Shuai Gu
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Shuai Gu.
Physical Review Letters | 2016
Y. W. Sun; Y. Liang; Yueqiang Liu; Shuai Gu; Xu Yang; W. Guo; Tonghui Shi; M. Jia; L. Wang; B. Lyu; C. Zhou; A.D. Liu; Qing Zang; H. Liu; Nan Chu; Hui-Hui Wang; T. Zhang; J. Qian; Liuwei Xu; Kaiyang He; D. M. Chen; B. Shen; X.Z. Gong; X. Ji; Shouxin Wang; M. Qi; Yong Song; Q.P. Yuan; Zhi-Cai Sheng; Ge Gao
Evidence of a nonlinear transition from mitigation to suppression of the edge localized mode (ELM) by using resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) in the EAST tokamak is presented. This is the first demonstration of ELM suppression with RMPs in slowly rotating plasmas with dominant radio-frequency wave heating. Changes of edge magnetic topology after the transition are indicated by a gradual phase shift in the plasma response field from a linear magneto hydro dynamics modeling result to a vacuum one and a sudden increase of three-dimensional particle flux to the divertor. The transition threshold depends on the spectrum of RMPs and plasma rotation as well as perturbation amplitude. This means that edge topological changes resulting from nonlinear plasma response plays a key role in the suppression of ELM with RMPs.
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion | 2016
Xu Yang; Youwen Sun; Yueqiang Liu; Shuai Gu; Yue Liu; Hui-Hui Wang; Lina Zhou; W. Guo
Sustained mitigation and/or suppression of type-I edge localized modes (ELMs) has been achieved in EAST high-confinement plasmas, utilizing the resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) fields produced by two rows of magnetic coils located just inside the vacuum vessel. Systematic toroidal modelling of the plasma response to these RMP fields with various coil configurations (with dominant toroidal mode number n = 1, 2, 3, 4) in EAST is, for the first time, carried out by using the MARS-F code (Liu et al 2000 Phys. Plasmas 7 3681), with results reported here. In particular, the plasma response is computed with varying coil phasing (the toroidal phase difference of the coil currents) between the upper and lower rows of coils, from 0 to 360°. Four figures of merit, constructed based on the MARS-F computations, are used to determine the optimal coil phasing. The modelled results, taking into account the plasma response, agree well with the experimental observations in terms of the coil phasing for both the mitigated and the suppressed ELM cases in EAST experiments. This study provides a crucial confirmation of the role of the plasma edge peeling response in ELM control, complementing similar studies carried out for other tokamak devices.
Nuclear Fusion | 2017
M. Jia; H.L. Zhao; Ge Gao; W. Guo; Yun Li; D. M. Chen; X. Ji; Y. W. Sun; Hui-Hui Wang; Yueqiang Liu; Kaiyang He; Baonian Wan; Ge Li; T. Zhang; Qing Zang; M. Qi; B. Shen; Shouxin Wang; Tonghui Shi; Liuwei Xu; B. Lyu; Y. Liu; Yong Song; Peng Fu; Q.P. Yuan; Y. Liang; Zhi-Cai Sheng; Lianzhou Wang; X.Z. Gong; J. Qian
A set of in-vessel resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) coil has been recently installed in EAST. It can generate a range of spectrum, and there is a relatively large window for edge localized mode (ELM) control according to the vacuum field modeling of the edge magnetic island overlapping area. Observation of mitigation and suppression of ELM in slow rotating plasmas during the application of an n = 1 RMP is presented in this paper. Strong ELM mitigation effect is observed in neutral beam injection heating plasmas. The ELM frequency increases by a factor of 5, and the crash amplitude and the particle flux are effectively reduced by a similar factor. Clear density pump-out and magnetic braking effects are observed during the application of RMP. Footprint splitting is observed during ELM mitigation and agrees well with vacuum field modelling. Strong ELM mitigation happens after a second sudden drop of plasma density, which indicates the possible effect due to field penetration of the resonant harmonics near the pedestal top, where the electron perpendicular rotation becomes flat and close to zero after the application of RMP. ELM suppression is achieved in a resonant window during the scan of the n = 1 RMP spectrum in radio-frequency (RF) dominant heating plasmas. The best spectrum for ELM suppression is consistent with the resonant peak of RMP by taking into account of linear magnetohydrodynamics plasma response. There is no mode locking during the application of n = 1 RMP in ELMy H-mode plasmas, although the maximal coil current is applied.
Physics of Plasmas | 2018
M. Jia; Youwen Sun; C. Paz-Soldan; R. Nazikian; Shuai Gu; Y. Q. Liu; T. Abrams; I. Bykov; L. Cui; T.E. Evans; A. M. Garofalo; W. Guo; X.Z. Gong; C.J. Lasnier; N.C. Logan; M. A. Makowski; D. M. Orlov; Hui-Hui Wang
Experiments using Resonant Magnetic Perturbations (RMPs), with a rotating n = 2 toroidal harmonic combined with a stationary n = 3 toroidal harmonic, have validated predictions that divertor heat and particle flux can be dynamically controlled while maintaining Edge Localized Mode (ELM) suppression in the DIII-D tokamak. Here, n is the toroidal mode number. ELM suppression over one full cycle of a rotating n = 2 RMP that was mixed with a static n = 3 RMP field has been achieved. Prominent heat flux splitting on the outer divertor has been observed during ELM suppression by RMPs in low collisionality regime in DIII-D. Strong changes in the three dimensional heat and particle flux footprint in the divertor were observed during the application of the mixed toroidal harmonic magnetic perturbations. These results agree well with modeling of the edge magnetic field structure using the TOP2D code, which takes into account the plasma response from the MARS-F code. These results expand the potential effectiveness ...
Nuclear Fusion | 2016
Hui-Hui Wang; Youwen Sun; J. Qian; Tonghui Shi; B. Shen; Shuai Gu; Yueqiang Liu; W. Guo; Nan Chu; Kaiyang He; M. Jia; D. M. Chen; Min-Min Xue; Jie Ren; Yong Wang; Zhi-Cai Sheng; B.J. Xiao; Zhengping Luo; Yong Liu; Haiqing Liu; H.L. Zhao; L. Zeng; X.Z. Gong; Y. Liang; Baonian Wan
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion | 2018
Xu Yang; Y. Q. Liu; Youwen Sun; Hui-Hui Wang; Shuai Gu; M. Jia; L. Li; Yue Liu; Z.R. Wang; Lina Zhou
Nuclear Fusion | 2018
M. Jia; Youwen Sun; Y. Liang; Liang Wang; Jichan Xu; Shuai Gu; B. Lyu; Hui-Hui Wang; Xu Yang; Fangchuan Zhong; Nan Chu; W. Feng; Kaiyang He; Yueqiang Liu; J. Qian; Tonghui Shi; Biao Shen
Nuclear Fusion | 2018
Nan Chu; Youwen Sun; Shuai Gu; Hui-Hui Wang; Y.J. Hu; Tonghui Shi; D.L. Chen; X. Gu; Kaiyang He; M. Jia; S. Y. Lin; H.Q. Liu; J. Qian; J. Ren; B. Shen; A. Ti; S.X. Wang; J.L. Xie; M. Xu; M.M. Xue; N. Yan; Qing Zang; L. Zeng; J.Z. Zhang; T. Zhang; Y. Zhang; G.Q. Zhong; C. Zhou; R.J. Zhou
Nuclear Fusion | 2018
Hui-Hui Wang; Youwen Sun; Tonghui Shi; Qing Zang; Yueqiang Liu; Xu Yang; Shuai Gu; Kaiyang He; Xiang Gu; J. Qian; Biao Shen; Zhengping Luo; Nan Chu; M. Jia; Zhi-Cai Sheng; Haiqing Liu; X.Z. Gong; Baonian Wan; East Contributors
Nuclear Fusion | 2018
N.C. Logan; L. Cui; Hui-Hui Wang; Youwen Sun; Shuai Gu; G. Li; R. Nazikian; C. Paz-Soldan