Skandan Shanmugan

Safety of lumbar drains in thoracic aortic operations performed with extracorporeal circulation

BACKGROUND The safety of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage in thoracic aortic surgery using extracorporeal circulation (ECC) with systemic heparinization has not been established. METHODS Four hundred thirty-two patients had descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair between 1993 and 2002. One hundred sixty-two of those patients (age range, 67 +/- 13 years) had repairs performed with ECC, systemic anticoagulation, and lumbar CSF drainage. Repairs performed without CSF drainage, without ECC, or by stent graft (n = 53) were excluded. The CSF catheters were inserted at L3 to L5. Cerebrospinal fluid was drained to maintain pressures of 10 to 12 mm Hg. In the absence of neurologic deficit or coagulopathy, the catheters were capped at 24 hours and removed at 48 hours. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage was continued beyond 24 hours for delayed onset paraparesis. RESULTS Cerebrospinal fluid drains were used in 135 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (extent I, n = 63; extent II, n = 25; extent III, n = 39; extent IV, n = 8) and 27 descending thoracic aortic repairs (aneurysm, n = 24; traumatic aortic injury, n = 2; aortic coarctation, n = 1). Partial left heart bypass was used in 132 patients, full cardiopulmonary bypass without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in 5, and cardiopulmonary bypass with adjunctive deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in 25. Time between catheter insertion and anticoagulation was 153 +/- 60 minutes. Heparin achieved an average maximum activated clotting time of 528 +/- 192 seconds. Average ECC time was 114 +/- 77 minutes. Average deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time was 40 +/- 12 minutes. Mortality was 14.1% (23 of 162), and permanent paraplegia was 4.9% (8 of 162). No epidural or spinal hematoma was observed. Six (3.7%) patients had catheter-related complications (temporary abducens nerve palsy [n = 1]; retained catheter fragments [n = 2]; retained catheter fragment and meningitis [n = 1]; isolated meningitis [n = 1]; and spinal headache [n = 1]). CONCLUSIONS The CSF drainage in thoracic aortic surgery using ECC with full anticoagulation did not result in hemorrhagic complications. The permanent paraplegia rate in this complex patient population consisting of combined distal arch, thoracoabdominal aortic procedures were low, and lumbar CSF catheter-related complications had no permanent sequelae.

Management of malignant colon polyps:Current status and controversies

Colon cancer remains a significant clinical problem worldwide and in the United States it is the third most common cancer diagnosed in men and women. It is generally accepted that most malignant neoplasms of the colon arise from precursor adenomatous polyps. This stepwise progression of normal epithelium to carcinoma, often with intervening dysplasia, occurs as a result of multiple sequential, genetic mutations-some are inherited while others are acquired. Malignant polyps are defined by the presence of cancer cells invading through the muscularis mucosa into the underlying submucosa (T1). They can appear benign endoscopically but the presence of malignant invasion histologically poses a difficult and often controversial clinical scenario. Emphasis should be initially focused on the endoscopic assessment of these lesions. Suitable polyps should be resected en-bloc, if possible, to facilitate thorough evaluation by pathology. In these cases, proper attention must be given to the risks of residual cancer in the bowel wall or in the surrounding lymph nodes. If resection is not feasible endoscopically, then these patients should be referred for surgical resection. This review will discuss the important prognostic features of malignant polyps that will most profoundly affect this risk profile. Additionally, we will discuss effective strategies for their overall management.

Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic colectomy has been used for training of surgical residents and has been considered as a model for technical skills assessment of board-eligible colorectal surgeons. However, construct validity (the ability to distinguish between skill levels) must be confirmed before widespread implementation. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to specifically determine which metrics for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy have evidence of construct validity. DESIGN: General surgeons that had performed fewer than 30 laparoscopic colon resections and laparoscopic colorectal experts (>200 laparoscopic colon resections) performed laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy on the LAP Mentor model. All participants received a 15-minute instructional warm-up and had never used the simulator before the study. Performance was then compared between each group for 21 metrics (procedural, 14; intraoperative errors, 7) to determine specifically which measurements demonstrate construct validity. Performance was compared with the Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05 was significant). RESULTS: Fifty-three surgeons; 29 general surgeons, and 24 colorectal surgeons enrolled in the study. The virtual reality simulators for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy demonstrated construct validity for 8 of 14 procedural metrics by distinguishing levels of surgical experience (p < 0.05). The most discriminatory procedural metrics (p < 0.01) favoring experts were reduced instrument path length, accuracy of the peritoneal/medial mobilization, and dissection of the inferior mesenteric artery. Intraoperative errors were not discriminatory for most metrics and favored general surgeons for colonic wall injury (general surgeons, 0.7; colorectal surgeons, 3.5; p = 0.045). LIMITATIONS: Individual variability within the general surgeon and colorectal surgeon groups was not accounted for. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual reality simulators for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy demonstrated construct validity for 8 procedure-specific metrics. However, using virtual reality simulator metrics to detect intraoperative errors did not discriminate between groups. If the virtual reality simulator continues to be used for the technical assessment of trainees and board-eligible surgeons, the evaluation of performance should be limited to procedural metrics.

Symptomatic rectocele: what are the indications for repair?

BACKGROUND The surgical indications for symptomatic rectocele are undefined, and surgery has high recurrence rates. We implemented magnetic resonance imaging defecography (MRID) to determine if utilizing strict inclusion criteria for rectocele repair improves outcomes. METHODS Patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) who underwent dynamic MRID were evaluated. Indications for surgical repair were defecation requiring manual assistance and the following MRID results: anterior defect >2 cm, incomplete evacuation, and the absence of perineal descent. Primary outcomes were the change in quality of life (QOL) scores and recurrence. RESULTS From 2006 to 2013, 143 patients who presented with ODS underwent MRID. Seventeen patients met the criteria for repair. Recurrence was low (5.8%) with a median follow-up of 23 months, QOL scores improved from 57.3 to 76.5 (P = .041). CONCLUSIONS A minority of patients (12%) with ODS met the above criteria for rectocele repair. Patients who underwent repair had a significant improvement in QOL and low recurrence rate.

Failing to Prepare Is Preparing to Fail: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Impact of a Preoperative Instructional Video on the Ability of Residents to Perform Laparoscopic Right Colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal resection is an index case for advanced skills training, yet many residents struggle to reach proficiency by graduation. Current methods to reduce the learning curve for residents remain expensive, time consuming, and poorly validated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the addition of a preprocedural instructional video to improve the ability of a general surgery resident to perform laparoscopic right colectomy when compared with standard preparation. DESIGN: This was a single-blinded, randomized control study. SETTINGS: Four university-affiliated teaching hospitals were included in the study. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents in postgraduation years 2 through 5 participated. INTERVENTION: Residents were randomly assigned to preparation with a narrated instructional video versus standard preparation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resident performance, scored by a previously validated global assessment scale, was measured. RESULTS: Fifty-four residents were included. Half (n = 27) were randomly assigned to view the training video and half (n = 27) to standard preparation. There were no differences between groups in terms of training level or previous operative experience or in patient demographics (all p > 0.05). Groups were similar in the percentage of the case completed by residents (p = 0.39) and operative time (p = 0.74). Residents in the video group scored significantly higher in total score (mean: 46.8 vs 42.3; p = 0.002), as well as subsections directly measuring laparoscopic skill (vascular control mean: 11.3 vs 9.7, p < 0.001; mobilization mean: 7.6 vs. 7.0, p = 0.03) and overall performance score (mean: 4.0 vs 3.1; p < 0.001). Statistical significance persisted across training levels. LIMITATIONS: There is potential for Hawthorne effect, and the study is underpowered at the individual postgraduate year level. CONCLUSIONS: The simple addition of a brief, narrated preprocedural video to general surgery resident case preparation significantly increased trainee ability to successfully perform a laparoscopic right colectomy. In an era of shortened hours and less exposure to cases, incorporating a brief but effective instructional video before surgery may improve the learning curve of trainees and ultimately improve safety.

Colorectal specialization and survival in colorectal cancer

It is recognized that higher surgeon volume is associated with improved survival in colorectal cancer. However, there is a paucity of national studies that have evaluated the relationship between surgical specialization and survival.

Hemorrhoids and Rectoceles

Abstract There are few diseases more chronicled in human history than symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease. Most hemorrhoidal complaints can be managed nonoperatively. Symptomatic internal hemorrhoids typically cause rectal bleeding, while external hemorrhoids typically cause thrombosis and pain. Physicians should be familiar with several different techniques to address hemorrhoidal complaints. These include office-based procedures, excisional hemorrhoidectomy, and newer techniques such as Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation. A rectocele occurs when the pelvic floor and rectovaginal septum becomes so weak that the rectum bulges forward onto the posterior wall of the vagina. The diagnosis and treatment of rectoceles requires a multidisciplinary approach, and nonoperative therapy includes the correction of constipation and biofeedback. Surgical repairs can be made with either a transrectal or transvaginal incision, with the latter having the best long-term outcomes.

Rectal Prolapse in the Healthy Patient: Is Perineal Approach Ever Indicated?

Perineal proctosigmoidectomy or the Altemeier procedure has been marginalized to the elderly due to high recurrence rates. However, a review of the literature suggests that this technique may be unfairly scrutinized due to outdated techniques and severe heterogeneity among the earlier published reports. In fact, recent studies show that the perineal proctosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty is safe and effective, has a favorably low recurrence rate, and should also be considered in healthy, young patients.

Laparoscopic Procedures: Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection

Laparoscopic colectomy has been proven to be equivalent to conventional open surgery, while minimally invasive rectal surgery has been much delayed. The challenges to laparoscopic rectal surgery include the steep technical learning curve and poorly defined indications and contraindications for resection. Despite these challenges, laparoscopic rectal surgery can often enhance the pelvic dissection and is safe and feasible in skilled hands and can achieve unequivocally excellent results. This chapter will outline the current evidence for laparoscopy as a treatment option for patients with rectal cancer and highlight the technical details of performing a laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Platforms and Instruments (Principles of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Available Platforms and Instruments)

Performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery through a single incision has gained renowned interest in the past decade. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is certainly safe and feasible but can be surgically challenging as this technique is inherently limited by working with multiple instruments through a constrained insertion point. Limitations of single-incision laparoscopy include the loss of triangulation, dexterity, and visualization. Nonetheless, new technologies are necessary and now available to overcome these limitations. This chapter describes the available platforms and instruments in our armamentarium to perform single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Newer advancements in laparoscopes, access ports, and instruments combined with technical nuances and skills can be used to compensate for the initial limitations of single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery.