Silvia La Cesa

Mechanisms of pain in multiple sclerosis: a combined clinical and neurophysiological study.

Summary In patients with multiple sclerosis, ongoing extremity pain is associated with damage to the spinothalamic pathway, whereas Lhermitte’s phenomenon is related to damage of non‐nociceptive pathways. ABSTRACT In this clinical and neurophysiological study, we examined the clinical characteristics and underlying mechanisms of neuropathic pain related to multiple sclerosis. A total of 302 consecutive patients with multiple sclerosis were screened for neuropathic pain by clinical examination and the DN4 tool. In patients selected for having ongoing extremity pain or Lhermitte’s phenomenon, we recorded somatosensory evoked potentials, mediated by Aβ non‐nociceptive fibres, and laser evoked potentials, mediated by Aδ nociceptive fibres. Of the 302 patients, 92 had pain (30%), and 42 (14%) neuropathic pain. Patients with neuropathic pain had more severe multiple sclerosis, as assessed by the expanded disability severity score, than those without pain. Whereas, in patients with ongoing neuropathic pain, laser evoked potentials were more frequently abnormal than somatosensory evoked potentials, we found the opposite in patients with Lhermitte’s phenomenon. Our data underline the clinical importance of pain in multiple sclerosis and indicate that a more severe disease is associated with a higher risk of developing neuropathic pain. The prevalence of pain that we found, which was lower than that reported in previous studies, may reflect the lesser disease severity in our patients. Neurophysiological data show that whereas ongoing extremity pain is associated with spinothalamic pathway damage, Lhermitte’s phenomenon is related to damage of non‐nociceptive pathways. These findings may be useful in designing a new therapeutic approach to neuropathic pain related to multiple sclerosis.

Trigeminal isolated sensory neuropathy (TISN) and FOSMN syndrome: despite a dissimilar disease course do they share common pathophysiological mechanisms?

BackgroundPatients presenting with bilateral trigeminal hypoesthesia may go on to have trigeminal isolated sensory neuropathy, a benign, purely trigeminal neuropathy, or facial-onset sensory motor neuronopathy (FOSMN), a malignant life-threatening condition. No diagnostic criteria can yet differentiate the two conditions at their onset. Nor is it clear whether the two diseases are distinct entities or share common pathophysiological mechanisms.MethodsSeeking pathophysiological and diagnostic information to distinguish these two conditions at their onset, in this neurophysiological and morphometric study we neurophysiologically assessed function in myelinated and unmyelinated fibres and histologically examined supraorbital nerve biopsy specimens with optic and electron microscopy in 13 consecutive patients with recent onset trigeminal hypoesthesia and pain.ResultsThe disease course distinctly differed in the 13 patients. During a mean 10 year follow-up whereas in eight patients the disease remained relatively stable, in the other five it progressed to possibly life-threatening motor disturbances and extra-trigeminal spread. From two to six years elapsed between the first sensory symptoms and the onset of motor disorders. In patients with trigeminal isolated sensory neuropathy (TISN) and in those with FOSMN neurophysiological and histological examination documented a neuronopathy manifesting with trigeminal nerve damage selectively affecting myelinated fibres, but sparing the Ia-fibre-mediated proprioceptive reflex.ConclusionsAlthough no clinical diagnostic criteria can distinguish the two conditions at onset, neurophysiological and nerve-biopsy findings specify that in both disorders trigeminal nerve damage manifests as a dissociated neuronopathy affecting myelinated and sparing unmyelinated fibres, thus suggesting similar pathophysiological mechanisms.

Diagnostic accuracy of laser-evoked potentials in diabetic neuropathy

Abstract Although the most widely agreed neurophysiological tool for investigating small fiber damage is laser-evoked potential (LEP) recording, no study has documented its diagnostic accuracy. In this clinical, neurophysiological, and skin biopsy study, we collected age-corrected LEP normative ranges, verified the association of LEPs with pinprick sensory disturbances in the typical diabetic mixed fiber polyneuropathy, and assessed the sensitivity and specificity of LEPs in diabetic small fiber neuropathy. From 288 LEP recordings from the face, hand, and foot in 73 healthy subjects, we collected age-corrected normative ranges for LEPs. We then selected 100 patients with mixed-fiber diabetic neuropathy and 25 patients with possible small-fiber diabetic neuropathy. In the 100 patients with mixed fiber neuropathy, we verified how LEP abnormalities were associated with clinically evident pinprick sensory disturbances. In the 25 patients with possible pure small fiber neuropathy, using the skin biopsy for assessing the intraepidermal nerve fiber density as a reference standard, we calculated LEP sensitivity and specificity. In healthy participants, age strongly influenced normative ranges for all LEP variables. By applying age-corrected normative ranges for LEPs, we found that LEPs were strongly associated with pinprick sensory disturbances. In relation to the skin biopsy findings, LEPs yielded 78% sensitivity and 81% specificity in the diagnosis of diabetic small fiber neuropathy. Our study, providing age-corrected normative ranges for the main LEP data and their diagnostic accuracy, helps to make LEPs more reliable as a clinical diagnostic tool, and proposes this technique as a less invasive alternative to skin biopsy for diagnosing diabetic small fiber neuropathy.

Cutaneous silent period recordings in demyelinating and axonal polyneuropathies

OBJECTIVE To investigate the cutaneous silent period (CSP), a spinal inhibitory reflex mainly mediated by A-delta fibres, in demyelinating and axonal polyneuropathy (PNP) and evaluate whether CSP parameters differ between patients with and without neuropathic pain. METHODS Eighty-four patients with demyelinating PNP, 178 patients with axonal PNP and 265 controls underwent clinical examination, DN4 questionnaire, standard nerve conduction study, motor-root stimulation and CSP recordings from abductor digiti minimi. We calculated the afferent conduction time of CSP (a-CSP time) with the formula: CSP latency-root motor evoked potential latency. RESULTS In the demyelinating PNP group the a-CSP time was significantly longer; in the axonal PNP group, CSP duration was shorter than the demyelinating group (p=0.010) and controls (p=0.001). CSP parameters were not different between patients with and without neuropathic pain. CONCLUSIONS The abnormality of a-CSP time in the demyelinating PNP group suggests the crucial role of A-delta fibres in the mechanism of CSP; the shorter CSP duration in the axonal PNP group supports the strong influence of the number of axons on this parameter. Our study suggests that neuropathic pain could be related to pathophysiological mechanisms differing from mere A-delta fibre loss. SIGNIFICANCE CSP evaluation is effective in detecting A-delta fibre dysfunction in axonal as well as demyelinating PNP.