Soo Mee Bang

Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: Results of an International Registry

IMPORTANCE Little information is available on the long-term clinical outcome of patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). OBJECTIVE To assess the incidence rates of bleeding, thrombotic events, and mortality in a large international cohort of patients with SVT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective cohort study was conducted beginning May 2, 2008, and completed January 30, 2014, at hospital-based centers specialized in the management of thromboembolic disorders; a 2-year follow-up period was completed January 30, 2014, and data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2014, to February 28, 2015. Participants included 604 consecutive patients with objectively diagnosed SVT; there were no exclusion critieria. Information was gathered on baseline characteristics, risk factors, and antithrombotic treatment. Clinical outcomes during the follow-up period were documented and reviewed by a central adjudication committee. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Major bleeding, defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis; bleeding requiring hospitalization; thrombotic events, including venous and arterial thrombosis; and all-cause mortality. RESULTS Of the 604 patients (median age, 54 years; 62.6% males), 21 (3.5%) did not complete follow-up. The most common risk factors for SVT were liver cirrhosis (167 of 600 patients [27.8%]) and solid cancer (136 of 600 [22.7%]); the most common sites of thrombosis were the portal vein (465 of 604 [77.0%]) and the mesenteric veins (266 of 604 [44.0%]). Anticoagulation was administered to 465 patients in the entire cohort (77.0%) with a mean duration of 13.9 months; 175 of the anticoagulant group (37.6%) received parenteral treatment only, and 290 patients (62.4%) were receiving vitamin K antagonists. The incidence rates (reported with 95% CIs) were 3.8 per 100 patient-years (2.7-5.2) for major bleeding, 7.3 per 100 patient-years (5.8-9.3) for thrombotic events, and 10.3 per 100 patient-years (8.5-12.5) for all-cause mortality. During anticoagulant treatment, these rates were 3.9 per 100 patient-years (2.6-6.0) for major bleeding and 5.6 per 100 patient-years (3.9-8.0) for thrombotic events. After treatment discontinuation, rates were 1.0 per 100 patient-years (0.3-4.2) and 10.5 per 100 patient-years (6.8-16.3), respectively. The highest rates of major bleeding and thrombotic events during the whole study period were observed in patients with cirrhosis (10.0 per 100 patient-years [6.6-15.1] and 11.3 per 100 patient-years [7.7-16.8], respectively); the lowest rates were in patients with SVT secondary to transient risk factors (0.5 per 100 patient-years [0.1-3.7] and 3.2 per 100 patient-years [1.4-7.0], respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Most patients with SVT have a substantial long-term risk of thrombotic events. In patients with cirrhosis, this risk must be balanced against a similarly high risk of major bleeding. Anticoagulant treatment appears to be safe and effective in most patients with SVT.

Comparative analysis between azacitidine and decitabine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes

The present study aimed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of azacitidine and decitabine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We compared the overall response rate (ORR) (complete responses, partial responses, marrow complete responses, and haematological improvements), overall survival (OS), event‐free survival (EFS), time to leukaemic transformation, and adverse outcomes between azacitidine and decitabine. To minimize the effects of treatment selection bias in this observational study, adjustments were made using the propensity‐score matching method. Among 300 patients, 203 were treated with azacitidine and 97 with decitabine. Propensity‐score matching yielded 97 patient pairs. In the propensity‐matched cohort, there were no significant differences between the azacitidine and decitabine groups regarding ORR (44% vs. 52%), OS (26 vs. 22·9 months), EFS (7·7 vs. 7·0 months), and rate of leukaemic transformation (16% vs. 22% at 1 year). In patients ≥65 years of age, survival was significantly better in the azacitidine group (P = 0·017). Patients who received decitabine experienced more frequent episodes of grade 3 or 4 cytopenia and infectious episodes. We found that azacitidine and decitabine showed comparable efficacy. Among patients ≥65 years of age, survival was significantly better in the azacitidine group (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01409070).

A multicenter retrospective analysis of adverse events in Korean patients using bortezomib for multiple myeloma

The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Adverse events, including thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy, have affected 30% to 60% of patients overall, and interrupted therapy in 10% to 20%. No prior toxicity data are available for Asian patients who have used bortezomib for MM. We used National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, to review the clinical records of patients with an MM diagnosis from 25 centers in Korea. The included patients were treated with bortezomib alone or in combination with other agents, including thalidomide. Ninety-five MM patients were treated. The patients had a median age of 60 years (range, 42-77 years). The median number of previous treatments was 3 (range, 0–10), and 39% of the patients had been treated with 4 or more major classes of agents, including thalidomide (67%), and autologous stem cell transplantation (51%). Regimens included bortezomib only in 38 patients (40%), bortezomib plus dexamethasone in 34 patients (36%), and bortezomib plus a thalidomide-containing regimen in 23 patients (24%). The analysis of patient response to therapy revealed a complete response (CR) or a near-CR in 31 patients (33%) and a partial response in 30 patients (32%), for an objective response rate of 65% in 93 patients. The most common adverse events reported were thrombocytopenia (47%), sensory neuropathy (42%), anemia (31%), and leukopenia (31%). Thirteen patients (14%) stopped therapy because of adverse events (neuropathy, 8; infection, 4; diarrhea, 1). Neuropathy greater than grade 2 was more frequent in patients who received 4 or more prior therapy regimens (17/37) than in those who received 3 or fewer (14/58). In addition, therapy including thalidomide was significantly correlated with neuropathy of grades 1 to 3 (P = .001). We identified 6 therapy-related deaths (6%) within 20 days after the last dose of borte-zomib. The causes of death were infection in 3 patients, disease progression in 2 patients, and suicide in 1 patient. The incidences of thrombocytopenia and neurotoxicity were similar; however, gastrointestinal toxicities were relatively low in Korean patients compared with those reported in Western studies. Significant neuropathy was associated with the number of prior regimens and combination with thalidomide. These findings provide useful information for clinicians and patients using bortezomib.

Prognostic implications of the immunophenotype in biphenotypic acute leukemia

The present study retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological and clinical data from 43 adult patients with biphenotypic acute leukemia (BAL) from 11 Korean institutes. The incidence of BAL was 2.1% among acute leukemias. In terms of immunophenotype, 31 patients had myeloid plus B-lymphoid (M + B), 10 had myeloid plus T-lymphoid (M + T), one had myeloid plus B-lymphoid plus T-lymphoid (M + B + T), and one had B-lymphoid plus T-lymphoid (B + T). Patients with M + T phenotype had significantly lower CR rate (55.6% vs. 88.0%, P = 0.039) and lower overall survival (0% vs. 33.9% at 5 years, P = 0.028) than those with M + B phenotype. Our results suggest that immunophenotype has prognostic implications in adult patients with BAL.

Antithrombotic treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis: results of an international registry.

Treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a clinical challenge due to heterogeneity of clinical presentations, increased bleeding risk, and lack of evidences from clinical trials. We performed an international registry to describe current treatment strategies and factors associated with therapeutic decisions in a large prospective cohort of unselected SVT patients. A total of 613 patients were enrolled (mean age 53.1 years, standard deviation ± 14.8); 62.6% males; the majority (468 patients) had portal vein thrombosis. Most common risk factors included cirrhosis (27.8%), solid cancer (22.3%), and intra-abdominal inflammation/infection (11.7%); in 27.4% of patients, SVT was idiopathic. During the acute phase, 470 (76.7%) patients received anticoagulant drugs, 136 patients (22.2%) remained untreated. Incidental diagnosis, single vein thrombosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, cancer, and cirrhosis were significantly associated with no anticoagulant treatment. Decision to start patients on vitamin K antagonists after an initial course of parenteral anticoagulation was significantly associated with younger age, symptomatic onset, multiple veins involvement, and unprovoked thrombosis. Although a nonnegligible proportion of SVT patients did not receive anticoagulant treatment, the majority received the same therapies recommended for patients with usual sites thrombosis, with some differences driven by the site of thrombosis and the pathogenesis of the disease.

Two Cases of Interstitial Pneumonitis Caused by Rituximab Therapy

Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, has become a part of the standard therapy for patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma either in combination with other drugs or as a single agent. The CD20 antigen is expressed on 95% of B-cell lymphoma cells and normal B-cells but, is not found on precursor B-cells or stem cells. Rituximab is now approved for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma when combined with standard CHOP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) or patients with follicular lymphoma who have failed first line chemotherapy. The monoclonal antibody is generally well tolerated. Most of the adverse events are infusion-associated, mild to moderate non-hematological toxicities. Severe respiratory adverse events have been infrequent. Here, we report two patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma in whom interstitial pneumonitis developed with rituximab therapy.

Trough plasma imatinib levels are correlated with optimal cytogenetic responses at 6 months after treatment with standard dose of imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia

To investigate the correlation of trough imatinib mesylate (IM) levels with cytogenetic or molecular responses, we measured trough IM levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic phase (CML-CP), at 6 months of treatment with a standard dose of IM. Eighty-seven newly diagnosed patients with CML-CP were prospectively enrolled. Seventy-eight patients (89.7%) showed an optimal response (complete or partial cytogenetic response) at 6 months. Trough IM levels were 1378 ± 725 ng/mL. When categorized into two groups, there was a statistically significant difference in numbers of patients with optimal and suboptimal responses at 6 months (group with <1000: 80.6% vs. 19.4%; ≥1000: 94.6% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.032), and in numbers of patients with early major molecular response (early-MMR) and without MMR at 6 months (group with <1000: 3.2% vs. 96.8%; ≥1000: 21.4% vs. 78.6%; p = 0.047). In conclusion, the incidence of optimal cytogenetic response or early-MMR in patients with CML-CP treated with IM for 6 months was significantly higher in those with a trough level of ≥1000 compared with those with a level of <1000. Dose escalation of IM can be one option in patients with CML showing suboptimal response or resistance to the standard dose of IM, especially with low trough plasma IM levels (<1000 ng/mL).

Korean Guidelines for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism

This guideline focuses on the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Korea. The guidelines should be individualized and aim at patients scheduled for major surgery, as well as patients with a history of trauma, high-risk pregnancy, cancer, or other severe medical illnesses. Currently, no nation-wide data on the incidence of VTE exist, and randomized controlled trials aiming at the prevention of VTE in Korea have yielded few results. Therefore, these guidelines were based on the second edition of the Japanese Guidelines for the Prevention of VTE and the eighth edition of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. These guidelines establish low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, and recommend appropriate thromboprophylaxis for each group.

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism, 2nd Edition: Korean Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

In 2010, we proposed the first Korean Guidelines for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). It was applicable to Korean patients, by modifying the contents of the second edition of the Japanese guidelines for the prevention of VTE and the 8th edition of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. From 2007 to 2011, we conducted a nationwide study regarding the incidence of VTE after major surgery using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database. In addition, we have considered the 9th edition of the ACCP Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines, published in 2012. It emphasized the importance of clinically relevant events as opposed to asymptomatic outcomes with preferences for both thrombotic and bleeding outcomes. Thus, in the development of the new Korean guidelines, three major points were addressed: 1) the new guidelines stratify patients into 4 risk groups (very low, low, moderate, and high) according to the actual incidence of symptomatic VTE from the HIRA databases; 2) the recommended optimal VTE prophylaxis for each group was modified according to condition-specific thrombotic and bleeding risks; 3) guidelines are intended for general information only, are not medical advice, and do not replace professional medical care and/or physician advice. Graphical Abstract

Multiple myeloma in Korea: past, present, and future perspectives. Experience of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party.

The incidence of multiple myeloma suggests an ethnic difference. Compared to Caucasians, who have an incidence rate of 3–5/100,000, Asians show much lower incidence rate compared to them, in the range of 0.5–3/100,000. In Korea, The very first case report of multiple myeloma was published in 1959 [1], and was followed by a few case reports until the 1970s. Since that time, the number of cases of multiple myeloma in Korea increased steadily, reaching 100 cases/year in 1990 [2] and 500 cases/year in 2000 [3], and it is still going up. Currently in Korea, 1,000 patients are estimated to be diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and 700 patients are assumed to die of this disease every year, and 4,000–5,000 patients are suffering from this disease [4]. The most updated, age-standardized, incidence rate of multiple myeloma in Korea is 1.4/100,000, and ranked as the third most common among the hematologic malignancies, only surpassed by non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia [5]. Besides, the mortality from multiple myeloma