Simon C. Whitaker

Common iliac artery aneurysms in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES To determine the incidence of common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and to evaluate the relationship between AAA and CIA diameter. METHODS Spiral CT angiography was used to measure the maximum diameters of the abdominal aorta and the common iliac arteries of 215 patients with AAA. RESULTS The median CIA diameter was 1.7 cm--significantly greater than the published mean of 1.25 (2 S.D. = 0.85-1.65) cm of an age-matched, non-vascular population. Thirty-four patients (16%) had unilateral and 26 patients (12%) bilateral CIA aneurysms > or = 2.4 cm diameter. Eight-six vessels (20%) were affected. Right CIA diameters were wider than left CIA diameters (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test). The correlation between AAA size and CIA diameter was weak. CONCLUSIONS The AAA population has abnormally dilated common iliac arteries. In this population, common iliac artery aneurysms should be defined as those greater than 2.4 cm diameter. 20% of CIAs in patients with AAA are aneurysmal according to this definition.

Early results of endovascular aortic aneurysm surgery with aortouniiliac graft, contralateral iliac occlusion, and femorofemoral bypass

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with use of an aortouniiliac graft secured with self-expanding (Gianturco) stents. METHODS Thirty patients with a median age of 72 years (age range, 52 to 86 years) and aneurysm diameter of 6.0 cm (range, 4.0 to 9.0 cm) were treated with an aortouniiliac endovascular graft. Of these 30 procedures, 28 were carried out electively and two as emergencies for leaking aneurysm. Of the 30 patients, 21 (70%) were considered to be at high risk for open surgery. A modified Gianturco stent, Dacron graft, and Wallstent were used for these procedures. RESULTS Endovascular repair was successfully carried out in 25 of 30 (83.3%) patients. All these patients were mobile and had resumed a normal diet within 48 hours of the procedure. The overall 30-day mortality rate was two in 30 (6.6%), but it was one in 28 (3.5%) for the elective cases; all deaths occurred in the group at high risk for surgery. Other complications encountered within 30 days of procedure included myocardial infarction in one patient, pneumonia in two patients, homonymous quadrantanopia in one patient, and colonic ischemia in one patient, giving an overall morbidity rate of four in 30 (13.3%). At a median follow-up of 4 months (range, 1 to 13 months), 27 of 30 (90%) patients remain alive and well. CONCLUSION Endovascular aortouniiliac repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with Gianturco stent is feasible in both elective and emergency situations. It appears to be minimally traumatic, and the majority of patients deemed to be at high risk for open surgery can safely undergo endovascular repair. However, data on more patients with longer follow-up is required to determine its role in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Transfemoral endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with bifurcated graft

Traditional open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has disadvantages. We present our experience of transfemoral endoluminal repair with a bifurcated graft system. 29 patients with aortic aneurysm over 5.5 cm in diameter and 1 with a 3.2 cm aneurysm and bilateral iliac stenosis were assessed; 5 were suitable for the procedure. The operation was successful in all the patients, without haemodynamic compromise or major complications. This technique has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. Further modifications are required to make it applicable to most aneurysms.

Anatomical suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair.

Purpose: To assess the anatomical suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) for emergency endovascular repair. Methods: All cases (46 patients [35 men; mean age 74 years, range 54–85]) in which computed tomographic angiography (CTA) confirmed AAA rupture over a 5-year period at our university hospital were reviewed for anatomical suitability for endovascular repair. Measurements were made by a radiologist experienced in anatomical assessment of CT criteria for elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Results: The mean aneurysm neck length was 18 mm (range 0–59); 17 were conical, 13 straight, 4 barrel, and 6 reverse conical. Six cases had no proximal neck. Overall, 37 (80%) patients were unsuitable for EVAR according to our criteria. Nearly half the patients (22, 48%) had ≥2 adverse features. Unsuitable neck morphology (35, 76%) was the primary reason for exclusion, but CIA aneurysm (10, 22%) and EIA tortuosity (7, 15%) were secondary adverse features. Conclusions: With current stent-graft design, the majority of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are anatomically unsuitable for endovascular repair.

Influence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Size on the Feasibility of Endovascular Repair

PURPOSE To assess the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size on overall aneurysm morphology with special attention to possible relationships among various anatomic variables that determine the feasibility of endovascular repair. METHODS One hundred sixty-eight patients were assessed with spiral computed tomographic angiography to measure the length and diameter of the AAA, the proximal neck, and the common iliac arteries. Anatomic variables were correlated with aneurysm size using Spearmans rank order correlation coefficients (rS); comparisons among small, intermediate, and large aneurysms were made using the Chi-square test. RESULTS Correlations between aneurysm size and the anatomic variables above were weak. The strongest association was between aneurysm size and aortic length (rS = 0.41, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in proximal neck length, neck diameter, or overall suitability for endovascular repair between aneurysms greater or smaller than 5.5-cm diameter. However, significantly more short (< 1.5 cm), wide (> 3 cm), and hence, unsuitable proximal necks were found in patients with aneurysms > 7 cm in diameter (chi 2 = 7.8, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Shortening and widening of the proximal neck seems to increase with aneurysm size but only after the aneurysm expands beyond 7 cm in diameter. Aneurysms with diameters in the 4.5- to 5.5-cm range are no more suitable for endovascular repair than those between 5.5 and 7 cm. The lack of any significant correlation between anatomic variables emphasizes the need for accurate preoperative assessment of the anatomy of each individual patient before endovascular repair.

The Zenith Aortic Stent-Graft: A 5-Year Single-Center Experience

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and midterm results of the Zenith stent-graft in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Methods: Since March 1994, 364 patients have undergone endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA. Of the 94 who were treated with the Zenith stent-graft from 1996 to 2002, 88 patients (82 men; mean age 72.6 ± 6.5 years, range 47–88) with at least 6-month follow-up were analyzed. Sixty-one (69.3%) patients were considered at high risk for intervention; 7 ruptured AAAs were treated emergently. In all, 68 (77.3%) bifurcated stent-grafts (including 18 TriFab systems) and 20 aortomonoiliac configurations were used. Cumulative data on endoleak, migration, secondary procedures, and survival were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: Implantation success was 97.7%; 2 (2.3%) access-related failures were converted to open repair (1 immediate, 1 at 3 months). There were 3 (3.4%) graft limb thromboses (2 immediate, 1 late), 3 (3.4%) cases of colon ischemia due to embolization in 1 and hypogastric artery occlusion in 2, and 1 (1.1%) renal infarction due to embolism. Three (3.4%) patients died within 30 days. Eleven (12.5%) endoleaks and 1 (1.1%) late endograft migration were recorded. The 5-year cumulative endoleak and migration rates were 15% and 7%, respectively. Sixty-three (71.6%) patients did not present any complication related to the repair during a mean follow-up of 20.6 ± 14.9 months (range 6–68); notably, no complications were associated with the 18 TriFab systems. Six (6.8%) secondary procedures were performed (31% 5-year cumulative secondary procedural rate). All 6 (6.8%) aneurysm-related deaths (the 3 perioperative, 2 from late AAA rupture, and 1 during a secondary procedure) and 14 of 18 (20.4%) non-aneurysm—related deaths occurred in high-risk patients; the 5-year cumulative survival rates were 57% for any death and 92% for aneurysm-related deaths. Conclusions: The Zenith stent-graft appears both safe and effective in terms of midterm outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

A study on the patency of the inferior mesenteric and lumbar arteries in the incidence of endoleak following endovascular repair of infra-renal aortic enerysms

OBJECTIVE An endoleak is defined as the presence of contrast medium within the aneurysm sac on post-operative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans (CT) in patients following endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The aim of this study was to correlate the incidence of endoleaks with the presence of patent lumbar (LA) and inferior mesenteric arteries (IMA) as seen on pre-operative angiography. DESIGN, MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-seven patients were assessed pre-operatively by both CT and angiography by a blinded radiologist prior to EVR of AAA. The number and size of patent vessels was recorded and correlated with the incidence of LA or IMA endoleaks on follow-up CT. Patent lumbar vessels were scored: 1 = small, 2 = medium, 3 = large. RESULTS Five patients were noted to have patent IMA on pre-operative angiography but none developed an endoleak. In this series, five patients had an endoleak due to a patent LA. The median score for patients with no endoleak was 1 (0-9) and for those with a lumbar endoleak 2 (0-5) (P = 0.26, Mann-Whitney U-test). The number of patent lumbar arteries was not predictive of a subsequent endoleak. Two out of nine (22 %) patients with large patent LA subsequently developed an endoleak. If a policy of pre-operative embolization on the basis of large patent LA had been adopted, seven patients would have had an unnecessary invasive procedure. CONCLUSION Pre-operative angiography to look for patent LA and IMAs is not required in patients undergoing EVR or AAA.

A prospective study to assess changes in proximal aortic neck dimensions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to detect any change in the proximal neck diameter after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS The study was performed in a teaching hospital with an endovascular program on 112 patients who had undergone endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. The interventions were pre-endovascular and postendovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with contrast-enhanced, spiral computerized tomography, and the main outcome measures were change in aortic proximal neck diameter, change in maximum aortic diameter, presence of endoleaks, and change in length from lowest renal artery to aortic bifurcation. RESULTS The median anterior-posterior and transverse diameter decreased from 63.5 mm before surgery to 50.4 and 54.5 mm, respectively, after surgery in a period of 4 years. This trend in reduction in maximum diameter was not seen in the patients with endoleaks. There was no significant change in the proximal neck diameters when measured at 5-mm intervals after endovascular repair. There was also no significant change in the aortic length after endovascular repair. CONCLUSION We have not demonstrated any evidence for proximal neck dilatation after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Type II endoleak: transperitoneal sacotomy and ligation of side branch endoleaks responsible for aneurysm sac expansion.

Purpose: To demonstrate aneurysm sac expansion in the face of a type II endoleak and its treatment with open ligation of multiple side branch endoleaks. Case Report: An 81-year-old patient had undergone elective endovascular repair of a 6.3-cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in September 1999. Routine spiral computed tomographic angiography at 10 months disclosed a type II endoleak; the aneurysm sac diameter had grown to 7.4 cm. Selective angiography revealed multiple lumbar endoleaks and a patent inferior mesenteric artery. Laparotomy and sacotomy was performed, confirming the presence of pulsatile type II endoleaks, which were ligated successfully. The patient made a full postoperative recovery. Conclusions: Type II endoleaks may cause aneurysm expansion. Open repair of multiple type II endoleaks is feasible and may be useful where endovascular or laparoscopic techniques are at high risk of procedural failure, such as multiple endoleak channels.

Spiral CT angiography versus aortography in the assessment of aortoiliac length in patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Purpose: To compare measurements of aortoiliac length obtained with spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and aortography in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. Methods: The distances from the lower-most renal artery to the aortic bifurcation and from the aortic bifurcation to the common iliac artery (CIA) bifurcation were measured using both CTA and aortography in 108 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results: The level of agreement between CTA and aortography was high, with 69% of aortic and 76% of iliac measurements within 1 cm and > 90% within 2 cm of each other. Mean differences were −0.35 ± 1.20 cm and 0.25 ± 1.10 cm, respectively, for aortic and iliac lengths. Aortography overestimated renal artery to aortic bifurcation length in comparison to CTA (p = 0.003), particularly in patients with large aneurysms (> 6.5 cm) and lumen diameters > 4.5 cm (p < 0.0001). Measurements of CIA length were shorter by aortography than CTA (p = 0.02). Conclusions: There is a high level of agreement between CTA and aortography in the measurement of aortoiliac length, but aortography overestimates renal artery to aortic bifurcation length in patients with large-diameter aneurysms and wide aneurysm lumens. CTA is sufficiently accurate in the majority of cases to be used as the sole basis for the construction of endovascular grafts.