 mutations was 25%, far lower than those with deletions in exon 19 and L858R mutations. Interestingly, different exon 20 mutations and coexisting mutations seemed to have a different influence on gefitinib response. Conclusions: EGFR exon 20 mutations of NSCLC patients result in poorer responsiveness to gefitinib treatment, but variability exists between different individuals.

EML4-ALK Translocation Predicts Better Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with Wild-Type EGFR

Introduction: The echinoderm microtubule-associated protein like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) fusion represents a novel target in a subset of non-small cell lung cancer, especially adenocarcinoma. EML4-ALK fusion is mutually exclusive with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. To understand the impact of EML4-ALK on the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer, we examined EML4-ALK fusion in lung adenocarcinoma from patients with wild-type EGFR and analyzed their clinical treatment outcomes. Methods: Lung adenocarcinoma patients with malignant pleural effusions having wild-type EGFR and measurable target lesions were enrolled for EML4-ALK analysis by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing. Demographic data, EML4-ALK status, and survival data were analyzed. We also performed fluorescence in situ hybridization on some available tumor samples to validate the PCR result. In addition, K-ras mutation was analyzed for patients without EML4-ALK fusion genes. Results: A total of 116 patients with wild-type EGFR sequencing results had complete clinical data for analysis. No patients received ALK inhibitor therapy. There were 39 patients (34%) with the EML4-ALK fusion gene. The concordance rate between reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization was 85%. The K-ras mutation rate for patients without EML4-ALK fusion gene was 6.5%. By multivariate analysis, patients who had better performance status (p < 0.001) and EML4-ALK translocation (p = 0.017) had longer overall survival. Comparing patients with tumors harboring variant 1 with those harboring nonvariant 1 EML4-ALK fusion genes, there were no significant differences in clinical factors and survival outcome. Conclusion: For lung adenocarcinoma patients with wild-type EGFR, EML4-ALK translocation is associated with longer overall survival.

Good Response to Gefitinib in Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring Coexisting EML4-ALK Fusion Gene and EGFR Mutation

A 72-year-old female nonsmoker presented with dry cough and progressive exertional dyspnea for 4 months. Chest radiography disclosed multiple nodular opacities in bilateral lung fields and right pleural effusion. A computed tomography (CT) of the chest after the drainage of pleural effusion (Figure 1A) showed an irregular mass at right upper lung. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was 442.1 ng/ml. The cytology of echoguided lung aspiration and right pleural effusion both yielded adenocarcinoma. The bronchial biopsy specimens showed neoplastic glands with immunoreactivity to thyroid transcription factor-1 protein and cytokeratin 7. Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with metastasis to brain and bone was diagnosed. A repeated chest CT (Figure 1B) 92 days after gefitinib treatment showed dramatic shrinkage of right upper lobe mass. The CEA declined to 87.6 ng/ml 196 days after gefitinib treatment. The RNA extracted from cancer cells of echo-guided lung aspiration at the diagnosis of lung cancer was assessed for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion by reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction and sequencing assays as previously described.1,2 Besides a variant 1 of EML4-ALK translocation, a mutant form of EGFR del 2235–2249 (del E746-A750) in exon 19 was identified (Figure 2). After 232 days of gefitinib treatment, the patient showed disease progression. The trend of lung cancer treatment has been toward personalized therapy. Identifying molecular genetic marker to guide treatment has been successfully demonstrated in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma in East Asia. Patients with the characteristics of being female, nonsmoker or former light smoker, previously untreated, and advanced stage, and especially the presence of mutation of the EGFR gene, benefited much from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) compared with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy.3 Recently, the EML4-ALK, a fusion gene first described in 2007, possesses oncogenic activity that can be blocked by ALK kinase inhibitor and represents a new therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EML4-ALK has been identified in 0.4 to 13.5% of unselected NSCLC patients.4 This subset of patients are often light or never smokers and mostly with adenocarcinoma,4 similar to those with EGFR mutations. The EML4-ALK fusions are almost in mutual exclusion to EGFR mutation,4 with

First- or second-line therapy with gefitinib produces equal survival in non-small cell lung cancer.

RATIONALE Gefitinib is effective in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Deletions in exon 19 and L858R in exon 21 are the best-documented EGFR mutations that are associated with effective gefitinib responsiveness. OBJECTIVES To clarify the influence of gefitinib timing, we conducted a study to compare the outcomes of different lines of gefitinib treatment in patients with exon 19 deletions or L858R. METHODS We surveyed the clinical data and mutational studies of patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutations in the National Taiwan University Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Three hundred and twenty-eight patients, who received gefitinib for stage IIIb or IV NSCLC, were adequately sequenced for EGFR mutations; 192 patients had mutant EGFR, including 77 patients with exon 19 deletions and 75 patients with L858R. The 152 patients with exon 19 deletions or L858R and who were receiving gefitinib were classified into a chemonaive group (91 patients) or a chemotherapy-treated group (61 patients). Chemonaive status before gefitinib and female sex were associated with clinical response to gefitinib (P = 0.006 and 0.053, respectively). Neither overall survival after the start of antitumor therapy nor progression-free survival after gefitinib therapy was significantly different between these two groups (P = 0.207 and 0.804, respectively). Clinical response to gefitinib was the only factor associated with better overall survival (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that gefitinib is effective in patients with EGFR mutations. The gefitinib response rate in chemonaive patients is higher than in chemotherapy-treated patients; however, there is no difference in overall survival.

The mechanism of acquired resistance to irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-afatinib in lung adenocarcinoma patients

Introduction Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are associated with favorable response in EGFR mutant lung cancer. Acquired resistance to reversible EGFR TKIs remains a significant barrier, and acquired EGFR T790M-mutation is the major mechanism. Second-generation irreversible EGFR TKI, afatinib, had also been approved for treating EGFR mutant lung cancer patients, but the mechanism of acquired resistance to afatinib has not been well studied. Results Forty-two patients had tissue specimens taken after acquiring resistance to afatinib. The sensitizing EGFR mutation were all consistent between pre- and post-afatinib tissues. Twenty patients (47.6%) had acquired T790M mutation. T790M rate was not different between first-generation EGFR TKI-naïve patients (50%) and first-generation EGFR TKI-treated patients (46.4%) (p = 0.827). No clinical characteristics or EGFR mutation types were associated with the development of acquired T790M. No other second-site EGFR mutations were detected. There were no small cell or squamous cell lung cancer transformation. Other genetic mutations were not identified in PIK3CA, BRAF, HER2, KRAS, NRAS, MEK1, AKT2, LKB1 and JAK2. Methods Afatinib-prescription record of our department of pharmacy from January 2007 and December 2014 was retrieved. We investigated patients with tissue specimens available after acquiring resistance to afatinib. Enrolled patients should have partial response or durable stable disease of treatment response to afatinib. Various mechanisms of acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR TKIs were evaluated. Histology and cytology were reviewed. EGFR, PIK3CA, BRAF, HER2, KRAS, NRAS, MEK1, AKT2, LKB1 and JAK2 genetic alterations were evaluated by sequencing. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier method. Conclusions T790M was detected in half of the lung adenocarcinoma after acquiring resistance to afatinib. T790M is still the major acquired resistance mechanism. First-generation EGFR TKI exposure did not influence the prevalence of T790M in lung cancer acquired resistance to afatinib.

Comparison of gefitinib and erlotinib in advanced NSCLC and the effect of EGFR mutations

INTRODUCTION Erlotinib and gefitinib are tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that are effective in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to compare their clinical uses and the influence of EGFR mutation. METHODS The usages of erlotinib and gefitinib in advanced NSCLC were analyzed. Clinical data and EGFR mutational status of tumors were collected. RESULTS Seven hundred and sixteen (716) patients received gefitinib (n=440) or erlotinib (n=276) for stage IIIb or IV NSCLC. Erlotinib was prescribed more frequently than gefitinib in males (58.2% vs. 41.8%, p<0.001), smokers (60.5% vs. 39.5%, p<0.001), and non-adenocarcinoma (70.6% vs. 29.4%, p<0.001). Of the 716 study patients, 327 underwent testing for EGFR mutations (170 with mutant EGFR and 157 with wild-type EGFR). Adenocarcinoma in patients with mutant EGFR and non-smoker status in patients with wild-type EGFR were associated with better overall survival after TK inhibitor treatment. In both patient groups with mutant EGFR or wild-type EGFR, the effectiveness of gefitinib and erlotinib, including drug response or overall survival, were not different. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed the obvious disparity in drug selection between erlotinib and gefitinib in clinical practice. Type of TK inhibitors did not influence treatment outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation or wild-type EGFR.

Good response to gefitinib in lung adenocarcinoma of complex epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations with the classical mutation pattern.

BACKGROUND Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are usually detected in lung adenocarcinoma and are associated with a response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, not all EGFR mutations have similarly high clinical response rates. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and response to gefitinib in lung adenocarcinoma patients with complex EGFR mutations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three hundred thirty-nine specimens of lung adenocarcinoma from patients treated with gefitinib were collected for EGFR sequencing. Nineteen patients with complex EGFR mutations were enrolled for the study after excluding three patients with the EGFR T790M mutation, which confers resistance to gefitinib. RESULTS Among the 19 patients, 12 had complex mutations with the classical mutation pattern (L858R or deletion in exon 19). When compared with those without the classical mutation pattern, patients with this mutation pattern had a higher response rate (83% versus 29%), longer progression-free survival duration (median, 12.7 months versus 4.9 months), and longer overall survival time (median, 24.7 months versus 12.3 months) after gefitinib treatment. Comparing patients harboring complex EGFR mutations with a classical mutation pattern with those harboring single classical mutations, there were no statistical differences in the response rate (83% versus 73%), progression-free survival time (median, 12.7 months versus 8.1 months,) or overall survival time (median, 24.7 months versus 16.4 months). CONCLUSION Patients with complex EGFR mutations with the classical mutation pattern had the same response rate, progression-free survival duration, and overall survival time as those with single classical mutations. EGFR TKIs may be the choice of treatment for this type of lung adenocarcinoma.

Survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients with malignant pleural effusion

In the era of targeted therapy, the association between lung adenocarcinoma patient survival and malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) remains unclear. This study investigated the clinical characteristics, survival and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene (EGFR) mutation status of lung adenocarcinoma patients with MPE. From June 2005 to December 2010, consecutive pleural effusions were collected prospectively. Patient clinical characteristics, EGFR mutation status, and overall survival were analysed. We collected MPEs from 448 patients in stage IV lung adenocarcinoma at initial diagnosis. Median overall survival for patients with MPEs at initial diagnosis and following disease progression were 14.3 months and 21.4 months, respectively (p=0.001). There were 296 (66.1%) patients harbouring EGFR mutations, the mutation rates among patients with an MPE at initial diagnosis and one following disease progression were 68.2% and 56.6%, respectively (p=0.044); the L858R mutation rate was also higher among the former (32.6% versus 18.1%; p=0.009). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients who: developed MPEs following disease progression, harboured EGFR mutations, and received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, had longer overall survival. Patients in stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with MPEs at initial diagnosis have shorter overall survival and higher EGFR mutation rate, especially for L858R, than patients who develop MPEs following disease progression.

Including Total EGFR Staining in Scoring Improves EGFR Mutations Detection by Mutation-Specific Antibodies and EGFR TKIs Response Prediction

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a novel target for therapy in subsets of non-small cell lung cancer, especially adenocarcinoma. Tumors with EGFR mutations showed good response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We aimed to identify the discriminating capacity of immunohistochemical (IHC) scoring to detect L858R and E746-A750 deletion mutation in lung adenocarcinoma patients and predict EGFR TKIs response. Patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled. EGFR mutation status was genotyped by PCR and direct sequencing. Mutation-specific antibodies for L858R and E746-A750 deletion were used for IHC staining. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the capacity of IHC, including intensity and/or quickscore (Q score), in differentiating L858R and E746-A750 deletion. We enrolled 143 patients during September 2000 to May 2009. Logistic-regression-model-based scoring containing both L858R Q score and total EGFR expression Q score was able to obtain a maximal area under the curve (AUC: 0.891) to differentiate the patients with L858R. Predictive model based on IHC Q score of E746-A750 deletion and IHC intensity of total EGFR expression reached an AUC of 0.969. The predictive model of L858R had a significantly higher AUC than L858R intensity only (p = 0.036). Of the six patients harboring complex EGFR mutations with classical mutation patterns, five had positive IHC staining. For EGFR TKI treated cancer recurrence patients, those with positive mutation-specific antibody IHC staining had better EGFR TKI response (p = 0.008) and longer progression-free survival (p = 0.012) than those without. In conclusion, total EGFR expression should be included in the IHC interpretation of L858R. After adjusting for total EGFR expression, the scoring method decreased the false positive rate and increased diagnostic power. According to the scoring method, the IHC method is useful to predict the clinical outcome and refine personalized therapy.

Clinical and the Prognostic Characteristics of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with ROS1 Fusion in Comparison with Other Driver Mutations in East Asian Populations

Introduction: The prevalence, demographic features, and clinical outcomes of lung adenocarcinoma patients with novel ROS1 oncogenic rearrangement in East Asian populations are not clear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and prognostic characteristics of lung adenocarcinoma in patients with ROS1 fusion compared with other driver mutations. Methods: Multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the ROS1 fusion gene in lung adenocarcinoma cases. Immunohistochemistry was used to confirm the expression of ROS1. The demographic data and clinical outcomes of patients with the ROS1 fusion gene were compared with those of patients without the ROS1 fusion gene, including those with the EGFR mutation, EML4-ALK fusion, KRAS mutation, and quadruple-negative patients. Results: Of 492 patients with lung adenocarcinoma, 12 (2.4%) had the ROS1 fusion gene. Their median age was 45.0 years, significantly younger than that of the ROS1 fusion-negative cohorts (p < 0.001). Acinar (including cribriform) and solid patterns were the two most common histologic subtypes in the ROS1 fusion tumors (7 of 12, 58.3%) and were predominantly seen in CD74-ROS1 fusion tumors (66.7%). There was no significant survival difference between the ROS1 fusion-positive and ROS1 fusion-negative cohorts in surgical group, but ROS1 fusion-positive patients might have worse outcomes than EGFR-mutant patients in the stage IV group. Conclusions: The ROS1 fusion gene can be successfully detected in East Asian patients with lung adenocarcinoma using multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. These patients tend to be younger and have characteristic histologic subtypes. Due to the small number of ROS1 fusion patients, the prognostic value of ROS1 fusion need further studies to confirm.