Shigeo Anai

Breath-hold monitoring and visual feedback for radiotherapy using a charge-coupled device camera and a head-mounted display: system development and feasibility

PurposeThe aim of this study was to present the technical aspects of the breath-hold technique with respiratory monitoring and visual feedback and to evaluate the feasibility of this system in healthy volunteers.Methods and materialsTo monitor respiration, the vertical position of the fiducial marker placed on the patient’s abdomen was tracked by a machine vision system with a charge-coupled device camera. A monocular head-mounted display was used to provide the patient with visual feedback about the breathing trace. Five healthy male volunteers were enrolled in this study. They held their breath at the end-inspiration and the end-expiration phases. They performed five repetitions of the same type of 15-s breath-holds with and without a head-mounted display, respectively. A standard deviation of five mean positions of the fiducial marker during a15-s breath-hold in each breath-hold type was used as the reproducibility value of breath-hold.ResultsAll five volunteers well tolerated the breath-hold maneuver. For the inspiration breath-hold, the standard deviations with and without visual feedback were 1.74 mm and 0.84 mm, respectively (P = 0.20). For the expiration breath-hold, the standard deviations with and without visual feedback were 0.63 mm and 0.96 mm, respectively (P = 0.025).ConclusionOur newly developed system might help the patient achieve improved breath-hold reproducibility.

Computerized estimation of patient setup errors in portal images based on localized pelvic templates for prostate cancer radiotherapy

We have developed a computerized method for estimating patient setup errors in portal images based on localized pelvic templates for prostate cancer radiotherapy. The patient setup errors were estimated based on a template-matching technique that compared the portal image and a localized pelvic template image with a clinical target volume produced from a digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) image of each patient. We evaluated the proposed method by calculating the residual error between the patient setup error obtained by the proposed method and the gold standard setup error determined by consensus between two radiation oncologists. Eleven training cases with prostate cancer were used for development of the proposed method, and then we applied the method to 10 test cases as a validation test. As a result, the residual errors in the anterior–posterior, superior–inferior and left–right directions were smaller than 2 mm for the validation test. The mean residual error was 2.65 ± 1.21 mm in the Euclidean distance for training cases, and 3.10 ± 1.49 mm for the validation test. There was no statistically significant difference in the residual error between the test for training cases and the validation test (P = 0.438). The proposed method appears to be robust for detecting patient setup error in the treatment of prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Computerized method for measurement of displacement vectors of target positions on EPID cine images in stereotactic radiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to develop a computerized method for measurement of displacement vectors of target position on electronic portal imaging device (EPID) cine images in a treatment without implanted markers. Our proposed method was based on a template matching technique with cross-correlation coefficient between a reference portal (RP) image and each consecutive portal (CP) image acquired by the EPID. EPID images with 512×384 pixels (pixel size:0.56 mm) were acquired in a cine mode at a sampling rate of 0.5 frame/sec by using an energy of 4, 6, or 10MV on linear accelerators. The displacement vector of the target on each cine image was determined from the position in which took the maximum cross-correlation value between the RP image and each CP image. We applied our method to EPID cine images of a lung phantom with a tumor model simulating respiratory motion, and 5 cases with a non-small cell lung cancer and one case of metastasis. For validation of our proposed method, displacement vectors of a target position calculated by our method were compared with those determined manually by two radiation oncologists. As a result, for lung phantom images, target displacements by our method correlated well with those by the oncologists (r=0.972 - 0.994). Correlation values for 4 cases ranged from 0.854 to 0.991, but the values for the other two cases were 0.609 and 0.644. This preliminary result suggested that our method may be useful for monitoring of displacement vectors of target positions without implanted markers in stereotactic radiotherapy.

A machine vision system with CCD cameras for patient positioning in radiotherapy: a preliminary report.

PURPOSE To determine positioning accuracy of a machine vision system in radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The machine vision system was composed of 640 x 480 pixel CCD cameras and computerized control systems. For image acquisition, the phantom was set up for the reference position and a single CCD camera was positioned 1.5 m from the isocenter. The image data of the fiducial marker with 1.5 mm lead pellet on the lateral surface of the phantom was captured onto the CCD, and then the position of the marker was accurately calculated. The phantom was moved 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 2.00, and 3.00 mm from the reference position, using a micrometer head. The position of the fiducial marker was analyzed using a kilo-voltage fluoroscopic imaging system and a machine vision system. RESULTS Using fluoroscopic images, the discrepancy between the actual movement of the phantom by micrometer heads and the measurement was found to be 0.12 +/- 0.05 mm (mean +/- standard deviation). In contrast, the detection of the movement by the machine vision system coincided with the discrepancy of 0.0067 +/- 0.0048 mm. CONCLUSION This study suggests that the machine vision system can be used to measure small changes in patient position with a resolution of less than 0.1 mm.