Shunji Takahashi

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of osteonecrosis of the jaw: integrated analysis from three blinded active-controlled phase III trials in cancer patients with bone metastases

BACKGROUND Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been reported in patients receiving bisphosphonates for metastatic bone disease. ONJ incidence, risk factors, and outcomes were evaluated in a combined analysis of three phase III trials in patients with metastatic bone disease receiving antiresorptive therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors or myeloma were randomly assigned to receive either s.c. denosumab (120 mg) or i.v. zoledronic acid (4 mg) every 4 weeks. On-study oral examinations were conducted by investigators at baseline and every 6 months. Oral adverse events were adjudicated by an independent blinded committee of dental experts. RESULTS Of 5723 patients enrolled, 89 (1.6%) patients were determined to have ONJ: 37 (1.3%) received zoledronic acid and 52 (1.8%) received denosumab (P = 0.13). Tooth extraction was reported for 61.8% of patients with ONJ. ONJ treatment was conservative in >95% of patients. As of October 2010, ONJ resolved in 36.0% of patients (29.7% for zoledronic acid and 40.4% for denosumab). CONCLUSIONS In this combined analysis of three prospective trials, ONJ was infrequent, management was mostly conservative, and healing occurred in over one-third of the patients. Educating physicians about oral health before and during bone-targeted therapy may help reduce ONJ incidence and improve outcomes.BACKGROUND Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been reported in patients receiving bisphosphonates for metastatic bone disease. ONJ incidence, risk factors, and outcomes were evaluated in a combined analysis of three phase III trials in patients with metastatic bone disease receiving antiresorptive therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors or myeloma were randomly assigned to receive either s.c. denosumab (120 mg) or i.v. zoledronic acid (4 mg) every 4 weeks. On-study oral examinations were conducted by investigators at baseline and every 6 months. Oral adverse events were adjudicated by an independent blinded committee of dental experts. RESULTS Of 5723 patients enrolled, 89 (1.6%) patients were determined to have ONJ: 37 (1.3%) received zoledronic acid and 52 (1.8%) received denosumab (P = 0.13). Tooth extraction was reported for 61.8% of patients with ONJ. ONJ treatment was conservative in >95% of patients. As of October 2010, ONJ resolved in 36.0% of patients (29.7% for zoledronic acid and 40.4% for denosumab). CONCLUSIONS In this combined analysis of three prospective trials, ONJ was infrequent, management was mostly conservative, and healing occurred in over one-third of the patients. Educating physicians about oral health before and during bone-targeted therapy may help reduce ONJ incidence and improve outcomes.

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: position paper from the Allied Task Force Committee of Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Japan Osteoporosis Society, Japanese Society of Periodontology, Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, and Japanese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been widely, efficiently, and safely used for the treatment of osteoporosis, malignant hypercalcemia, bone metastasis of solid cancers, and multiple myeloma bone diseases. Accumulating recent reports describe that surgical dental treatments in patients with cancer or osteoporosis who have been receiving intravenous or oral BPs are associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw (bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, BRONJ). The accurate incidence, clinical backgrounds, and pathogenesis of BRONJ have been unclear and appropriate approaches for prevention and treatment have not been established to date. To address the current situation of BRONJ in Japan, the “Allied Task Force Committee of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw,” consisting of physicians specializing in bone biology, orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, obstetrics/gynecology, and medical oncology and dentists specializing in oral surgery, periodontology, dental radiology, and oral pathology, was organized. The committee attempted to propose a standard position paper for the treatment of BRONJ. The committee expects that this proposal will provide objective and correct scientific information on BRONJ and will serve as a reference for conducting dental procedures for patients receiving BPs and in designing prevention and treatment of BRONJ. However, because this position paper is not based on direct clinical evidence, it should be used as a reference, and a decision on treatment in each case should be made after an extensive discussion among physicians, dentists/oral surgeons, and the patients.

Phase I study of inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) in Japanese patients with follicular lymphoma pretreated with rituximab-based therapy

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC‐544), an antibody‐targeted chemotherapeutic agent composed of an anti‐CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic antibiotic, specifically targets the CD22 antigen present in >90% of B‐lymphoid malignancies, rendering it useful for treating patients with B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (B‐NHL). This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of inotuzumab ozogamicin in Japanese patients. Eligible patients had relapsed or refractory CD22‐positive B‐NHL without major organ dysfunction. Inotuzumab ozogamicin was administered intravenously once every 28 days (dose escalation: 1.3 and 1.8 mg/m2). All 13 patients had follicular lymphoma, were previously treated with ≥1 rituximab‐alone or rituximab‐containing chemotherapy, and were enrolled into two dose cohorts (1.3 mg/m2, three patients; 1.8 mg/m2, 10 patients). No patient had dose‐limiting toxicities, and the maximum tolerated dose, previously determined in non‐Japanese patients (1.8 mg/m2), was confirmed. Drug‐related adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (100%), leukopenia (92%), lymphopenia (85%), neutropenia (85%), elevated AST (85%), anorexia (85%), and nausea (77%). Grade 3/4 drug‐related AEs in ≥15% patients were thrombocytopenia (54%), lymphopenia (31%), neutropenia (31%), and leukopenia (15%). The AUC and Cmax of inotuzumab ozogamicin increased dose‐dependently with pharmacokinetic profiles similar to non‐Japanese. Seven patients had complete response (CR, 54%) including unconfirmed CR, four patients had partial response (31%), and two patients had stable disease (15%). The overall response rate was 85% (11/13). Inotuzumab ozogamicin was well tolerated at doses up to 1.8 mg/m2 and showed preliminary evidence of activity in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma pretreated with rituximab‐containing therapy, warranting further investigations. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00717925). (Cancer Sci 2010)

Biomarkers to predict response to sunitinib therapy and prognosis in metastatic renal cell cancer

Sunitinib is an orally‐administered, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The main targets are vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)‐1, VEGFR‐2, VEGFR‐3, platelet‐derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)‐α, and PDGFR‐β. Among therapeutic targeting agents, it is the best available in the USA for patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC). Well‐constructed clinical trials have led to the worldwide approval of various agents for RCC. However, in clinical practice, it remains difficult to determine the best treatment strategy with these agents. Therefore, the identification of biomarkers to predict response and side‐effects and to select optimal dosages is urgently needed. Potential mechanisms of action and resistance need to be understood in order to make accurate predictions. This article briefly reviews candidate biomarkers of sunitinib therapy in terms of clinical variables, genetic factors, and circulating proteins and endothelial cells. Although further validation and implementation is necessary, if validated, biomarkers will help measure the therapeutic response in individual patients and establish treatment strategies for metastatic RCC. (Cancer Sci, 102: 1949–1957)

Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Neratinib (HKI-272) in Japanese Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase 1 Dose-escalation Study

OBJECTIVE Neratinib (HKI-272), a potent, irreversible, small-molecule, orally administered, pan-ErbB inhibitor that blocks signal transduction via inhibition of three epidermal growth factor receptors [ErbB1, ErbB2 (Her2) and ErbB4], is being developed for the treatment of solid tumors, including breast cancer. This Phase 1 dose-escalation study assessed the safety, tolerability, maximum-tolerated dose, antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics of neratinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS Patients received neratinib 80, 160, 240 or 320 mg orally; each patient enrolled in only one dose cohort. Patients received a single dose in week 1, followed by daily continuous doses. Blood samples collected were on days 1 and 21 for pharmacokinetic analyses. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were enrolled (3 breast cancer; 17 colorectal cancer; 1 gastric cancer). Neratinib-related adverse events (all grades) included diarrhea (20 patients), fatigue (14 patients), nausea and abdominal pain (9 patients each) and anorexia (8 patients). Grade ≥3 neratinib-related adverse events in two or more patients were diarrhea and anorexia (two patients each). Dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea and anorexia (two patients, 320 mg dose). The maximum-tolerated dose and recommended dose was neratinib 240 mg once daily. Of 21 evaluable patients, 2 with breast cancer had partial response, 3 had stable disease ≥24 weeks, 7 had stable disease ≥16 weeks and 9 had progressive disease. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that neratinib exposures increased with dose. CONCLUSIONS The safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic profiles of neratinib are consistent with those reported for non-Japanese patients and warrant further investigation of neratinib in Japanese patients with solid tumors.

Prospective evaluation of incidence and severity of oral mucositis induced by conventional chemotherapy in solid tumors and malignant lymphomas

PurposeOral mucositis (OM), a complication frequently associated with cancer chemotherapy, may decrease treatment efficacy due to dose reduction or impair the patients quality of life. The purpose was to determine the incidence and severity of OM and its sequelae in patients receiving conventional chemotherapy for various malignancies.MethodsTwo hundred twenty-seven patients (male, 33%; female, 66%) who received chemotherapy for head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and malignant lymphomas at the Cancer Institute Hospital between January 2007 and December 2008 were examined with questionnaires, prospectively.ResultsThe incidence of OM was highest in patients with breast cancer (76.5%), then head and neck cancer (67.7%), colorectal cancer (63%), esophageal cancer (57.8%), and malignant lymphoma (42.9%). However, patients who experienced severe OM (≥grade 3) were rare: at most 4.8%. The high-risk regimens for OM were TPF (85.7%), FOLFIRI (80%), CAF (78.8%), AC (70.6%), and FOLFOX (60%). OM was associated with gastrointestinal adverse events, anorexia, diarrhea, and dysphagia, which aggravated quality of life. There was no correlation between incidence of OM and prior therapy, PS, oral care, or laboratory data. There was no statistically significant correlation between OM and overall survival. The predictive factor was history of OM in previous chemotherapy.ConclusionOM frequently occurs in patients with various tumors receiving conventional chemotherapy. Despite low-grade OM, they might cause gastrointestinal adverse events. Adequate preventive treatment for OM is required depending on each chemotherapy regimen and each patients OM history.

Bone metastasis and poor performance status are prognostic factors for survival of carcinoma of unknown primary site in patients treated with systematic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) generally has a poor prognosis, and there is no established standard therapy. There have been no reports of a prognostic model for CUP patients treated with a single regimen of systemic chemotherapy. METHODS Univariate and multivariate prognostic factor analysis for overall survival (OS) were conducted retrospectively in 58 consecutive CUP patients treated with carboplatin plus paclitaxel (Taxol) therapy as a first-line treatment. RESULTS Univariate prognostic factor analysis revealed baseline performance status (PS) of two or more, low serum albumin level, pleural effusion, bone metastasis, and liver metastasis as adverse prognostic factors. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that poor PS and bone metastasis had the most powerful adverse impact on survival. We developed a prognostic model using those two variables-a good-risk group (PS 0-1 without bone metastasis) and a poor-risk group (PS > or =2 or bone metastasis). The poor-risk group showed significantly poorer OS than the good-risk group (1 year OS 36.8% versus 67.1%, P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS Poor PS and bone metastasis were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors in CUP. A simple prognostic model was developed and seems useful for decision making as to whether chemotherapy is indicated for CUP patients.

Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density and Androgen-deprivation Therapy in Japanese Prostate Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES To examine Japanese patients who had received androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for longer periods, as it is known that ADT of patients with prostate cancer reduces their bone mineral density (BMD). However, our previous cross-sectional study revealed that short-term ADT (average, 23.5 months) does not significantly increase the prevalence of osteoporosis in Japanese patients. METHODS The subjects consisted of 201 native Japanese patients with prostate cancer. They comprised 113 ADT-treated and 88 hormone-naive patients. Lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMDs were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and expressed in standard deviation units relative to the scores of young adult men (T-score) or age-matched men (Z-score). Serum levels of bone metabolism markers were also measured. RESULTS The ADT-treated patients had significantly lower BMD values, T-scores, and even Z-scores than the hormone-naive patients (P <.001). For patients who were hormone-naive, ADT-treated for less than 2 years, and ADT-treated for more than 2 years, the osteoporosis prevalence was 4.5% (4/88), 12.1% (4/33), and 10.8% (4/37), respectively. The ADT-treated patients had significantly higher serum amino-terminal telopeptide levels than the hormone-naive patients (P = .014), but significantly lower serum carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen levels than the ADT-treated patients with bone metastasis (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS Our cross-sectional study confirmed that both ADT-treated and hormone-naive Japanese patients with prostate cancer have low rates of osteoporosis. These findings are different from those of studies in western countries. Genetic and hormonal or other environmental factors may result in population differences in the characteristics of prostate cancer and BMD.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Combined Cisplatin and Irinotecan Chemotherapy for Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

OBJECTIVE No standard treatment has been established for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; the usual recommended treatment is based on the strategy for small cell lung carcinoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma to the combination of irinotecan and cisplatin in one institution. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 50 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma patients treated from September 2005 to April 2011 in our institution. Patients were divided into two stages: limited disease or extensive disease. Forty-four patients received the combination chemotherapy of irinotecan and cisplatin, consisting of 4-week cycles of 60 mg/m(2) irinotecan on days 1, 8, 15 and 60 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 1. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Median age was 60 years. Median follow-up time was 11.4 months. Overall survival did not reach the median, and 1-year overall survival was 67%. The response rate was 50% (64% at first line), and progression-free survival was 4.8 months (7.3 months at first line). Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events were seen in 29 patients (66%) and Grade 3-4 non-hematologic adverse events were seen in 20 patients (45%), but no patients died of adverse events. Multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant relationship with neuron-specific enolase elevation and poor overall survival (P= 0.016, hazard ratio 6.261, 95% confidence interval). The combination chemotherapy of irinotecan and cisplatin is moderately effective and feasible, and it should be considered as a treatment option for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Phase I study of dasatinib (BMS-354825) in Japanese patients with solid tumors.

Dasatinib is a potent oral inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including the SRC family kinases, which are activated in tumors, and implicated in invasion and bone metastasis. This phase I dose‐escalation study assessed safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Japanese patients with refractory, advanced solid tumors. Dasatinib was administered once daily at 100, 150 and 200 mg/day. Sixteen patients were treated with dasatinib in the following doses: 100 mg (nine patients), 150 mg (three patients) and 200 mg (four patients). The most frequent adverse events (AE; ≥50%) were anorexia, fatigue, pleural effusion, anemia, constipation, diarrhea, vomiting and increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST). The most frequent AE of grade ≥3 (≥10%) were anemia, decreased lymphocyte count, fatigue and increased blood magnesium. Dose‐limiting toxicities were observed in two patients: grade 2 pleural effusion and bronchial wall thickening at the 100‐mg level and grade 3 dyspnea at the 200‐mg level. In addition, grade 2 pleural effusion was observed in all four patients treated with 200 mg. Therefore, 150 mg was determined to be the MTD. The pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable among the dose levels. As a pharmacodynamic study, markers of bone metabolism were assessed. Bone resorption markers, NTx and TRACP‐5b, showed a decrease of 46.3% and 22.2%, respectively. No objective responses were observed, but three patients had stable disease that lasted for over 6 months. In this study population, the safety profile of dasatinib was generally acceptable and 150 mg of dasatinib administered once daily was determined to be the MTD. (Cancer Sci 2011; 102: 2058–2064)