Simon A. Euler

Biomechanical Analysis of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Effect of Screw Malpositioning on Proximal Humeral Strength

Background: Humeral fracture after subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of biceps tendon (LHB) is a rare but devastating complication. Purpose: To determine whether malpositioned (laterally eccentric) tenodesis screw placement has an influence on humerus strength reduction compared with central placement. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Two groups, each consisting of 10 matched pairs of human humeri, were used for this study. Biceps tendons were fixed subpectorally with 8-mm screws in unicortical 8-mm sockets. In the first group, the socket was placed concentrically in the bicipital groove and the tendon was fixed with an interference screw. In the second group, the socket was malpositioned 30% eccentrically to the lateral (tension) side of the humerus. Contralateral humeri remained intact as positive controls. Specimens were aligned in 40° of abduction, and a uniaxial compressive force was applied to the humeral head until failure. Strength reduction was reported as percentage reduction in ultimate failure load between paired humeri. Relative defect size was calculated as a percentage of the total humeral width at the height of the tenodesis. Results: Laterally eccentric malpositioned biceps tenodeses significantly decreased humeral strength compared with intact (mean change, −25%; SD, 23%; P = .017), while concentrically placed biceps tenodeses did not (mean change, −10%; SD, 15%; P = .059). A linear regression between relative defect size and strength reduction in the malpositioned group showed a significant negative linear correlation (beta = −2.577; R2 = 0.423; P = .042). Conclusion: Humeral fracture after subpectoral tenodesis of the LHB is a complication that may be minimized with careful surgical technique. Laterally eccentric malpositioned biceps tenodesis caused significant reduction (25%) in humeral strength, which might be clinically relevant and contribute to postsurgical humeral shaft fracture. Strength reduction was also significantly correlated with relative defect size. Surgeons using this technique should ensure central and orthogonal placement of the socket, especially in smaller individuals. This study lends biomechanical evidence to support the clinical procedure of a correctly, concentrically placed tenodesis screw. Clinical Relevance: These biomechanical results indicate that in a clinical setting, special attention should be drawn to patient selection for LHB tenodesis. This study reveals that central screw positioning is critical, particularly in high-impact and overhead athletes, as well as for patients with small humeral widths or osteoporotic bone quality. Alternative surgical options such as smaller screws or other fixation methods might be considered to diminish the postoperative risk of humeral fracture.

The relevance of neutral arm positioning for true ap-view X-ray to provide true projection of the humeral head shaft angle

IntroductionTextbooks commonly recommend using the true anterior–posterior (ap)-view with the patient’s arm in a sling and therefore in internal rotation (IR) for radiologic diagnostic assessment of the proximal humerus after trauma. However, IR or external rotation (ER) may affect the projection of the head shaft angle (HSA) and therefore bias the diagnostic conclusion significantly. We hypothesized that neutral rotation (NR) of the arm is mandatory for true ap-view to provide true projection of the HSA.Materials and methodsA simplified geometrical model of the proximal humerus was used to examine the influence of different arm positions and angulations of the central ray in relation to the projection of the HSA.ResultsBoth ER and IR misleadingly suggested an increased valgus angle. Simulating the true ap-view with the central ray in cranio-caudal direction, IR changed the projection of the HSA substantially.ConclusionIn conclusion, standard fixation of the patient’s arm in a shoulder sling in IR for true ap-view may result in an oblique projection, potentially leading to incorrect surgical implications. To prevent misdiagnosed valgus or varus angulation, NR of the arm should be obeyed when performing true ap-view X-ray. We, therefore, highly recommend to overcome the traditionally arm position, ensuring the true amount of dislocation to assure correct surgical implications and comparable follow-up examinations.

The J-Shaped Bone Graft for Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction A 10-Year Clinical Follow-up and Computed Tomography–Osteoabsorptiometry Study

Background: The J-shaped bone graft procedure is one of the recommended methods to reconstruct significant glenoid rim defects. Purpose: To evaluate long-term (minimum 10-year) clinical outcomes and show further details of the remodeling effects on the articular cavity of the glenoid after J-shaped bone grafting. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 14 patients treated with a J-shaped bone graft procedure were observed clinically. Additionally, bilateral preoperative and postoperative follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were used for CT-osteoabsorptiometry (OAM) to evaluate the bony remodeling processes. Results: The follow-up rate was 93% at a mean follow-up time of 10.7 years (range, 10.08-11.75 years). Patients exhibited a mean Constant score of 92.5 (range, 80-100) on the clinical evaluation. All patients had free range of motion and were pain free without any recurrence of instability. Based on CT-OAM, comparable and almost anatomically reconstructed, bilaterally equal glenoid cavities were found postoperatively. The distribution patterns of glenoid subchondral mineralization were bilaterally equal in 85.7% of the patients. Conclusion: The surgical treatment of recurrent shoulder instability with a significant bony Bankart lesion using the J-shaped bone graft procedure provided excellent long-term results. This study lends evidence to support the capability of the J-shaped bone graft procedure to restore the normal glenoid shape due to physiological remodeling processes.

Straight proximal humeral nailing: Risk of iatrogenic tendon injuries with respect to different entry points in anatomical specimens

BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship of implant-related injuries to the adjacent anatomical structures in a newer generation straight proximal humeral nail (PHN) regarding different entry points. The proximity of the proximal lateral locking-screws of the MultiLoc proximal humeral nail (ML PHN) may cause iatrogenic tendon injuries to the lateral edge of the bicipital humeral groove (BG) as reference point for the tendon of the long head of biceps brachii (LBT) as well as the lateral insertion of the infraspinatus tendon (IST). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study comprised n = 40 upper extremities. Nail application was performed through a deltoid approach and supraspinatus tendon (SSP) split with a ML PHN. All tests were performed in three different entry points. First nail (N1) - standard position in line with the humeral shaft axis; second nail (N2) - a more lateral entry point; third alternative (N3) - medial position, centre of the humeral head. After nail placement, each specimen was screened for potential implant-related injuries or worded differently hit rates (HR) to the BG and the IST. The distances to the anatomical structures were measured and statistically interpreted. RESULTS The observed iatrogenic IST injury rate was 17.5% (n = 7/40) for N1, 5% (n = 2/40) for N2 and 62.5% (n = 25/40) for N3, which was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.001). Regarding the BG, the evaluated HR was 7.5% (n = 3/40) for both N1 and N2. Only the nail placed in the head centre (N3) showed an iatrogenic injury rate of 20% (n = 8/40) (p < 0.062). No statistically significant association between humeral head size and the HR could be observed (head diameter: IST: p = 0.323, BG: p = 0.621; head circumference: IST: p = 0.167; BG: p = 0.940). For the IST and BG, all distances in nail positions N1 and N2 as well as N2 and N3 differ statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS An entry point for nail placement in line or slightly laterally to the humeral shaft axis - but still at the cartilage - should be advocated.

Does intra-articular load distribution change after lateral malleolar fractures? An in vivo study comparing operative and non-operative treatment

PURPOSE The impact of isolated malleolar fractures on the intra-articular load distribution within the ankle joint has been studied in several biomechanical cadaver studies during the last decades. Recently, computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM) has been proposed as a valuable tool to assess intra-articular joint load distribution in vivo. The purpose of this retrospective matched pair analysis was to apply CT-OAM to evaluate in vivo changes of talar load distribution after lateral malleolar fractures in patients treated with open anatomic reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) compared to patients treated non-operatively. METHODS Ten matched pairs of patients with isolated lateral malleolar fractures with a maximum fracture dislocation of 3mm and a median follow-up of 42 month were included into the study. Patients were matched for age, gender, and fracture dislocation. Range of ankle motion (ROM), the AOFAS hindfoot score and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) were evaluated. CT-OAM analysis of the injured and the uninjured contralateral ankles were performed. RESULTS Patients treated with ORIF showed a significant lower ROM compared to the uninjured contralateral ankle. No differences were found regarding clinical scores between patients treated by ORIF and those treated non-operatively. CT-OAM analysis showed symmetrical distribution of subchondral bone mineralization in comparison to the uninjured contralateral ankles for both groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS The data of this study suggest that isolated lateral malleolar fractures with fracture gaps up to 3mm are not associated with a change of the tibio-talar joint load distribution in vivo. Therefore, patients with isolated minimally displaced lateral malleolar fractures may achieve good clinical long-term outcome following non-operative treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Rotator Cuff Tears in Athletes: Part II. Conservative Management – American Mind

In the athletic population, rotator cuff tears most commonly result from an acute traumatic injury chronic overuse. While acute tears frequently require surgical treatment, chronic tears may benefit from conservative, nonoperative treatment. Following a phasic rehabilitation program, overhead athletes suffering partial- or even full-thickness rotator cuff tears often return to their preinjury level of competitive sport. Basic rehabilitation practices include passive and active range of motion exercises, selective capsular stretching, core strengthening and stability, neuromuscular exercise, and strengthening of the rotator cuff, deltoid, and periscapular musculature. The use of oral anti-inflammatory medications, injections, cryotherapy, and heat may also be indicated. In order to maintain optimal performance and to prevent subsequent re-injury throughout the competitive season, it is essential for the overhead athlete to maintain adequate strength, power, range of motion, and endurance.

The ability of massive osteochondral allografts from the medial tibial plateau to reproduce normal joint contact pressures after glenoid resurfacing: the effect of computed tomography matching

BACKGROUND Current techniques for resurfacing of the glenoid in the treatment of arthritis are unpredictable. Computed tomography (CT) studies have demonstrated that the medial tibial plateau has close similarity to the glenoid. The purpose of this study was to assess contact pressures of transplanted massive tibial osteochondral allografts to resurface the glenoid without and with CT matching. METHODS Ten unmatched cadaveric tibiae were used to resurface 10 cadaveric glenoids with osteochondral allografts. Five cadaveric tibiae and glenoids were CT matched and studied. An internal control group of 4 matched pairs of glenoids, with the contralateral glenoid transplanted to the opposite glenoid, was also included as a best-case scenario to measure the effects of the surgical technique. All glenoids were tested before and after grafting at different abduction and rotation angles, with recording of peak contact pressures. RESULTS Peak contact pressures were not different from the intact state in the autografted group but were increased in both allografted groups. CT-matched tibial grafts had lower peak pressures than unmatched grafts. Peak pressures were on average 24.8% (range [18.3%, 29.6%]) greater than in the native glenoids for unmatched allografts, 21.8% ([17.0%, 25.5%]) greater for the matched allografts, and 4.9% ([3.8%, 5.5%]) greater for matched autografts. CONCLUSION Osteochondral grafting from the medial tibial plateau to the glenoid is feasible but results in increased peak contact pressures. The technique is reproducible as defined by the autografted group. Contact pressures between native and allografted glenoids were significantly different. The clinical significance remains unknown. Peak pressures experienced by the glenoid seem highly sensitive to deviations from the native glenoid shape.