Slawomir K. Grzechnik

The importance of alignment accuracy for molecular replacement.

Many crystallographic protein structures are being determined using molecular replacement (MR), a model-based phasing method that has become increasingly important with the steady growth of the PDB. While there are several highly automated software packages for MR, the methods for preparing optimal search models for MR are relatively unexplored. Recent advances in sequence-comparison methods allow the detection of more distantly related homologs and more accurate alignment of their sequences. It was investigated whether simple homology models (without modeling of unaligned regions) based on alignments from these improved methods are able to increase the potential of MR. 27 crystal structures were determined using a highly parallelized MR pipeline that facilitates all steps including homology detection, model preparation, MR searches, automated refinement and rebuilding. Several types of search models prepared with standard sequence-sequence alignment (BLAST) and more accurate profile-sequence and profile-profile methods (PSI-BLAST, FFAS) were compared in MR trials. The analysis shows that models based on more accurate alignments have a higher success rate in cases where the unknown structure and the search model share less than 35% sequence identity. It is concluded that by using different types of simple models based on accurate alignments, the success rate of MR can be significantly increased.

Shotgun crystallization strategy for structural genomics: an optimized two-tiered crystallization screen against the Thermotoga maritima proteome.

As the field of structural genomics continues to grow and new technologies are developed, novel strategies are needed to efficiently crystallize large numbers of protein targets, thus increasing output, not just throughput [Chayen & Saridakis (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 921-927]. One strategy, developed for the high-throughput structure determination of the Thermotoga maritima proteome, is to quickly determine which proteins have a propensity for crystal formation followed by focused SeMet-incorporated protein crystallization attempts. This experimental effort has resulted in over 320 000 individual crystallization experiments. As such, it has provided one of the most extensive systematic data sets of commonly used crystallization conditions against a wide range of proteins to date. Analysis of this data shows that many of the original screening conditions are redundant, as all of the T. maritima proteins that crystallize readily could be identified using just 23% of the original conditions. It also shows that proteins that contain selenomethionine and are more extensively purified often crystallize in distinctly different conditions from those of their native less pure counterparts. Most importantly, it shows that the two-tiered strategy employed here is extremely successful for predicting which proteins will readily crystallize, as greater than 99% of the proteins identified as having a propensity to crystallize under non-optimal native conditions did so again as selenomethionine derivatives during the focused crystallization trials. This crystallization strategy can be adopted for both large-scale genomics programs and individual protein studies with multiple constructs and has the potential to significantly accelerate future crystallographic efforts.

Crystal structures of two novel dye-decolorizing peroxidases reveal a beta-barrel fold with a conserved heme-binding motif.

BtDyP from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (strain VPI‐5482) and TyrA from Shewanella oneidensis are dye‐decolorizing peroxidases (DyPs), members of a new family of heme‐dependent peroxidases recently identified in fungi and bacteria. Here, we report the crystal structures of BtDyP and TyrA at 1.6 and 2.7 Å, respectively. BtDyP assembles into a hexamer, while TyrA assembles into a dimer; the dimerization interface is conserved between the two proteins. Each monomer exhibits a two‐domain, α+β ferredoxin‐like fold. A site for heme binding was identified computationally, and modeling of a heme into the proposed active site allowed for identification of residues likely to be functionally important. Structural and sequence comparisons with other DyPs demonstrate a conservation of putative heme‐binding residues, including an absolutely conserved histidine. Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments confirm heme binding, but with a stoichiometry of 0.3:1 (heme:protein). Proteins 2007.

Crystal structure of thy1, a thymidylate synthase complementing protein from Thermotoga maritima at 2.25 Å resolution

Peter Kuhn, Scott A. Lesley, Irimpan I. Mathews, Jaume M. Canaves, Linda S. Brinen, Xiaoping Dai, Ashley M. Deacon, Marc A. Elsliger, Said Eshaghi, Ross Floyd, Adam Godzik, Carina Grittini, Slawomir K. Grzechnik, Chittibabu Guda, Keith O. Hodgson, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Cathy Karlak, Heath E. Klock, Eric Koesema, John M. Kovarik, Andreas T. Kreusch, Daniel McMullan, Timothy M. McPhillips, Mark A. Miller, Mitchell Miller, Andrew Morse, Kin Moy, Jie Ouyang, Alyssa Robb, Kevin Rodrigues, Thomas L. Selby, Glen Spraggon, Raymond C. Stevens, Susan S. Taylor, Henry van den Bedem, Jeff Velasquez, Juli Vincent, Xianhong Wang, Bill West, Guenter Wolf, John Wooley, and Ian A. Wilson* The Joint Center for Structural Genomics Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, California The Genomics Institute of Novartis Foundation, San Diego, California The San Diego Supercomputer Center, La Jolla, California The University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California

Structural Basis of Murein Peptide Specificity of a γ-D-glutamyl-L-diamino Acid Endopeptidase

The crystal structures of two homologous endopeptidases from cyanobacteria Anabaena variabilis and Nostoc punctiforme were determined at 1.05 and 1.60 A resolution, respectively, and contain a bacterial SH3-like domain (SH3b) and a ubiquitous cell-wall-associated NlpC/P60 (or CHAP) cysteine peptidase domain. The NlpC/P60 domain is a primitive, papain-like peptidase in the CA clan of cysteine peptidases with a Cys126/His176/His188 catalytic triad and a conserved catalytic core. We deduced from structure and sequence analysis, and then experimentally, that these two proteins act as gamma-D-glutamyl-L-diamino acid endopeptidases (EC 3.4.22.-). The active site is located near the interface between the SH3b and NlpC/P60 domains, where the SH3b domain may help define substrate specificity, instead of functioning as a targeting domain, so that only muropeptides with an N-terminal L-alanine can bind to the active site.

Crystal structure of the global regulatory protein CsrA from Pseudomonas putida at 2.05 Å resolution reveals a new fold

Chris Rife, Robert Schwarzenbacher, Daniel McMullan, Polat Abdubek, Eileen Ambing, Herbert Axelrod, Tanya Biorac, Jaume M. Canaves, Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Ashley M. Deacon, Michael DiDonato, Marc-André Elsliger, Adam Godzik, Carina Grittini, Slawomir K. Grzechnik, Joanna Hale, Eric Hampton, Gye Won Han, Justin Haugen, Michael Hornsby, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Heath E. Klock, Eric Koesema, Andreas Kreusch, Peter Kuhn, Scott A. Lesley, Mitchell D. Miller, Kin Moy, Edward Nigoghossian, Jessica Paulsen, Kevin Quijano, Ron Reyes, Eric Sims, Glen Spraggon, Raymond C. Stevens, Henry van den Bedem, Jeff Velasquez, Juli Vincent, Aprilfawn White, Guenter Wolf, Qingping Xu, Keith O. Hodgson, John Wooley, and Ian A. Wilson* The Joint Center for Structural Genomics Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, California The University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California The Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California

Crystal structure of a tandem cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS) domain protein (TM0935) from Thermotoga maritima at 1.87 Å resolution

Mitchell D. Miller, Robert Schwarzenbacher, Frank von Delft, Polat Abdubek, Eileen Ambing, Tanya Biorac, Linda S. Brinen, Jaume M. Canaves, Jamison Cambell, Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Xiaoping Dai, Ashley M. Deacon, Mike DiDonato, Marc-André Elsliger, Said Eshagi, Ross Floyd, Adam Godzik, Carina Grittini, Slawomir K. Grzechnik, Eric Hampton, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Cathy Karlak, Heath E. Klock, Eric Koesema, John S. Kovarik, Andreas Kreusch, Peter Kuhn, Scott A. Lesley, Inna Levin, Daniel McMullan, Timothy M. McPhillips, Andrew Morse, Kin Moy, Jie Ouyang, Rebecca Page, Kevin Quijano, Alyssa Robb, Glen Spraggon, Raymond C. Stevens, Henry van den Bedem, Jeff Velasquez, Juli Vincent, Xianhong Wang, Bill West, Guenter Wolf, Qingping Xu, Keith O. Hodgson, John Wooley, and Ian A. Wilson* Joint Center for Structural Genomics, Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park California Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California San Diego Supercomputer Center, La Jolla, California University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California

Crystal Structure of the First Eubacterial Mre11 Nuclease Reveals Novel Features that May Discriminate Substrates During DNA Repair

Mre11 nuclease plays a central role in the repair of cytotoxic and mutagenic DNA double-strand breaks. As X-ray structural information has been available only for the Pyrococcus furiosus enzyme (PfMre11), the conserved and variable features of this nuclease across the domains of life have not been experimentally defined. Our crystal structure and biochemical studies demonstrate that TM1635 from Thermotoga maritima, originally annotated as a putative nuclease, is an Mre11 endo/exonuclease (TmMre11) and the first such structure from eubacteria. TmMre11 and PfMre11 display similar overall structures, despite sequence identity in the twilight zone of only approximately 20%. However, they differ substantially in their DNA-specificity domains and in their dimeric organization. Residues in the nuclease domain are highly conserved, but those in the DNA-specificity domain are not. The structural differences likely affect how Mre11 from different organisms recognize and interact with single-stranded DNA, double-stranded DNA and DNA hairpin structures during DNA repair. The TmMre11 nuclease active site has no bound metal ions, but is conserved in sequence and structure with the exception of a histidine that is important in PfMre11 nuclease activity. Nevertheless, biochemical characterization confirms that TmMre11 possesses both endonuclease and exonuclease activities on single-stranded and double-stranded DNA substrates, respectively.

Crystal structure of a PIN (PilT N‐terminus) domain (AF0591) from Archaeoglobus fulgidus at 1.90 Å resolution

Inna Levin, Robert Schwarzenbacher, Rebecca Page, Polat Abdubek, Eileen Ambing, Tanya Biorac, Linda S. Brinen, Jamison Campbell, Jaume M. Canaves, Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Xiaoping Dai, Ashley M. Deacon, Mike DiDonato, Marc-André Elsliger, Ross Floyd, Adam Godzik, Carina Grittini, Slawomir K. Grzechnik, Eric Hampton, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Cathy Karlak, Heath E. Klock, Eric Koesema, John S. Kovarik, Andreas Kreusch, Peter Kuhn, Scott A. Lesley, Daniel McMullan, Timothy M. McPhillips, Mitchell D. Miller, Andrew Morse, Kin Moy, Jie Ouyang, Kevin Quijano, Ron Reyes, Fred Rezezadeh, Alyssa Robb, Eric Sims, Glen Spraggon, Raymond C. Stevens, Henry van den Bedem, Jeff Velasquez, Juli Vincent, Frank von Delft, Xianhong Wang, Bill West, Guenter Wolf, Qingping Xu, Keith O. Hodgson, John Wooley, and Ian A. Wilson* Joint Center for Structural Genomics, Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park California Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California San Diego Supercomputer Center, La Jolla, California University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California

Crystal structure of an iron-containing 1,3-propanediol dehydrogenase (TM0920) from Thermotoga maritima at 1.3 Å resolution

Robert Schwarzenbacher, Frank von Delft, Jaume M. Canaves, Linda S. Brinen, Xiaoping Dai, Ashley M. Deacon, Marc A. Elsliger, Said Eshaghi, Ross Floyd, Adam Godzik, Carina Grittini, Slawomir K. Grzechnik, Chittibabu Guda, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Cathy Karlak, Heath E. Klock, Eric Koesema, John S. Kovarik, Andreas Kreusch, Peter Kuhn, Scott A. Lesley, Daniel McMullan, Timothy M. McPhillips, Mark A. Miller, Mitchell D. Miller, Andrew Morse, Kin Moy, Jie Ouyang, Rebecca Page, Alyssa Robb, Kevin Rodrigues, Thomas L. Selby, Glen Spraggon, Raymond C. Stevens, Henry van den Bedem, Jeff Velasquez, Juli Vincent, Xianhong Wang, Bill West, Guenter Wolf, Keith O. Hodgson, John Wooley, and Ian A. Wilson* The Joint Center for Structural Genomics, California Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, California The Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California The San Diego Supercomputer Center, La Jolla, California The University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California