Shehla Zaidi
Aga Khan University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shehla Zaidi.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Shehla Zaidi; Maryam Bigdeli; Noureen Aleem; Arash Rashidian
Introduction Inadequate access to essential medicines is a common issue within developing countries. Policy response is constrained, amongst other factors, by a dearth of in-depth country level evidence. We share here i) gaps related to access to essential medicine in Pakistan; and ii) prioritization of emerging policy and research concerns. Methods An exploratory research was carried out using a health systems perspective and applying the WHO Framework for Equitable Access to Essential Medicine. Methods involved key informant interviews with policy makers, providers, industry, NGOs, experts and development partners, review of published and grey literature, and consultative prioritization in stakeholder’s Roundtable. Findings A synthesis of evidence found major gaps in essential medicine access in Pakistan driven by weaknesses in the health care system as well as weak pharmaceutical regulation. 7 major policy concerns and 11 emerging research concerns were identified through consultative Roundtable. These related to weaknesses in medicine registration and quality assurance systems, unclear and counterproductive pricing policies, irrational prescribing and sub-optimal drug availability. Available research, both locally and globally, fails to target most of the identified policy concerns, tending to concentrate on irrational prescriptions. It overlooks trans-disciplinary areas of policy effectiveness surveillance, consumer behavior, operational pilots and pricing interventions review. Conclusion Experience from Pakistan shows that policy concerns related to essential medicine access need integrated responses across various components of the health systems, are poorly addressed by existing evidence, and require an expanded health systems research agenda.
The Lancet | 2013
Abdul Ghaffar; Shehla Zaidi; Huma Qureshi; Assad Hafeez
2234 www.thelancet.com Vol 381 June 29, 2013 The construction of health facilities, establishment of medical schools, and recruitment of health workers in the public sector have been important aspects of a popular political agenda in Pakistan, especially for elected governments. According to offi cial reports, the number of medical graduates has increased from 500 in 1947 to 171 450 in 2012 and the number of medical colleges has increased from two to 88, respectively. The total budget of the Pakistan Medical Research Council (PMRC) has increased 2·5 times between the fi scal years 2007–08 and 2011–12; and the number of health research publications has increased 7·5 times between 2001 and 2011 (fi gure). These increases give the illusion that the number of doctors in Pakistan who are capable and competent of providing needed clinical services to the population is adequate; that there is an increase in the number of research publications about health issues suggesting that we have skilled researchers; and that funding for health research by the government has gone up over the years. The truth is not so auspicious. Over recent years the real increase in the number of medical graduates Medical education and research in Pakistan health system and improving health outcomes for the country’s most vulnerable citizens. The Lancet Pakistan Series further shows the knowledge and public health capability in Pakistan, and clearly points the way to health reform, particularly in the postdevolution scenario. But tough questions remain. Will the commitment and generosity of communities throughout Pakistan be mobilised to address the most devastating day-to-day public health disaster the country faces? Will policy makers use experience of disasters to expand health-care services in diffi cult-toreach areas? Will political resolve be galvanised, reforms implemented, and resources made available? Pakistan has shown some public health success in response to natural disasters and humanitarian emergencies. The lessons and opportunities must be applied to the health system to prevent the continued death of more than 400 000 children and 12 000 women each year.
PLOS Medicine | 2017
Kumanan Rasanathan; Sara Bennett; Vincent Atkins; Robert P. Beschel; Gabriel Carrasquilla; Jodi Charles; Rajib Dasgupta; Kirk Emerson; Douglas Glandon; Churnrurtai Kanchanachitra; Peter Kingsley; Don Matheson; Rees Murithi Mbabu; Charles Mwansambo; Michael Myers; Jeremias Paul; Thulisile Radebe; James Smith; Orielle Solar; Agnes Soucat; Aloysius Ssennyonjo; Matthias Wismar; Shehla Zaidi
Kumanan Rasanathan and colleagues argue that the potential of multisectoral collaboration for improving health remains untapped in many low- and middle-income countries.
Vaccine | 2015
Mohammad Atif Habib; Sajid Soofi; A. Sheraz; Zaid Bhatti; H. Okayasu; Shehla Zaidi; N.A. Molodecky; Mark A. Pallansch; Roland W. Sutter; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta
BACKGROUND Polio eradication remains a challenge in Pakistan and the causes for the failure to eradicate poliomyelitis are complex. Undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies, especially zinc deficiency, are major public health problems in Pakistan and could potentially affect the response to enteric vaccines, including oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of zinc supplementation among infants on immune response to oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). METHODS A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted in newborns (aged 0-14 days). Subjects were assigned to either receive 10mg of zinc or placebo supplementation daily for 18 weeks. Both groups received OPV doses at birth, at 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks. Data was collected on prior immunization status, diarrheal episodes, breastfeeding practices and anthropometric measurements at recruitment and at 6 and 18 weeks. Blood samples were similarly collected to determine the antibody response to OPV and for micronutrient analysis. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between seroconversion and zinc status. RESULTS Overall, 404 subjects were recruited. At recruitment, seropositivity was already high for poliovirus (PV) serotype 1 (zinc: 91.1%; control: 90.5%) and PV2 (90.0%; 92.7%), with lower estimates for PV3 (70.0%; 64.8%). By week 18, the proportion of subjects with measured zinc levels in the normal range (i.e. ≥60 μg/dL) was significantly greater in the intervention group compared to the control group (71.9%; 27.4%; p<0.001). No significant difference in seroconversion was demonstrated between the groups for PV1, PV2, or PV3. CONCLUSIONS There was no effect of zinc supplementation on OPV immunogenicity. These conclusions were confirmed when restricting the analysis to those with measured higher zinc levels.
BMC Public Health | 2016
Fauziah Rabbani; Leah Shipton; Franklin White; Iman Nuwayhid; Leslie London; Abdul Ghaffar; Bui Thi Thu Ha; Göran Tomson; Rajiv N. Rimal; Anwar Islam; Amirhossein Takian; Samuel Wong; Shehla Zaidi; Kausar S Khan; Rozina Karmaliani; Imran Naeem Abbasi; Farhat Abbas
BackgroundPublic health has multicultural origins. By the close of the nineteenth century, Schools of Public Health (SPHs) began to emerge in western countries in response to major contemporary public health challenges. The Flexner Report (1910) emphasized the centrality of preventive medicine, sanitation, and public health measures in health professional education. The Alma Ata Declaration on Primary Health Care (PHC) in 1978 was a critical milestone, especially for low and middle-income countries (LMICs), conceptualizing a close working relationship between PHC and public health measures. The Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2005–2008) strengthened the case for SPHs in LMICs as key stakeholders in efforts to reduce global health inequities. This scoping review groups text into public health challenges faced by LMICs and the role of SPHs in addressing these challenges.Main textThe challenges faced by LMICs include rapid urbanization, environmental degradation, unfair terms of global trade, limited capacity for equitable growth, mass displacements associated with conflicts and natural disasters, and universal health coverage. Poor governance and externally imposed donor policies and agendas, further strain the fragile health systems of LMICs faced with epidemiological transition. Moreover barriers to education and research imposed by limited resources, political and economic instability, and unbalanced partnerships additionally aggravate the crisis. To address these contextual challenges effectively, SPHs are offering broad based health professional education, conducting multidisciplinary population based research and fostering collaborative partnerships. SPHs are also looked upon as the key drivers to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs).ConclusionSPHs in LMICs can contribute to overcoming several public health challenges being faced by LMICs, including achieving SDGs. Most importantly they can develop cadres of competent and well-motivated public health professionals: educators, practitioners and researchers who ask questions that address fundamental health determinants, seek solutions as agents of change within their mandates, provide specific services and serve as advocates for multilevel partnerships. Funding support, human resources, and agency are unfortunately often limited or curtailed in LMICs, and this requires constructive collaboration between LMICs and counterpart institutions from high income countries.
BMJ | 2017
Shehla Zaidi; Prasanna Saligram; Syed Masud Ahmed; Egbert Sonderp; Kabir Sheikh
Policy initiatives aiming to improve access to healthcare in South Asia have proliferated in recent years, but are they enough to address widespread health inequity in the region, ask Shehla Zaidi and colleagues?
BMJ Open | 2013
Arash Rashidian; Nader Jahanmehr; Samer Jabbour; Shehla Zaidi; Fatemeh Soleymani; Maryam Bigdeli
Objectives We assessed the situation of academic publications on access to and use of medicines (ATM) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) of the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). We aimed to inform priority setting for research on ATM in the region. Design Bibliographic review of published studies. Setting LMICs in EMR. Inclusion criteria Publications on ATM issues originating from or focusing on EMR LMICs covering the period 2000–2011. Publications involving multinational studies were included if at least one eligible country had been included in the study. Information sources and data extraction We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index. We used the WHO ATM framework for data extraction and synthesis. We analysed the data according to the ATM issues, health system levels, year of publication and the countries of origin or focus of the studies. Results 151 articles met the inclusion criteria. Most articles (77%) originated from LMICs in EMR, suggesting that the majority of evidence on ATM in the region is home-grown. Over 60% of articles were from Iran, Pakistan, Jordan and Lebanon (in order of volume), while we found no studies assessing ATM in Somalia, Djibouti and South Sudan, all low-income countries. Most studies focused on the rational use of medicines, while affordability and financing received limited attention. There was a steady growth over time in the number of ATM publications in the region (r=0.87). Conclusions There is a growing trend, over the years, of more studies from the region appearing in international journals. There is a need for further research on the financing and affordability aspects of ATM in the region. Cross-border issues and the roles of non-health sectors in access to medicines in the region have not been explored widely.
International journal of health policy and management | 2016
Sayed Masoom Shah; Shehla Zaidi; Jamil Ahmed; Shafiq Ur Rehman
BACKGROUND Workforce motivation and retention is important for the functionality and quality of service delivery in health systems of developing countries. Despite huge primary healthcare (PHC) infrastructure, Pakistans health indicators are not impressive; mainly because of under-utilization of facilities and low patient satisfaction. One of the major underlying issues is staff absenteeism. The study aimed to identify factors affecting retention and motivation of doctors working in PHC facilities of Pakistan. METHODS An exploratory study was conducted in a rural district in Khyber Puktunkhwa (KP) province, in Pakistan. A conceptual framework was developed comprising of three organizational, individual, and external environmental factors. Qualitative research methods comprising of semi-structured interviews with doctors working in basic health units (BHUs) and in-depth interviews with district and provincial government health managers were used. Document review of postings, rules of business and policy actions was also conducted. Triangulation of findings was carried out to arrive at the final synthesis. RESULTS Inadequate remuneration, unreasonable facilities at residence, poor work environment, political interference, inadequate supplies and medical facilities contributed to lack of motivation among both male and female doctors. The physicians accepted government jobs in BHUs with a belief that these jobs were more secure, with convenient working hours. Male physicians seemed to be more motivated because they faced less challenges than their female counterparts in BHUs especially during relocations. Overall, the organizational factors emerged as the most significant whereby human resource policy, career growth structure, performance appraisal and monetary benefits played an important role. Gender and marital status of female doctors was regarded as most important individual factor affecting retention and motivation of female doctors in BHUs. CONCLUSION Inadequate remuneration, unreasonable facilities at residence, poor work environment, political interference, inadequate supplies, and medical facilities contributed to lack of motivation in physicians in our study. Our study advocates that by addressing the retention and motivation challenges, service delivery can be made more responsive to the patients and communities in Pakistan and other similar settings.
BMC Health Services Research | 2014
Peter Hatcher; Shiraz Shaikh; Hassan Fazli; Shehla Zaidi; Atif Riaz
BackgroundThere is dearth of evidence on provider cost of contracted out services particularly for Maternal and Newborn Health (MNH). The evidence base is weak for policy makers to estimate resources required for scaling up contracting. This paper ascertains provider unit costs and expenditure distribution at contracted out government primary health centers to inform the development of optimal resource envelopes for contracting out MNH services.MethodsThis is a case study of provider costs of MNH services at two government Rural Health Centers (RHCs) contracted out to a non-governmental organization in Pakistan. It reports on four selected Basic Emergency Obstetrical and Newborn Care (BEmONC) services provided in one RHC and six Comprehensive Emergency Obstetrical and Newborn Care (CEmONC) services in the other. Data were collected using staff interviews and record review to compile resource inputs and service volumes, and analyzed using the CORE Plus tool. Unit costs are based on actual costs of MNH services and are calculated for actual volumes in 2011 and for volumes projected to meet need with optimal resource inputs.ResultsThe unit costs per service for actual 2011 volumes at the BEmONC RHC were antenatal care (ANC) visit USD
IDS Bulletin | 2013
Shehla Zaidi; Shandana Khan Mohmand; Noorya Hayat; Andrés Mejía Acosta; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta
18.78, normal delivery US