Shi Sherebrin

Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system

There are currently limitations associated with the prostate biopsy procedure, which is the most commonly used method for a definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer. With the use of two-dimensional (2D) transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for needle-guidance in this procedure, the physician has restricted anatomical reference points for guiding the needle to target sites. Further, any motion of the physicians hand during the procedure may cause the prostate to move or deform to a prohibitive extent. These variations make it difficult to establish a consistent reference frame for guiding a needle. We have developed a 3D navigation system for prostate biopsy, which addresses these shortcomings. This system is composed of a 3D US imaging subsystem and a passive mechanical arm to minimize prostate motion. To validate our prototype, a series of experiments were performed on prostate phantoms. The 3D scan of the string phantom produced minimal geometric distortions, and the geometric error of the 3D imaging subsystem was 0.37 mm. The accuracy of 3D prostate segmentation was determined by comparing the known volume in a certified phantom to a reconstructed volume generated by our system and was shown to estimate the volume with less then 5% error. Biopsy needle guidance accuracy tests in agar prostate phantoms showed that the mean error was 2.1 mm and the 3D location of the biopsy core was recorded with a mean error of 1.8 mm. In this paper, we describe the mechanical design and validation of the prototype system using an in vitro prostate phantom. Preliminary results from an ongoing clinical trial show that prostate motion is small with an in-plane displacement of less than 1 mm during the biopsy procedure.

Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the vasculature

With conventional ultrasonography, the diagnostician must view a series of two-dimensional images in order to form a mental impression of the three-dimensional anatomy, an efficient and time consuming practice prone to operator variability, which may cause variable or even incorrect diagnoses. Also, a conventional two-dimensional ultrasound image represents a thin slice of the patients anatomy at a single location and orientation, which is difficult to reproduce at a later time. These factors make conventional ultrasonography non-optimal for prospective or follow-up studies. Our efforts have focused on overcoming these deficiencies by developing three-dimensional ultrasound imaging techniques that are capable of acquiring B-mode, colour Doppler and power Doppler images of the vasculature, by using a conventional ultrasound system to acquire a series of two-dimensional images and then mathematically reconstructing them into a single three-dimensional image, which may then be viewed interactively on an inexpensive desktop computer. We report here on two approaches: (1) free-hand scanning, in which a magnetic positioning device is attached to the ultrasound transducer to record the position and orientation of each two-dimensional image needed for the three-dimensional image reconstruction; and (2) mechanical scanning, in which a motor-driven assembly is used to translate the transducer linearly across the neck, yielding a set of uniformly-spaced parallel two-dimensional images.

Design and evaluation of a 3D transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy system.

Biopsy of the prostate using ultrasound guidance is the clinical gold standard for diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma. The current prostate biopsy procedure is limited to using 2D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images to target biopsy sites and record biopsy core locations for postbiopsy confirmation. Localization of the 2D image in its actual 3D position is ambiguous and limits procedural accuracy and reproducibility. We have developed a 3D TRUS prostate biopsy system that provides 3D intrabiopsy information for needle guidance and biopsy location recording. The system conforms to the workflow and imaging technology of the current biopsy procedure, making it easier for clinical integration. In this paper, we describe the system design and validate the system accuracy by performing mock biopsies on US/CT multimodal patient-specific prostate phantoms. Our biopsy system generated 3D patient-specific models of the prostate with volume errors less than 3.5% and mean boundary errors of less than 1 mm. Using the 3D biopsy system, needles were guided to within 2.3 +/- 1.0 mm of 3D targets and with a high probability of biopsying clinically significant tumors. The positions of the actual biopsy sites were accurately localized to within 1.5 +/- 0.8 mm.

A compact mechatronic system for 3D ultrasound guided prostate interventions.

PURPOSE Ultrasound imaging has improved the treatment of prostate cancer by producing increasingly higher quality images and influencing sophisticated targeting procedures for the insertion of radioactive seeds during brachytherapy. However, it is critical that the needles be placed accurately within the prostate to deliver the therapy to the planned location and avoid complications of damaging surrounding tissues. METHODS The authors have developed a compact mechatronic system, as well as an effective method for guiding and controlling the insertion of transperineal needles into the prostate. This system has been designed to allow guidance of a needle obliquely in 3D space into the prostate, thereby reducing pubic arch interference. The choice of needle trajectory and location in the prostate can be adjusted manually or with computer control. RESULTS To validate the system, a series of experiments were performed on phantoms. The 3D scan of the string phantom produced minimal geometric error, which was less than 0.4 mm. Needle guidance accuracy tests in agar prostate phantoms showed that the mean error of bead placement was less then 1.6 mm along parallel needle paths that were within 1.2 mm of the intended target and 1 degree from the preplanned trajectory. At oblique angles of up to 15 degrees relative to the probe axis, beads were placed to within 3.0 mm along a trajectory that were within 2.0 mm of the target with an angular error less than 2 degrees. CONCLUSIONS By combining 3D TRUS imaging system to a needle tracking linkage, this system should improve the physicians ability to target and accurately guide a needle to selected targets without the need for the computer to directly manipulate and insert the needle. This would be beneficial as the physician has complete control of the system and can safely maneuver the needle guide around obstacles such as previously placed needles.

Repeat Prostate Biopsy Accuracy: Simulator-based Comparison of Two- and Three-dimensional Transrectal US Modalities

PURPOSE To compare the accuracy of biopsy with two-dimensional (2D) transrectal ultrasonography (US) with that of biopsy with conventional three-dimensional (3D) transrectal US and biopsy with guided 3D transrectal US in the guidance of repeat prostate biopsy procedures in a prostate biopsy simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Five residents and five experts performed repeat biopsies with a biopsy simulator that contained the transrectal US prostate images of 10 patients who had undergone biopsy. Simulated repeat biopsies were performed with 2D transrectal US, conventional 3D transrectal US, and guided 3D transrectal US (an extension of 3D transrectal US that enables active display of biopsy targets). The modalities were compared on the basis of time per biopsy and how accurately simulated repeat biopsies could be guided to specific targets. The probability for successful biopsy of a repeat target was calculated for each modality. RESULTS Guided 3D transrectal US was significantly (P < .01) more accurate for simulated biopsy of repeat targets than was 2D or 3D transrectal US, with a biopsy accuracy of 0.86 mm +/- 0.47 (standard deviation), 3.68 mm +/- 2.60, and 3.60 mm +/- 2.57, respectively. Experts had a 70% probability of sampling a prior biopsy target volume of 0.5 cm(3) with 2D transrectal US; however, the probability approached 100% with guided 3D transrectal US. Biopsy accuracy was not significantly different between experts and residents for any modality; however, experts were significantly (P < .05) faster than residents with each modality. CONCLUSION Repeat biopsy of the prostate with 2D transrectal US has limited accuracy. Compared with 2D transrectal US, the biopsy accuracy of both experts and residents improved with guided 3D transrectal US but did not improve with conventional 3D transrectal US.

Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging

Ultrasound is an inexpensive and widely used imaging modality for the diagnosis and staging of a number of diseases; nevertheless, technical improvements are needed before its full potential is realized. We believe that 2-D viewing of the 3-D anatomy, using conventional ultrasound procedures, limits our ability to quantify, diagnose and stage a number of diseases because: conventional ultrasound images are 2-D, multiple images must be integrated in the diagnosticians mind to develop a 3-D impression of the anatomy leading to a time-consuming process with increased operator variability; the patients anatomy or orientation sometimes restricts the image angle, resulting in the optimal image plane necessary for diagnosis being unavailable; and, it is difficult to localize the conventional 2-D image plane and reproduce it at a later time, making it suboptimal for monitoring of therapy. Our efforts have focused on overcoming these deficiencies by developing 3-D ultrasound imaging techniques that are capable of acquiring B-mode, color Doppler and power Doppler images from existing ultrasound instruments, reconstructing the information in 3-D, and then allowing interactive viewing of 3-D ultrasound images on inexpensive desktop computers.

Feasibility of 3D Ultrasound to Evaluate Upper Extremity Nerves

PURPOSE This study investigates the performance of a 3 D Ultrasound (US) system in imaging elbow and wrist nerves. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty healthy volunteers with asymptomatic median, ulnar and radial nerves were prospectively investigated. Bilateral 3DUS scans of the elbows and wrists were acquired by using a commercially available US scanner (18 MHz, AplioXG, Toshiba) and stored as a 3 D volume by a dedicated software (CURE, Robarts Research Institute). Retrospectively, qualitative (image quality, atypical nerve location, findings potentially associated with compression neuropathy) and quantitative (cross-sectional area measurements) evaluations were performed. RESULTS In all 200 nerves 3DUS was feasible (100%). Image quality was insufficient in 13.5% (25 ulnar nerve elbow, 2 radial nerve) and sonomorphology was not assessable in those nerves. Measurement of cross sectional areas was feasible in all nerves (100%). Median cross-sectional area (range) were: median nerve elbow 7 mm2 (6-9), radial nerve 3 mm2 (1-4), ulnar nerve elbow 8 mm2 (5-11), median nerve wrist 8 mm2 (5-10), and ulnar nerve wrist 4 mm2 (2-6). No significant changes in nerve cross-sectional area along each nerve was found. Ulnar nerve subluxation was found in 2 nerves (6.7%). No anconeus epitrochlearis muscle or osteophytes were found. CONCLUSION 3DUS is a feasible method for assessing nerves of the upper extremity and has been shown to provide a good overview of the median, ulnar and radial nerve at the elbow and wrist, but is limited for evaluation of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. This technique enables reliable measurements at different locations along the nerve.

3D image-guided robotic needle positioning system for small animal interventions

PURPOSE This paper presents the design of a micro-CT guided small animal robotic needle positioning system. In order to simplify the robotic design and maintain a small targeting error, a novel implementation of the remote center of motion is used in the system. The system has been developed with the objective of achieving a mean targeting error of <200 μm while maintaining a high degree of user friendliness. METHODS The robot is compact enough to operate within a 25 cm diameter micro-CT bore. Small animals can be imaged and an intervention performed without the need to transport the animal from one workspace to another. Not requiring transport of the animal reduces opportunities for targets to shift from their localized position in the image and simplifies the workflow of interventions. An improved method of needle calibration is presented that better characterizes the calibration using the position of the needle tip in photographs rather than the needle axis. A calibration fixture was also introduced, which dramatically reduces the time requirements of calibration while maintaining calibration accuracy. Two registration modes have been developed to correspond the robot coordinate system with the coordinate system of the micro-CT scanner. The two registration modes offer a balance between the time required to complete a registration and the overall registration accuracy. The development of slow high accuracy and fast low accuracy registration modes provides users with a degree of flexibility in selecting a registration mode best suited for their application. RESULTS The target registration error (TRE) of the higher accuracy primary registration was TRE(primary) = 31 ± 12 μm. The error in the lower accuracy combined registration was TRE(combined) = 139 ± 63 μm. Both registration modes are therefore suitable for small-animal needle interventions. The targeting accuracy of the robotic system was characterized using targeting experiments in tissue-mimicking gelatin phantoms. The results of the targeting experiments were combined with the known calibration and needle deflection errors to provide a more meaningful measure of the needle positioning accuracy of the system. The combined targeting errors of the system were 149 ± 41 μm and 218 ± 38 μm using the primary and combined registrations, respectively. Finally, pilot in vivo experiments were successfully completed to demonstrate the performance of the system in a biomedical application. CONCLUSIONS The device was able to achieve the desired performance with an error of <200 μm and improved repeatability when compared to other designs. The device expands the capabilities of image-guided interventions for preclinical biomedical applications.

Minimization of tool tracking error using fulcrum correction in minimally invasive interventions: application to prostate biopsy procedure

Real-time 3D optical tracking of free-hand imaging devices or surgical tools has been studied and employed for object localization in many minimally invasive interventions. However, the surgical workspace for many interventional procedures is often sub-dermal with tool access through ports from surgical incisions or anatomical orifices. To maintain the optical line-of-sight criterion, external extensions of inserted imaging devices and rigid surgical tools must be tracked to localize the internal tool tips. Unfortunately, tracking by this form of correspondence is very susceptible to noise as orientation errors on the external tracked end compound into both rotational and translational errors on the internal, workspace position. These translational errors are proportional to the length of the probe and the sine of the angulation error, so small angulation errors can quickly compromise the accuracy of the tool tip localization. We propose a real-time tracking correction technique that uses the rotational fulcrum created by the device entry port to minimize the effect of translational and rotational noise errors for tool tip localization. Our technique could apply to many types of interventions, but we focus on the application to the prostate biopsy procedure for tracking a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) probe commonly used for prostate biopsies. In vitro studies were performed using the Claron Technology MicronTracker 2 to track a TRUS probe in a fixed rotational device. Our experimental results showed an order of magnitude improvement in RMS localization of the internal TRUS probe tip using fulcrum correction over the raw tracking information.

Mechanically Assisted 3D Prostate Ultrasound Imaging and Biopsy Needle-Guidance System

Prostate biopsy procedures are currently limited to using 2D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging to guide the biopsy needle. Being limited to 2D causes ambiguity in needle guidance and provides an insufficient record to allow guidance to the same suspicious locations or avoid regions that are negative during previous biopsy sessions. We have developed a mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound imaging and needle tracking system, which supports a commercially available TRUS probe and integrated needle guide for prostate biopsy. The mechanical device is fixed to a cart and the mechanical tracking linkage allows its joints to be manually manipulated while fully supporting the weight of the ultrasound probe. The computer interface is provided in order to track the needle trajectory and display its path on a corresponding 3D TRUS image, allowing the physician to aim the needle-guide at predefined targets within the prostate. The system has been designed for use with several end-fired transducers that can be rotated about the longitudinal axis of the probe in order to generate 3D image for 3D navigation. Using the system, 3D TRUS prostate images can be generated in approximately 10 seconds. The system reduces most of the user variability from conventional hand-held probes, which make them unsuitable for precision biopsy, while preserving some of the user familiarity and procedural workflow. In this paper, we describe the 3D TRUS guided biopsy system and report on the initial clinical use of this system for prostate biopsy.