Shravan Kumar Muppa
University of Hohenheim
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shravan Kumar Muppa.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2016
Volker Wulfmeyer; Shravan Kumar Muppa; Andreas Behrendt; Eva Hammann; Florian Späth; Zbigniew Sorbjan; David D. Turner; R. Michael Hardesty
AbstractAtmospheric variables in the convective boundary layer (CBL), which are critical for turbulence parameterizations in weather and climate models, are assessed. These include entrainment fluxes, higher-order moments of humidity, potential temperature, and vertical wind, as well as dissipation rates. Theoretical relationships between the integral scales, gradients, and higher-order moments of atmospheric variables, fluxes, and dissipation rates are developed mainly focusing on the entrainment layer (EL) at the top of the CBL. These equations form the starting point for tests of and new approaches in CBL turbulence parameterizations. For the investigation of these relationships, an observational approach using a synergy of ground-based water vapor, temperature, and wind lidar systems is proposed. These systems measure instantaneous vertical profiles with high temporal and spatial resolution throughout the CBL including the EL. The resolution of these systems permits the simultaneous measurement of gra...
Boundary-Layer Meteorology | 2016
Shravan Kumar Muppa; Andreas Behrendt; Florian Späth; Volker Wulfmeyer; Simon Metzendorf; Andrea Riede
Turbulent humidity fluctuations in the convective boundary layer (CBL) under clear-sky conditions were investigated by deriving moments up to fourth-order. High-resolution humidity measurements were collected with a water vapour differential absorption lidar system during the
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2018
Volker Wulfmeyer; David D. Turner; B. Baker; Robert M. Banta; Andreas Behrendt; Timothy A. Bonin; W. A. Brewer; M. Buban; Aditya Choukulkar; E. Dumas; R.M. Hardesty; Thijs Heus; Joachim Ingwersen; D. Lange; T.R. Lee; Simon Metzendorf; Shravan Kumar Muppa; Tilden P. Meyers; Rob K. Newsom; M. Osman; Siegfried Raasch; J. Santanello; Christoph J. Senff; Florian Späth; Timothy J. Wagner; Tammy M. Weckwerth
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society | 2017
Rieke Heinze; Anurag Dipankar; Cintia Carbajal Henken; Christopher Moseley; Odran Sourdeval; Silke Trömel; Xinxin Xie; Panos Adamidis; Felix Ament; Holger Baars; Christian Barthlott; Andreas Behrendt; Ulrich Blahak; Sebastian Bley; Slavko Brdar; Matthias Brueck; Susanne Crewell; Hartwig Deneke; Paolo Di Girolamo; Raquel Evaristo; Jürgen Fischer; Christopher Frank; Petra Friederichs; Tobias Göcke; Ksenia Gorges; Luke B. Hande; Moritz Hanke; Akio Hansen; Hans Christian Hege; C. Hoose
\hbox {HD(CP)}^{2}
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2014
Andreas Behrendt; Volker Wulfmeyer; Eva Hammann; Shravan Kumar Muppa; S. Pal
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Andreas Macke; Patric Seifert; Holger Baars; Christian Barthlott; Christoph Beekmans; Andreas Behrendt; Birger Bohn; Matthias Brueck; Johannes Bühl; Susanne Crewell; Thomas Damian; Hartwig Deneke; Sebastian Düsing; Andreas Foth; Paolo Di Girolamo; Eva Hammann; Rieke Heinze; Anne Hirsikko; John Kalisch; N. Kalthoff; Stefan Kinne; M. Kohler; Ulrich Löhnert; Bomidi Lakshmi Madhavan; Vera Maurer; Shravan Kumar Muppa; Jan H. Schween; Ilya Serikov; H. Siebert; Clemens Simmer
HD(CP)2 Observational Prototype Experiment (HOPE). Two cases, both representing a well-developed CBL around local noon, are discussed. While the first case (from the intensive observation period (IOP) 5 on 20 April 2013) compares well with what is considered typical CBL behaviour, the second case (from IOP 6 on 24 April 2013) shows a number of non-typical characteristics. Both cases show similar capping inversions and wind shear across the CBL top. However, a major difference between both cases is the advection of a humid layer above the CBL top during IOP 6. While the variance profile of IOP 5 shows a maximum at the interfacial layer, two variance peaks are observed near the CBL top for IOP 6. A marked difference can also be seen in the third-order moment and skewness profiles: while both are negative (positive) below (above) the CBL top for IOP 5, the structure is more complex for IOP 6. Kurtosis is about three for IOP 5, whereas for IOP 6, the distribution is slightly platykurtic. We believe that the entrainment of an elevated moist layer into the CBL is responsible for the unusual findings for IOP 6, which suggests that it is important to consider the structure of residual humidity layers entrained into the CBL.
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2016
Florian Späth; Andreas Behrendt; Shravan Kumar Muppa; Simon Metzendorf; Andrea Riede; Volker Wulfmeyer
Capsule SummaryA new field campaign using a synergy of scanning lidar systems as well as other in-situ and remote sensing methods provides profiles, gradients, and fluxes of temperature, humidity, and winds from the surface to the top of the planetary boundary layer to evaluate and improve our understanding of land-atmosphere interactions.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Rieke Heinze; Christopher Moseley; Lennart Nils Böske; Shravan Kumar Muppa; Vera Maurer; Siegfried Raasch; Bjorn Stevens
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2014
Florian Späth; Andreas Behrendt; Shravan Kumar Muppa; Simon Metzendorf; Andrea Riede; Volker Wulfmeyer
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Rieke Heinze; Christopher Moseley; C. M. Böske; Shravan Kumar Muppa; Vera Maurer; Siegfried Raasch; Bjorn Stevens