Shannon T. Bailey
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shannon T. Bailey.
Nature Genetics | 2010
Housheng Hansen He; Clifford A. Meyer; Hyunjin Shin; Shannon T. Bailey; Gang Wei; Qianben Wang; Yong Zhang; Kexin Xu; Min Ni; Mathieu Lupien; Piotr A. Mieczkowski; Jason D. Lieb; Keji Zhao; Myles Brown; X. Shirley Liu
Chromatin plays a central role in eukaryotic gene regulation. We performed genome-wide mapping of epigenetically marked nucleosomes to determine their position both near transcription start sites and at distal regulatory elements, including enhancers. In prostate cancer cells, where androgen receptor binds primarily to enhancers, we found that androgen treatment dismisses a central nucleosome present at androgen receptor binding sites that is flanked by a pair of marked nucleosomes. A new quantitative model built on the behavior of such nucleosome pairs correctly identified regions bound by the regulators of the immediate androgen response, including androgen receptor and FOXA1. More importantly, this model also correctly predicted previously unidentified binding sites for other transcription factors present after prolonged androgen stimulation, including OCT1 and NKX3-1. Therefore, quantitative modeling of enhancer structure provides a powerful predictive method to infer the identity of transcription factors involved in cellular responses to specific stimuli.
Cancer Cell | 2011
Min Ni; Yiwen Chen; Elgene Lim; Hallie Wimberly; Shannon T. Bailey; Yuuki Imai; David L. Rimm; X. Shirley Liu; Myles Brown
Endocrine therapies for breast cancer that target the estrogen receptor (ER) are ineffective in the 25%-30% of cases that are ER negative (ER-). Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 60%-70% of breast tumors, independent of ER status. How androgens and AR regulate breast cancer growth remains largely unknown. We find that AR is enriched in ER- breast tumors that overexpress HER2. Through analysis of the AR cistrome and androgen-regulated gene expression in ER-/HER2+ breast cancers we find that AR mediates ligand-dependent activation of Wnt and HER2 signaling pathways through direct transcriptional induction of WNT7B and HER3. Specific targeting of AR, Wnt or HER2 signaling impairs androgen-stimulated tumor cell growth suggesting potential therapeutic approaches for ER-/HER2+ breast cancers.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012
Shannon T. Bailey; Hyunjin Shin; Thomas Westerling; Xiaole Shirley Liu; Myles Brown
More than two-thirds of breast cancers express the estrogen receptor (ER) and depend on estrogen for growth and survival. Therapies targeting ER function, including aromatase inhibitors that block the production of estrogens and ER antagonists that alter ER transcriptional activity, play a central role in the treatment of ER+ breast cancers of all stages. In contrast to ER− breast cancers, which frequently harbor mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor, ER+ breast cancers are predominantly wild type for p53. Despite harboring wild-type p53, ER+ breast cancer cells are resistant to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in the presence of estrogen. Using genome-wide approaches, we have addressed the mechanism by which ER antagonizes the proapoptotic function of p53. Interestingly, both ER agonists such as estradiol and the selective ER modulator (SERM) tamoxifen promote p53 antagonism. In contrast, the full ER antagonist fulvestrant blocks the ability of ER to inhibit p53-mediated cell death. This inhibition works through a mechanism involving the modulation of a subset of p53 and ER target genes that can predict the relapse-free survival of patients with ER+ breast cancer. These findings suggest an improved strategy for the treatment of ER+ breast cancer using antagonists that completely block ER action together with drugs that activate p53-mediated cell death.
Blood | 2016
Ashujit Tagde; Hasan Rajabi; Audrey Bouillez; Maroof Alam; Reddy Gali; Shannon T. Bailey; Yu-Tzu Tai; Teru Hideshima; Kenneth C. Anderson; David Avigan; Donald Kufe
Multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines and primary tumor cells are addicted to the MYC oncoprotein for survival. Little is known, however, about how MYC expression is upregulated in MM cells. The mucin 1 C-terminal subunit (MUC1-C) is an oncogenic transmembrane protein that is aberrantly expressed in MM cell lines and primary tumor samples. The present studies demonstrate that targeting MUC1-C with silencing by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 editing or with the GO-203 inhibitor is associated with downregulation of MYC messenger RNA and protein. The results show that MUC1-C occupies the MYC promoter and thereby activates the MYC gene by a β-catenin/transcription factor 4 (TCF4)-mediated mechanism. In this way, MUC1-C (1) increases β-catenin occupancy on the MYC promoter, (2) forms a complex with β-catenin and TCF4, and, in turn, (3) drives MYC transcription. Analysis of MM cells using quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction arrays further demonstrated that silencing MUC1-C is associated with downregulation of MYC target genes, including CCND2, hTERT, and GCLC Analysis of microarray data sets further demonstrated that MUC1 levels positively correlate with MYC expression in MM progression and in primary cells from over 800 MM patients. These findings collectively provide convincing evidence that MUC1-C drives MYC expression in MM.
Cancer Research | 2015
Shannon T. Bailey; Thomas Westerling; Myles Brown
Among the genes regulated by estrogen receptor (ER) are miRNAs that play a role in breast cancer signaling pathways. To determine whether miRNAs are involved in ER-positive breast cancer progression to hormone independence, we profiled the expression of 800 miRNAs in the estrogen-dependent human breast cancer cell line MCF7 and its estrogen-independent derivative MCF7:2A (MCF7:2A) using NanoString. We found 78 miRNAs differentially expressed between the two cell lines, including a cluster comprising let-7c, miR99a, and miR125b, which is encoded in an intron of the long noncoding RNA LINC00478. These miRNAs are ER targets in MCF7 cells, and nearby ER binding and their expression are significantly decreased in MCF7:2A cells. The expression of these miRNAs was interrogated in patient samples profiled in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Among luminal tumors, these miRNAs are expressed at higher levels in luminal A versus B tumors. Although their expression is uniformly low in luminal B tumors, they are lost only in a subset of luminal A patients. Interestingly, this subset with low expression of these miRNAs had worse overall survival compared with luminal A patients with high expression. We confirmed that miR125b directly targets HER2 and that let-7c also regulates HER2 protein expression. In addition, HER2 protein expression and activity are negatively correlated with let-7c expression in TCGA. In summary, we identified an ER-regulated miRNA cluster that regulates HER2, is lost with progression to estrogen independence, and may serve as a biomarker of poor outcome in ER(+) luminal A breast cancer patients.
Molecular Endocrinology | 2011
Gustavo A. Miranda-Carboni; Miriam Guemes; Shannon T. Bailey; Edgar Anaya; Mirko Corselli; Bruno Péault; Susan A. Krum
Estrogens regulate osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. We identified GATA4 as a transcription factor expressed in osteoblasts and directly regulated by 17β-estradiol in this cell type but not in breast cancer cells, another estrogen-responsive tissue. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing) reveals that estrogen receptor α (ERα) binds to chromatin near GATA4 at five different enhancers. GATA4 and ERα are both recruited to ERα binding sites near genes that are specifically expressed in osteoblasts and control osteoblast differentiation. Maximal binding of GATA4 precedes ERα binding, and GATA4 is necessary for histone 3 lysine 4 dimethylation at ERα binding sites, suggesting that GATA4 is a pioneer factor for ERα. As such, knockdown of GATA4 reduced recruitment of ERα to DNA. Our study illustrates that GATA4 is a pioneer factor for ERα recruitment to osteoblast-specific enhancers.
Molecular Cancer Research | 2014
Shannon T. Bailey; Penelope Miron; Yoon Jong Choi; Bose S. Kochupurakkal; Gautam Maulik; Scott J. Rodig; Ruiyang Tian; Kathleen M. Foley; Teresa V. Bowman; Alexander Miron; Myles Brown; J. Dirk Iglehart; Debajit K. Biswas
Breast cancers with HER2 overexpression are sensitive to drugs targeting the receptor or its kinase activity. HER2-targeting drugs are initially effective against HER2-positive breast cancer, but resistance inevitably occurs. We previously found that NF-κB is hyperactivated in a subset of HER2-positive breast cancer cells and tissue specimens. In this study, we report that constitutively active NF-κB rendered HER2-positive cancer cells resistant to anti-HER2 drugs and cells selected for lapatinib resistance upregulated NF-κB. In both circumstances, cells were antiapoptotic and grew rapidly as xenografts. Lapatinib-resistant cells were refractory to HER2 and NF-κB inhibitors alone but were sensitive to their combination, suggesting a novel therapeutic strategy. A subset of NF-κB–responsive genes was overexpressed in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancers, and patients with this NF-κB signature had poor clinical outcome. Anti-HER2 drug resistance may be a consequence of NF-κB activation, and selection for resistance results in NF-κB activation, suggesting that this transcription factor is central to oncogenesis and drug resistance. Clinically, the combined targeting of HER2 and NF-κB suggests a potential treatment paradigm for patients who relapse after anti-HER2 therapy. Patients with these cancers may be treated by simultaneously suppressing HER2 signaling and NF-κB activation. Implications: The combination of an inhibitor of IκB kinase (IKK) inhibitor and anti-HER2 drugs may be a novel treatment strategy for drug-resistant human breast cancers. Mol Cancer Res; 12(3); 408–20. ©2013 AACR.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Rinath Jeselsohn; Lillian Werner; Meredith M. Regan; Aquila Fatima; Lauren Gilmore; Laura C. Collins; Andrew H. Beck; Shannon T. Bailey; Housheng Hansen He; Gilles Buchwalter; Myles Brown; J. Dirk Iglehart; Andrea L. Richardson; Steven E. Come
Advancements in molecular biology have unveiled multiple breast cancer promoting pathways and potential therapeutic targets. Large randomized clinical trials remain the ultimate means of validating therapeutic efficacy, but they require large cohorts of patients and are lengthy and costly. A useful approach is to conduct a window of opportunity study in which patients are exposed to a drug pre-surgically during the interval between the core needle biopsy and the definitive surgery. These are non-therapeutic studies and the end point is not clinical or pathological response but rather evaluation of molecular changes in the tumor specimens that can predict response. However, since the end points of the non-therapeutic studies are biologic, it is critical to first define the biologic changes that occur in the absence of treatment. In this study, we compared the molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors at the time of the diagnostic biopsy versus the definitive surgery in the absence of any intervention using the Nanostring nCounter platform. We found that while the majority of the transcripts did not vary between the two biopsies, there was evidence of activation of immune related genes in response to the first biopsy and further investigations of the immune changes after a biopsy in early breast cancer seem warranted.
Cancer Research | 2015
Shiliang A. Cao; Elgene Lim; Myles Brown; Shannon T. Bailey
Background ER+ breast cancers are predominantly p53 wildtype (wt). Despite this genotype, these cancers are relatively resistant to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in the presence of estrogen. Thus, current clinical practice is to administer hormonal therapy and chemotherapy sequentially rather than concurrently. Using the ER+/p53wt cell line MCF-7, we previously demonstrated that ER bound by either the ER agonist estradiol or partial antagonist tamoxifen inhibits the expression of a set of proapoptotic p53 target genes, whereas the full ER antagonist fulvestrant, a selective ER downregulator (SERD), removes the ER-mediated suppression of these genes, sensitizing breast cancer cells to p53-mediated cell death .We hypothesize that effective chemoendocrine therapy requires complete ER antagonism resulting in ER downregulation, increased p53 activity, and ultimately apoptosis. Methods: To model mechanisms of tumor sensitivity and resistance to therapy in vivo, therapeutic experiments were performed in immunodeficient mice bearing ER+/p53wt tumor xenografts derived from a 61-year-old African-American female with grade 2 invasive ductal carcinoma. The mice were randomly assigned to the following treatment groups: A) fulvestrant B) tamoxifen, C) doxorubicin, D) fulvestrant plus doxorubicin, E) tamoxifen plus doxorubicin, and F) control. Tumors were measured weekly for 42 days to determine treatment effects on growth. In addition, RNA was harvested from tumors at an early time point for RNA sequencing to determine genes regulated by the treatments. Results: Combination therapy comprising doxorubicin plus fulvestrant resulted in tumor regression compared with single-agent or doxorubicin plus tamoxifen treatment, which inhibited the growth of tumors but did not lead to their regression. Conclusions: Current paradigms for the treatment of ER+ breast cancer either in the adjuvant or advanced setting have involved the sequential use of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. This protocol is partially based on evidence of potential antagonism between tamoxifen and chemotherapy as observed in early studies. Our published work in vitro and the preclinical study presented here suggest that complete ER antagonism with SERDs such as fulvestrant is required to overcome the ability of ER to block p53-mediated apoptosis. Our results suggest treatments involving fulvestrant concurrent with chemotherapies involving p53 activation should be considered for the treatment of patients with ER+/p53wt breast cancer. Citation Format: Shiliang A Cao, Elgene Lim, Myles Brown, Shannon T Bailey. Modeling chemoendocrine therapy for ER+/p53wt luminal breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-14.
Cancer Research | 2012
Shannon T. Bailey; Hyunjin Shin; X. Shirley Liu; Myles Brown
Breast Cancer is a disease that affects thousands of women every year. A large subset of breast cancer is attributed to estrogen receptor (ER) dysregulation. Previously, our lab and others have determined the estradiol-stimulated ER cistrome in the MCF7 mammary epithelial cell line. To determine the relationship between ER and the apoptotic response, we compared our ER cistrome to a published p53 dataset. The p53 transcription factor is a tumor suppressor protein that is responsible for cell-cycle control and apoptosis. Our lab generated a doxorubicin-stimulated p53 cistrome in MCF7 cells, and we employed an integrative analysis approach examining the p53 and ER cistromes and gene expression microarray data to determine the genes coordinately regulated by both transcription factors. We identified a number of genes that are involved in the cell cycle, apoptosis, and DNA damage repair. By treating MCF7 cells with both stimuli, we found that the ER could inhibit the expression of a p53 target gene subset, thus diminishing the efficacy of the p53 program. These genes correlate with poor breast cancer clinical outcome. Moreover, we found that treatment of breast cancer cells with a combination of the anti-estrogen fulvestrant with p53 stimuli (i.e., doxorubicin and nutlin-3) leads to the synergistic enhancement of pro-apoptotic genes. Together, these data point to a set of genes essential for breast cell survival in ER-mediated breast cancer and suggest an improved paradigm for ER-positive breast cancer treatment i.e., the addition of fulvestrant with a p53 stabilizing drug. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-74. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-LB-74