Shrimati Shetty

Venous thromboembolism in young patients from western India: a study.

The goal of this article is to study the association of known markers of thrombophilia with venous thrombosis in young patients (< 45 years) from the Western part of India. A prospective study of 432 patients (252 males and 180 females, age 1-45 years) was conducted between 1994 and 2000 (6 years). The diagnosis was confirmed in all the patients by ultrasound with Doppler or by a computed tomograph (CT) scan of the brain with or without contrast depending on the case. Detailed clinical examination, and family history was taken to establish recurrent thrombosis and familial occurrence of thrombosis. The markers studied were protein C, protein S, antithrombin (AT) III, factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene G20210A polymorphism, and the thermolabile MTHFR variant C677T polymorphism, using appropriate techniques. Lupus inhibitor was tested in the first 72 patients using Dilute Russel Viper Venom Time (DRVVT) test, and anticardiolipin antibodies were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Protein C, protein S, and AT III deficiency was detected in 9.5%, 6.5%, and 2.6%, respectively, among the patients. Anticardiolipin antibody was present in 9.9% of the patients, whereas lupus anticoagulant was present in 8.3% of patients; factor V Leiden mutation was detected in 3% of patients; thermolabile variant of MTHFR C677T polymorphism was present in 14.9% of patients with 1.2% homozygotes. Prothrombin G20210A polymorphism was not detected in any sample in this population. One hundred and four patients of 432 (24.9%) had recurrent attacks of thrombosis without any proximate precipitating cause, whereas 7.5 % of the patients had another close member of the family with a history of deep venous thrombosis. Eighty-six members from 28 families (out of 32 families giving family history of thrombosis) were investigated and found to have protein C and protein S deficiency in seven each; factor V Leiden was present in 6, and MTHFR C677T polymorphism was present in 5 cases. Hence, 25 of 86 members (28%) from the family of patients with familial history deep venous thrombosis had positive markers for thrombophilia. Thus, we could show that in young patients presenting with thrombosis, at least 34% of them had a demonstrable cause for thrombophilia. Prothrombin gene polymorphism G20210A seems to be nonexistent in our population and AT III deficiency also appears to be low compared to other markers of thrombophilia. There is a high prevalence of variant MTHFR C677T in our series, but the incidence of MTHFR C677T in our general population is also high. Hence, the significance of this finding in our cases of deep venous thrombosis remains to be seen, but we did not see any homozygotes when we tested 70 randomly selected asymptomatic persons, whereas in the present series, 1.8% of the patients had homozygosity for the MTHFR C677T polymorphism.

Acquired hemophilia a: diagnosis, aetiology, clinical spectrum and treatment options.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disorder with an incidence of approximately 1 per million/year with a high mortality rate of more than 20%. The disease occurs due to autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) which neutralize its procoagulant function and result in severe, often life-threatening bleeding. The antibodies arise in individuals with no prior history of hemophilia A. AHA may be associated with pregnancy, autoimmune diseases, malignancy, infections or medication and occurs most commonly in the elderly. Approximately 50% of the patients remain idiopathic with no known underlying pathological condition. Clinical manifestations include spontaneous hemorrhages into the skin, muscles or soft tissues or excessive bleeding during surgery. Hemarthrosis which is the hallmark of congenital severe hemophilia A seldom occurs in AHA. The diagnosis of AHA is based on the isolated prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) which does not normalize after the addition of normal plasma along with reduced FVIII levels. The treatment involves two aspects-eradication of antibodies and maintaining effective hemostasis during a bleeding episode. The protocols for eradication of antibodies include immunoadsorption, immunosuppression or immune tolerance induction (ITI). The treatment of acute bleeding episodes involves use of different bypassing agents like recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa, NovoSeven®) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC, (FEIBA®) in case of patients with high titer inhibitors or with antifibrinolytics,1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) or FVIII concentrates in low titer inhibitor patients. The anti CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, has shown very good results either singly or in combination with immunosuppressive regimens in patients who do not respond to standard immunosuppressors. The present review summarizes the diagnostic, aetiological, clinical and treatment aspects of AHA focusing on the recent advances in this area.

Glanzmann's thrombasthenia: updated

Glanzmanns thrombasthenia is an autosomal recessive disorder, rare in a global context, but a relatively more common platelet function defect in communities where consanguineous marriages are more frequent. On clinical grounds alone, it cannot be distinguished from other congenital platelet function defects. Epistaxis, gum bleeding, menorrhagia are the common clinical manifestations, whereas large muscle hematoma or hemarthrosis seldom occur in these patients. Essential diagnostic features are a normal platelet count and morphology, a greatly prolonged bleeding time, absence of platelet aggregation in response to ADP, collagen, epinephrine, thrombin and to all aggregating agents which ultimately depend on fibrinogen binding to platelets for this effect, flow cytometry, studies of GPIIb-IIIa receptors on the platelet membrane surface using monoclonal antibodies. The present review describes some of the uncommon features of the disorders and the currently available options which the treating physicians should be aware of during the management of these patients. Although by definition all patients with Glanzmanns thrombasthenia have a virtually complete failure of platelet aggregation, a number of variant forms of GT have been described in which the glycoproteins are present in normal or near normal amounts but are functionally defective. Understanding the pathophysiology of the disorder by the treating physicians is of utmost importance. Presence of high affinity platelet receptors resulting in thrombasthennia-like phenotype may require an antagonistic treatment atypical of classical GT management. It has now been established that different genetic mutations of either GPIIb or IIIa genes results in such a heterogeneity of thrombasthenia phenotype. Glanzmanns thrombasthenia is a paradigm for treating coronary artery disease patients with GPIIb-IIIa antibody and inhibitors. By using these medicines we create a temporary GT-like situation. Hence, understanding this disease is of utmost importance to the practicing cardiologist. As mutations for different variant forms of GT become known, our understanding of how GPIIb-IIIa molecules can be activated to act as a receptor for fibrinogen molecules will be increased. Such understanding undoubtedly will help us to devise better drugs with GPIIb-IIIa inhibitors. Molecular biology techniques have enabled us to equivocally detect heterozygote carriers who are clinically asymptomatic. However, there may be several laboratories in the developing world, which have no access to molecular biology techniques. Development of more robust techniques of quantitation of platelet receptors has enabled an accurate diagnosis of heterozygote carriers or an unborn fetus in the second trimester. The importance of the GPIIb-IIIa polymorphisms in carrier and prenatal diagnosis has not been properly studied. Nowadays the less direct method of PLA1 typing (determination of the levels of platelet antigen) of the foetal platelets as early as 16 weeks of intrauterine life can be used for prenatal diagnosis of GT.

Contribution of natural anticoagulant and fibrinolytic factors in modulating the clinical severity of haemophilia patients

The role of natural anticoagulants, fibrinolytic cascade factors and common prothrombotic gene polymorphisms in modulating disease severity were studied in 35 ‘clinically mild’ and 37 ‘clinically severe’ haemophilia patients with severe factor VIII or IX deficiency (<0·01 IU/ml). Strong association of deficiencies of proteins C and S, antithrombin III, tissue factor pathway inhibitor and tissue plasminogen activator, together with factor V Leiden and endothelial protein C receptor 23 bp insertion polymorphisms were observed in the ‘clinically milder’ group as compared with the ‘clinically severe’ group. These results indicate a synergistic modulation of bleeding tendency in haemophilia patients by factors in the anticoagulant and fibrinolytic systems.

Milder clinical presentation of haemophilia A with severe deficiency of factor VIII as measured by one-stage assay.

During the course of investigations we encountered 11 patients with haemophilia A who had severe factor VIII deficiency as measured by one‐stage assay but had surprisingly mild clinical presentation. Four of these patients had either a brother, nephew or maternal uncle with severe clinical manifestations. Two patients had low protein S levels, and one was heterozygous for the factor V Leiden mutation. One patient had a combined deficiency of protein C and antithrombin III. Four patients had a two‐stage factor VIII assay value that was much higher than the one‐stage assay value. Five patients were heterozygous for the MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism, of whom two patients were also deficient for protein S and one had two‐stage factor assay values higher than the one‐stage assay values. The patient who was both factor VIII deficient and heterozygous for factor V Leiden had mild clinical presentation as compared to his maternal uncle who was only factor‐VIII deficient. The maternal cousin of the same patient was heterozygous for factor V Leiden and had suffered two thrombotic episodes. Thus, the present study advocates that the physiological inhibitors of blood coagulation also play an important role in cases of haemophilia A in the final outcome of haemostasis in vivo.

Immune Response to FVIII in Hemophilia A: An Overview of Risk Factors

Development of inhibitors is perhaps the most serious complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy, which can practically preclude efficient clinical management of patients with hemophilia A. Much effort therefore has been focused both in improving our understanding of the reasons for the formation of FVIII antibodies and to find alternative methods of treatment. Several patient-related factors have been related to the risk of inhibitor development such as ethnicity, FVIII gene mutation type, family history of inhibitors, HLA haplotype, polymorphisms in the promoter regions of IL 10 gene, single nucleotide polymorphisms of tumor necrosis factor alpha gene, and so on. In addition to the genetic determinants, there are several nongenetic factors which mainly include treatment characteristics like the type and purity of coagulation factor concentrates used for treatment, age at the time of initial treatment, initial doses of concentrate, mode of infusion, surgery, frequency of dosing prior to inhibitor development, and intensity of treatment or regular prophylaxis. Inflammatory processes in early childhood are under discussion as being an environmental factor that may modify the immune response to a foreign antigen. The genetic risks cannot be changed, while environmental factors may increase or decrease the inhibitor risk in an individual patient. In addition, there are other causes of inhibitor development against FVIII like stress, age, malignancy, infection, pregnancy, antibiotics, etc. Development of inhibitors in such cases happens in individuals who are not hemophilic and have normal plasma FVIII levels. Acquired inhibitors to FVIII in nonhemophiliacs (autoantibodies) pose a further challenge to treatment, as this is often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prognosis in case of autoantibodies is related to the underlying disease process and is associated with high mortality. Improved understanding of these complex interactions may lead to the development of preventive measures to minimize FVIII inhibitor formation. The modifiable risk factors for inhibitor formation may provide the key to predict and perhaps prevent the formation of inhibitors in hemophilia patients.

Development of inhibitors in patients with haemophilia from India

Four hundred and seven patients (352 haemophilia A and 55 haemophilia B) were investigated for the presence of factor VIII and IX inhibitors. Twenty‐four out of 292 severe and two out of 36 moderate haemophilia A patients showed the presence of inhibitors. The mean age at development of inhibitors was 17.7 years (range 6–52 years). In 12 patients the inhibitors were detected due to suboptimal response to factor replacement therapy (symptomatic) and in the remaining 14 patients the inhibitors were detected during the routine screening of the patients’ samples for inhibitors. They had, however, responded well to the usual doses of factor concentrates and there was no suspicion in these patients that they had developed an inhibitor (asymptomatic). There were two families in which the inhibitors were detected in more than one family member. The level of inhibitors in symptomatic patients ranged from 2.2 Bethesda units (BU) mL–1 to 460.6 BU mL–1, and in asymptomatic patients it ranged from 0.8 BU mL–1 to 3.2 BU mL–1. The inhibitors persisted in all patients except one, who developed an inhibitor postoperatively for a brief period of 3 months. All these patients were followed up from first factor exposure and were tested for inhibitors at least twice a year. The mean number of exposure days before they developed inhibitors was 47.5 exposure days (range 17–98 exposure days). No inhibitors appeared after more than 100 exposure days in any of the patients. When 50 consecutive patients were investigated for intron 22 inversions of the factor VIII gene, 17 patients were found to be positive for inversions (10 proximal inversion; seven distal inversion) out of whom four patients developed inhibitors, three patients belonging to the same family. Out of 35 haemophilia B patients, only one patient developed an inhibitor. The overall prevalence of inhibitors was thus 8.2%, which is similar to the reports from western countries, prior to the introduction of highly purified factor concentrate therapy.

Factor VIII and IX gene polymorphisms and carrier analysis in Indian population

The efficacy of the three common intra‐ and extragenic polymorphic sites of the factor VIII and IX genes has been examined in the Indian population, with an aim to develop a strategy that would be accurate and informative, yet economical. The approach for hemophilia A carrier detection includes tests for Bcll, Xbal, and Taql polymorphic sites for introns 18 and 22 and the extragenic locus St 14, respectively, whereas for hemophilia B, tests include detection of Taql, Ddel, and Hhal polymorphic sites for introns 4 and 1, and the 3′ flanking region of the factor IX gene, respectively. In hemophilia A, the cumulative efficiency of these three polymorphisms has been found to be 100%, since all 37 tested families were informative for at least one of these three polymorphisms. It is of interest to note that a case of recombination between St 14 and the factor VIII gene was also observed. Of the 47 unrelated X chromosomes examined (normal = 10, factor VIII:C deficiency = 37), heterozygosity for Bcll, Xbal, and St 14 was found to be 47%, 36%, and 86%, respectively, in the factor VIII gene. However, when 37 unrelated X chromosomes (normal = 10, factor IX:C = 27) were analyzed for polymorphism with Taql, Ddel, and Hhal, it was found that the polymorphism detection rate was only 18% for the Taql site but 45% each for the Ddel and Hhal sites, in the factor IX gene. This indicates a low effectiveness of the Taql restriction site in carrier analysis of hemophilia B families in our population. Am. J. Hematol. 54:271–275, 1997

Role of epsilon amino caproic acid in the management of haemophilic patients with inhibitors.

Summary.  We managed bleeding crisis in 10 consecutive severe haemophilic patients with inhibitors (eight had an inhibitor level of >5 BU mL−1) mainly with the antifibrinolytic agent, i.e. epsilon amino caproic acid (EACA). EACA was used by local, oral or intravenous routes either in combination or separately. Five patients developed inhibitors postoperatively and among the remaining five, four had recurrent haemarthrosis or soft tissue bleeds and one patient presented with severe gastrointestinal bleeding without demonstrable lesion. In all the patients, addition of EACA to their management protocol resulted in stoppage and/or reduced frequency of bleeding. In six of 10 patients, the results were excellent; of these six patients, five developed inhibitors postoperatively. Although a reduction in the frequency of bleeding was observed in patients with haemarthrosis and soft tissue bleed, it was not spectacular and the patients required additional therapy. Hence the results could be described as poor. No patient needed to stop the medicine because of the side‐effect of EACA. Symptoms like mild nausea and vertigo were seen as the side‐effects of this medicine when high intravenous dosage was administered. EACA thus appears to be an excellent adjuvant therapy for haemophilic patients with inhibitors. Besides its well‐recognized antifibrinolytic activity, EACA may have additional mechanisms of action in haemophilic patients with inhibitors . More extensive use of this cheap and safe product is warranted in haemophilic patients with inhibitors. If larger studies confirm this observation, then using antifibrinolytics will allow substantial reduction of FEIBA or activated prothrombin complex (APCC) usage in such patients without necessarily increasing the thrombotic complications or reduction of the clinical efficacy, when compared with higher dosage of FEIBA or APCC alone. This will lead to substantial financial savings in countries where up to 35% of severe haemophilia A patients develop inhibitors.

JAK2 Mutations Across a Spectrum of Venous Thrombosis Cases

The JAK2(V617F)mutation is recurrent in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia, which are myeloproliferative neoplasms frequently associated with arterial and venous thromboembolism. It has also been reported as a marker for occult myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) in patients with splanchnic venous thrombosis. Limited data are available regarding the prevalence of the JAK2(V617F) mutation in patients with thrombosis outside the splanchnic region. For the study, 321 cases of venous thrombosis in the splanchnic and nonsplanchnic regions (cerebral venous thrombosis [CVT], 70; deep venous thrombosis [DVT], 36; Budd-Chiari syndrome [BCS], 137; portal venous thrombosis [PVT], 78) were studied for the presence of JAK2 mutations. The prevalence values for the JAK2 mutation were 3% (1/36), 8.8% (12/137), 5% (4/78), and 3% (2/70) in DVT, BCS, PVT, and CVT, respectively; 19 (5.9%) of 321 cases were positive for the JAK2 mutation. Of 111 healthy subjects screened for this mutation, none were found to be carriers. Determination of the JAK2(V617F) mutation may be useful to identify patients who should be carefully observed for the development of overt MPDs. The significance of screening for this mutation in nonsplanchnic thrombosis cases needs to be analyzed in a larger series.