Simon L. Croft

Visceral leishmaniasis: current status of control, diagnosis, and treatment, and a proposed research and development agenda

Visceral leishmaniasis is common in less developed countries, with an estimated 500000 new cases each year. Because of the diversity of epidemiological situations, no single diagnosis, treatment, or control will be suitable for all. Control measures through case finding, treatment, and vector control are seldom used, even where they could be useful. There is a place for a vaccine, and new imaginative approaches are needed. HIV co-infection is changing the epidemiology and presents problems for diagnosis and case management. Field diagnosis is difficult; simpler, less invasive tests are needed. Current treatments require long courses and parenteral administration, and most are expensive. Resistance is making the mainstay of treatment, agents based on pentavalent antimony, useless in northeastern India, where disease incidence is highest. Second-line drugs (pentamidine and amphotericin B) are limited by toxicity and availability, and newer formulations of amphotericin B are not affordable. The first effective oral drug, miltefosine, has been licensed in India, but the development of other drugs in clinical phases (paromomycin and sitamaquine) is slow. No novel compound is in the pipeline. Drug combinations must be developed to prevent drug resistance. Despite these urgent needs, research and development has been neglected, because a disease that mainly affects the poor ranks as a low priority in the private sector, and the public sector currently struggles to undertake the development of drugs and diagnostics in the absence of adequate funds and infrastructure. This article reviews the current situation and perspectives for diagnosis, treatment, and control of visceral leishmaniasis, and lists some priorities for research and development.

Antimalarial drug discovery: efficacy models for compound screening

Increased efforts in antimalarial drug discovery are urgently needed. The goal must be to develop safe and affordable new drugs to counter the spread of malaria parasites that are resistant to existing agents. Drug efficacy, pharmacology and toxicity are important parameters in the selection of compounds for development, yet little attempt has been made to review and standardize antimalarial drug-efficacy screens. Here, we suggest different in vitro and in vivo screens for antimalarial drug discovery and recommend a streamlined process for evaluating new compounds on the path from drug discovery to development.

Natural products as antiparasitic drugs

Abstract. Natural products are not only the basis for traditional or ethnic medicine. Only recently, they have provided highly successful new drugs such as Artemisinin. Furthermore, screening natural products found in all sorts of environments such as the deep sea, rain forests and hot springs, and produced by all sorts of organisms ranging from bacteria, fungi and plants to protozoa, sponges and invertebrates, is a highly competitive field where all of the major pharmaceutical companies are encountered. Already, many new natural product groups have revealed antiparasitic properties of surprising efficacy and selectivity, as will be shown in this review for plant-derived alkaloids, terpenes and phenolics. Many novel lead structures, however, have severe chemico-physical drawbacks such as poor solubility. Here, innovative drug formulations and carrier systems might help, as discussed by the authors in another article of this series.

Leishmaniasis: new approaches to disease control

Leishmaniasis is one of the major infectious diseases affecting the poorest regions of the world, but new developments in diagnosis, treatment, and control offer some fresh hope

Chemotherapy in the Treatment and Control of Leishmaniasis

Drugs remain the most important tool for the treatment and control of both visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis. Although there have been several advances in the past decade, with the introduction of new therapies by liposomal amphotericin, oral miltefosine and paromomycin (PM), these are not ideal drugs, and improved shorter duration, less toxic and cheaper therapies are required. Treatments for complex forms of leishmaniasis and HIV co-infections are inadequate. In addition, full deployment of drugs in treatment and control requires defined strategies, which can also prevent or delay the development of drug resistance.

The activity of alkyl phosphorylcholines and related derivatives against Leishmania donovani

Several alkyl phosphorylcholines and related derivatives were tested against Leishmania donovani amastigotes in mouse peritoneal macrophages in vitro and ED50 values were determined in the range of 1-12 microM. The three alkyl phosphorylcholines tested against L. donovani in BALB/c mice were active, an ED50 of 12.8 mg/kg/day X 5 was ascertained for one compound, but an alkyl phosphorylethanolamine was inactive.

Sensitivities of Leishmania species to hexadecylphosphocholine (miltefosine), ET-18-OCH3 (edelfosine) and amphotericin B

The sensitivities of both promastigote and amastigote stages of six species of Leishmania, L. donovani, L. major, L. tropica, L. aethiopica, L. mexicana and L. panamensis, were determined in vitro to the phospholipid drugs hexadecylphosphocholine (HPC, miltefosine) and ET-18-OCH(3) (edelfosine). In all assays L. donovani was the most sensitive species, with ED(50) values in the range of 0.12-1.32 microM against promastigotes and 1.2-4.6 microM against amastigotes. L. major was the least sensitive species in the majority of assays with ED(50) values for HPC in the range of 4.8-13.1 microM against promastigotes and for HPC and ET-18-OCH(3) in the range of 7.5-37.1 microM against amastigotes. Amphotericin B deoxycholate was used as the standard drug and gave submicromolar ED(50) values in all assays; L. mexicana was the least sensitive species to this drug.

Formulation of amphotericin B as nanosuspension for oral administration

Amphotherin B was formulated in a nanosuspension as a new oral drug delivery system for the treatment of experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Amphotericin B (AmB) nanosuspensions were produced by high pressure homogenisation obtaining particles with a PCS diameter of 528 nm. Environmental stability was determined in artificial gastrointestinal fluids at different pH and electrolyte concentrations. In vivo efficacy was determined in a mouse model of visceral leishmaniasis. Following oral administration (5 mg kg(-1)), micronised amphotericin B did not show any curative effect. However, administrations of amphotericin B nanosuspension, reduced liver parasite load by 28.6% compared to untreated controls.

Antiprotozoal activities of phospholipid analogues

The antiprotozoal activity of phospholipid analogues, originally developed as anti-cancer drugs, has been determined in the past decade. The most susceptible parasites are Leishmania spp. and Trypanosoma cruzi with activity also shown against Trypanosoma brucei spp., Entamoeba histolytica and Acanthamoeba spp. Miltefosine, an alkylphosphocholine, was registered for the oral treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in India in March 2002. This review will focus on the biological activities of phospholipid analogues. Biochemical and molecular targets and mechanism(s) of action have been studied extensively in tumor cells but have not been determined in protozoa.

Characterisation of Leishmania donovani promastigotes resistant to hexadecylphosphocholine (miltefosine)

Leishmania donovani promastigote lines resistant to hexadecylphosphocholine (HePC, miltefosine) at 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0 and 40.0 microM were developed in vitro by continuous step-wise drug pressure. The 40 microM line was 15 times more resistant to HePC than the wild-type clone and showed cross-resistance to the ether lipid ET-18-OCH3 (edelfosine) but not to the standard anti-leishmanial drugs. Resistance was stable up to 12 weeks in drug-free culture medium. No amplification of specific genes, including the multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein gene, could be detected in the resistant parasites.