Shankar Shastry
Pennsylvania State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shankar Shastry.
Current Biology | 2010
Shankar Shastry; William O. Hancock
Defining the mechanical and biochemical determinates of kinesin processivity is important for understanding how diverse kinesins are tuned for specific cellular functions. Because transmission of mechanical forces through the 14-18 amino acid neck linker domain underlies coordinated stepping, we investigated the role of neck linker length, charge, and structure in kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 motor behavior. For optimum comparison with kinesin-1, the KIF3A head and neck linker of kinesin-2 were fused to the kinesin-1 neck coil and rod. Extending the 14-residue kinesin-1 neck linker reduced processivity, and shortening the 17-residue kinesin-2 neck linker enhanced processivity. When a proline in the kinesin-2 neck linker was replaced, kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 run lengths scaled identically with neck linker length, despite moving at different speeds. In low-ionic-strength buffer, charge had a dominant effect on motor processivity, which resolves ongoing controversy regarding the effect of neck linker length on kinesin processivity. From stochastic simulations, the results are best explained by neck linker extension slowing strain-dependent detachment of the rear head along with diminishing strain-dependent inhibition of ATP binding. These results help delineate how interhead strain maximizes stepping and suggest that less processive kinesins are tuned to coordinate with other motors differently than the maximally processive kinesin-1.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2011
Shankar Shastry; William O. Hancock
Consistent with their diverse intracellular roles, the processivity of N-terminal kinesin motors varies considerably between different families. Kinetics experiments on isolated motor domains suggest that differences in processivity result from differences in the underlying biochemistry of the catalytic heads. However, the length of the flexible neck linker domain also varies from 14 to 18 residues between families. Because the neck linker acts as a mechanical element that transmits interhead tension, altering its mechanical properties is expected to affect both front and rear head gating, mechanisms that underlie processive walking. To test the hypothesis that processivity differences result from family-specific differences in neck linker mechanics, we systematically altered the neck linker length in kinesin-1, -2, -3, -5, and -7 motors and measured run length and velocity in a single-molecule fluorescence assay. Shortening the neck linkers of kinesin-3 (Unc104/KIF1A) and kinesin-5 (Eg5/KSP) to 14 residues enhanced processivity to match kinesin-1, which has a 14-residue neck linker. After substituting a single residue in the last alpha helix of the catalytic core, kinesin-7 (CENP-E) exhibited this same behavior. This convergence of processivity was observed even though motor speeds varied over a 25-fold range. These results suggest that differences in unloaded processivity between diverse kinesins is primarily due to differences in the lengths of their neck linker domains rather than specific tuning of rate constants in their ATP hydrolysis cycles.
Biophysical Journal | 2014
Göker Arpağ; Shankar Shastry; William O. Hancock; Erkan Tüzel
Intracellular cargo transport frequently involves multiple motor types, either having opposite directionality or having the same directionality but different speeds. Although significant progress has been made in characterizing kinesin motors at the single-molecule level, predicting their ensemble behavior is challenging and requires tight coupling between experiments and modeling to uncover the underlying motor behavior. To understand how diverse kinesins attached to the same cargo coordinate their movement, we carried out microtubule gliding assays using pairwise mixtures of motors from the kinesin-1, -2, -3, -5, and -7 families engineered to have identical run lengths and surface attachments. Uniform motor densities were used and microtubule gliding speeds were measured for varying proportions of fast and slow motors. A coarse-grained computational model of gliding assays was developed and found to recapitulate the experiments. Simulations incorporated published force-dependent velocities and run lengths, along with mechanical interactions between motors bound to the same microtubule. The simulations show that the force-dependence of detachment is the key parameter that determines gliding speed in multimotor assays, while motor compliance, surface density, and stall force all play minimal roles. Simulations also provide estimates for force-dependent dissociation rates, suggesting that kinesin-1 and the mitotic motors kinesin-5 and -7 maintain microtubule association against loads, whereas kinesin-2 and -3 readily detach. This work uncovers unexpected motor behavior in multimotor ensembles and clarifies functional differences between kinesins that carry out distinct mechanical tasks in cells.
Current Biology | 2015
Johan O.L. Andreasson; Shankar Shastry; William O. Hancock; Steven M. Block
The response of motor proteins to external loads underlies their ability to work in teams and determines the net speed and directionality of cargo transport. The mammalian kinesin-2, KIF3A/B, is a heterotrimeric motor involved in intraflagellar transport and vesicle motility in neurons. Bidirectional cargo transport is known to result from the opposing activities of KIF3A/B and dynein bound to the same cargo, but the load-dependent properties of kinesin-2 are poorly understood. We used a feedback-controlled optical trap to probe the velocity, run length, and unbinding kinetics of mouse KIF3A/B under various loads and nucleotide conditions. The kinesin-2 motor velocity is less sensitive than kinesin-1 to external forces, but its processivity diminishes steeply with load, and the motor was observed occasionally to slip and reattach. Each motor domain was characterized by studying homodimeric constructs, and a global fit to the data resulted in a comprehensive pathway that quantifies the principal force-dependent kinetic transitions. The properties of the KIF3A/B heterodimer are intermediate between the two homodimers, and the distinct load-dependent behavior is attributable to the properties of the motor domains and not to the neck linkers or the coiled-coil stalk. We conclude that the force-dependent movement of KIF3A/B differs significantly from conventional kinesin-1. Against opposing dynein forces, KIF3A/B motors are predicted to rapidly unbind and rebind, resulting in qualitatively different transport behavior from kinesin-1.
Nature Communications | 2016
Martin F. Engelke; Michael Winding; Yang Yue; Shankar Shastry; Federico Teloni; Sanjay Reddy; T. Lynne Blasius; Pushpanjali Soppina; William O. Hancock; Vladimir I. Gelfand; Kristen J. Verhey
The human genome encodes 45 kinesin motor proteins that drive cell division, cell motility, intracellular trafficking and ciliary function. Determining the cellular function of each kinesin would benefit from specific small-molecule inhibitors. However, screens have yielded only a few specific inhibitors. Here we present a novel chemical-genetic approach to engineer kinesin motors that can carry out the function of the wild-type motor yet can also be efficiently inhibited by small, cell-permeable molecules. Using kinesin-1 as a prototype, we develop two independent strategies to generate inhibitable motors, and characterize the resulting inhibition in single-molecule assays and in cells. We further apply these two strategies to create analogously inhibitable kinesin-3 motors. These inhibitable motors will be of great utility to study the functions of specific kinesins in a dynamic manner in cells and animals. Furthermore, these strategies can be used to generate inhibitable versions of any motor protein of interest.
Biophysical Journal | 2011
Shankar Shastry; William O. Hancock
Understanding the mechanical and biochemical determinates of kinesin processivity is important for defining the chemomechanical mechanism of kinesin and for uncovering how different kinesins are tuned for specific cellular functions. Because the neck-linker domain is a key mechanical element that underlies coordinated stepping, we previously investigated the effects of neck-linker length, charge and structure in the processivity of Kinesin-1 and Kinesin-2 motors. When the 14 amino acid long neck-linker of Kinesin-1 was extended, processivity was diminished, and conversely, shortening the 17 amino acid long Kinesin-2 neck-linker enhanced processivity. From stochastic simulations of the hydrolysis cycle, these effects can best be explained by a combination of slower strain-dependent detachment of rear head and a reduced strain-dependent inhibition of ATP binding. To test the degree to which the processivity of other N-terminal kinesins is determined by their neck-linker domains, we investigated motor domains of Kinesin-3 (CeUnc104, NL=17 residues), Kinesin-5 (XlKSP, NL=18 residues) and Kinesin-7 (XlCENP-E, NL=18 residues), fused to the Kinesin-1 coiled-coil and GFP. With native neck-linkers, run lengths were 0.6 µm for Kinesin-3, 0.9 µm for Kinesin-7 and below our detection limit for Kinesin-5. Surprisingly, when their neck-linkers were shortened to 14 amino acids, Kinesin-3 and Kinesin-5 run lengths matched Kinesin-1, as did Kinesin-7 after the end of α-6 was changed to match Kinesin-1 sequence. This convergence of processivity is observed even though the speeds of these motors varied over a 25-fold range. These results suggest that diverse N-terminal kinesins are inherently processive to the same degree, and their wild-type behavior results from differences in the length and sequence of their neck-linker domains.
Current Biology | 2009
Gayatri Muthukrishnan; Yangrong Zhang; Shankar Shastry; William O. Hancock
Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics | 2013
John Hughes; Shankar Shastry; William O. Hancock; John Fricks
Biophysical Journal | 2010
Shankar Shastry; William O. Hancock
Biophysical Journal | 2018
Xi Long; Terren Chang; Shankar Shastry; Joeseph W. Parks; Michael D. Stone